The National Enquirer says Bailey book might herald the end of Palin marriage.

Palin with Frank Bailey

As many of you know I have long stated that the Palin marriage is one based on political convenience rather than love, and in fact I was the first person to report that there were significant problems and talk of divorce as far back as 2009.

Now according to the Enquirer the revelations in the Bailey manuscript may contain information that will prove too much for the marriage to withstand.

"The Palins' marriage was already shaky, and this book is so scathing regarding Todd that it could cause Sarah to leave him," said a source familiar with the manuscript.

Sources say Palin, 47, is desperately trying to discredit former confidante Frank Bailey, who plans to publish a blockbuster book titled, "Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of Our Tumultuous Years."

Even while Sarah was running for governor, the couple's marriage was shaky, according to the book.

"The only love they shared was the love of Sarah's career, and everything they did was aimed at Sarah's public image," the source says. "Todd and Sarah stayed together solely for political purposes.

None of this comes as much of a surprise to me, however there was a part mentioned in this article about a possible pornographic image of Sarah Palin that I found very interesting, and not for the reasons you might assume.

In one bombshell, Bailey reveals Palin's husband Todd didn't seem to blink an eye when a doctored nude photo of her popped up during her gubernatorial campaign.

When told about the photo, Todd, 46, asked only if it was real, Bailey says.

Then the "First Dude" just laughed and hinted that snapping a nude photo of his wife would be easy since their house had so many windows and she walked around with her robe open, according to an insider familiar with the book.

Bailey, who is clearly infatuated with Sarah, is horrified that Todd does not react with more anger, especially since they attack almost ALL potentially damaging rumors with the tenacity of a pair of rabid pitbulls, but the part that caught my eye was this one: "she walked around with her robe open."

Well this incident, which takes place around May of 2006, certainly paints an image of a woman who is not terribly self conscious when in her own home. Which got me to thinking, how in the hell could a woman who had a habit of walking around the house virtually naked have possibly hidden her pregnancy from her own children (as she claims in her book "Going Rogue" on pg.191, and has been corroborated by other sources as well) for seven months? According to Palin she "shared the news with family" in March right before she went public.

So are we to believe that a woman who walked around the house semi-nude often enough that her husband had no difficulty believing somebody could have photographed her in that condition through their giant plate glass windows, suddenly started dressing so conservatively in her home that NOBODY in the family realized she was pregnant?

Like I have said all along, there is NO way her family would not have known she was pregnant, which is just another obvious indication that she faked the whole thing.

And despite Frank Bailey's denial of the evidence that was right in front of him, his book is just chock full of evidence that does much to prove she faked this pregnancy right under the noses of her closest friends, and trusted advisers, who were clearly so enamored of her that they were unable to recognize that they were all being taken for a "wild ride" right along with the rest of Alaska.

I have made this plea in private, but let me once again make it in public;  PLEASE GET THIS BOOK PUBLISHED JUST AS SOON AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE!