Thursday, March 29, 2012

Have you been wondering why suddenly the Post Office is going broke. Well blame George Bush!

Courtesy of Common Dreams:  

For the past several months, the laissez-fairyland blogosphere, assorted corporate front groups, a howling pack of congressional right-wingers and a bunch of lazy mass media sources have been pounding out a steadily rising drumbeat to warn that our postal service faces impending doom. It's "broke," they exclaim; USPS "nears collapse"; it's "a full-blown financial crisis!" 

These gloomsayers claim the national mail agency is bogged down with too many overpaid workers and costly brick-and-mortar facilities, so it can't keep up with the instant messaging of Internet services and such nimble corporate competitors as FedEx. Thus, say these contrivers of their own conventional wisdom, the Postal Service is unprofitable and is costing taxpayers billions of dollars a year in losses. Wrong. 

Since 1971, the postal service has not taken a dime from taxpayers. All of its operations — including the remarkable convenience of 32,000 local post offices — are paid for by peddling stamps and other products. 

The privatizers squawk that USPS has gone some $13 billion in the hole during the past four years — a private corporation would go broke with that record! (Actually, private corporations tend to go to Washington rather than go broke, getting taxpayer bailouts to cover their losses.) The Postal Service is NOT broke. Indeed, in those four years of loudly deplored "losses," the service actually produced a $700 million operational profit (despite the worst economy since the Great Depression). 

What's going on here? Right-wing sabotage of USPS financing, that's what. 

In 2006, the Bush White House and Congress whacked the post office with the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act — an incredible piece of ugliness requiring the agency to PRE-PAY the health care benefits not only of current employees, but also of all employees who'll retire during the next 75 years. Yes, that includes employees who're not yet born! 

No other agency and no corporation has to do this. Worse, this ridiculous law demands that USPS fully fund this seven-decade burden by 2016. Imagine the shrieks of outrage if Congress tried to slap FedEx or other private firms with such an onerous requirement. This politically motivated mandate is costing the Postal Service $5.5 billion a year — money taken right out of postage revenue that could be going to services. That's the real source of the "financial crisis" squeezing America's post offices. 

In addition, due to a 40-year-old accounting error, the federal Office of Personnel Management has overcharged the post office by as much as $80 billion for payments into the Civil Service Retirement System. This means that USPS has had billions of its sales dollars erroneously diverted into the treasury. Restore the agency's access to its own postage money, and the impending "collapse" goes away.

You might be asking yourself WHY the Republicans are so hell bent on destroying the USPS.

The answer is both simple, and disgusting. They are represented by one of the most powerful unions in America (the APWU), which is also affiliated with the AFL-CIO, a union that the conservatives have been trying to disband for decades.

Apparently it is worth it to the Republicans to destroy an American institution, that helps connect loved ones all around the world, if it also means damaging a political foe. 

Assholes!



33 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:36 AM

    The USPS is a great equalizer too, everyone is entitled to get mail, and have it treated by the government as your personal piece of private property.

    I happen to like FedEx, but I don't like their prices. DHL, UPS and other less known carriers are only okay. It's nice to have a choice, but I go to the post office almost every day because it plays a huge part in my business, a business without any infrastructure. I need their brick & mortor, I need their professionalism to make me look good.

    Bypass mail is the lifeline for rural Alaska, without this service, our communities couldn't even function as American towns.

    It doesn't surprise me in the least that the pro-corporate political culture would try to usurp equal access by all, to the parcel wars.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sally in MI4:49 AM

    I've known about this heinous law for about a year, and am clueless as to why the media refuses to report the truth. Can anyone imagine what happens to our economy if we lose the USPS? I was talking to my carrier, who is a delightful woman, and she said Congress does know allow the PO to have their own fleet of planes, so they CONTRACT with UPS for any mail flown anywhere. Talk about insidious creeps! The GOP should be jailed for being traitors to this country...any of them, all of them!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:02 AM

    i am a post office worker, and i love my job!!!
    i do not receive any pension or insurance coverage.
    my job might be at risk due to union pensions.
    my rural area cannot afford to lose its mail services.
    i am furious at the situation, and proud of the USPS! i hope the burdensome mandate can be wiped out, and that we can keep our mail services!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:30 AM

      Thank you, post office worker! I am a very loyal post office customer. I have always been treated with curtesy and efficiency when at the window of the post office. And the mailman who delivers our mail is always cheerful and polite despite the weather, the silly barking beagles when he has packages, or the heft of some of the mail. One of the best business relationships we Americans have - with our postal service. I cannot say the same for the idiot Congressman for our district, Dave Camp, an ALEC acolyte.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:55 AM

      "my job might be at risk due to union pensions."

      Your job is not at risk because of union pensions.
      It at risk because of "In 2006, the Bush White House and Congress whacked the post office with the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act"

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:55 AM

      My husband is a retired postal employee and he does not receive a UNION pension even though he belonged to the mailhandlers union. Before my husband retired, he paid 7 percent of his income into the Civil Service Retirement System (as all Federal employees hired prior to the hideous Reagan administration, which replaced CSRS with the more complicated Federal Employee Retirement System) did), and he now receives Federal employee retirement benefits. Just exactly as I, a non-postal Federal retiree, do.

      So I don't know WTF you are talking about "union pensions." Postal employee pensions are not funded by nor are the terms of them bargained for by any postal unions. They are established by Federal employee retirement laws and administered by the same Federal agency that administers Federal employment retirement.

      And if you don't receive pension or insurance coverage, you must be a casual, meaning you have not taken the postal exam and are essentially a temp employee. Don't tell me you wouldn't become a full-time postal employee with benefits and "pension" (Federal retirement benefits) if you could.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous1:05 PM

      actually, i'm a contract worker, with 35 years under my belt; a great way the USPS keeps their budget in bounds; so if i want a retirement, i have to provide it for myself. if i want insurance, same thing.

      i was told that the pension fund is what the Bush folks demanded be funded in such an onerous way. if i somehow trivialized the data, i ask forgiveness, but it does seem that pensions are a burden to lots of financial enterprises. is that not the unions?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:26 PM

      2:05, to repeat, postal unions have NOTHING to do with postal employee pensions. N-O-T-H-I-N-G. Each postal craft has its own union, but all postal employees participate in the same retirement system established by Congress for all Federal employees (postal employees are supposedly not Federal employees, they say now - but my husband's paycheck was a U.S. Treasury check, just like mine) and which are administered by the Office of Personnel Management, a Federal Government agency.

      I worked with many government contractors during my Federal career. They are not unique to the USPS. They certainly didn't come cheap, either. Not by a long shot. The idea wasn't to save money. It was to spread as much taxpayer money to the private sector as possible, so that it could funneled back into campaign contributions.

      - 12:55

      Delete
  4. "laissez-fairyland" ... excellent! Thank you for that!

    ReplyDelete
  5. lostinmn5:27 AM

    Check to see where the corporate big nuts at FedEX and UPS send their money for campaign support.

    Everything is about money and union busting, stealing women's uterus's and denying sexual preferences - oh, and race - yeah that race thing.

    And I loved reading that giving women access to birth control has been a major contributing force in women's climbing toward pay parity in the same job - still 77 cents to a dollar but the advent of widely available BC contributed mightily. Maybe the nasty's on the right want BC to go away to satisfy their morality while putting women back in their rightful place AND making a positive impact on the old bottom line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:48 AM

      I totally agree about FedEx and UPS. Their influence and lobbying during the Bush years.

      After one Bush era postal rate increase, I noticed many changes in size and weight for letter and package rates.

      What had previously been rather inexpensive was suddenly rather expensive for first class mailings.

      When I asked my local postal location staff about it, they said that UPS and FedEx had complained about unfair competition.

      So everyone got stuck with paying more for less due to meddling from UPS and FedEx (and perhaps other for-profit private delivery services).

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:45 AM

      Also too....
      Fedex IS a RW Employer and they pay their Ground/home worker by the PIECE!
      Did you get that?
      The piece.
      They do not pay for OT or a hourly wage or breaks. They pay just like in the Upton Sinclair book "The Jungle" by piece. You have to sue them in labor court.
      They they will retaliate and not validate employment for your next job! Do not use them! USPS is union and so is UPS use them. Avoid FEDEX!

      Delete
  6. I’m sure you’re right about that union busting.
    I was in unions for a long time. Yes, they do protect folks and keep wages up, but they also protect the slackers. Once a person passes probation, it’s nearly impossible to get rid of them.
    Our current postal deliverer is an obvious drug addict. She misses many Mondays, and then some poor little sub delivers our mail in the middle of the night (not safe). Complaining does nothing, and I have the number of a *very* powerful USPS regulating body.
    I wish other people would weigh in on this… I’m of two minds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not "nearly impossible" to get rid of slackers. They just cannot be summarily fired, except in special circumstances enumerated in their contract. The supervisor has to document problems (that's why it's important to complain), then the slackers have to be given two warnings, then they're put on probation, then they can be fired. It's not complicated, but it requires the supervisor to stay on top of the problem. If done properly, and if the slacker behavior is consistent, a firing can occur in a few months.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:48 AM

      How "Exactly" do you "know" she is a drug addict?
      For all you know she might have cancer?
      She might have Lupus or something else?
      Geeze.
      I do think they do pee testing at these gov jobs.
      You are one judgeMental person.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:43 PM

      Postal employees are not pee tested. Not yet anyway.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous5:45 AM

    i know that ups uses the usps network to deliver a lot of their packages. a friend of mine always orders via UPS, but then the stuff comes via mail.
    we couldn't live happily without the mail!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous6:07 AM

    Thank you for posting about this issue.

    I have been furious for some time about the way Congress mandated the pre-paying.

    I wish someone could bring suit against the government for this obvious ploy to end the USPS.

    Rural communities absolutely depend upon the USPS. People cannot - particularly with gas prices going up - afford to travel dozens of miles to pick up their own mail once small post offices are closed.

    Republicans don't care about jobs and they don't care about those "real" Americans they are always talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous6:21 AM

    Thank you for finally posting on this issue, Gryphen. I have been leaving comments about the dismantling of USPS in your comments for months. FOLKS, ACT NOW. CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES! SERIOUSLY. CALL NOW and EXPRESS SUPPORT. The new bill to reform USPS, stop cuts, and maintain Sat. service will be taken up in early April. Here's a great OpEd by Sen. Bernie Sanders on the subject: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73508.html

    Do you need any more reasons to care about this? Want your absentee ballot delivered by FedEx? Want to cut jobs for American workers on American soil in this economy? Want to end an institution, started by Ben Franklin, that is mentioned in the Constitution? Darrell Issa has promised the USPS business to FedEx.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Remember when Hillery Clinton said " There is a vast right wing conspiracy"? She wasn't just "makin stuff up".
    The very concerted effort of the right wing over the last 30 plus years is represented in our government from city councils to the SCOTUS.
    Now it's quite evident when every gop gov. in the country, is pushing the same crazy laws against women & government workers & unions.
    The NRA & ALEX are such a great influence in our laws & writing of the laws, that the proof is in the facts. In every state with these aggressive anti women & workers bills, the gop is pushing for this agenda even when they may loose their seat in office.
    When connecting the dots and it's not hard to do these days with the likes of the Koch Bros. outed as right wing supporters, people are not even embarrassed to associate with the corporate owned groups like ALEC & Tea Party Express & Americans for Prosperity (all of which are corporate sponsored & owned and for their own agenda as in No Regulations on oil comp. & no taxes on the rich & leave the tax exempt church alone & on & on...... They worked on the "Stand your Ground" bill which is a law in several states. Why is our Congress allowing the NRA & ALEC to write our laws & to use the same law for as many states as possible knowing this kind of law would never make it through as a Federal law?
    The lobbyists for NRA & ALEX are in charge.

    Sister sarry lulu is just another tool in this conspiracy.
    Yesterday documents surfaced that the DOMA & the group defending it has been secretly working to create trouble between the gay community & the black.
    Divide & conquer.
    Thanks to blogs & people like Gryphen who do care about the truth, people are shining a light on the dark side of the gop.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Randall6:58 AM

    Are we talking about H.R. 6407?
    The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act?

    That bill was sponsored by Tom Davis (R-VA)
    but was co-sponsored by another Republican; John McHugh (R-NY)

    and two DEMOCRATS; Danny Davis (D-IL)
    and HENRY WAXMAN (D-CA)

    ...looks kind of bi-partisan to me.

    Or have I got the wrong bill?

    Also, I'm looking at the PDF of the bill, and the son-of-a-bitch is 67 pages of boring legalese. Could you point me to the section where they mandate the agency to pre-pay the healthcare benefits for 75 years, please?

    thank you in advance,
    Randall

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:11 AM

      Did you go back to the bill from 2006?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:56 AM

      Randall, Title 8, Sec. 803

      Delete
  12. Anonymous7:33 AM

    Here's something that no one ever seems to mention. The USPS is the nations largest employer of disabled vets!

    So for those of us who like to support our vets,and our troops, we must support the USPS!

    ReplyDelete
  13. hedgewytch8:30 AM

    The Republican's want to deregulate all the gov. agencies, take away reproductive health care choices from women, deny gays the right to marry or serve in the military, take away SS, Medicare/Medicade, and do away with Unions.

    So they are against equal rights for individuals, workers, and clean environment and safe industry.

    Why does the Republican Pary hate America and American's so much? And how can any American vote for them??!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8:45 AM

    APWU is the clerk's union; NALC (National Association of Letter Carriers) I'd the carrier's union-- just as powerful as APWU!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous9:27 AM

    I was oblivious to this "privatization" nightmare until I stumbled upon the book by Naomi Klein that did such a good job of explaining WHY the ultra rich have this plan, and are making sure the easily swayed public supports it (along with the sudden hatred of UNIONS)

    Since reading it a couple years ago, I've watched its predictions come true at an astonishing pace, and at the same time, see rabid support of it all, by poor people who do not realize how much they are being manipulated.

    The HATE for Obamacare, while its provisions are actually LOVED; the HATE for unions, until its explained that the term "weekend" wasn't even in the vocabulary, until unions pushed for them, as well as worker safety and minimum wage; the HATE for Social Security and Medicare, or any other "entitlement" despite how many of those new haters of such programs, are currently surviving only because of their existence.

    Sooner or later, people HAVE to wake up to how they are being TOLD how to think, and come to their senses. Hopefully it won't be too late to DO anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's hilarious that those running Congress are calling restructuring the USPS pre-payment a bailout. Congress has been counting on the money to bail itself out since 2006. Must be why they call their Congressional committee an Oversight.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:08 AM

    25 year postal veteran here, we deliver over 30% of packages for FedEx and UPS; they pay us a fee to do so, which saves them money, especially in rural areas, where we stop at houses everyday, where they have to go several miles out of their way for one small package. Delivering the Last Mile it's called.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous2:31 PM

    There are other reasons the USPS is in trouble. Read the GAO report. The GAO is non-partisan.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anita Winecooler6:49 PM

    The ED Show did a great job awhile back, here's the you tube link

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KySKsH9uDaE

    FWIW, we used Fed Ex for our business, then switched to the USPS when the business grew. They gave the same, if not better service, and with a more professional, personable image we felt reflected well with our company.

    I have serious problems with this in regards to people who live in rural areas, absentee ballots, and those who depend on it for medicines.

    Thanks for doing this post! The more people who know, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  20. S1789, sponsored by Lieberman, would cut 100,000 jobs with the USPS when we don't need to have more unemployed workers. S1789 would decrease compensation for injured workers and end it for those over 65, when we don't need to take away compensation or lower compensation for injured workers.It would weaken the unions which promote a "living wage" at a time when we don't need to add more people to the "working poor", S1789 would close smaller post offices (some have already closed),and slow mail delivery by closing 200+ distribution centers.
    In 2006 Congress voted to have the USPS fund 75 years of retiree health benefits in 10 amounting to 5.5 Billion a year.
    Saddled with funding 5.5 Billion a year that had nothing to do with mail delivery, the USPS could no longer have it's revenue =costs as it had done until 2005.
    If this bill is passed or HR2309 the USPS will end up virtually privatized with lower wages and benefits for it's workers,a scaled down and overworked workforce, more mail services contracted out, less services for the public including encouragement of curbside service in place of home delivery.
    My 3 videos on this matter.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09ybkkiH2Ho

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am4wez1ShPY

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsPIY9bFFZY

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.