Bill O'Reilly dangles red meat in front of Sarah Palin's cage door with predictable results. Update!

O'Reilly starts off the interview (What game of dice did HE lose to end up interviewing this sideshow pinhead by the way?) by playing Laura Ingraham's admonition to the Republicans that if they cannot win the election while running against Obama's economic record that they should just shut down the party, and then asking the Grizzled Mama if she agrees.

Silly question, of course she does! (After all hasn't she been talking about a third party for months now?)

 "Come on Republicans, if you can't get this fire lit underneath this base and get them convinced that...uh...Barack Obama's lack of a plan to get us out of these economically woeful times...if...if..if you can't get your message through that filter of the media then we're in a world of hurt."

O'Reilly then asks what Palin thinks the Republicans SHOULD be doing. (You know because her ideas have worked so well in the past.)

"We're not explaining to the rest of America who thinks they're going to get a bunch of free stuff from Obama that you have a choice. You either get free stuff or you get freedom, you can't have both and you need to make a choice. And if we could explain and get that message through to people that 'there ain't no such thing as a free lunch' and that we are an insolvent nation when you consider us being sixteen trillion dollars in debt, we're broke. We can't keep continuing down this path. Well again we're in a world of hurt if we can't get that explanation to the public, to the voters, regarding what the choices are and.."

O'Reilly then asks if it is possible to drive that message home when half of Americans receive some assistance from the government (Palin's so-called "free stuff.")

"Well it's possible that we are so far down that road Bill that yes the majority of Americans could potentially vote to continue that nonsense, yes." (This last part was stated while O'Reilly was talking over her and he ends his statement by saying the population is changing in Obama's favor.)

O'Reilly then goes on to ask The Lunatic from Lake Lucille if the Romney campaign should attack the President in a "more personal way" and use buzzwords like "incompetent," "dangerous," and "socialist."

Like throwing raw meat to a feral Tasmanian Dipshit, this causes Palin to virtually foam at the mouth, and she lurches to the attack.

"Well when they're not JUST buzzwords, those are accurate descriptions of our Commander-in-Chief, yes! He should be very aggressive and should be ADAMANT in his attacks on Obama's record, which is so dismal. His plan, or lack of a plan, of Obama's, to get us out of these woeful times. Yes, he needs to be SEVERELY aggressive in his articulation." (Pretty sure that "severely" comment, is a dig at Romney's self description that he is "severely conservative" by the way. Nasty bitch can't help herself.)

Here O'Reilly tries to slide a word in edgewise but Palin is frothing and refuses to stop gnawing on the President's leg.

"But listen you know you bring up those demographics, and what they're representing in terms of perhaps wanting some free stuff, you have to remember America is still center right, Proof of that is, look at how Obama has to couch his message, he has to lie, to pretend he's for fiscal sanity and strong national defense, and those center right positions that the vast majority of Americans stand for, Obama has to pretend like he is that in order to get that...that base."

So in Palin's worldview it is the PRESIDENT who is the liar? Projecting much crazy lady?

Personally I think that the Romney campaign should listen to Wasilla's Wailing Wendigo. After all WHO knows more about the seductive qualities of free stuff than SHE does? And when it comes to vicious attacks on a person's character, well hell she wrote the book! (Well she signed ghostwritten copies of the book anyhow.)

Look, the Romney campaign is losing anyhow, why NOT invite this political albatross aboard their campaign dinghy? Then when it sinks into the inky depths they can simply blame it on her.

Worked for the McCain campaign.

P.S. For some reason I cannot link to the video in the traditional manner, but if you check the first comment down below you can cut and paste it from there. This is strange, I have never had this difficulty before.

Update: Okay I was only joking about Romney taking Palin's advice, but it seems that they are kind of doing just that:  

After saying earlier that Sept. 11 was not the day to criticize President Obama on foreign-policy matters, Mitt Romney late on Tuesday issued a statement blasting the Obama administration for a statement from the U.S. Embassy in Cairo expressing what it characterized as sympathy for Muslims upset by anti-Muslim activity in the United States. But the GOP nominee apparently confused the sequence of events. 

Romney called the statement the administration's first response to the violent protests and the attacks that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three others. However, the embassy statement was issued before those events, according to The New York Times.

 I saw Romney attempting to rationalize this statement this morning, but it was in fact an EPIC FAIL!

We just lost our Libyan Ambassador and three other Americans, so this is going to make Romney look like the insensitive prick that most of us already know that he is.

Update: And yes it DOES appear that Romney was  following Palin's lead. Just check her Facebook page:

America can’t afford any more “leading from behind” in such a dangerous world. We already know that President Obama likes to “speak softly” to our enemies. If he doesn’t have a “big stick” to carry, maybe it’s time for him to grow one.

Clearly sexualized language designed to get her more media attention. Truly a revolting woman!