Saturday, October 27, 2012

My daughter tells me that this is the hottest thing trending on the social networks right now. Which is not good news for Romney concerning the youth vote.

Apparently it all started with this article over at Slate on October 23rd:

Sometimes one gets a little tired of the echo-chamber of election anxiety, the fretful watching of the debates, the scrolling through tweets and Facebook postings to see what everyone else is thinking watching the debates, the brilliant little analyses by friends, the bits of cleverness, the instant polls. So it was sort of relaxing and informative to watch the foreign policy debate with my 9-year-old Violet, who is at that phase of life when she views the world entirely through the lens of Harry Potter. 

It started in the last debate when she said of Mitt Romney, after hearing him talk for a few minutes: “He’s Umbridge!” And of course I saw exactly what she meant, the brittle, lacquered, self-satisfied smile of the ambitious Dark Arts professor and passionate ministry bureaucrat, Dolores Umbridge. The saccharine, almost-girlish chuckle. The proclamations she issues at Hogwarts, the self-important talk about “the ministry this” and “the ministry that.” The classes doomed to read out loud instead of learning the spells they desperately need. The moment where she makes Harry write lines into his own skin with a pen that draws real blood, all the while smiling that fake and brittle smile. Then of course there is her interest in Muggle Registration, and protecting “pureblood” wizards from the dilution and compromise of human blood.

And from there it went viral.

My daughter informs me that these images and humorous comments connecting Romney and Umbridge have been flying fast and furious around the inter-tubes.

And you know, now that I think about it, there IS a rather frightening similarity. Don't you think?

13 comments:

  1. BabyRaptor2:26 AM

    Oh,mygod...He IS Pink Bitch! I'm never going to be able to unsee that now.

    Also, totally helping this spread.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:01 AM

    Richard Mourdock or Abu Hamza?
    Spot the difference between the Christian social conservatives and the Islamic fundamentalists.

    This week, Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock became the latest in a string of Republicans to say really, really stupid things about women while campaigning for office in 2012. In a debate with Democratic opponent Joe Donnelly, Mourdock sought to explain his abortion stance by saying that “even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that is something that God intended to happen.” Prior to that, Pennsylvania Senate candidate Tom Smith compared rape to having a baby out of wedlock, saying if you “put yourself in a father’s situation” it’s a similar kind of thing. And we all remember Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin telling an interviewer “if it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
    What do all these men have in common aside from the fact that they are GOP standard-bearers for the U.S. Senate? To one degree or another, they are Christian fundamentalists.
    The sheer number of these types of quotes that we’ve seen in 2012 got us wondering: Who says more antiquated things about women and families, Christian fundamentalists or Islamic fundamentalists? Here are nine stupid, backward, and often misogynistic quotes from nine different Islamic fundamentalist and Christian social conservative leaders. See if you can spot which one is which.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/10/richard_mourdock_rape_scandal_spot_the_difference_between_the_christian.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sally in MI4:01 AM

    Perfect. What bothers me about him (other than the viciousness I see in him) are the red-lined eyes. I noticed it in Debate 1, then by the second one the red was more prominent. He is either not sleeping, or
    the evil in him is trying to escape.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:02 AM

    FORWARD!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GOwfCSiuGg&feature=

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous4:45 AM

    I don't believe there has ever been a candidate that has had the negative impact on me this man does.....but I've known other self-absorbed people who have......

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:40 AM

    From John Sununu to Sarah Palin, Racism is the Lexicon of the Right

    Here we go again. The former governor, former 2008 Vice President candidate and former Miss Alaska pageant entrant, opening up her mouth and trying to defend herself from racist comments she posted on her Facebook page…for ALL to read.

    The controversy started when Sarah Palin posted the following comment:


    http://www.politicususa.com/john-sununu-sarah-palin-racism-lexicon.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, your daughter is so right- people will be ALL over this. I can't believe I myself never made the connection! Menschie and I are serious Potterheads and at the release of all eight movies joked about how I was the only black person in the crowd and we hoped Hogwarts had an affirmative action policy.

    Anyway, never again shall I see Romney without picturing a wall full of mewling kittens on porcelain plates behind him.

    ReplyDelete
  8. hedgewytch8:32 AM

    That was just perfect. Good thing I hadn't taken a sip of my fresh poured Earl Grey Tea yet before I looked at the pic.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:28 AM

    Children see so clearly how could I have missed this?! Of course it's him!! All the hate and smug self satisfaction of the power hungry evil...right there for all to see! LOL it's perfect! Thanks for this!

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know. Those that grew up reading Harry Potter are of voting age now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly.... and they know the overriding theme of the Potter series was the triumph of good over evil, and that the "witchcraft" was merely allegorical. Something the Christian right has never figured out because, after all, they choose evil.

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.