Friday, October 26, 2012

Proof that the Republicans are actively stealing our elections, and have been doing so since at least 2008.

Courtesy of UK Progressive:

 In states where the winner will be decided by less than 10%, of the vote he already knows he will win. This is no tinfoil hat conspiracy. It’s a maths problem. And mathematics showed changes in actual raw voting data that had no statistical correlation other than programmable computer fraud. This computer fraud resulted in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican in every federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial election since 2008 (thus far) and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney. 

This goes well beyond Romney’s investment control in voting machine maker Hart Intercivic and Diebold’s close ties to George W. Bush. Indeed all five voting machine companies have very strong GOP fundraising ties, yet executives (including the candidate’s son Tagg Romney) insist there is no conflict between massively supporting one party financially whilst controlling the machines that record and count the votes. 

A retired NSA analyst has spent several sleepless nights applying a simple formula to past election results across Arizona. His results showed across-the-board systemic election fraud on a coordinated and massive scale. But the analysis indicated that this only happens in larger precincts because anomalies in small precincts can be more easily detected. 

“Easy to Cheat” 

Retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho has worked for nearly seven years trying to understand voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. This publication has written extensively about apparent vote machine manipulation in a 2006 RTA Bond issue election that is still being fought in the courts. Said Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, because you can’t see what is going on in the machine.” 

When Duniho applied a mathematical model to actual voting results in the largest voting precincts, he saw that only the large precincts suddenly trended towards Mitt Romney in the Arizona primary – and indeed all Republicans in every election since 2008 – by a factor of 8%-10%. The Republican candidate in every race saw an 8-10%. gain in his totals whilst the Democrat lost 8-10%. This is a swing of up to 20 point, enough to win an election unless a candidate was losing very badly. 

Since sifting through and decoding massive amounts of data was his work for decades on behalf of the National Security Agency, he wanted to understand why this was ONLY happening in large precincts. 

Nose Counting 

The idea of examining large precinct results came via a link to a report written by Francois Choquette and James Johnson. Choquette became curious about South Carolina primary results in the February Republican contest. There a poll observer noted an unusually big gain of votes for Mitt Romney in larger precincts than in smaller ones. Choquette wanted to know why? 

He examined and applied all of the normal statistical markers to see where a variance might occur: income level, population density, race, urban vs. rural, even party registration numbers. He found no correlation to explain why Romney votes trended upward while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward -yet only in large precincts. 

Choquette then looked at all 50 states and found roughly a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP. This was noted in every state except Utah, where the presumption was, as it was Mitt’s religious home state and very conservative, there was no chance of Romney losing and no variance was found. 

Choquette even saw in Maricopa County, which is Phoenix and its suburbs, that in 2008 Romney used this technique against John McCain. But McCain beat him by too much for a 10% fraud gain to matter. McCain tried to do the same thing in the general election to President Obama but 9 million votes nationally were too many to make up.

I have been trying to post this extremely important story since last night, but have found it virtually impossible to open the article over at UK Progressive.  Today I learned why:

Our website has been under a DDOS attack for the last 12 hours by GOP operatives who do not want the story of stolen elections to get out.

That is why I put such a late sampling along with the video here at IM.  It is EXTREMELY important that we get this information out to the voters and authorities as quickly as possible.

I think in many ways this will come as no surprise to most of us, after all we have been talking about the GOP's many methods of stealing elections for quite some time, but to discover just how entrenched these methods are within the system itself, is fairly frightening.

Not to be too negative, but it may be too late to fix a problem like this before November 6, which means the ONLY way to beat it is to give President Obama a fucking landslide.

So if you have not voted yet, do it now, and get as MANY as your friends and family to vote early as well. Maybe, just maybe, we can beat these bastards despite their cowardly attempts to steal our democracy right from under our noses.

God damn this pisses me off!

55 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:19 AM

    Thank you for posting this! I hope people will get this out all over Facebook! It needs to go viral. Wonder if "they" are messing with the early votes in the swing states already?

    Very important to get a landslide. GOTV!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:35 PM

      I am telling everyone to demand paper ballots.
      The question is what can we do about it?

      What is Team Obama doing about it?
      It is kind of a relief tho to know that there isn't THAT many retards that voted in the "Do nothing congress" small relief that...It was hijacked.

      Delete
    2. Ditto, thanks for posting this story, Gryphen. I've been Tweeting the story link and choice quotes ever since I read what you blogged above.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:07 PM

      This is a really, really stupid misinterpretation of an innocent fact: urban voters often have different preferences than rural voters. In this case, Romney's strongest support was among urban Republicans, while Paul's strongest support was among rural Republicans. This article only proves that there are some gullible ignoramuses out there.

      Delete
    4. Generally speaking, urban voters trend Democrat.

      Delete
  2. YES! This is my fear as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sally in MI9:23 AM

    I do hope something can be done, and fast! Since this has to do with math, the intellectually challenged GOP will want nothing to do with it. They can't even comprehend when their very rights are eroding.
    I am steaming because by idiot sister in OH sent me a scathing email reciting right wing talking points about Obama and Libya. No facts, you know, just surmises. As I was getting ready to find all the facts for her, she wrote: Don't bother responding; I won;t read it. THIS is what we're dealing with. Blinding vicious hatred and no room left for any cogent thought. Landslide it is!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:23 PM

      They are going crazy about "Libya" and its a non issue.
      I bet when PBO wins they will try to Impeach him or something stupid.

      But no one listened to PBO in the debate and Joe Biden.
      They just listen to idiot faux news.
      Retards. Their hatred for POTUS transcends the Truth!
      OT: BreitFart shithead danReilh is in the hospital.
      Their asking for "donations". How socialist of them?
      Karma. Here that Sarah? Why doncha give you good friend Danny boy some $$$ You know share the wealth.
      *crickets*
      If she does give she will make a Big "Dill" out of it and only b/c I wrote it here.
      Karma's comin' for you too Sarah!

      Delete
  4. Anonymous9:37 AM

    Suggestive analysis - but until there is some actual proof anyone spreading the word will be called a conspiracy theorist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10:12 AM

    This could explain what Mitt has been doing of late. As Colin Powell put it, "On almost every issue that was discussed on Monday night, Governor Romney agreed with the President with some nuances." This may or may not influence a significant number of voters to switch to Mitt, but it will provide an excuse for a switch of votes to Mitt.

    GET OUT THE VOTE!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Smirnonn10:14 AM

    Yeah, it figures. The dwindling, xenophobic, racist, regressive party that the gop has become cannot possibly win on it's actual platform so it HAS to resort to every underhanded, immoral tactic possible. Voter fraud, fear mongering, outright propaganda (that's YOU, faucks nooze!), etc.

    Oh, still can't get through to the UK Progressive site. Truth hurts, hey rethuggies?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not What You Want to Hear10:37 AM

    Since 2008? To this day, I'm fairly certain George Bush was an illegitimate president.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. fromthediagonal1:17 PM

      Agreed... little brother Jeb's Florida helping out in 2000 with the help of others, as in the local judiciary and the US Supreme Court!

      Don't be flummoxed, to use an old term, by Jeb's reticence to admit to his right-wing agenda by using his marriage to a latina. He will use his kids to his/their agenda.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:51 PM

      Bush did not win the popular vote in 2000. I live in Texas. I will vote, but my vote will not count. It's time to rethink the electoral college.

      Delete
    3. Indeed. Not once, but twice.

      Delete
  8. And so far we're hearing nothing about this - even on MSNBC. This is alarming stuff.
    M from MD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:51 PM

      If anyone would address this issue, it would be Rachael Maddow on MSNBC...I'm going to send her this info...even though I'm sure she already probably has it! Be sure and watch her show tonight.

      OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:09 PM

      That's not totally true. Ed Schultz had the story about Tagg Romney owning voting machines on his radio show and on his television show within the last week and he was poo pooed by even the DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The Ohio state politician, Nina ?, said she wasn't worried about there being a problem with the machines in Ohio so I thought, okay. Brad Blog was accused of being a conspiracy theorist by
      thinkprogress.com! This is the troubling thing about Democrats, we're too damn naive and believe that NOBODY would try to steal an election. Mark my words: when we all wake up on November 7th and find out that Robmey won Ohio, 51 to 49 we'll still be scratching our heads. Obama will be just like Gore and will not want to "make a scene" and will want to do what's best for the country and will be delivering his concession speech. I have hoped to hell that this wouldn't happen but you can see that the fix is already in. Does no one else remember Ohio in 2004 and Ken Blackwell? And the guy that was getting ready to spill the beans when unfortunately his small plane crashed and killed him when he was on his way to Washington to give testimony? I think I learned that little tidbit right here on this site, IM. I feel like we are living in some small 3rd world fiefdom. If I am wrong about what will happen on November 7th, then I will make a contribution to some charity ala the Donald.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous10:41 AM

    Intrade has Obama at 63.7% now. But the repubs are feeling confident because indications are that they will get the big voter turnout and Dems aren't all that interested. Or at least not nearly as interested as they were in 2008. Overall, I would tend to trust Intrade because it's all about money there and not about feel good politics. HP's polls do seem to be mirroring what is happening at Intrade, although they are slow to react at times. However, if you're going to trust or distrust Intrade then you have to make up your mind regardless of what it's saying. To be on and off just makes some people look foolish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:18 PM

      The media is controlling this election too. Watch what they say - telling how the voter turnout is going to be, etc. How the hell do they know?

      These phone calls I get as to polls - I purposely lie to them w/my answers to throw them off and I'll wager others across the nation do the same thing! I don't like them delving into my personal business w/their questions and don't think it their business as to how I plan to vote!!!!

      Delete
    2. Beldar J. Conehead12:26 PM

      Trust Nate.

      Delete
    3. fromthediagonal1:31 PM

      Come on, Beldar!
      Don't they all have an axe to grind?
      I won't sleep much until all of the votes as we can see them are tabulated.

      I hope that calls for international observers will not have been in vain, because there are too many opportunities for digital manipulations of votes cast.

      I shall vote straight ticket "D" because I (see my name) understand the dangers of becoming complacent.


      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:20 PM

      I trust Nate. Either way Intrade goes doesn't matter to me because it's about money.

      Delete
    5. Beldar J Conehead2:38 PM

      Diagonal, you're right. There is bias and manipulation everywhere, but Nate pulled me through in 2008 and I'm sticking with his analysis to the end (as long as President Obama is re-elected at the end). I also sense that Nate acknowledges his leanings and tries to minimize their effect and/or compensate for them in his projections.

      I guess we'll all be here a week from next Tuesday to find out. (C U Next Tuesday, Screechy!! sorry, couldnt resist...)

      I see the Obama election night rally is going to be inside of McCormick Place - raffled tickets - instead of outside in Grant Park as it was in 2008. I hope that's in recognition of Chicago's frigid November nights and not a reflection of expectations. I think I would just bundle up and go if it were held outside this time, but it's not to be.

      Ok, enough rambling.

      Vote, everyone!
      Obama2012

      Delete
    6. Anonymous8:14 PM

      I could be wrong but I thought that it was proven that Intrade was not accurate because the people working that or investing or however it works were mainly Romney surrogates trying to game the system. I think that was on Nate Silverman's site a few weeks back.

      Delete
  10. "So if you have not voted yet, do it now, and get as MANY as your friends and family to vote early as well."
    ----------------------------
    I hate to be nitpicky, but not every state allows early voting! We *cannot* vote early in Michigan. And there are only a very few limited reasons that allow you to cast an absentee ballot in Michigan, none of which apply to me.

    But yes, we really have to do all we can to make this a blowout election. I understand the reasoning on both sides and on the part of the media to keep calling the race as being close.

    But I really am concerned that a close vote will allow voting machine tampering; "oh well, it was a close vote."

    We have to GOTV and make sure every indication and exit poll shows a strong lead for the President.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:25 PM

      Since 2000 exit polls are not accurate because voter machine tampering occured then in Ohio and Florida that year. Remember when Tom Brokaw and the guy that used to host MTP (can't remember his name at the moment)were dumbfounded when their exit polls were saying that Gore would be the winner and lo and behold Bush was said to be the winner.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous10:52 AM

    Very scary news. Whoever would cheat in an election would have to be one ruthless dictator bent on doing anything to get his way. Lying has been proven to be a Romney specialty. Finding loopholes so as not to pay taxes on investments overseas is a form of stealing and cheating, in that it takes more out of the middle class to foot the bills and gets to keep back more for himself - not paying his fair share.

    Would the Romney campaign be so corrupt as to steal an election? It's not hard to believe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:31 PM

      You've got Rove involved; Romney campaign will do anything necessary to win, anything.

      Elizabeth 44

      Delete
    2. You've just described Bush/Cheney 2004 masterminded by Karl Rove.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous11:12 AM

    Ugh! Nothing but bad news today it seems. HuffPo seems full of stories about Romney taking the lead in swings states, swing states' newspapers endorsing Romney..Makes me want to throw up.
    I voted yesterday for Obama. But I'm depressed today!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anita Winecooler10:00 PM

      hey, it gets better, it always does. Obama is putting himself out there, flooding the media, mtv, Rolling Stone, 30 Rock, etc. etc. He never shut down the ground game, so we had a jump start from the get go.

      I wish we had early voting in my state!

      Delete
  13. Anonymous11:15 AM

    Can you get this information to the DNC and the Obama reelection campaign?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous11:19 AM

    Romney Campaign Exaggerates Size Of Nevada Event With Altered Image

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-campaign-appears-to-exaggerate-size-of-neva

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11:25 AM

    Gryphen:

    Hope you have forwarded this story to Andrew Sullivan.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hedgewytch11:33 AM

    We've all known the bastards have been cheating since 2000, with the Bush elections. They fine tuned their methodology after the Bush 2 redo.

    You gotta wonder how far up this corruption goes because there is no way this has gone on for so long, so wide spread with it not being investigated, reported on and STOPPED.

    This is for sure Sedition.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous12:05 PM

    The Voter Fraud Myth

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/10/29/121029fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all

    Stealing the election...you can bet the GOP is behind it. The republican party has been reduced to a criminal enterprise. It has long abandoned the political process. Elections are easier to buy or steal, why attempt to win one?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous12:14 PM

    The asswipe Romney keeps saying he is going to win w/that shitty grin!

    We need to get this information out across the nation and make sure our family members and friends vote for anyone that is not Republican!

    I detest their party and my feeling has grown ever since Sarah Palin (lying racist skank!) was put on the ticket by McCain.

    The race is supposedly close, but can we trust the media w/the information? They were so wrong with their information on the various channels in 2010! Remember?

    Absentee voting is the way to go as per President Obama and VP Biden. That is how I did it - felt wonderful marking my ballot in the privacy of my home and then putting it in the mail.

    I want to bring up something else regarding the CEO's telling their employees how to vote (anti Obama) suggesting they'll be laid off or lose their medical insurance if President Obama is reelected!!

    CEO's legally are not suppose to give instructions to their employees as to how to cast their votes. If any of my bosses (I'm now retired) had tried to tell me how to vote, I'd have kept the information the boss had provided me (letter/email/faxes or a recording of the conversation) and then filed suit against him or her after the election.

    Plus, I would not have voted the way they instructed me! I would have made up my own mind and voted accordingly. These assholes should not get away with this! Romney has encouraged this behavior of the CEO's and is on record doing so - which I'd also use in a suit against the boss.

    People - DO NOT fall for their crap/intimidation!

    OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:35 PM

      Washington State, and I believe Oregon, are all mail-in ballots. There are no polling stations anymore. We get our ballot in the mail, fill it out in the privacy/comfort of our homes, and mail it back.(Or take it to a drop box). I love it.

      Elizabeth 44

      Delete
  19. Beldar J. Conehead12:23 PM

    The French have a name for it: coup d'état.






    Obama2012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. fromthediagonal1:54 PM

      Beldar:
      L'etat est moi... or other shades of ancient Louis XIV... or was it Louis XVI?
      Je ne sais pas...

      Delete
    2. That would be the Sun King Louis the Fourteenth.
      Quite the dancer too, I hear.
      M from MD
      PS. His grandson was the fifteenth: Louis the Well-Beloved

      Delete
  20. Anonymous12:40 PM

    This has been going on a long time. A complicit corporate media spins it as neck and neck, and the machines hack the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Beldar J. Conehead12:40 PM

    And there's even worser news: Colin Powell's powerful endorsement of President Obama for re-election has been officially disqualified by White People's Power Party chairman, former New Hampshire governor and tea-baggin' minion of Satan, John Sunnunnunnu, because, as he so eloquently observes, "it doesnt count when one darkie endorses another darkie".

    In happier news: President Obama proved that some politicians DO speak the truth when, in the current issue of Rolling Stone, he called Mittens a "bullshitter".

    Obama2012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. fromthediagonal1:59 PM

      Yessir! There is some sanity left in all of this corporate-driven madness, and there also is a quiet, true courage in the man we elected to represent us almost four years ago.

      He has my admiration, for better, for worse... and I ain't no hero worshipper!

      Delete
  22. Anonymous12:42 PM

    The story on UK Progressive proves nothing. It's linked to an unlabeled spreadsheet of numbers that can't be checked for accuracy. If we assume the precinct data is accurate, all it shows is that in one, unspecified state, urban voters liked Romney better than rural voters, and vice versa for Paul. The story uses highly misleading language ("suddenly trended") to promote a theory -- that individual precinct counts changed -- for which there is no evidence. Disparities between rural and urban voting patterns is perfectly normal. And the claim that Choquette found similar patterns in all states actually disproves Duniho's claim of computer manipulation, because many states still use paper ballots. Recounts, which are commonplace and closely scrutinized by both parties and the press, reveal any discrepancies between the actual ballots and the reported results. Duniho claims (without any evidence) that he has proved that population density cannot explain these results. That flies in the face of the simple fact that precincts with very large numbers of voters only exist in densely-populated areas, which are the only places where having just one polling place for many thousands of people is practical. This is an ignorant, ill-informed conspiracy theory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anita Winecooler9:53 PM

      Thanks, that's exactly how my husband broke down the numbers used, but came short of calling it a conspiracy theory. It all hinges on getting the vote out, Obama's had his ground game in place since 2008, we need to get the turnout of actual votes from supporters.

      Delete
  23. Anonymous1:06 PM

    This conspiracy theory alleges that Romney somehow hacked the vote counts in thousands of individual precincts across the country, including caucus votes that were tallied not by computer, but by head counts of people who stood in different corners of the room to show which candidates they supported. There isn't even a printed ballot for the Iowa caucus, never mind any electronic means of counting the votes. This is a stupid, stupid misinterpretation of a natural phenomenon: voters in rural areas often have different preferences than voters in urban areas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:01 PM

      But the hole in your dismissal of this "conspiracy theory," as you label it, is the fact that rural voters tend to vote republican. How, then, would more populated urban districts swing so far towards republicans?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:37 PM

      Oh, yea. Remember the Iowa caucuses claimed Romney won, then weeks later it was revealed that Santorum actually won, and then a few weeks later it was Ron Paul? Iowa's right to be the first state out of the box should be taken away after this year!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:56 AM

      @2:01 p.m. -- You're misunderstanding this completely. These are PRIMARY results. ALL the voters are Republican. The rural ones favored Paul while the urban ones favored Romney.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:03 PM

      One of the things the ignorant authors of this "study" have failed to account for is the perfect smoothness and very gradual rise of the curve from small to large precincts. If Romney were hacking only the largest precincts, there would be some sort of jump in the graph where the Romney effect begins. For vote fraud to have produced such uniform results, Romney would have had to hack every precinct in the country, right down to the smallest ones with only handfuls of voters. And that's just another evidence of how stupid this conspiracy theory is.

      Delete
  24. Anonymous2:12 PM

    Romney's get PANNED on his so called 'Policy Speech'.

    http://www.politicususa.com/reaction-romneys-economic-speech-all-obama-uniformly-negative.html

    Benjy Sarlin ‏@BenjySarlin So….what’s the news in this major Romney speech so far.

    Ali Velshi ‏@AliVelshi I’ll rejoin @SuzanneMalveaux on @CNN after Romney’s econ speech from. This speech isn’t delivering specifics.

    Kathie Obradovich ‏@KObradovich Romney about 9 minutes into his speech and it has been uniformly negative in terms of bashing Obama. #romneyia

    Molly Ball ‏@mollyesque So far Romney’s big speech on the economy is all about Obama.

    Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp With all the talk of bi-partisanship, has anyone asked Romney campaign if he still looks back at himself as a severely conservative gov?

    Justin Wolfers ‏@justinwolfers Turns out that Romney’s “big economic speech” today, was just a placeholder, so that he could go on the attack if the GDP numbers were bad.

    Jonathan Cohn ‏@CitizenCohn It’s been a while since I listened to a full Romney speech. Sort of awe-inspiring to hear all of deceptions strung together.

    Eric Kleefeld ‏@EricKleefeld Mitt Romney delivers major economic speech, declares substantively that he loves America.

    Molly Ball ‏@mollyesque Apparently difference between a Major Romney Address & a regular Romney speech is whether he enters to “Air Force One” or “Born Free.”

    Elizabeth Drew ‏@ElizabethDrewOH There Mitt goes again: He will create the 12 million jobs that are going to happen anyway. Who is going to speak up?

    Travis Waldron ‏@Travis_Waldron There was nothing major about that speech.

    Poor Mitt Romney. Today, the Economist wrote, “Yet in the latest quarter America made its biggest contribution to world GDP growth since 2005 (excluding periods of global recession).”

    Lis Smith, Obama campaign spokeswoman, said in a statement, “Romney has started promising ‘big change,’ but the only change Romney’s offering is to take us back to the same failed policies that crashed our economy in the first place. That’s not the change we need, and with every ‘major speech,’ Mitt Romney just reminds voters that’s all he’s got to offer.”

    Why was Mitt so negative yet unspecific? Because his specifics spell doom for most Americans. The Economic Policy Institute concluded, “Romney’s policy proposals would reduce GDP growth by 0.5% in 2013, and by 1.1% in 2014. His spending cuts alone would reduce GDP growth by 0.9% in 2013 and by 1.3% in 2014.”

    Yeah, that’s change you can believe in — Bushian, backward change. Only Mitt Romney would promise to deliver economic news in an allegedly major economic policy speech and then fail to deliver any news or policy.

    After what Mitt Romney did to Massachusetts’ economy, it’s unclear why anyone thinks he could do better if he had a hold of the entire nation. Perhaps this is another reason why he fails to deliver specifics. The economy has a long way to go in order to continue its recovery, but backward isn’t advisable.

    Irony alert: Romney gave this speech at a location that received Obama stimulus funds.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Let us not forget the complicity of the right wing media in making the race look so close that a Rmoney win would never be questioned. This isn't about making it a horse race to sell papers, ad time or ratings. This is about covering up voter fraud on a national level. I knew they were rigging the voter machines way back in 2004.

    They can't report how far ahead Obama is. If they did, then a Rmoney win would look way too suspicious. But if it's a tight race, then it's believable.

    Today they're reporting Rmoney ahead.

    There ya go.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anita Winecooler9:47 PM

    I was pretty peeved when I read the comment yesterday. I couldn't get the page to open, but found a cached page. I sent it out to everyone I could think of, Current TV, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and some friends with ties in high places in Pennsylvania politics.

    My husband went over it with me earlier today, and he feels this SOUNDS good, but they're using numbers on an unmarked graph supposedly in one state. It's basically manipulation as we've seen in all the polls, but using numbers from one state.
    That's why we've seen our President being so proactive. Most of the Democratic ground base has been in place since 2008. so we were ahead of Romney from jump street. Romney had to spend a lot of time and money getting everything started, and early voting has been key in getting the battleground states lined up favorably with the electoral college votes.
    The ONLY response that will work is to vote and get out the vote as much as possible. Get his supporters to actually vote come heck or high water (or hurricanes).

    Sorry for the rant, but it's one of my passions.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.