The current wave of school closings is latest result of bipartisan educational policies which began with No Child Left Behind in 2001, and have kicked into overdrive under the Obama administration's Race To The Top. In Chicago, the home town of the president and his Secretary of Education, the percentage of black teachers has dropped from 45% in 1995 to 19% today. After winning a couple skirmishes in federal court over discriminatory firings in a few schools, teachers have now filed a citywide class action lawsuit alleging that the city's policy of school “turnarounds” and “transformations” is racially discriminatory because it's carried out mainly in black neighborhoods and the fired teachers are disproportionately black.
How did this happen? Where did those policies come from, and exactly what are they?
Beginning in the 1980s, deep right pockets like the Bradley and Walton Family Foundations spent billions to create and fund fake “grassroots movements.” They churned out academic studies and blizzards of media hype, first for vouchers, later on for charter schools and what’s become a whole panoply of privatization-oriented “education reforms” ranging f rom teacher merit pay to common core curriculum and more.
Those billions paid off with the 2001 passage of the No Child Left Behind Act which made the right wing corporate agenda of undermining and ultimately privatizing public education national policy. Though standardized test scores were long known to prove little aside from student family income, they suddenly became the gold standard for judging teacher & school performance. School districts were required to purchase & give dozens of costly meaningless tests and to publish lists ranking their own schools and teachers as “failing” when test scores were low, which again, was mostly wherever students were poor .
Amid torrents of “blame the teachers” propaganda, so-called “failing schools” were required to hire expensive contractors with cockeyed “run the school like a business” remedies and more crackpot tests. Thus it was that NCLB s pawned almost overnight an entire industry of jackleg educational consultants and test suppliers guaranteed a market with dollars diverted from already tight public school budgets. Those industries attracted capital investors, and began doing what every other industry does in the US—make big campaign contributions to politicians to get sweeter contracts and more favorable regulation. When test scores still didn’t rise, NCLB required many schools to close, making openings for chains of charter schools, often highly profitable charter schools, bringing the blessings of “choice” and free market competition to the educational “marketplace.”
It was an unequal sort of “competition” though, because charter schools have always been allowed to pick and choose their students, to turn away those with special needs, and to hire teachers and principals with little or no relevant training.
Now look you all know that I am a huge supporter of President Obama, but instead of doing away with the damaging policies of George Bush he seemed to only make them worse. Something I never thought was even possible.
Part of the problem is that it seems that the President has allowed the Republicans to define the conversation, and keep the focus on standardized test results that do NOT indicate actual student progress nor take into account poverty levels, learning disabilities, or cultural background.
And it has to STOP!
I can hear it now, "But Gryphen don't we WANT to get rid of bad teachers and under performing schools? And don't charter school and school vouchers offer us a viable alternative, and a way to force public schools to clean up their act?"
NO I don't, and NO they don't!
If you are one of the people who thinks like that perhaps you don't fully recognize the REAL agenda behind why the conservatives push for those two options so aggressively.
Here perhaps this report will open your eyes a little:
So far, I have documented 310 schools, in nine states and the District of Columbia that are teaching creationism, and receiving tens of millions of dollars in public money through school voucher programs.
There is no doubt that there are hundreds more creationist voucher schools that have yet to be identified. The more than 300 schools I have already found are those that have publicly stated on their websites that they teach creationism or use creationist curricula.
There are hundreds more voucher schools, across the country, that are self-identified Christian academies, that appear very similar in philosophy to the ones I’ve identified in my research as teaching creationism. These schools may not blatantly advertise that they teach creationism on their websites, or often don’t even have a website, but there is a good chance that hundreds more voucher schools are also teaching our children creationism. Some states, Arizona and Mississippi, haven’t even released lists of schools participating in their voucher programs for the public to audit.
Here are a few highlights from creationist voucher schools I have identified:
- The Beverly Institute in Jacksonville, Florida, teaches “Evidence of a Flood,” and “Evidence against Evolution,” and ”The Evolution of Man: A Mistaken Belief.”
- Creekside Christian Academy in McDonough, Georgia says,“The universe, a direct creation of God, refutes the man-made idea of evolution. Students will be called upon to see the divine order of creation and its implications on other subject areas.
- Life Christian Academy in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma says their life science class will “lead the student to recognize that God created all living things and that these living things are fearfully and wonderfully made.” Evolution is taught only in history class, where students “evaluate the theory of evolution and its flaws.” The school uses the creationist Bob Jones and CSI curriculums.
- The principal of the Claiborne Christian School, in West Monroe, Louisiana, says in a school newsletter, “Our position at CCS on the age of the Earth and other issues is that any theory that goes against God’s Word is in error.” She also claims that scientists are “sinful men” trying to explain the world “without God” so they don’t have to be “morally accountable to Him.”
- Trinity Academy, in Gary, uses the creationist A Beka curriculum and says it “presents the universe as the direct creation of God and refutes the man-made idea of evolution.”
- Rocky Bayou Christian School, in Niceville, Florida, says in its section on educational philosophy, “God mandates that children be discipled for Christ. They must be trained in the biblical world view which honors Jehovah, the sovereign Creator of the universe. It recognizes that man was created in the image of God” and says “Man is presumed to be an evolutionary being shaped by matter, energy, and chance… God commands His people not to teach their children the way of the heathen.”
- Wisconsin Lutheran High School, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, says in its biology syllabus that it teaches, “evolutionists are ‘stuck’ because they have no god, therefore they must believe in evolution” and “young earth evidence a disaster to evolutionists.”
Advocates for vouchers argue that private schools and more competition would offer a better education for American students. Schools that teach creationism and do not meet basic science standards will fail our students and do not deserve taxpayer funding.
This is NOT about providing our children the best possible education, it is about protecting Christianity in America, and about making sure that our children are not educated enough to become confident critical thinkers.
By pushing the idea of alternative schools the advocates for charter schools and voucher programs are able to bypass that whole separation of church and state thing that keeps faith out of the science classroom, and introduce ideas like "America was founded as a Christian nation," or "slavery was a good thing for the black man," or "The Native American people welcomed us with open arms and gave up their land freely," and my new favorite "Prohibition was a liberal idea." (I literally heard that last one on Glenn Beck's radio show yesterday. Just in case you think he is right.)
In a charter school the Bible can easily become an alternate replacement for the science textbook, conservative points of view become the alternative to historical facts, and human reproduction is a lesson you learn the hard way in a car parked behind the library.
What's more is that these schools are run like a business, where profit is more important than pupils, where cheap and easy replaces costly and comprehensive, and where test scores are a product produced by underage workers in minimally educational sweatshops.
Now you know I would never call the President out like this if I did not have the strongest possible feelings on this topic, and I believe me I fucking do!
I am with him all the way when it comes to doing something about gun control, I am totally in his corner about reforming our health care system, I will defend him until my last breath as he works to get us out of Afghanistan, but I simply cannot sign on to this Race to the Top program.
President Obama brought those children out onstage with him to help sell the idea of firmer gun control policies. I would have him look at them again and realize that protecting their bodies is only PART of his responsibilities to them. They also desperately need him to protect their access to a good education, and their hopes for the future.
And the time to act is now, because for a generation of our children it is already too late.
You don't want to rationally get rid of bad, under-performing teachers?
ReplyDeleteREALLY?????????
If the litmus test for determining who is, or who is not, a bad teacher relies on standardized test scores than no I don't want to simply get rid of them.
DeleteYes there are bad teachers in the world, but they need to be evaluated in a case by case manner, and not simply cut loose due to poor student scores on a standardized test.
Gryphen, maybe you should republish the article you did about the teacher who quit and read his statement on YouTube(?). It may help this individual understand what it is you are saying.
Delete"Bad , under-performing" teachers? Where to begin. It's interesting to note that students academic success is closely tied with the educational level of their parents. There are good reasons for this. Blaming teachers is a cop out. Parents with little education are the same ones who value education very little, thus their lack thereof. And no, this is not simple economics. I had kids when I was very young and I was very poor. My kids got a good education because I gave a shit. I was involved. They had the Stanford reading list for incoming Freshmen in High School. They were required to read after homework rather than watching the tellie. My kids are adults and they still read and they think.
DeleteNow I'll tell you a story about bad teachers. We moved when my daughter was still in HS to a very crappy state, one that's notorious for shit schools. My daughter went to school every day to witness kids who refused to open their books when the teacher asked, refused to take out earbuds when the teacher asked, had kids (majority) by age 15. They also didn't much graduate and had shitty test scores. The teachers, frustrated, routinely resorted to reading aloud the assigned readings because the kids refused to read. Tests? They tossed them on the floor as often as not. Do you think, perchance, that it was shitty teachers that made that happen. Think again. Teachers repeatedly told my daughter that the parents often told them "I don't go no education and I'm fine." Outlaw shitty parents and you'll do a hell of a lot more to improve the schools.
Every time I hear the whole "bad teachers" canard I'm reminded why I was not terribly interested after college in going into education.
Charter schools are designed to do exactly one thing: take money from education and transfer it to private entities for profit. Period.
Mexmer, I have to agree with you - AND disagree. Most of what you say is quite true. It is NOT - in most cases - the teacher's fault.
DeleteI have to blame the parents, yes, for their failure to instill respect into their own children; failure to participate in the education of their kids; failure to stand up to lousy school boards who don't give a damn about the success of the children in their care. I could go on and on, as most of us could.
I have to blame the school boards for not standing up to little Johnny's parents when he is a proven disruption and not disciplining him. (I have to say, though, that some of what the school boards do to enforce discipline is totally WRONG!) Throw him in a special class for fuck-ups like they used to do. There are lots of problems.
But did you not catch Gryphen stating that each should be judged on a "case by case basis"?
I have to say that if you were lucky enough to have NO bad teachers, then my hat is off to you and I have to say you are among a VERY tiny minority. There have always been bad teachers. There are now. There probably always will be. I personally had at least a dozen while I was going through public school and most of my peers had the same. No,it wasn't due to the education level of our parents, or a lack of respect for teachers. It wasn't even a poor school board!
I graduated from high school in 1966 and our town's high school was in the top ten of our entire state! Not the top ten percent. The top TEN. Why? Because our parents DEMANDED it. Most of them worked for DuPont and seriously participated in making our school system superior to anything THEY had as kids. And STILL we had bad teachers.
To be fair, sometimes it isn't the teacher's fault directly. They may have been placed in sections of the student body for which they weren't fully qualified. Or they may have been one of the few who were not really teachers even though they passed the tests and got hired. Some people just can't teach - at least, not in public schools. They may be better qualified to teach in college or even industry.
Does that make them bad teachers? If they are in public schools, then yes. If you can't do the work....
Then there are those who were really, REALLY good at taking tests and easily passed their boards, but didn't really know the subject(s) they were teaching. Were they bad teachers? Some were. And some went on to create the crapy system we have today which teaches how to pass tests instead of knowing the material!
"In my day", if a student didn't do the work and couldn't demonstrate a working knowledge of a subject, he or she was FAILED. Period. Fail enough courses and they were held back! I, personally, find the practice of advancing little Johnny to keep from bruising his little ego a miscarriage of education. It degrades the efforts of those who DID the work. And it also teaches him that failure to do the work is not a problem. Well, that doesn't do him a DAMN bit of good when he gets fired for not being able to do the work or not even hired because he couldn't prove it.
What is he going to do when that happens and he has a pregnant wife at home?
No, better to teach him early on that a lack of effort causes problems than get him used to "getting by" and slamming him at a seriously bad time in his life.
Is there a single answer? No. There never is to difficult problems. But denying something is a problem will PREVENT correction.
I am happy for your children. But I have to say that your statistical sampling (like mine with my personal experience) is far too limited to preclude the judgement that there are bad teachers.
I work as a parapro with bands in my district. We have Band and Orchestra Festival in early March (we used to do mid-March, but required state testing made us bump everything up two weeks, because they use the band rooms for testing, and so the bands and orchestras can't meet for four entire days. Can you imagine a basketball team getting bumped from their practice time the week before district tournaments?) Anyway, a LOT of the smaller schools are choosing not to participate and give their students this wonderful opportunity to practice hard and then get comments from judges because schools have tied ratings at these things to a teacher's job performance. Yes, a teacher in a tiny district with a 40 piece band of very happy and well-adjusted kids, but whose band may be unbalanced due to lack of funding for big brass instruments, oboes, and percussion equipment, and who gets a 2 instead of a 1, can cause their band director to be fired. Because who needs abnd class when there is creationism to be taught?
ReplyDeleteOh, great another so called liberal who spends their time complaining about what the President has or has not done. I swear this people must be deaf and dumb. Don't they have any idea what has been going on in the past couple months since the President was reelected? Perhaps they do and really just don't care.
ReplyDeleteThank you. You posted my thoughts. These so-called liberals did not even go after Bush the way they go after President Obama, and they literally kissed Reagan's rightwing ass.
DeleteBut they think President Obama is supposed to be their water boy.
Yet, some things he has accomplished are more than what any president in US history has accomplished.
I don't think you read what Jesse had to say. He has been a consistent backer of Mr. Obama. That doesn't mean Mr. Obama is perfect and we must bow down and worship him because we are liberals. Liberals tend to be free thinkers, not "bots" following our leader slavishly. Therefore, we tend to cheer our leader on and take him to task when we think he is wrong.
DeleteElizabeth 44
Gryphen said......"Now look you all know that I am a huge supporter of President Obama, but instead of doing away with the damaging policies of George Bush he seemed to only make them worse. Something I never thought was even possible."
ReplyDeleteThat's because Obama is part of the system, Gryphen. When will you figure that out. The Dems who control the party and the Republicans who control that party are all part of the team using government to enslave the people. You think you have a meaningful choice. That's the funny part.
How is Obama different than Bush other than superficially? Bush wanted a bailout, Obama pushed it through. Bush wanted domestic spying. Obama increased it. Bush started drone assassinations. Obama increased them. The Republicans wanted public education destroyed. The downturn continues under Obama. Bush attacked the Constitution with the "war on Terror and Patriot Act". And now Obama is attacking the Second Amendment.
American voters are short sighted sheep. They need to take the country back from the politicians.
I agree with a lot of what you have to say, but being that we are a Democracy, where only our votes count in the "system" how do we actually "take our country back from the politicians"?
DeleteYou have to realize that only a certain egocentric, narcissistic type person runs for office. How do we change that? Even those that were not flawed at the outset become jaded and cynical once receiving the votes that place them in office.
I went a long time without actually voting, for anything, local or national, but then realized that I guess the only thing I could do was make my voice heard through voting, but yeah, we are generally just voting in people that really couldn't care less about us or our country.
It's a sick system where our politicians are purchased by the highest bidder and that highest bidder most often is not the actual public they are elected to serve, but what to do? Move? I don't know, but compared to some other places, like those that we attack with drones and send armed troops to fight over their oil, I guess America really is the most comfortable place to live.
We're on top, and I guess I'd rather be in a broken America than some third world shithole that we are drone-attacking. It's the best that there is and if you care enough about your kids you'll send them to private school, if you can't afford it, then your kids are fucked.
I really feel that President Obama has done so much for our nation, and all while being pushed against every step of the way. It's been beyond difficult for him to do what he's done so far. This last weekend I was able to see two friends of mine (one in the military, one ex-military) finally have their marriage recognized.
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying to ignore education or to just be happy with what's been done so far (passed health care reform, ended the war in Iraq, turned around the auto industry, repealed DADT, eliminated Osama Bin Laden, passed Wall Street reform, reversed Bush torture policies, increased fuel efficiency standards, etc), but in terms of education Obama's first term was focused more on college-aged students. Improving the nutrition in the lunchroom and expanding children's health care was pretty much the extent of helping school-aged children in terms of education.
Most recently I've heard he's focusing on the gun violence issues (I was so happy to hear he's putting effort towards furthering mental health help) and immigration reform. But with all he's accomplished in the last four years, I'm sure education will be up there too.
You have to be a grown up...be realistic how long it takes to change things...there are so many changes because of Obama that effect people now, good changes like healthcare, gay rights, now gun control. My goodness, do you remember what he walked in to? In 4 years he has kept a million balls in the air and managed to do amazing things, now ending 2 friggin wars and killing Bin Laden. No other person on earth knows what he knows, carries the burden he does...so education, I agree needs help. What about his cabinet? That's what a good leader does...appoint people expert in those areas. There should never be federal tax money going to those religious schools, just as the Mormon and Scientology churches should pay income taxes. Everything starts with the home owners taxes going into the local coffers for education, when the housing bubble burst...there went the money.
ReplyDelete''In Chicago, the home town of the president and his Secretary of Education, the percentage of black teachers has dropped from 45% in 1995 to 19% today.'''
ReplyDeleteIt's not the president's fault black teachers have dropped in Chicago. Is he supposed make blacks become teachers? Of course not, that is a personal choice for someone to decide to become a teacher.. People want to blame everything on this president.
'''The election is over Mr. President, so no more pussy footing around, it's time to talk education. You have some explaining to do!''
ReplyDeleteThe president is criticized for things that no other president has been criticized for. Yet he has done a better job. This president has many hats to wear, and he has done a great job, more than his critics could ever do.
Anchorage school district's new superintendent is cutting another $25 million from the budget. This guy is a bean counter disguised as an educator.
ReplyDelete