Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Time Magazine's new cover is going to make conservative heads explode all over the country.
Courtesy of Time Lightbox:
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases that will determine the fate of same-sex marriage in America.
The court’s decision won’t come for months, but regardless of how the justices rule, David Von Drehle’s new cover story chronicles how, thanks to a massive shift in public opinion, gay marriage went from inconceivable to inevitable in less than two decades.
To illustrate Von Drehle’s story, TIME invited same-sex couples in California and New York to share some intimate moments for photographer Peter Hapak. Two of these couples, Sarah Kate and Kristen Ellis-Henderson (married in 2011) and Russell Hart and Eric LaBonté (engaged since 2010), appear on our cover this week. (Newsstand editions will be divided between issues featuring the Ellis-Hendersons and those featuring Hart and LaBonté.)
You know what? People are just going to have to get used to it.
They're queer and they're here!
(And do you know what? They always have been!)
By the way do you remember how I wrote in my piece covering Mark Begich coming out in favor of marriage equality that the really BIG news would be when our other Senator Lisa Murkowski also came out in support? Well it looks like that very thing might be on the horizon:
"The term 'evolving view' has been perhaps overused, but I think it is an appropriate term for me to use," Murkowski said, according to the Chugiak-Eagle River Star. The senior Alaska senator has previously expressed opposition to gay nuptials.
She added that her state may ultimately revisit the issue at some point and that she's evaluating her own position "very closely." In 1998, Alaska passed a constitutional amendment that defined marriage as between one man and one woman.
"It may be that Alaska will come to revisit its position on gay marriage, and as a policy maker I am certainly revieiwing that very closely," Murkowski said.
Murkowski seemed to suggested that her two young sons have inspired her to moderate on same-sex marriage — emblematic of the views held by most young Americans on the issue.
"I've got two young sons who, when I ask them and their friends how they feel about gay marriage, kinda give me one of those looks like, 'Gosh mom, why are you even asking that question?'" she said.
It's always the young people dragging their parents toward the future isn't it?
I think this leaves virtually no doubt that Murkowski will soon jump on board. Which then kind of makes me think we will soon see a real change in how other conservative Alaskan politicians deal with gay marriage, and gay rights, as well.
My guess is that soon they will simply have no choice but to support marriage equality, which could signal the end of Jerry Prevo's influence in Alaska politics and his ability to marginalize the LGBT community in Anchorage and beyond.
So though it is not my usual position I am really pulling for Murkowski to make the right decision here. As our VP would say, it is "a big fucking deal!"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My dad is as conservative as they get, yet he says why can't gay people suffer like the rest of us married people do? I love my dad.
ReplyDeleteDetective Lenny Briscoe (Jerry Orbach) also said it once quite a few years ago on "Law & Order." His zinger went like this, "Why not let them get married; then, they can be as miserable as us."
DeleteIt will be fun to watch Murkowski (for whom I've never voted!) become pro as to the issue. I suspect Alaska, as a whole, might be another story. We are majority Republican at this point, have a gov (Parnell) that is more than likely against the issue as might be the heads in the Alaska Legislature.
ReplyDeleteAnchorage also has the Baptist Church (Prevo) that had it's congregation come out in full force against gays a few years ago (appeared before the Anchorage Assembly). They will do so again if given the opportunity. Vote Tim Steele - Honaman and Traini in the upcoming election - we badly need them seated on the Assembly!
It's going to be a fight in Alaska! We have a good start w/Mark Begich recently coming out in favor of the issue. Thank you, Mark!
Ms Lisa, like most of the elected, has her finger in the air, trying to find out which way the wind is blowing. That's her "evolution."
DeleteBingo hrh
DeleteCourage is rare in politics. Political expediency is nothing to brag about, but even if the band-wagon jumpers are late to the party, let's let em in anyway.
DeleteI still like them a hell of a lot better than the fake family-values crowd that is praying for an asteroid to hit everyone but them for not wanting to burn all teh gays at the stake.
BBB
And don't forget to write in Nick Moe for Assembly ... instead of voting for Ernie Hall. Write in Nick's name and don't forget to fill in the bubble!!
Deletesorry O/T The NRA Is Complaining That People Are Accurately Reporting About The Newtown Shooter From Police Documents
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-adam-lanza-warrants-documents-nancy-2013-3#ixzz2Os6xpHOF
I'll throw this oth O/T here too,
DeleteDr Gina Louden (isn't she a Palin co-hort?) will be on Wife Swap
http://www.examiner.com/article/dr-gina-goes-out-on-a-limb-fights-culture-wars-receives-lots-of-support
For me, personally, the entire aspect of marriage is anachronistic. However, as I get older, and having been with a the same person for 20 years, I sometimes feel that perhaps we should legally justify our union, only for those reasons of having the right to visit each other in hospital should one of us fall ill, or more immediate resolution of jointly held assets in the case that one of us should pass away. We share "power of attorney" on each other but sometimes a marriage certificate will facilitate the legal wrangling one must go through to secure the deceased's assets. Other than that, we'd never jointly file taxes as it is not financially beneficial, and basically we are joined spiritually and have seen no need to "justify" our union through marriage.
ReplyDeleteHopefully you've consulted an attorney about estate planning. In most states, a Power of Attorney ceases to exist upon the death of the grantor and cannot be used for financial transactions.
Delete"This week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases that will determine the fate of same-sex marriage in America."
ReplyDeletePretty sure how this will be decided. Gays are pretty good at "oral" arguments.
Heteros are pretty good at oral too. I speak from experience both on the giving and receiving end :-)
DeleteWell gee thanks for making this weird.
DeleteThat's what weird people do.
DeleteOkay, Gryphen & hrh, call me crazy, but.. Wierd makes me self-conscious.
DeleteYay for marriage equality!
ReplyDeleteBoo to Time for making the two women kissing look like a perv's lesbian porn fantasy.
Wrong! I am a perv and that is nothing like I imagine it.
DeleteJust saying.
OK, point taken! But why aren't the guys mouths' open while they're kissing? I guess that's my real beef. It's as if they're saying two ladies together = titillation whilst two guys together = ewwwwwww. Time is pandering.
DeletePS Thanks for the response!
I don't want to see a guy kissing a guy or a gal. Even if it's a picture of ME, I don't want to see a pic of me kissing a guy or a gal. If I were a woman, I would definitely either be gay, or if that didn't work out for me, I'd be so nerdy that guys wouldn't take a second look. It might be misogyny or something repressed way back in my subconscious idle brain area, but there is nothing hotter than seeing two good looking babes kissing or even right before they make contact.
DeleteOn the other hand, I don't want to see older folks of either sex giving one another a tongue bath. But now that I think about it, a couple of cougars hot on the prowl would be pretty awesome, too.
We get it, 7:06. You can stop telling us how completely and utterly heterosexual you are.
DeleteStop gay marriage
ReplyDeleteImpeach the Kenyan Muslim Marxist
TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY
Sarah Palin to win in 2016
Only in your dreams. little troll.
Delete@anon 2:45 PM Right on, Comrade! At the top of this page, you'll see a Pay Pal button. The more you give, the better your chances to stop gay marriage, impeach everyone, and take back your country. Double your contribution to IM's Pay Pal, and maybe Sarah will run in 2016. She can't win if she doesn't run. Don't forget. Give generously to IM and your dreams just may come true.
DeletePoor Rush has a sad...
ReplyDeleteLimbaugh Gives Up On Anti-Gay Marriage Fight: ‘This Issue Is Lost,’ ‘It Is Now Inevitable’
On his radio show this afternoon, Rush Limbaugh seemed to wave the white flag over his opposition to same-sex marriage. “This issue is lost,” he said. “It is now inevitable” that gay marriage will come to pass, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules on two separate cases related to the issue.
“We lost the issue when we started allowing the word ‘marriage’ to be bastardized and redefined,” Limbaugh explained, pointing the finger at “the left,” whom he believes has attempted to co-opt the word “marriage” to go beyond its definition.
“Once you decide to modify the word marriage then the other side has won,” he lamented. “The best thing that marriage had going for it was basically what they teach you the first day in law school: If you hang on a horse the sign that says ‘Cow,’ it does not make it a cow.”
“Although today it might,” he added. “And that’s where we are today.”
Limbaugh went on to dismiss the notion that anti-LGBT discrimination plays any role in the same-sex marriage fight: “Discrimination is not an issue and never was. No one sensible is against giving homosexuals the rights of contract, or inheritance, or hospital visits. There’s nobody that wants to deny them that. The issue has always been denying them a status that they can’t have by definition.”
“And by definition,” he concluded, “same sex people cannot be married.”
Listen below:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/limbaugh-gives-up-on-anti-gay-marriage-fight-this-issue-is-lost-it-is-now-inevitable/
And HOW many times has HE been married???
DeleteThe only reason I can imagine anyone marrying him is for his money, although NO amount of cash could convince me to live with that disgusting piece of garbage.
Did he really just claim that we're "allowing the word ‘marriage’ to be bastardized"???
Yeah, Rush Limbaugh is the perfect spokesperson for the sanctity of marriage. Hah!
It's a shame we'll have to wait so long for the rulings. I'm anxious to see what the devout will have to say when western civilization doesn't end when marriage equality comes to pass.
ReplyDelete"To illustrate Von Drehle’s story, TIME invited same-sex couples in California and New York to share some intimate moments for photographer Peter Hapak."
ReplyDeleteWhat some people call "work" is beyond me!
Good for Lisa. I'm impressed she's going about it the right way, it gives me hope for others in the GOP and some Democrats up for re election in red leaning states.
Don't count on Lisa until she votes. She has a way of floating appeasement and then falling in line with the ugliest positions of the GOP when the time comes to make a stand.
ReplyDelete