Okay so "The Brick Bible" was published in 2011 by Brendan Powell Smith as a fun method for telling Biblical stories in a new and interesting manner.
Here is how it is described over at Amazon:
Brendan Powell Smith has spent the last decade creating nearly 5,000 scenes from the bible--with Legos. His wonderfully original sets are featured on his website thebricktestament.com, but for the first time 1,400 photographs of these creative designs--depicting the Old Testament from Earth's creation to the Books of Kings--are brought together in book format. The Holy Bible is complex; sometimes dark, and other times joyous, and Smith's masterful work is a far cry from what a small child might build. The beauty of The Brick Bible is that everyone, from the devout to nonbelievers, will find something breathtaking, fascinating, or entertaining within this collection. Smith's subtle touch brings out the nuances of each scene and makes you reconsider the way you look at Legos--it's something that needs to be seen to be believed.
And here are some of the illustrations.
Nice right? Wrong!
At least wrong according to certain Christian parents who have gone to Amazon in order to complain that the book is not censored to their liking.
Such as this one:
Is this being advertised as a children's book?
I flipped through this in a local bookstore, found very adult themed lego pictures>
such as sex and violence.
NOT FOR KIDS
shameful book this is - no warning label or nothing.
And this one:
I bought this book in the store thinking that it would be a cute way to introduce the bible to my kids until I got it home. I started looking through the book and they the pictures were very inapproiate for children. They were very graphic with blood and violence that a child should not see done with toys. While the pictures in this book were created by legos this book is diffently not for children.
And this one:
I bought both the old and new testament versions of these books because my kids are big lego fans. I understand all topics covered in the Bible aren't G rated, but I'm not ready to discuss rape and similar topics with my children.
Or this one, who claims to be somewhat of an expert:
I bought these books for my Lego-fanatic son for Christmas, thinking this was a perfect marriage of Bible exposure and his beloved Legos. When I picked it up to read it however, it was quickly apparent that it was not Biblically sound, and many of the images (and implied narrative) were inappropriate for children or plain incorrect.
I understand the Bible is bloody, and there is more gore and murder in the Bible than most books ever printed, which is not my quarrel with the Brick Bibles. I do not shield my older children from those aspects, so that characteristic of the books did not bother me too much (with the exception that I do not think rape should be depicted in Lego bricks). What did bother me is the use of Legos images to imply large amounts of information that dissuade the reader from the actual lessons within the Bible--if I were unfamiliar with the Bible, I know I would not follow such a whacked-out perpetually angry, tantrum of a God portrayed here. Who would? There was little to no forgiveness, very little love, and a distinct lack of explanation of the gravity of sin (or what the sins entailed) as the reason for the carnage in some of the stories.
The text is spare, so the images tell the story. Unfortunately, the pictures--commonly held to be worth a thousand words--do not tell of a greater truth, nor do they tell the story correctly because there is no context. And there are some images that just do not need to be there, like the waist-down naked Lego girl having her legs spread for a virginity check, or the aforementioned rape.
I do not know the author or his religious bent, but I do know inaccuracies (and deception) when I see them. I am trained to recognize and engage in the psychology of marketing and images, and study how they help us to create and order our world. I recognize that this book lacks the integral thread of God's story throughout its disjointed telling, and I recognize the subtle insults to the stories themselves and consequently, to those that believe as a whole.
Parents, before you hand this book over to your child, at least look it over in detail. If you have not purchased it, pass it by--it is not for kids.
And this one:
I was so excited when I saw this book at Sam's club then sadly disappointed in the content when I got it home and actually read it. Glad I did before I gave it to my kids. As other viewers have mentioned, the author is NOT a person with a high regard for the truth of scripture. His main focus is on truthful "parts" of the Old Testament with his primary focus on all that is violence and judgement and depicts God as an angry frowning God. Anyone who values the Bible in its entirety and sees scripture as the story of a holy and loving God who works his perfect will for the redemption of mankind, should bypass this cynical and lopsided viewpoint. It is definitely not presented in a child- appropriate manner.
At this point one has to wonder if these people have actually ever READ the Bible. Or if they simply assumed that because it was done in Legos that it would be sanitized for their enjoyment. It is worth noting that the author Brendan Powell Smith does not misrepresent the stories in the Bible, in fact he represents them quite graphically.
He also offers a series aimed directly at children, with much less rape and torture.
But hey a true Christian should be able to accept the Bible in its entirety, AND have the patience and faith to explain it to their children. Right?
Assholes cannot be placated, don’t put one foot on that path. The whole thing looks kind of fun, go for it, Brick Bible.
ReplyDelete"Anyone who values the Bible in its entirety and sees scripture as the story of a holy and loving God..."
ReplyDeleteActually, no. You pick & choose what you want to read, throwing away the questionable parts and the stuff that makes you squeamish, like infanticide, slavery, & the like. The rest you reinterpret to fit your narrow-minded & parochial view of the world. You weren't forced to read or purchase the book, nor did somebody put a gun to your head and tell you it was imperative to give to your children. Just because it's LEGO doesn't mean it's safe.
In a similar way of thinking, I could construct some rather overt depictions of human sexual equipment using fruit and vegetables, but you wouldn't go and picket the local green-grocer because his bananas are too phallic, or the cantaloupes are too voluptuous.
Puh-leeze.
for most of the old testament god is sort of an angry old white guy yelling "get off my lawn."
DeleteWhat pissed them off? Was there a diarama of Lot doing his daughters?
ReplyDeleteNah! That's way too mild!
DeleteCan't imagine a polite way to illustrate the genocide in the Old Testament.........just sayin'
ReplyDeleteo/t but will rush be forced to apologize to ALL women?
ReplyDeletefrom huffpo:
where the fuck is the outrage from the skank over what rush said today? throwing rape around like a lunatic!!!!!!
from huffpo:
"Every now and then, some lunatic in the group proposes to change the rule to allow women to be raped. But they never were able to get six votes for it. There were always the four women voting against it and they always found two guys.Well, the guy that kept proposing that women be raped finally got tired of it, and he was in the majority and he was one that [said], 'You know what? We're going to change the rule. Now all we need is five." And well, 'you can't do that.' 'Yes we are. We're the majority. We're changing the rule.' And then they vote. Can the women be raped? Well, all it would take then is half of the room. You can change the rule to say three. You can change the rule to say three people want it, it's going to happen."
Clearly the Bible should be removed from all libraries because of the excess of sex and violence it portrays.
ReplyDeleteBut it's just a fictional story like Danielle Steele's books, isn't it?
DeleteBut, of course.
DeleteSo they're OK with rape and murder as long as it's not illustrated?
ReplyDeleteThey offer a "Sanitized" version, and they're still complaining?
ReplyDeleteDon't know what Smith's religious background is. It's safe to assume he's not Catholic, or he would know a bit more about the sources of the various books. I.e., the Pentateuch is composed of a rich tapestry of foundational folklore stories of ancient Canaanite tribes. Studied with care, and with a good teacher proficient in Classical languages (I recommend a Jesuit, Dominican, or Benedictine, in that order) you'll reach one inescapable conclusion: You can't represent a far- and wide-reaching set of books covering the scope of idealized history, mystery, wisdom, and beauty encompassed by the Bible with a set of blocks designed for very young children. For Christ's sake, the impact of the Bible on culture and history has inspired how many thousands of written words, from the divine to the ridiculous? And it doesn't get more ridiculous than this.
ReplyDeleteI expect he's a fundamentalist, evangelical, Pentecostal, nondenominational, or some admixture thereof. (There are thousands of Protestant splinter groups.) Some of these Christian faiths may lose sight of rationality and common sense when they read the Bible. Just think of the young-earthers, e.g., who want creationism taught in schools
In their favor, at least in my city, these groups also operate the most low-barrier homeless shelters. If street people aren't willing to fill out the background screening forms at The Sidewalk intake center, or if they don't pass the background check, there are shelters who will take them in, feed them, and at least let them sleep on the floor with a blanket.
Olympia, WA., Crazy Faith Ministries has set up soup kitchens and shelters to care for anyone in need. Low-barrier, people with serious issues are served without question. Business owners complain, citizens avoid the areas because of public urination, aggressive pan-handling, and so on, but these fringe groups are doing what Jesus would do.
Lego blocks? Even small children are too smart for that.
If Sam's Club bans it, it must be good.
DeleteI seriously doubt he is anything like what you "claim" he must be, you deluded hack.
DeleteDo a Google search before you screed again:
http://www.vendettachristmas.com/
http://brendanpowellsmith.com/
I agree with your entire post. As to the Bible--yes. As to the charitable work--also yes. It was Catholic Charities that stepped in to save the Head Start programs in our city from the sequester.
DeleteSo what? He's not yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater. He enjoys the same freedom of speech we all do.
Delete"the Pentateuch is composed of a rich tapestry of foundational folklore stories of ancient Canaanite tribes."
DeleteThis is why it should not be used to set policy in our society.
OK, i am feeling like a really bad parent.
ReplyDeleteI got my boys the Breaking Bad Meth lab Lego set - not the bible set lol!!!
4:22 for the win.
ReplyDelete4:22 FTW
ReplyDeleteI don't want to say how I got it, but I have this book. I find it incredibly humorous. My friend calls it blasphemy. We both laugh. The author is an atheist according to the google search we did. It is truly amazing how much blood and gore he portrayed with lego. He also cited each photo with the chapter and verse of the Bible that it came from. My take is that he was trying to highlight the hypocrisy of picking and choosing which parts of the Bible that religions emphasize. the outcry against the book proves that point rather well.
ReplyDeleteAs a born again Southern Baptist, am I wrong for being thoroughly amused by the stories illustrated by Brick Bible? It actually made reading the stories of the bible easier to understand especially since you didn't have to figure out all the code words (i.e. so that we can "know" him, spilled his seed, etc.) It's a pretty sick and twisted collection of short stories that demonstrate human nature and human's continuous quest to control it in themselves and others.
ReplyDelete