Sunday, December 15, 2013

Sarah Palin claims she cannot be sued for copyright infringement because the defendant lives in the wrong place. Wait, what?

Courtesy of Deadline:  

The Fox News contributor and former Alaska Governor says a copyright infringement lawsuit against her for use of an iconic photo of the U.S. flag being raised at Ground Zero on September 11 should be tossed out. “A New Jersey Sarah Palin Signs Copies Of Her New Book "Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas"newspaper has chosen New York as the forum to sue defendants located in distant states, based on conduct with no particular connection to this District besides the subject matter of the photograph — a consideration that is irrelevant for purposes of venue,” lawyers for Sarah Palin wrote yesterday (read it here) in a filing in NYC District Court. “Defendants therefore seek dismissal…on the ground of improper venue or, in the alternative, for transfer of this action to an appropriate forum,” the motion memo adds.

Okay I am not a lawyer so I am not completely clear on how the place in which a lawsuit is filed  has any impact on the fact that Palin used a copyrighted photo of firefighters raising the American flag on the ruins of the World Trade Cente, slapped a SarahPAC logo on it, and then posted it to her Facebook page to make money, has any bearing on the fact that she illegally used their product to make money?

Here are the papers that SarahPAC filed, which falsely claim that Palin is a resident of Alaska by the way, so perhaps one of you legal eagles can explain how her argument holds any water.

Palin, as we know, is incredibly slippery when it comes to lawsuits, having wriggled her way out of several in the last five years, so it would be no surprise to see her slither away from this own as well.

P.S. Okay having looked a little harder at the document, it appears that the problem is that the company may have filed the lawsuit in a district in which the company does not have a physical presence. In other words the lawsuit itself is not being addressed, only the legality of where they filed it.

So this is a delaying tactic that SarahPAC hopes will drain the company of resources and convince them to drop the suit, because it appears to me that they have a pretty good case.

I hope that if the court agrees with the venue argument that the North Jersey Media Group refiles and pushes forward. Because SOMEBODY needs to hold this woman accountable for SOMETHING.

220 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:39 AM

    I believe the media group that owns the copyright offices in New York. So they filed in New York. I believe her attorney was arguing in his brief that the suit should have been filed in Alaska. That would be incorrect. I think a judge will rule that the suit was correctly filed in New York State.

    TexasMel

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14 AM

      I agree. That slime bag Tiemessen wants it Alaska where the judges are bought and paid for.

      Delete
    2. In addition, the photograph was taken in New York, so that is also an argument for venue.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Motions like this are very common and almost never work getting a case dismissed. All they are the defense attorneys grasping for straws hoping they can get the case dismissed, but judges seldom dismiss a case unless it'e based on frivolous claims to begin with. Palin's attorney's I'm sure has warned her not to get too excited that her case will not be dismissed.

      I did go over and read some of the comment over at C4P and some sound as if it's a foregone conclusion this will get her case dismissed. I think they will be disappointed when it's not. They'll probably blame the judge for being a Palin hater and is the reason why it wasn't dismissed.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous1:58 PM

      Sarah's use of the photo was nationwide, and not confined to Alaska. Heck, her blog goes around the world. New Jersey, where the owner of the picture, is domiciled, is the appropriate place to file suit, and the court will decide that in short order.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous3:18 PM

      She has been everywhere (except in Libril 'merika) so where does it flippin matter where its filed except of course if the judges are all bough in AK?

      Delete
  2. Anonymous9:45 AM

    God she wears UGLY clothes. Absolutely NO sense of taste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:37 AM

      matches her physical and mental selves - uuuuuGGGGGly.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:13 PM

      I try not to be too negative about Palin's dress or physical appearance because my gripe is more about competence. However the fashion police need to write up some citations on this woman. It wouldn't be too difficult to hire someone say, once a year to help coordinate a wardrobe from "professional" to "casual" and at least look the part of---what is she now?? Political Pundit, Evangelist, Hockey Mom or Failed Republican Rouge?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:42 PM

      She could hire a nutritionist before it is too late for the family.
      December 10, 2013 Another creepy kid pic put up by n a n c y not Bristol.
      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristolpalin/2013/12/whos-on-the-naughty-list/#disqus_thread

      How is Chuck1's health now? Chuck2 was updating and went silent. Nothing for the holiday family time? It is time they revisit the family fitness book and let their fans know their secrets.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:41 PM

      12:42 PM
      last I read here head stalker not so hot. funny why chuckles jr and Sarah went silent on the old perv?

      Delete
    5. Anon 12:42, she needs a psychiatrist more than she needs a nutritionist. Her problems are mental, and obviously being anorexic she needs to be placed in a treatment center for at least 3 months to get her wight back and to help her control her disease. During her treatment, she will also have a nutritionist teach her healthy eating habits, but after she is released it will solely be up to her whether she follows what she's been taught. It is also not uncommon for anorexic's to through many multiple admissions before they can get their problem under control, and if they don't they usually die. I'll bet her family is well aware of her problem, but she refuses to get treatment because she's afraid she'll lose her fans, or what fans she has left, when they learn about her illness which she sees as a weakness.

      I'm betting she get worse before anything happens.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:58 PM

      m baker -
      They all depend on her grifting for their lavish lifestyles, especially now that Bristol is out of the television/reality show business. They can't afford to have her hospitalized or in rehab for any prolonged period of time because the money to SarahPac is dwindling even WITH her constant media presence.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:12 PM

      3:41 PM

      Perv1 didn' fully recover, I guess it is top secret.
      Perv2 has that crazy eye, did he have it fixed?
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2040110/Todd-Palin-file-divorce-advisers-tell-Sarah-White-House-dream-over.html

      Delete
    8. Anonymous6:13 PM

      She needs to be in detox and fed IV.
      She is a drug addict.
      As well as "food issues" what came first the meth or the food issue?

      Delete
  3. Anonymous9:51 AM

    NO WAY DOES PALIN WANT TO HAVE A CASE OUTSIDE OF ALASKA.

    HUGE HEAD. Gaint baby in blanket?

    June 2008. Sarah, Sam and what th...
    http://www.pawneerock.org/wind/wind30.html
    "On the port's viewing deck, I introduced Sam to former Governor Bill Sheffield, who now runs the port. Our present governor, Sarah Palin, was there, too. She had brought her own clutch of kids to see the ships; I overheard her tell Sheffield that she wanted them to understand where things came from."

    Sarah, where did Trig come from?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:53 PM

      She wants the 'fight' in Alaska because she knows she'll be protected there. But, the attorneys filing this on the east coast have done it before and know the ins and outs of the law regarding this matter.

      I sincerely hope they nail her ass and take her for as much as they can cuz I think she's gonna lose! She'll be in big boy country with the big, big attorney firms and I suspect they know what they are doing!

      Clean her stinking clock guys!!!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:57 PM

      where Trig came from
      http://treeofmamre.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/sarah-palins-complete-letter-to-her-family-about-trig/

      Delete
    3. Anonymous2:07 PM

      Anon @12:57 PM

      Laughable... what a bunch of hooey. The delusions are strong at 'The Tree of Mamre'. 'Unapologetically untethered from reality' should be the byline at that site.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:52 PM

      ROTFLMAO!!!!

      Satire?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:48 PM

      It's just funny how you treat them like they're celebs when they dont consider themselves even famous. You all need lives.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous7:37 PM

      They are criminals. The word is infamous, not famous.Has beens, wants to be Snooki or Kim fame. Some of it is just entertainment. A sense of humor helps. Enjoy, I am sure that is why you are here, for some laughs.

      Delete
  4. Is 'discovery' open to all questions, or is it too soon to let our hopes rise...?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:49 PM

      discovery is limited to the case.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous9:57 AM

    Maybe somebody could help me out. How does she keep the wigs on her head when they are in an updo? Or is this the only time we see real hair? Sure seems to be a huge hairline that runs to her ear but I would think that she would be scared as hell to wear a wig onto a plane and she is at the airport in this picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:16 PM

      Krazy glue, get it? Ha ha

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:32 PM

      LOL!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:05 PM

      3:16 -
      I know you were joking, but you might be closer to the truth than you think.

      There is a special theatrical glue that is used to hold on all sorts of hair pieces, prosthetic features and facial hair.

      There's also special tape that's used by models and other performers to prevent 'wardrobe malfunctions'. Either of those could probably be used to keep her fake hair on her empty head.

      She probably is familiar with one or both from her pageant days and from the 2008 campaign.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:00 PM

      Wow! She really is shrinking away to nothing. Her head looks ginormous!
      M from MD

      Delete
    5. Anonymous7:41 PM

      Sarah had a professional photographer take that pic. You would think they would have made the head smaller.

      They did fool me at first. I actually thought that pro just took a random pic at the airport. Turns out she works for another hoax artist. The Pioneer Woman.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous10:04 AM

    I'm making some assumptions:
    Anyone filing a copyright infrngement against Sarah Palin has hired good attorneys familiar with the law. It's not the kind of think you go to the general practitioner for.
    Anyone familiar and experienced with copyright law knows the rules about venue, which can be complex and confusing.
    I'm guessing that there is sufficient nexus for the suit to be filed in NY. that's just a gut reaction. Maybe my assumptions are wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:34 PM

      Another assumption or two
      And anyone protecting an iconic picture from the media, has good lawyers, especially if all proceeds are going to charity. Good people/lawyers will come forward to aid the cause if necessary. I wouldn't be surprised to learn all representation on this case is pro bono too.

      Sarah's lawyers aren't so smart if they are arguing her residence is in Alaska! ????

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:07 PM

      12:34 -
      Didn't I see something posted recently about her NOT being on the Permanent Fund list? Couldn't her absence from the list be used as evidence that she's not a resident?

      Delete
  7. Anonymous10:08 AM

    Cork wedgies in the winter is inappropriate and a fashion faux pas.
    And she's wearing the sunglasses indoors again..
    Politico has a piece today on a true lady-Caroline Kennedy.
    Of course, the notright wing is going cuckoo.
    Ambassador Kennedy would never appear anywhere
    in dirty jeans, big wigs , low cut blouses with inappropriate cleavage ,
    sunglasses indoors, hooker footwear , too short skirts , tacky jewelry, etc.
    In other words, Palin's usual attire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29 AM

      Sunglasses indoors... Eyes are light sensitive, and she does not want anyone to see her pupils, which would convey that she is on drugs...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:49 AM

      Love your comment. So true!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:59 AM

      That photo at top was from last June when she and Todd were in Republic, Washington and she spoke to graduates. "You gotta get off your butt to make a buck". Todd - I wish I knew how to quit you.- was saving a buck by wearing his fav dirty wrinkled shirt, the one he slept in over and over. You know, have you seen Todd? He just can't quit that shirt.
      https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/942211_10151644824058588_1067508685_n.jpg

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2343492/Shes-Palin-appearance-Fox-says-Bloomberg-treating-New-Yorkers-like-babies.html

      https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/935337_10151644823903588_997732718_n.jpg

      Palin Honors HS Grads. in Town that Helped Her Dad 49 Yrs. Ago
      http://conservatives4palin.com/tag/chuck-heath-sr

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:26 AM

      Sarah Palin has no cleavage to show, and I'm not sure I've ever seen any on her. Low tops, but not cleavage. Perhaps a bit of me-vage......

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:41 AM

      10:29

      plus the inbred skank's fukin' crosseyed

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:43 AM

      Willow stayed home. She isn't doing the geyser top.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous10:09 AM

    Fuck Sarah Palin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:31 PM

      Literally that's what some horny old men would like to do. ;-)

      Delete
  9. Anonymous10:13 AM

    Damn! Sarah Palin sure is aging fast.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:25 PM

      Pretty scary to put side by side pics of '08 and now. That's what all that underlying bitterness and jealousy will foment. She truly thought she was Queen Esther and, when she found out she wasn't and God was slammin' those doors shut, she wouldn't take no for an answer. Someone needs to get her psychiatric help and FAST before she's pushing up daisies.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:25 PM

      All you grown ups projecting Sarah's health care. She is healthy with old lady arms.
      This is what an aging skinny woman looks like.
      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gLzzwqDIrQ4/Uq4Qwtzi8iI/AAAAAAAAEdY/ZbdgeYU8in8/s1600/palin+armed.JPG

      http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/FFN_Palin_Sarah_MIGUELFF_ROCSTARFF_EXCL_100712_50909696.jpg

      This is what an addict looks like
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2368671/Is-proof-Cory-Monteiths-heroin-addiction-stems-year-Pictures-2012-appear-needle-marks-arm.html

      See the difference? People inject all types of things, including botox.
      http://www.sciencephoto.com/image/268292/350wm/M3720032-Injection_tracking_marks_on_arm_of_heroin_addict-SPL.jpg
      People inject other drugs. Think Botox. It is not only heroin and they don't all look like the end stages of meth teeth.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:12 PM

      riiiiight Concern Trollie and "the check's in the mail" might work 4 c4p but not here.
      FLOTUS is the one to look for ARMSs and a healthy mind and body not Sarah snorts...
      sry!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:58 PM

      LOOK AT THAT. She is a drug addict that needs a loving family and intervention. ASAP.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous10:20 AM

    skank's gonna loose this one - hope it's also the straw that breaks her humped boney back

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10:25 AM

    Every TIME I see pics of her, I just HOOT at the fact that she wanted to be Ivana Trump and this is her version of HAWT and worldly. . Just LOOK at her!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous10:31 AM

    A) she is NOT a resident of Alaska
    B) she has been seen in NJ and NY (Faux Noise has their offices there)
    ERGO she can be sued in either one of those states.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:46 PM

      You are stupid if you think you can claim that.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:36 PM

      The proof is the PFD stats for the last 2 years. Palin's name is not on it. Therefore she is NOT living in Alaska.
      I Hope both the plaintiff & Defendants know this for a fact.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:01 PM

      You aren't forced to file for a PFD, it's optional. You'd think the grifter would go for it, but maybe she realized it'd be seen in poor taste for a muli-millione who

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:16 PM

      6:46 : pray tell what are you smoking???
      I am not CLAIMING anything. I am simply stating FACTS.
      Learn the difference before spouting nonsense next time.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous10:37 AM

    My god she looks homely in that picture. She must not have her usual pancake makeup on. And I wonder what those hooves smell like. I thought black made a person look thinner. She looks huge. Time to lose a few, bitch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:28 PM

      I think that's an old photo. The woman has no thighs, and in those pants, it's obvious that she does. i think someone's been reading posts calling her a scarecrow, so she hustled up this photo.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:57 PM

      that is an old pic - skank's grotesquely obese in that pic, moreso than she is now, particularly those short stubby thighs, she just needs to keep workin' it ... another 30lbs dropped and she'll be very swank and svelte

      Delete
    3. Anonymous1:18 PM

      That is an old picture from 'Trust God and Sarah Palin'. June of this year at the airport. Seattle. Gazing at a restaurant menu.

      She does look short and heavy in those bell bottoms. She must be staring at the dessert menu, what goes with vodka and Red Bull.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:11 PM

      It still amuses me how she struts around like she's the shit. I just cannot stop laughing ala GinaM style.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:04 PM

      she looks homely in that picture.....

      10:37 AM Homely? What is wrong with you? Above is one of her model poses. Since when does she look like that in a random shot? Granted she isn't working it like she did in Vegas or NYC, but she was working it.
      (Thursday, Dec. 12, 2013 SMOKIN' HOT YOGI PALIN POSE)
      http://us4palin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/SarahPalinSouthPointBJLVNB_t653.jpg

      Above it even looks like she will dine out, and not eat junk food. That is astounding for her.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous6:46 PM

      Jealous? She looks normal

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:45 PM

      o yeah, we always wanted that big head scrawny look. ROTFLMAO

      When lost for words go with the sos 6:46 PM it is proof of brain death.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous8:38 PM

      Normal to a cult member is not the same as to the rest of the world.

      Delete
  14. Jurisdiction of Copyright Infringement - possible the jurisdiction should be NJ?



    http://faculty.ist.psu.edu/bagby/432Spring12/T15/jurisdiction.html

    ReplyDelete
  15. I would assume that this is not the first time that the photo copyright holder has had to file suit against people living in a wide variety of places who appropriate the photo without attribution or permission for their own gain.

    So I would also be inclined to believe that the copyright holder knows where and how to file a claim. Palin's chickenshit lawyer? Not so much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:02 AM

      If her lawyer has nothing he will delay anyway he can.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:50 PM

      I suppose. I'm not seeing the value of delaying in this case. I also imagine that the Plaintiff has been through this before, and so the cost the plaintiff to argue their position is probably not nearly what it is to SP. Unless she is making huge amounts of money off the photo and hasn't take her PAC request off, I'm just not seeing the value in delaying. Even if she has, the plaintiff can ask for damages.
      There are times delay helps. Criminal matters. estate matters. custody matters (criminal or child). But in this - where the law is clear and the damages pretty predictable, and you'll have to give back anything you've gained using the photo, I'm not seeing the value in delay. But what do I know?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:36 PM

      If a person being sued is facing a fatal disease is there anything a plaintiff can do to expedite a lawsuit?

      Seriously, Sarah Palin is not well and it is plain and simple that is the case.

      Delete
  16. Anonymous10:47 AM

    If the game is to drain one of the parties of money, the paper has more money and more resources than Sarah does. The advertising on the copyright protected image was for Sarah's PAC, whose address is a post officer box in Virginia. That's where the money would be deposited. Follow the money. Sarah flits around, signing books here, living there. The money is in Virginia, but the image that is protected is registered with the paper-- and their ownership just might be where the case was filed. It's their image and someone stole it from them. You don't sue the robber where the robber lives. You take the robber to court where the crime took place.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:59 AM

    She is seeking a transfer of venue, as well as a dismissal on the merits for failure to state a claim for violation of the Lanham Act (unfair competition) and failure to state a claim under the Copyright Act. Her lawyers are claiming that using the photo constitutes "fair use" under the Copyright Act. I'm a lawyer (but not a copyright expert), and based on my read of the motion, the Lanham Act claim may be dismissed and the Copyright Act claim may survive. Venue will depend on whether the photo's owners have a presence in NY. If not, NJ seems like the best venue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:37 PM

      I understand you're not a copyright lawyer, but here's a question anyway... I know a bit about copyright and the fair use exception, but I'm wondering how is it "fair use" to put one's own logo on someone else's copyrighted image, and not identify the true owner of the image.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:43 PM

      How can it be 'fair use' when they affixed the SarahPAC logo complete with link to collect donations?

      And wouldn't the correct venue fall to the place where the owner of the image either resides or conducts business?

      Thanks -
      -Oz

      Delete
    3. It's not fair use.

      The paper's lawyers have expertise in copyright. They wouldn't have filed in New York if that were not the proper venue. They wouldn't have filed if they knew they would lose under fair use.

      The paper has a lot deeper pockets than Sarah but they wouldn't bother taking a high profile person into court unless they were sure they will win.

      Sarah is going to lose this one.

      I suspect if anything happens, it will be that she pays a boatload of money to settle out of court.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:45 PM

      Hi, this is Anon 10:59. I agree that the PAC's use of the photo is not "fair use" which is why I opined that the Copyright Act claim would likely survive the 12(b)(6) motion. Mlaiuppa is probably right; the copyright owners would not have sued in the SDNY if they believed that venue was improper.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:35 PM

      Sarah is going to lose this one.

      I suspect if anything happens, it will be that she pays a boatload of money to settle out of court.
      ******
      doing a happy dance yes I am! The courts said NO bitch!

      Delete
  18. Anonymous11:00 AM

    Anyone can figure out this case. Here is the website for the photograph: http://www.groundzerospirit.org/ The newspaper protected it with a copyright because the moment that it appeared, the response was so overwhelming; it became an iconic image of September 11. Any money from fees to use the photo are donated to first responders. It doesn't take a genius to read the information at the bottom of the website:
    * Please contact us if you find people who may be using our photo without permission.
    We seek to ensure that the photograph is not used for personal gain and that it is used in a dignified and proper manner.

    The words "please contact us" are highlighted in blue, linking you directly to the place to report abuse. And what was Sarah's abuse? She used it to advertise her PAC, with the logo and website added in the lower right hand corner of the photo which she posted on her Facebook. Even if someone posted it for Sarah, it's in her name, her Facebook and her PAC.

    The other thing that Sarah did was to change it from a colored photo to black and white. The copyright protects the image from being altered. In color, it shows the ashes on the firefighters, the grey somber background and the red, white and blue American flag. It is a work of art, and Sarah tampered with it. That is simply not allowed, for any purpose.

    Here are the rules regarding use of the photo:
    • For personal, non-commercial use, visit NorthJerseyImages.com. Prints are available framed or unframed.
    • For editorial use, please visit Getty Images.
    • For nonprofit reuse, please call (973) 569-7014 or email groundzerospirit@northjersey.com.
    • For licensed products, please use officially licensed vendors.

    By the way, if anyone is feeling just a little pissed off with the abuse of that photo, one of Sarah Pee People uses the image as his avatar and on his Facebook. When he first adopted the photo, other Pee People were doing the same thing. It happened after the newspaper sued Sarah for copyright abuse, and their attitude was "I can use that photo, too, so there."(With no legal research, they decided that if it appeared in a newspaper, it was fair game.) They did to show support for Sarah. Most of them have changed their avatars, but one particular Pee Person still uses it. I have clicked on the "report abuse" link and reported him. He is listed in the White Pages, and he makes no secret of his identity. I hope that if you are as pissed off as I am that you will report him too. If they want to stand with Sarah, they ought to be prepared to go down in the sinking ship with her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Getty images?

      Oooooo Sarah is in deep doo doo.

      If the Pee person receives a cease and desist letter and refuses to change the avatar and the website receives a cease and desist and refuses to block the avatar's user the website could be shut down.

      It's happened before.

      Wouldn't that be a hoot? Sea 'o Pee being shut down for copyright infringement and refusing to honor the cease and desist. Karmageddon baby.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:56 PM

      the super fan foodstamp pete, which i used for a time on bretfart..lol
      i love poking fun at the peeponders
      i have used ...C4Ptroll, trigsdad, glenricedoespalin,
      and many others...it drives them over the edge

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:56 PM

      And that Pee person would be Pete Petretich, who is actually hoping that by using that picture on 'her website', he'll get locked up in a jail cell - with Sarah!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:00 PM

      For editorial use, please visit Getty Images.

      Getty images has an office in NYC !!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:58 PM

      11:00 AM
      Yaaaa baaabeee!!!!!
      Thank you for your detailed description looks like snorting sarah in deep shit!
      And Thanks mlaiuppa1:43 PM
      also, too!

      Delete
    6. Anonymous7:46 PM

      She has lost and it is only starting.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:57 PM

      Thanks, Anonymous11:00 AM- You did well. ;-)

      Delete
    8. Anonymous8:43 PM

      Back in September when Sarah was first served with the Cease & Desist order (which she ignored), Pete announced on Sarah's fan website that he was using the same photo, daring them to come after him. He has used it since the middle of September as a act of defiance.

      The website for the photo says.... that the photograph is not used for personal gain and that it is used in a dignified and proper manner. I don't think that using it as an act of defiance is dignified or proper. It is insulting. Pete is waving the photo around, daring people to sue him so he can make a big fuss out of the matter. He rarely works, and since we pay for his food stamps, and we are probably paying for his health care among other things, we have a right to say something about how our money is being spent. Oh, and to make matters worse, he is looking for a temp job at the IRS. That guy is that last guy who should have access to peoples' tax records. Pete has a big mouth, and he likes to talk (write) big. I wonder what would happen if he was told to take down that image since he is not using it in a respectful way. It is certainly not being used to honor the victims of September 11 and the brave first responders. He is using the three firemen and our flag as a symbol of his love for Sarah Palin.

      To report misuse of the September 11 photo, the email is: groundzerospirit@northjersey.com

      Delete
  19. Anonymous11:31 AM

    Lawyers use every trick to slow down the lawsuit's progress, to wear out the opponent, and to jabber about any possible way they can turn the tide. This is not unusual legally. It is just amusing that it is so public. We all get to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous11:46 AM

    "So this is a delaying tactic that SarahPAC hopes will drain the company of resources and convince them to drop the suit, because it appears to me that they have a pretty good case."

    The resources of Sarah's PAC are around a million dollars. Sarah was originally handed 12 million when she signed up with Murdoch. How much of that do you think that she has left? If it's going to be a contest to see who drains who, let me introduce Stephen A. Borg, the current head of the media group that owns the newspaper that controls the copyright of the photo: http://stephenborg.tumblr.com/ Bog is the head of the New Jersey Media Group, which publishes newspapers, magazines, and their printing plant (and distribution center) is so big that it prints USA Today along with other publications.

    Since it is the PAC that used the photo for advertising, and the PAC's address is in Virginia, I can't imagine why the case belongs in Alaska. And good luck with that PAC money going up against New Jersey Media's money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:24 PM

      I really question that Palin has the net worth that is being spewed around - 12 Million. Somehow don't think so! Plus, she is funding her entire family. Friggin' amazing!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:25 PM

      Palin was not handed $12 million for her Fox contract. She was signed up for three years initially at a $1 million per year contracted amount. The rest of her net worth has come from speaking fees, when people actually paid her to speak, and from the advances and sales for her first two books.

      That being said, she has a PAC that will soon be in the red and unless she's invested her Fox and book money wisely she'll end up being just another "lottery winner" that is soon broke. Her brand just isn't strong enough to keep bringing in major amounts of money. Look at her now, hawking a poorly selling book and hanging out at casinos just for the publicity.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous1:09 PM

      So true, she is toast! It couldn’t happen to a more greedy self-serving human boil on humanity’s butt.

      Delete
    4. The $12 million figure for the period of time between her resignation date and tax time the next year (April 2010).

      It includes the book contract she signed before she'd even resigned as governor, also the speeches she'd given after signing up with the Washington Speakers Bureau, the "Sarah Palin's Alaska" deal, and, of course, her Fox deal.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:36 PM

      Don't forget she also has that illegal Legal Fund named after the state's fund. What was it, Alaska Trust Fund?

      She was ordered to pay the money back, but did she? I've never heard or seen anything to indicate she did.

      http://www.csmonitor.com/From-the-news-wires/2010/0626/Sarah-Palin-probe-finds-her-defense-fund-illegal-nearly-400K-must-be-repaid

      Also, too, didn't one of her "best buds" promise to give regular accountings of the money in the account as a way to make Alaskans feel better about the illegal account?

      Have we ever heard a peep about that since?

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:46 PM

      She doesn't have as much money as you'd think. Even with fancy just-this-side-of-legal accounting.

      Say she did get $12 mil. That was self-employed income which means the IRS got close to half up front that first year or two.

      I'm sure they write off every and anything they can ("I'll do it 'till the court says I can't"). But, the things that most businesses write off are the kinds of things that the PAC pays for...travel, office, etc.

      Who would want to place a bet as to whether or not they are double dipping the write offs?

      IRS where are you?

      Plus, despite all the PAC paid perks, you know they spend money like crazy and are going through the stash.

      They say she paid cast $1.7 for the house in Arizona (Sarah's permanent residence now). They could sell it and get that back once the economy recovers, which it is.

      That's not even counting "bad habits" and possible illegal drug use. Nor does it include "hush" money, or the babysitters or the "handlers," etc.

      Like 12:25 said "lottery winner" syndrome. And when it's all gone it will be all OUR fault, none of their making bad decisions.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:45 PM

      She funds, herself, her husband, and 2 kids. She has THREE adult kids who support themselves and have had jobs since HS.

      And yes, I doubt she's made as much as people think. She may be famously frugal, but theres no way to know her net worth.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous6:45 PM

      And remember, raising a special needs child is expensive.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous7:49 PM

      SEND HER MONEY. 6:45 PM Send her all your money. Poor poor poor Sarah Palin. Let her die from whatever is making her skeletal and gigantic head look . Just send her money.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous8:31 PM

      Can you imagine the expense of 'medications'? If Sarah isn't the only one 'medicated' her family must stay happy and someone needs to pay the bills.

      Delete
  21. Anonymous12:00 PM

    This is SERIOUSLY off topic but I need some help. I know Alaska didn't sign up with the Affordable Health Care Plan but how does it happen that a person making $15,000 a year can get tax help with premiums (which are high) and one making $8,000 does not get any help at all. Cannot afford the $500 and up premiums so does anyone know if there is something else I can look for. Cant believe my State would throw me to the wolves like this. I will be penalized if I don't sign up but cannot afford to pay those premiums and not be able to buy food!! Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:22 PM

      Parnell didn't sign up for the extended Medicaid benefits (it would not have cost our state anything for the first three years) so unfortunately it is the very poor who don't qualify for insurance. If something catastrophic happens then you will have to just go the emergency room and deal with medical bills. Our state is one of the worst when it comes to helping the poor.

      Alaska is on a downhill slide due to our decreasing oil revenues and an obstinate republican governor. Housing prices will begin to decrease and once again a major portion of our road belt populace will leave the state.

      I wish I could give you better advice but unless you can afford private insurance then our governor has made sure that you are uncovered and basically screwed.

      Delete
    2. hedgewytch1:49 PM

      Sounds like you haven't thoroughly looked through the federal exchange. It is very large, and can be very confusing to shop all the available plans. If you need help, there is the ANTHC ( I think that's them) and Planned Parenthood - the only 2 in the state I think, that have health care web site navigators to help you locate a plan that you can afford, and will help you to understand any subsidies that you may qualify for. The State of AK will not help you and will actually give you false information in order to discourage you from signing up. (as are Fla, GA, AZ, NC, OK and others) I have a health care plan through Premara Blue Cross, the only health insurance company available in AK through my husband's insurance. The plan is expensive, high deductible, and low coverage. I will be shopping the exchange for a better plan for our family.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:13 PM

      Hedgewytch:

      The Federal Exchange doesn't cover anyone who earns less than $13,000 per year unless your State accepted the additional Medicaid funding, which Alaska didn't.

      Delete
    4. There is no penalty if you income is under a certain amount and it sounds like your is. You also can't be penalized because your governor is a dickweed.

      Delete
    5. Phyllis5:28 PM

      The federal poverty level for Alaska for 1 person is $14350.00. If your income is below 100% of the poverty level there is no subsidy because that would put you at Medicaid level income,
      Since you only make $8000.00 a year you will not have to pay a penalty for not buying insurance.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous6:59 PM

      You have a TeaTHUG governor - like Indiana's which refused the federally government paid for Medicaid Gap just to screw you/the President.

      No penalty, but she still won't have inurance.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:01 PM

      Yes, you've been screwed by Parnell. LEAVE AK go to a blue state. And no hedgewytch, there isn't any other route.

      Delete
  22. Not one person mentioned the well greased stripper pole.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous12:33 PM

    *LOL* Palin seeking a change of venue... Is she trying for a 6:00am trial at MatSu Hospital?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous12:49 PM

    McCain Admits Castro-Hitler Comparison Was 'Gross Exaggeration'

    And this same old coot called Palin the Worlds expert on Oil.

    I'd say McCain has deep character and expertise judging capability flaws!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous12:58 PM

    When Sarah was in Alsaka politics, she knew how to manipulate the local media. This is the woman who wrote letters to the editor in praise of herself, the governor, signing the letters Louise Heath or Lou Sarah. (LOL). She also had a group of friends who did this. In a state of less than a million people, Sarah was the darling of the press. The ADN had a special daily column devoted to "Our Governor," posting photos and covering her as if she was a movie star.

    We saw what happened when national media covered Sarah. They were like a magnifying glass, and we saw her flaws. It was no longer cute to talk in run on sentences that didn't mean anything (but sounded important). She couldn't fool the national media. And, I doubt that she can bully them or run them out of money. Their rules for the photo were posted on their website. Just because it appeared in a paper doesn't mean that you can use the image as advertising for your PAC or change the color photo to black and white. Sarah has been good in court when it comes to scare young men who don't have the resources to defend themselves. (The kid in Tennessee who hacked her email, the PA stalker kid or poor Levi). Sarah is good at bullying people who are smaller than her. I don't think that Sarah is going to run the newspaper out of business any time soon. It's not a good idea to pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the truckload.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:23 PM

      the PA kid ? Wasn't she successful in getting him out of PA to Ak where her peeps can really jack him off?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous1:32 PM

      VERY well put, 12:58 PM.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:46 PM

      ummm PA stalker boy? Its Palins who are the stalkers...
      READ http://bit.ly/1dgyN0P

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:11 PM

      Anonymous12:58 PM - When Sarah was in Alsaka politics, she knew how to manipulate the local media______________

      Sarah knows how to manipulate professional bloggers across the country. Check out the Pioneer Woman Hoax and professional blogger, author and photographer
      pretending NOT to know the Palins and also pretending to know them for 25 years... what the ??? And KANSAS Barn Sale Chicks http://www.kansasbarnsale.blogspot.com/2013/10/meet-kansas-barn-sale-chicks.html

      Delete
  26. The venue is where the plaintiff files. The defendant does not have a say in where it is filed.

    Copyright is FEDERAL law. Sarah doesn't get to decide in which state she gets to be held accountable for violating the law.

    Once again Palin proves she is a doofus, not worthy to clean the toilets of the white house.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:49 PM

      The owners of the copyright are the New Jersey Media group. They own a number of publications, mostly in Northern New Jersey. I wonder if they chose New York as a venue because that's where the work of art was created, and it is a place where people still haven't forgotten and take a dim view of people trying to cash in on their tragedy. You have to look at the photo as a work of art, and it was created (taken) at Ground Zero.

      The money collected from any fees got into a fund for first responders. Jon Stewart had to goad the Senate and House into passing a bill authorizing payment to them because ten years later, they were suffering terrible health problems. The government is responsible for sending them into the ashes without protective masks and gear because Christine Whitman, then the head of the EPA, told them that it was safe. NO IT WASN'T. And, if there is a judgement against Palin, it would not go to the newspaper. It would go into the fund for the first responders, the same place that the fee would have gone if Palin paid for the rights to use their photo.

      Delete
  27. Anonymous2:04 PM

    I wouldn't be surprised if Sarah Palin asked that Todd, Caint Get Right, Bristol, Willow, Tripp, Sally, Creepy Chuckie, Molly, Mansour and Junker to be the jury of her peers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:43 PM

      Dude, grow up. Stop lying. Stop spreading slander.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:43 PM

      Why are you attacking innocent people you dont know? You do realize that looks petty and juvenile?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:51 PM

      6:43 PM links ?

      be specific or just waste your time

      Delete
  28. Anonymous2:10 PM

    Anonymous12:25 PM
    Palin was not handed $12 million for her Fox contract. She was signed up for three years initially at a $1 million per year contracted amount. The rest of her net worth has come from speaking fees, when people actually paid her to speak, and from the advances and sales for her first two books.That being said, she has a PAC that will soon be in the red and unless she's invested her Fox and book money wisely she'll end up being just another "lottery winner" that is soon broke. Her brand just isn't strong enough to keep bringing in major amounts of money. Look at her now, hawking a poorly selling book and hanging out at casinos just for the publicity

    Is that why Sarah didn't enroll her kids in college because she is broke? That explains why poor Willow had to drop out of high school and enroll in hair school because her parents are broke .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:03 PM

      Just how far does a Lil' Abner brand go anymore? She doesn't know jack, just a dime store strumpet that will be tossed to the wolves when the next bimbo comes along to do Koch talking points. Katie Couric can be thanked for the "gotcha" questions ANY of us could have answered.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:11 PM

      Her children are too stupid for college. That's why they go to hair school or join the military.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:31 PM

      The thought of ANY of her kids in college is a riot. Remember Piper and the flash cards? Education has never been valued in that family and never will be. Focused on the quickest way to make a buck.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:43 PM

      STOP SPREADING LIES. omg. Seriously. What is the point in lying about strangers?

      And seriously, OBVIOUSLY education is valued. Bristol did well in school and Tripps had a college fund since infancy.

      Delete
    5. emrysa8:46 PM

      "and Tripps had a college fund since infancy. "

      and how would you know? tmz? lol

      Delete
  29. Anonymous2:23 PM

    Hey, Sarah, you have a copyright on your books, right? How would you like it if someone lifted entire chapters and printed them as their own life story? No? Then you have to respect the copyright that someone has on their work of art.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous 11:46 AM, the $12 million also includes the "Sarah Palin's Alaska" deal, for which it was estimated she was supposed to get paid ~$250,000 per episode.

    Also, the period of time that $12 million oft-quoted payout covered was between spring 2009 when she signed the book and Fox contracts, and April 2010 when her FEC filing became public.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2010/04/sarah_palin_has_earned_12_mill.html

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous3:01 PM

    Just in case anyone forgets what happened:
    In a report about their lawsuit, the North Jersey Media Group-owned NorthJersey.com said that the lawsuit was filed when neither Palin nor the PAC responded to a letter.

    “It is important to enforce our copyright on this iconic photo,” said Jennifer A. Borg, vice president, corporate secretary and general counsel for North Jersey Media Group. “When neither Ms. Palin nor representatives from her PAC responded to our demand letter to remove the photograph, we were left with no choice but to seek redress in court.”
    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/14/sarah-palin-sued-for-copyright-infringement-by-new-jersey-newspaper/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:21 PM

      Sarah why didn't your ass answer the letter?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:26 PM

      The Palins don't have to answer any letters or appear in court. Remember when Todd was subpoenaed to I believe was Troopergate or some gate and he ignored the subpoena too? Well fuck you guys.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:39 PM

      I think the newspaper's attorneys know how and where to file copyright infringement actions.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:48 PM

      "I can do what I want until the courts tell me no" ~Sarah Palin
      aka meth palin...

      Delete
  32. Anonymous3:49 PM

    Why oh why can this woman not ever wear shoes that fit her?

    Must we always be subjected to the cringeworthy sight of her toes curling like talons over the ends of her ridiculous shoes?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous3:50 PM

    My dream jury-Lev and Sunny Johnston, Mike Wooten, Walt Monegan, Irl Stambaugh, Martin Bashir, Gabby Giffords, Keith Olbermann, Lyda Green, David Kernell, Joe McGinnis, and Andree McCleod.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous3:59 PM

    Civil suits arising under the Copyright Act may be brought in the district where the defendant “resides or may be found.”

    Guess sarah is going to stay away from NY for awhile.!

    Many time cases are filed in the district where the defendant resides because it is easier to get them into court, but sarah does not get to decide.
    If it turns out the venue is wrong, which I doubt the newspapers attorney are stupid, they will refile in NJ.

    However I think the choice of NY has to do with the fact that photo was online or the newspaper does business in NY and the sarah pac image damaged their business in NY.

    By the way, I love how her attorney added, along with some other 3rd grade comments," Sarah Palin, is
    the well known former governor of the State of Alaska, formerly the Republican nominee for Vice President"

    Like it makes a difference, if she violated the law (except in AK).










    I only skimmed over the documents her attorneys filed, but it seemed to me they"failed to mention that she slapped the sarah pac icon on the photo"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:25 PM

      I view the photograph as a work of art, a singular special creation protected by a copyright. The newspaper knew how special it was which is why they did copyright it, with the proceeds from sales and fees going to first responders. The newspaper does not profit from the photo. The photo was taken, created in New York City. It is OF NYC. And, the people who benefit from the copyright protection (the people receiving money from the sale or fees) are the first responders who came mainly from New York. They are the ones who are the injured parties.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:03 PM

      3:59 "Sarah Palin, is the well known former governor of the State of Alaska, formerly the Republican nominee for Vice President"

      The fact that she was a governor and the a VP candidate would -- to most people -- indicate why she should have known better.

      You know, like those at higher levels should be held to a higher standard than some Joe off the street with no education and no access to resources, who truly might not have known how serious it was.

      It also makes it a bigger offense to all involved. A slap in the face, a FU to everyone.

      And, since I'm on a roll. Why the heck this this get this far anyway?

      I'm not surprised Sarah tried to make the photo her own and to associate herself with heroes and an American icon so as to make some money.

      I am not really surprised that they didn't respond to the letter from the attorneys, given how totally chaotic and dysfunctional they are. (Isn't that why they pay the T attorneys such big bucks?)

      But what really eggs me on is:

      1) She could have just apologized, pretended she felt bad about the "confusion" and "innocent mistake". A bit of a donation to the First Responder Fund would probably have ended it.

      2) Why is she having her attorney pursue it? Does she think she'll win? I don't see how. And as more people become aware of the violation and flagrant disregard for the First Responder Fun, it will only turn Real Americans against her.

      In fact, until I saw this post today I thought it was already said and done and that she and her attorney's had already taken care of it.

      Now I will calm down and ignore the crazy woman because crazy people do crazy things and it's a waste of time for us non-crazies to try to figure it out.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:52 PM

      She is methed out! And she thinks she is "RILL" 'mericka so its "ok" for her to steal a iconic pic to grift funds!
      I am so glad this paper and I'm glad whomever it was (from here?) turned her ass in!!

      Delete
  35. Anonymous4:02 PM

    sorry for the shallowness, but her head is too BIG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:23 PM

      It has to be because she has such a big mouth...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:05 PM

      Are you talking about Lollipop Sarah Palin?

      Delete
  36. Anonymous4:35 PM

    HOLD SARAH PALIN ACCOUNTABLE!!!!

    When Sarah Palin isn't stealing other peoples images she is making fake/fraud images for her family brand. Nothing much about Sarah Palin is real or what she leads you to believe. Including the image above, an image that was taken by a professional photographer and author.
    http://s45.photobucket.com/user/pamperingbeki/media/new/SP.jpg.html
    Sarah posing and pretending she didn't know about the set up.

    Remember that one time I met Sarah Palin at the airport? I just got a Christmas card from her. http://instagram.com/p/hwjRRiENEQ/ (dirty finger nail and all)
    (Don't believe everything you read from this photographer/author)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:10 PM

      I clicked a few links and yes, this woman is a professional blogger and photographer and just published a book.

      "In 2013 Beki authored her first book. Sunflowers & Sweet Tea is a photo based coffee table book: A snapshot of rural Midwest life. Bits of warmth and inspiration, told in 80 pages.

      http://www.therustedchain.com/book/

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:41 PM

      im still in disbelief that picture is copyrighted. It's EVERYWHERE.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:54 PM

      Thanks Trollie for linking to a stupid pic of her happy holiday card.
      Fuck off trollie!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:55 PM

      Beki Hastings also supports The Pioneer Woman (hoax). She gets paid for her crap I would think. No surprise she was able to hook up with Sarah Palin and get that picture. Just as Sarah planned I betcha. The pose, going to eat, bell bottoms make her look fatter is a nice touch.

      Check out the Marlboro Woman, she is down on hoaxers.
      http://themarlborowoman.com/2012/04/the-pioneer-woman-sheeple-of-the-week-no-2/

      Delete
    5. Anonymous7:55 PM

      6:54 PM the dirty finger nail is a hoot. Tell me you're not laughing.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous8:23 PM

      Rebecca D Hastings must be a professional liar as well as photographer. Check out some of her ALIASES and how she works the internet.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous8:47 PM

      EVERY photo is copyrighted, either to the person who took it or to the entity to which it was assigned by that person, or by the employer of that person if the photo was a work for hire, dumbass at 6:41. Not only that, copyright is automatic. As soon as the work is created, it's copyrighted. You can go to the trouble and expense of applying for a copyright, if you want an official record, but it is not necessary - your rights to your own work are still protected under the law. Her ignorance and arrogance are going to cost Palin big time.

      Delete
  37. Anonymous4:36 PM

    The beautiful first family!

    Christmas at the White House

    http://theobamadiary.com/2013/12/15/christmas-in-washington-updating/#comments

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:36 PM

      ♥ ❤ ❤ ♥

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:40 PM

      I wonder if the rumors out of Chicago about their faux marriage are true. Eh, not my place. But why dont either daughter look like Barack AT all.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:33 PM

      Are you fucking serious, 6:40? Malia very much favors Barack Obama's mother's side of the family. And she looks like her father when he was a teen. You must be blind, or just a moron.

      Delete
  38. Anonymous5:15 PM

    "The Record licenses personal uses of the photo itself, and it is available for editorial use by publications through Getty Images. Commercial memorabilia bearing the image is available through only a few authorized companies.

    Court records show the company isn't afraid to protect its images, filing at least eight other copyright infringement cases over the past two years.

    Friday's complaint isn't the first time Palin has gotten into hot water over the use of copyrighted content in her political activities..."

    http://www.law360.com/articles/472910/nj-co-sues-sarah-palin-for-using-iconic-9-11-photo




    ReplyDelete
  39. Anita Winecooler5:35 PM

    I'm shocked she didn't sic her big brudder on those nasty people who hold the copyright, like she did with Cher. I don't know much about the law, but I do think the lawsuit is valid. I guess she saw this coming, that's why her PAC has been bleeding money like a vampire with hemophilia.
    What a crass thing to do, put your pac's information on a photo of 911 victims. Let's hope the pink handcuffs come out, along with all her "gates".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:24 PM

      Please take the trouble to read this website about the iconic photo: http://www.groundzerospirit.org/ It spells out very clearly who may use the photo and how they may use it. If there is a fee to be paid, the money goes to the first responders fund. They are suffering terrible after effects of inhaling all of the debris and ash.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:39 PM

      Her family's pretty classy. If MY family had as many lies spread about them as hers does, they'd probably have gone gun postal

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:14 PM

      6:39 PM Don't forget Track knows the Oxy Road. Keeps that anger under control. The Palins have there ways. Have you heard of Christina Taylor Green?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tucson_shooting#Victims

      Delete
    4. Anonymous8:48 PM

      No doubt, 6:39.

      Delete
    5. emrysa8:53 PM

      "Her family's pretty classy."

      rofl! you might need to check the definition of classy.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous9:14 PM

      They wouldn't appear non-postal if it wasn't for Track. And now we see the track on the old lady arm above. That be skeleton Sarah Palin. Knocking on deaths door. The clueless cult calls it 'classy'.

      Delete
  40. Anonymous5:38 PM

    That photo sure looks like Sarah Palin playing Sarah Palin!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:44 PM

      Beki Hastings - Brown Noser Supreme, Sarah Palin's photographer and Ree Drummond’s hoax. The comments are fairly funny.
      http://themarlborowoman.com/2012/04/the-pioneer-woman-sheeple-of-the-week-no-2/

      Sarah Palin isn't the only hoaxer. It looks like these peeples have a market in the Hoax Industry and Sarah is just one of the gang working TV.

      Delete
  41. Anonymous6:16 PM

    Wow. Considering that Palin no longer holds public office and is unlikely to run again, you guys sure hold a lot of hate against her. You need to get a life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:38 PM

      Amen. All she does is chill with her family, be a normal mom, and support charities. People online are lifeless and obsessed with pointless things. Here's a life tip: No one is perfect. People grow daily.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:47 PM

      Great satire. Keep your sense of humor.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:57 PM

      treeofmamre6:16 PM
      BooFucking Hooo!
      Trollie
      Whaaaaaa!!!! Call the whambulance!!!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:17 PM

      6:16.......BWAHAHAHAHA, You are a certified Nut Job.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:49 PM

      She's also a photo thief.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous9:17 PM

      There is no reason this season to like a photo thief. No reason to like the Queen of Hoax and the professional photographer of numerous internet hoax.

      Be sure to look into The Pioneer Woman and what say

      Delete
  42. Anonymous6:17 PM

    How do you know what state she actually claims residency? You don't. Just because she doesn't claim a pfd doesn't mean she isnt' a resident. It COULD mean she doesn't want bullshit online from nasty bloggers about her claiming RIGHTFUL money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:45 PM

      These things will come out in one of her court cases.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:59 PM

      Trollies?
      If she doesn't claim the girfter fund she is not in in AK GET IT? "We're all Arizonians now"! Even the Russians get it!!!

      Delete
    3. emrysa8:54 PM

      "rightful" money, lol. explain that one.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:29 PM

      Sorry, troll, but the $arah Palin *I* know has NOT been known to turn down money that is rightfully hers. Thus it is proven that $he is NOT a resident of Alaska anymore. Especially, since Toad is STILL claiming HIS dues!

      Delete
  43. Anonymous6:18 PM

    Who's going to hold Gryphen accountable for spreading lies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:00 PM

      Oh! Rilly? 6:18 PM? Is it coke night again bitches?
      Going to report someone?
      Everyone is one to you.... EVERYONE!!!

      Delete
  44. Anonymous6:19 PM

    It is still funny to me that nasty leftwing bloggers approve of their own lie and propaganda spreading tactics while condemning others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:05 PM

      Anonymous6:19 PM

      It is still funny to me that nasty leftwing bloggers approve of their own lie and propaganda spreading tactics while condemning others.
      *****
      What lies? Snortin' Sarah? Wallows?
      Common what lies exactly?
      Fuck you cactus cunt bitchiness!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:16 PM

      6:18, 6:19 are you a Recorded Message? You repeat the same ignorant Rants daily. You are in need of Intervention, because you HAVE NO LIFE.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:30 PM

      Funny, how the trolls have suddenly appeared here. Been waiting for them for a while...

      Delete
  45. Anonymous6:29 PM

    I want to know when nasty bloggers are going to apologize for slandering Curtis' name, when gryphen will apologize for manipulating things he obviously knows nothing about (remember when he stated Bristol didn't work all of summer 2010? LIE. She worked until early August after she ditched the punk for good in July. That is just one example of a stupid lie written by an ignorant blogger.

    Remember when ALASKANS lied about where Trig lives, where Track lives, where Willow lives. ALL the while claiming they wont go away. Um, YOU ARE THE REASON they're blog topics assholes. The kids live happy, private lives with jobs and fulfillment. TRY IT. You may be happy for once.

    Sure they support their loving parents. Who doesn't. They should. They have good parents, who wants what's best and always have. That is known by all who KNOW them: Erika Fagerstrom who saw them daily, the kids friends.

    So grow up everyone who lives outside and the liars inside.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:54 PM

      damn chuck_tard jr, yer on a roll - ya know ya shouldn't be drinkin' so heavily on account it's a school night eh?

      ya fatass adulterer fuktard inbred fraud - yer skank little sis is gonna go down takin' the rest of you heath/palin white trash along with - enjoy fuk_tard ..

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:06 PM

      Holy shit! New LINES of COKE bitches!?
      Trollies are all coked up!
      Well keep on truckin...
      eyes watchin'1

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:17 PM

      Let's see Bristol lied Levi raping her but Bristol repeatedly laid up in in Levi's mama's house fucking Levi's brains out and moaning like there was no tomorrow.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous8:07 PM

      Krusty P. is still on pins and needles waiting for the lovers at the motel to decorate the lobby tree. Krusty can't do any trolling until Nancy uploads those pictures. The love nest lobby for Tripp, Junker and Bristol... she can't wait.
      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristolpalin/2013/12/cant-wait-til-christmas/#disqus_thread

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:28 PM

      It's that troll again, who thinks that writing something here is manipulating people. No, people either read it and believe it or they don't. The posts are always the same, poorly written at a middle school level, telling people to get a life and to grow up. It's too bad that poor girl has nothing else to do. Finishing high school might be a good start.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous9:27 PM

      Send out a wellness check for poor Nancy French.

      Delete
  46. Anonymous7:13 PM

    6:29 PM Tou don't know SHIT about the Palins, you are a Stalker. The Palins are in fear of you, because you are a Psycho with a Fetish for Bristol Palin. You are the problem here, not any of us or Gryphen. You should be thankful that Gryphen even allows your Comical Postings. THROW UP.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous7:20 PM

    Sarah we like our Palins like we like our mash per taters..... in New Yawk.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous7:22 PM

    Sarah Palin looks like a fucking big head alien in that picture Gryphen posted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:22 PM

      She should get her money back from Beki. Sarah probably heard all she does for the Pioneer Woman Hoax and thought she would make Sarah look good. HaHaHaHa! Sarah thought the French President Sarkozy called her. She is just not that bright, easy to fool her, isn't it Beki?

      Delete
  49. Anonymous7:27 PM

    Pretty sad that Sarah Palin is an old wrinky grandmother of bastard grandkids and refuses to dress her age.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous7:31 PM

    What's the story on Sarah Palin's SarahPac? Did she ever respond to her violation? Or did she ignore that like she did her trademark violation?

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anonymous7:35 PM

    Zoom in on that picture of Sarah Palin. That motherfucker is in need of cosmetic surgery. Look how her face and neck is sagging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:38 PM

      Sarah's transformation into Creepy Chuckie is almost complete.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:39 PM

      Look at her mouth. All droopy and sad looking.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:23 PM

      And she thought Beki was her friend.

      Delete
  52. Anonymous9:25 PM

    I hate Michael Kors product placements. Crappy bags, too. Good to let the peeps know.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.