Tuesday, January 06, 2015

A member of the Michael Brown grand jury is suing so that he can speak out about the case. And we should all hope he wins.

Courtesy of St. Louis Post-Dispatch:  

A member of the grand jury that declined to file criminal charges against former Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson in the death of Michael Brown sued St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch Monday for the right to speak publicly about the proceedings. 

The suit says that the former juror, identified in court documents only as "Grand Juror Doe," wishes to speak out to challenge public misconceptions about the case and that speaking publicly could "contribute to the current public dialogue concerning race relations" that was sparked by the Aug. 9 fatal shooting. It hints that jurors were not unanimous in their decision. Doe also wants "to advocate for legislative change to the way grand juries are conducted in Missouri," the suit says, and more simply, be able to talk about the case "with close family members at home." 

..............

The plaintiff claims McCulloch's characterization of the grand jury's view of the evidence after they declined to indict Wilson was at odds with Doe's opinions of the case, that the public's understanding of the grand jurors' views is "not entirely accurate." 

The investigation of Wilson "had a stronger focus on the victim than in other grand jury cases," the suit says. The presentation of evidence and "the State's counsel to the grand jury" "differed markedly and in significant ways. . . from the hundreds of matters presented to the grand jury earlier in its term." The suit also claims the legal guidelines presented to jurors in applying facts of the case were "muddled and untimely" compared to other cases.

Well we all know that this gran jury case was fixed from the get go, so it would be really great to have the opportunity to hear what really happened behind the scenes. 

It might also be helpful to the Feds who are doing their own investigation.

22 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:36 AM

    58-point lawsuit filed by juror in Darren Wilson case against St. Louis prosecutor Bob McCulloch

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/01/05/1355668/-58-point-lawsuit-filed-by-juror-in-Darren-Wilson-case-against-St-Louis-prosecutor-Bob-McCulloch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:44 AM

      I read a bunch of Shaun King 'pieces' during this event.

      That guy writes flat out bullshit.


      Delete
  2. ibwilliamsi7:14 AM

    McCulloch may be looking for a new profession sometime soon.

    http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2015/01/05/bar-complaint-filed-against-mcculloch/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:42 AM

      He will be just fine. A BS complaint will go nowhere. The GJ did its job.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:28 AM

      And you KNOW that...how??

      Delete
    3. ibwilliamsi9:30 AM

      @7:42 AM - it's only the beginning. This will go much further. So sad for you entitled bigots.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:12 PM

      Wrong, ibwilliamsi, on everything you just wrote.

      Save your bigot comments for yourself.

      Delete
  3. hedgewytch7:26 AM

    O/T - I'm sure Gryf will be posting on this one soon: Palin on Hannity last night accusing Mayor de Blasio of killing groundhogs. http://crooksandliars.com/2015/01/palin-accuses-nyc-mayor-de-blasio

    But Sarah, don't cha know? Groundhog is damn tasty!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:46 AM

      Suicide. The ground hog jumped. Was depressed he was being used year after year. Pulled out of his den and forced out of hibernation and used as a tourist attraction and meaningless forecaster of Spring.

      RJ in BBistan

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:31 AM

      She has to turn any criticism of her bad behavior into something political, because she's ALWAYS a victim.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous7:29 AM

    OT

    Sarah Palin (“an idiot” and “stupid”)
    Endorses Louie Gohmert for House Speaker
    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-endorses-louie-gohmert-for-house-speaker/

    Jeb Bush must be gleefully happy with the faux Republican acting as if political.

    Jeb Bush Files for Leadership PAC, Will Take Your Money Now
    http://www.mediaite.com/online/jeb-bush-files-for-leadership-pac-will-take-your-money-now/

    Sarah Palin Employment at Fox News Conditional on Her Attractiveness, Popularity
    http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/10/breaking--sarah-palin-employment-at-fox-news-conditional-on-her-

    Fox News president Roger the-Hutt Ailes experienced a fleeting instance of intellectual honesty in a recent interview with the Associated Press concerning his 15th anniversary as network overlord. “I hired Sarah Palin because she was hot and got ratings,” he said. New York magazine reported back in May that Ailes thinks the former Alaska governor is “an idiot” and “stupid.” But how could anyone find a woman attractive whom he doesn’t also think is smart?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:49 AM

      Jeb Bush’s New PAC Website Pretends George W. Bush Never Existed

      http://www.mediaite.com/online/jeb-bushs-new-pac-website-pretends-george-w-bush-never-existed/

      Delete
  5. Anonymous7:31 AM

    Yes we can go after quickly other countries and people of color in US but yet can't go after Cheny Bush quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:03 AM

    O/T Palin on the "Today Show" this morning

    http://www.today.com/news/sarah-palin-peta-criticism-photo-trig-dog-absolutely-hypocritical-double-1D80406754

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:15 AM

      She's really milking this... last night with Hannity.

      http://video.foxnews.com/v/3972931561001/sarah-palin-slams-peta-amid-dog-controversy/?#sp=show-clips

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:20 AM

      ...and she's wearing her Dolly Parton top again.

      https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mB_aXBoqmU4/UnAZlPGrNMI/AAAAAAAAFQ8/-F-k1W9V3ck/s1600/Palin2.jpg

      Delete
  7. Anonymous8:07 AM

    @ 7:42
    I don't believe you know what a grand jury does or how it is supposed to operate.Talk about B S. Why don't you elaborate on why you feel the "GJ did it's job".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:32 AM

      It is not a question of whether the Grand Jury did its job, but if the Prosecutor did his job in presenting all of the evidence that might have brought the defendant, Wilson, to trial. There were problems with the witnesses that were called and especially not called.

      RJ in BBistan

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:14 PM

      Just because you don't like the findings 8:07, doesn't mean the GJ didn't do it's job. It is done. Stop crying in your wheaties and buck up.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous8:13 AM

    Small point G but I don't believe we know if the grand juror who filed this is a he or a she.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:38 AM

    The fact is, three sets of forensics experts (including Holder's and one representing the Brown family) all came up in agreement. Whoever the jury member is will have a hard time arguing against three separate experts in agreement over the evidence.

    orlin sellers

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anita Winecooler5:32 PM

    Good. I want the truth to come out, and if this is what it takes, I'm all for it. IT won't bring the dead back, but it's a small measure of justice.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.