Friday, July 29, 2016

Donald Trump essentially says that a vote for the Jill Stein of the Green Party is a lost vote for Hillary.

Go ahead, throw your vote away. 
Courtesy of The Hill:

Donald Trump on Wednesday said he would be happy if people voted for Green Party candidate Jill Stein for president because it would draw votes away from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. 

During a rally in Toledo, Ohio, Trump appeared to dismiss candidates outside of the two major parties. 

“I think a vote for Stein would be good — that’s the Green Party,” he said. “Because I figure anyone voting for Stein is gonna be for Hillary. So I think vote for Stein is fine.”

Gee if even Donald Trump understands that a vote for a third party candidate like Jill Stein only helps him in the long run you would think all of these idiots who are so angry that Hillary Clinton  won the nomination that they cannot bring themselves to vote for the Democrat might figure that out as well.

I mean the guy is a fucking idiot, and he gets it.


  1. Anonymous2:16 AM

    It isn't. And a fucking write in vote for Bernie Sanders is a vote for Trump. Trump knows that. He's hoping the Bernie bots keep voting for Bernie. That pulls votes from Hillary.

    1. Anonymous4:37 AM

      @Anonymous 2:16 AM

      I believe the troublemaker Bernie-bots are not even Democrats. I believe they are Repubs who are paid to do what they are doing. So, they will not be taking votes from Hillary, at all.

      Real genuine Dem. Bernie supporters are on the Hillary team now.

    2. Anonymous8:18 AM

      I agree with you.

    3. Anonymous8:29 AM

      I've thought that, too! It would really be interesting to find out what some of the Bernie bots are actually registered as. Years ago, Rush Limbaugh encouraged his ditto shit heads to vote in democratic primaries in order to throw votes away from Hillary! (2008). Same foe Laura Nazi salute Ingraham. She encouraged her fellow jackasses to call into democratic headquarters in every state to jam the telephone lines! On Election Day! I heard her say it. She thought it would be so funny. Fucking bitch.

  2. Anonymous2:46 AM

    Whats up with morning elephant snooze? flippin flops. Not so giddy about your candidate today? Really? But he is the face of the Republican party warts and all. And you SIGNED THE PLEDGE against America and Americans. You people built that. You people own that.

    1. 66gardeners5:54 AM

      Republicans have reaped what they have sown. Trump is everything they have embraced over the past few decades. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they are starting to wake up. Have you noticed they have stopped saying how terrible of a president Obama has been. They know you will laugh in their face.

  3. Anonymous3:29 AM

    And foxy morning media trump enablers call Clintons liars? Really? How come the enablers don't take credit for years of spin to win? that failed miserably!!! Emails? lol you people created it. bengazzi? yep you people created that too. Nope. Its not a close race, it is a rigged by republican scam artist race to hurt the innocent American's in their way.

  4. Anonymous3:33 AM

    That Green vote wouldn't matter in the least if Hillary had earned a strong lead in the polls and you know it.
    Why does it make you so-called progressives mad when folk want to use their constitutionally given right to vote their conscience, instead of the way YOU want them to vote?

    1. 66gardeners5:55 AM

      Your head will be asplodin on election day, and it makes us feel right with the world.

  5. Anonymous3:34 AM

    I like Stein. She's a good woman, she seems sincere. 2 things one doesn't get from Hillary. I tried to watch the DNC, I did. Between Michelle kissing her ass when you know the two hate each other (yeah fucking right Hillary didn't get mad or sulk after losing in 2008. BWAHAHAHAHA People have purposefully died so she can get this far,) to Chelsea laying it on THICK, to that ridiculously fake smile and simulated hug from Hillary to Obama, Im surprised I didn't vomit last Thanksgiving.

    1. Anonymous4:29 AM

      You really seem to have allll the answers, don't you?!

    2. Anonymous5:05 AM

      3:33/3:34 Trolling is a 24 hour gig for you? Do you ever sleep? Your vote won't be missed, so go right ahead and throw it away. You saved your vomit to post it here, assclown.

    3. Anonymous5:57 AM

      3:34, your lame ass can't defend voting for Trump. so there is that.

  6. Anonymous5:00 AM

    Wow! I think the "Russia for Trump" people are in Gryphen's house today. Nothing but Hillary envy and hate. Don't blame Hillary supporters when President Pence and the titular PINO* Trump blow up the economy like W did back in '08.
    *President In Name Only - he'll be Making America Great Again while Pence is working to establish a theocracy.

  7. Anonymous5:12 AM

    Don't be a Dick. The polls in Alaska will still be open when they announce the winner of the race, so your vote really doesn't matter.

    Clinton is going to win in a landslide anyhow, so go ahead, vote your conscience. Quit denigrating people who would otherwise agree with you.

    1. Anonymous4:34 PM

      Not unless she carries Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Ohio. Or at least two out of the four. Trump needs all four for their electoral votes. To defeat them Hillary must take those states away from him. And there are plenty of voters in those states that are eating up Trump's message. I think he's campaigning there right now.

  8. Anonymous5:25 AM

    Stein is an anti-vaxxer who wants Trump to win.

    1. Anonymous4:35 PM

      No, she's not.

  9. Anonymous5:49 AM

    Appealing to the low-info crowd again, Donnie?

  10. Anonymous6:10 AM

    While Clinton's oh so fabulous for women VP pick tells CNN this morning he's still for the Hyde amendment. What a fucking disaster. Hillary Clinton can't get out of her own way.

    1. Anonymous7:59 AM

      Hardly a disaster. The Hyde Amendment has been in place for years with not one Democrat raising it's repeal as an issue. Were Obama's campaigns and his presidency a disaster because he hasn't promised or tried to repeal the Hyde Amendment? Do you think there's any possibility that it could be repealed in the next 4 years?

    2. Anonymous8:23 AM

      "...with not one Democrat raising it's repeal as an issue..."

      You are very uninformed. Repealing the Hyde Amendment is in the 2016 platform. Kaine said last week he really was in favor of repealing the Hyde amendment to assuage the concerns about his abortion views. Now he's reversed himself. Disaster.

      "We believe unequivocally, like the majority of Americans, that every woman should have access to quality reproductive health care services, including safe and legal abortion—regardless of where she lives, how much money she makes, or how she is insured. We believe that reproductive health is core to women’s, men’s, and young people’s health and wellbeing. We will continue to stand up to Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood health centers, which provide critical health services to millions of people. We will continue to oppose—and seek to overturn—federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment."

    3. Anonymous8:31 AM

      Huffington Post
      No National Security Briefing For Donald Trump: Important To Sign This Petition Immediately!

      There is a new petition No National Security Briefing for Donald Trump on “We the People” at If it gets 100,000 signatures, the government must respond.

      It has been a tradition for an Administration to provide both major party nominees a national security briefing. It is only a tradition. It is not a legal requirement.

      This is the petition:

      “No National Security Briefing for Donald Trump

      Read more at HP

  11. Anonymous8:27 AM

    Huffington Post:
    Urgent! No Security Briefing For Donald Trump: Sign Petition Immediately

    A few weeks ago, I urged everyone to sign a petition telling the Obama Administration not to provide Donald Trump a security briefing. Trump will use whatever they tell him for his own dark purposes.

    Read the article, and sign the petition here.

    There is no legal requirement for the President to provide that briefing. Let me repeat: There is no legal requirement for the President to provide that briefing.

    We now have two more reasons to make sure that no how, no way, does Trump receive intelligence briefing.

    The first reason is Vladimir Putin. As more information and analysis shows a Trump link to Putin, providing Trump a security briefing would be tantamount to providing Putin the information itself.

    The second reason is the Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort who, for example, was a consultant to deposed and disgraced Ukrainian dictator, Viktor Yanukovitch, himself a close ally of Putin.

    This is a very dangerous circle.

    Trump is putty in Putin’s paws. Putin knows how to manipulate him. All he need do is heap praise upon him, tell everyone how wonderful he is, let him build a hotel someplace in Moscow... .and, Trump will tell everyone how terrific, how beautiful, how amazing Putin is. And, for good measure, provide no resistance as Putin expands into former Soviet states.

    From Putin-to Manafort — to Trump.

    And, would Trump care at all about sacrificing, e.g., “the” Estonians, for the Trump brand? The question answers itself.

    Read more at HP

  12. Anonymous8:37 AM

    Harry Reid Wants Intelligence Agencies to Give Trump “Fake” Briefings After Russia Commentsarry

    Reid has a message for the U.S. intelligence officials who will soon be giving Donald Trump national security briefings: Just fake it.

    “How would the CIA and the other intelligence agencies brief this guy? How could they do that? I would suggest to the intelligence agencies, if you’re forced to brief this guy, don’t tell him anything, just fake it, because this man is dangerous,” the Senate minority leader told the Huffington Poston Wednesday. “Fake it, pretend you’re doing a briefing, but you can’t give the guy any information.”

    Go to Slate for more

  13. Anonymous8:49 AM

    POLITICS JUL 29 2016, 12:18 PM ET
    Could Candidate Donald Trump Be Denied National Security Briefings?

    ... Who conducts the briefings?

    For the first 52 years, the CIA gave the briefings, but since the 2004 election, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has, which include a printed briefing book for the candidate....

    Who gets the briefings?

    In addition to the presidential candidates, the vice presidential nominees are also briefed....

    Candidates are also able to bring in top staff.

    What if a candidate spills classified information?....

    The candidate and his or her national security staff in the room do not have to have security clearances....

  14. Anonymous4:30 PM

    He is apparently clueless that those that can't stand him and won't vote for Hillary either may just take his suggestion and vote for Stein. There are a lot of Trump haters out there. Quite a few Republicans have left the party because of him and even those that haven't can't bring themselves to vote for Trump.

    So he's just given them a great idea.

    What a doofus.

  15. Anita Winecooler5:18 PM

    My mr tornado hair, what tiny hands you have.
    Tell me another, Donnie.


Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.