Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Book deal dead, CPAC speaking slot rescinded, and now ejected from Breitbart. The terrible, horrible, no good, very bad week of Milo Yiannopoulos.

Courtesy of CNN: 

The professional provocateur has resigned as an editor at Breitbart News amid a firestorm over unearthed comments in which he seemed to endorse sex between "younger boys and older men." 

Yiannopoulos released a statement on Tuesday afternoon, minutes before he was scheduled to give a press conference in Manhattan. 

"It would be wrong to allow my poor choice of words to detract from my colleagues' important reporting, so today I am resigning from Breitbart, effectively immediately. This decision is mine alone," Yiannopoulos said in a statement. 

While Yiannopoulos has made a living off of deliberately offensive statements, his comments on two recently discovered video clips proved too much, even for his friends and colleagues at Breitbart.

Jesus literally just 48 hours ago this guy was considered a conservative rising star.

And now he is essentially radioactive.

Gee, I guess promoting the idea that gays are pedophiles and that their sexual assault could work to help children "discover who they are" simply proved a bridge too far for the conservatives.

Remember it wasn't the antisemitic, anti-women, or racist comments that got Yiannopoulos in hot water.

Those apparently were just fine with the conservative folks, and even helped him to win a slot at CPAC this year.

Joan Walsh of "The Nation" recognizes that those disgusting comments were not only what made Yiannopoulos a star, but it is not the first time that kind of talk has done so:

But the question everyone should be asking is, how did a low-rent scam-artist like Yiannopoulos rise to the top of conservative politics, anyway? Even some conservatives are mystified. Reagan biographer Craig Shirley was aghast. “This is the first time I can recall a spoiled man child whose main purpose is self-promotion being selected as…[a] speaker at CPAC,” Shirley told The Daily Beast’s Matt Lewis. 

Shirley’s memory is a little short. CPAC helped mainstream another “spoiled man child whose main purpose is self-promotion” just four years ago when the group invited Trump to speak at its conference. Yiannopoulos’s political trajectory tracks that of the man he calls “Daddy.” His fall shows that the craven opportunism of the modern conservative movement has at least one limit: pedophilia. Of course, both men should have been stopped long ago. 

The rise of Yiannopolous is evidence that modern conservatism is mostly driven by fear, backlash, scapegoating, and whiny complaints about “political correctness,” which essentially comes down to white men complaining they can’t insult women and people of color without censure anymore. That’s the heart of Trump’s appeal, too.

Yep, there is a reason that Yiannopoulos calls Donald Trump "Daddy."

They share a similar pig-like DNA.

Trump was able to talk about "grabbing pussies," and walking in on young girls changing their clothes, and still get elected president. And one would think that in an environment like this conservatives should be able to get away with saying just about ANYTHING.

Unfortunately for Yiannopolulos he forgot the old adage, "Never get caught with a dead girl or a live boy." (Yes I know that in this case the idiot was not actually caught with a live boy, but from his words it sounds like there were a lot of time he could have been.)

By the way don't think is the last we will see of this pathetic little troll.

Personally I hope the media stays on this, because I would REALLY like to know who would fund something like this.

62 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:03 PM

    NAMBLA?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:19 PM

      RIGHTwing>"doubling {on the} down-LOW"

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:48 PM

      drumpf's turtle face "bitch mcCONnell"

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mitch-mcconnell-trump-tweets_us_58acac56e4b0e784faa278c1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

      Delete
  2. Anonymous2:04 PM

    Only a matter of time until he joins the inner circle. "See? I LOVE gay people!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:07 PM

    That freaky MaMcGriz over at the pee pond is all in for poor widdle victimized Milo (real name Mike btw). Who or what is actually operating th sock puppets at the clown show Palin has going over there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:29 PM

      I saw that last night & today. So is thegedster and vikings444. Thegedster even went this far:

      TheGedster MaMcGriz
      18 hours ago
      "Ma... what did he say?... crickets about him on BB now! Publisher pulled his book. No CPAC... Is the left aware that in a lot of the ME countries, sex with boys by men, is the norm... and, they (the left) don't seem to mention it... I'm confused. Surely Milo was not promoting underage non-consensual sex??? Just wondering"

      So, thegedster is excusing raping teen boys, because some cultures condone it? Does he condone the treatment of girls and women that are acceptable in some middle eastern cultures? Or, does he only defend boy-rape, and if so, why?
      At least mark1955 is no longer the most disgusting pile of shit on c4p now!
      C4p is mamcgriz's site now. She (?) dominates it, posts constantly, responds to too many comments and moderates it to her view point. Should rename it mmg4trump

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:39 PM

      There's hardly anyone there anymore, and I have to laugh especially when she starts her "you're getting dangerously close" stuff when people don't cowtow to her At The Name Of Sarah And Trump Every Knee Will Bow crap.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:17 PM

      Yep. It is ma's site now. And, she stands with Milo (her exact words).
      Strange how the majority of "posters" moved on at the same time AIP Palin went broke...

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:30 PM

      VG showed up today and basically begged for more gofundme $$$. Unfortunately, once he hit $15,000. the gang got tired of supporting his lifestyle. Poor freeloading VG. Life on a hundred acre VA farm is rough. Good thing he isn't like those liberals he claims are always looking for handouts!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:43 PM

      Seriously, every second or third comment is by ma. I hope she is getting paid overtime for keeping the site alive. I can't stand her persona. Very pushy and self-righteous. Much like stlouissix.
      I think ma is vg. I really do.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous3:51 PM

      Reynolds and MJ are so desperate for female company now that all old hags have moved on (or were run off). MJ was even pining for TBO and failed to remember how shitty he treated her when he took January's side in their tiff.
      Right, MJ?
      Such a fun soap opera at c4p-except the players are not young or sexy or smart or successful. (Last) DAYS OF OUR LIVES.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous4:17 PM

      Someone posted here that the site went down a few months ago and I thought it was done? So it's still a thing? Wow, I thought it went the way of all things Palin.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous4:26 PM

      It was hacked or had serious gliches awhile back. But like Palin's relevancy, it is sucking its last breath.

      Delete
    9. Nikki Munson4:44 PM

      There is a Palin post just before this one. Is there a reason why you Palin obsessed people can't post remarks about her and C4P there?

      Delete
    10. Anonymous5:04 PM

      I think VG and Ma are the same person too - and they are both either RAM or that creepy Thomas the Truth Fairy who puts up all the articles over there. Which would explain the allegiance to Milo. I mean Mike.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous5:34 PM

      Nikki, complain to Gryphen. He owns the site and controls the comments. Or, just skip over them, hun.

      Delete
    12. Anonymous5:36 PM

      @5:04, who the heck is Thomas and where does he write or post? It would explain VG's absence from c4p.

      Delete
    13. Anonymous7:02 PM

      5:04 pm here. Thomas is one Thomas Schmitz, listed as a C4p editor. He posts the articles that now show up there. If you google this beauty he comes up as a very minor league Milo based in Hollywood. Hey isn't that the RAM stomping grounds?
      Maybe Thomas and Milo and VG are all RAM!! See Nikki c4p does belong in this thread.

      Delete
    14. Anonymous6:28 AM

      Schmitz-as in itz? I get it! Thanks!
      Milo sucks (mentioned for topic relevancy).

      Delete
    15. Anonymous6:54 AM

      7:02, if you happen back, thank you! I looked at his facebook and, Wow! I have often wondered about mamcgriz. Something is off about all this, or palin is the Judy Garland/Bette Midler of politics

      Delete
    16. Anonymous7:57 AM

      You are welcome. I suppose he's Ases too. Remember their "special forces warrior" who spent his time between battles posting at the pee pond? Hey sailor! As MaMcGriz likes to say to VG between their begging stints.

      Delete
    17. Anonymous8:14 AM

      Yep, Ases is AWOL! I assume vg will needs funds to cover that heart transplant soon...
      By the way, in case you haven't heard, stlouissix is a (non-com)vet and has navy and cop sons-so his opinions are waaay more important than yours!
      What happened to moderator Steve, who was also gay (not judging, just surprised since it is a Palin site)?

      Delete
    18. Anonymous8:23 AM

      Didn't you think it odd that a special ops would go to a geriatric Palin site when home from battle?
      And, speaking of odd, I never figured out the whole elusive brianus (?) thing and Mindy showing up to post prose to him.
      Do you know why the site bitch jr8 left? Amazedone?

      Delete
    19. Anonymous10:33 AM

      I think they stopped getting paid when SarahPAC croaked.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous2:17 PM

    Maybe Milo can get a job writing for Bristhoe's blog!

    Or endorsing ass rocket colonic weight loss teas!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:28 PM

    You Know, substitute the position and it still rings true:
    Reagan biographer Craig Shirley was aghast. “This is the first time I can recall a spoiled man child whose main purpose is self-promotion being selected as…President of the United States,” Shirley told The Daily Beast’s Matt Lewis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:20 PM

      I don't know which is worse: the death of truth ... or ... the death of irony. Along with zero self-awareness we've got the Bermuda Triangle of Regressive thinking.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous2:30 PM

    I hear that there is a media job opening in Trump's WH. I mean, what could go wrong? He lies, he cheats, he loves sex with kids-not much there that the "Christians' will object too as long as he says he's 'sorry if I offended anyone' right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:12 PM

      And he doesn't even have to apologize. What you've described here sounds like Trump, and the evangelicals love him and have never asked for any kind of apology.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous2:45 PM

    I think Milo was a fraud from the get go. I think he saw an opportunity to fleece ignorant rubes and he used conservatives like Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham and Joel Osteen use the ignorant "Christians".
    The amazing thing about Milo is that he was in your face, over the top and they still baa, baa'ed, all the way down the abyss, much like they did with pussy grabbing, adulterous, lying, tax evading, Russia-loving drumpf.
    Africkingamazing!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:55 PM

    So is Milo Bannon's boyfriend or son? I get them all so confused.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:18 PM

      He calls drumpf daddy. Seriously.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:35 PM

      He calls trump daddy? Oh boy. I can see the role playing fantasy with those two.
      Golden shower time.
      They are both disgusting!!

      Delete
  9. Anonymous3:05 PM

    If this were about a hetero man having sex with a 13-year-old girl, it'd not have gotten the same reaction. In fact, 13 would not seem all that young to some people--12 and 13 are acceptable to them. Many people would have accepted it or just barely spoken against it. And such girls, down to 12, who would end up pregnant or for whatever reason get their parents' or a court's consent, would be legally tied to the much older man. It happens. So many states don't even have a real minimum age for consent, and in those cases the accepted age is 12.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:42 PM

      You are mentally ill. There is no other explanation for that sick comment.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:56 PM

      SEE, THE POND STILL LOVE HIM.



      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:29 PM

      No, 3:42, I am not mentally ill. You read my post as condoning, not criticizing. I guess I needed to start out my post using the word "Unfortunately" so that you would get it. The fact is that there are exceptions to the age of consent requirement and parents and courts, especially in red states, push girls of puberty age into marriages with adult males. Yes, many of us complain, but there are many who don't--and definitely at least not like they do when, because it's an adult male and a boy, suddenly that thirteen-year-old is considered a real child. Unlike the girl. Both the boy and girl are victims.

      Apology accepted.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:54 PM

      I am not 3:42, but I read it as he/she did. It is your responsibility to clearly state your thoughts, not the readers responsibility to interpret your words. You were at fault and you should be apologizing first for failing to be clear and expecting the reader to be clairvoyance and secondly, for being snotty in your response, when you even admit you should have made your point better. Now, apologize!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:31 PM

      No, I will not apologize.

      As I said, I guess I could have used the word "Unfortunately," but since when do pro-pedophilia people post on here? And while Gryphen allows a lot to be said on IM, he does draw the line, and I don’t see him as allowing my post here if he thought I was defending pedophilia. Especially given what a protector of and defender of kids he is. And if people read with any care, things I said: the "acceptable to” a “them” and the words “just barely spoken against it” and “down to 12” and “legally tied to” and “So many states don’t have a real minimum age for consent” all should have sounded much more like I was against children being in relationships with adults than the other way around. But I was instead attacked and called mentally ill by someone who couldn’t bother being a closer reader before posting what s/he did.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:58 PM

      Wow 5:31. Nice rant. Not clear or concise, but quite a rant. Your first comment was confusing and your second was annoying. The third was not worth the bother...so, I didn't.
      Sorry.
      (You finally got an apology of sorts.)

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:35 PM

      No, let me apologize. I realize now that you need a picture book with pages that read something like: "See Milo with the boy. Milo likes the boy. Some people don't like Milo with the boy. But if Milo liked a girl, they would like that. They would say Milo should marry the girl, and everything would be okay."

      Delete
    8. Anonymous6:53 PM

      Jesus anonymous @6:35, even when you are trying to simplify your point you are too wordy.
      I am beginning to think anonymous @3:42 was right.
      Maybe you should call it a night?

      Delete
    9. Anonymous9:25 PM

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-rape-case_us_581a31a5e4b0c43e6c1d9834

      Delete
    10. Anonymous10:38 PM

      Nope, not wordy at all. Calling me wordy or not clear or not concise is off-target. My posts have been neither. But I understand the choice to grab at something so as to have the last word. I'm not the one who needed to call it a night. You could have moved on to focus on adding something of value to IM tonight, but you couldn't let the person who was defending herself have the last word. How Palinesque.

      Delete
    11. Leland9:07 AM

      To all those giving 3:05 a hard time:

      I agree with her initial response. You can't read and/or comprehend. I had absolutely NO problem understanding she was being negative about the concept on my very first time through. And having now read it several times (the initial comment, that is) I STILL can't see how it could be misconstrued - unless it is deliberate.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous3:11 PM

    So glad he crashed. And what he said aside, he's so freaky-ugly looking but thinks he's a hot young GOP. The features of his face are distorted and so is the shape of his head. He loves getting his picture taken, but he shouldn't--he is bizarre looking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:10 AM

      He's got that Klaus Kinski look, ewww.
      THERE'S a freak, now. Wonder if there's a family connection.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous3:44 PM

    OT: too bad soo sad>
    http://www.politicususa.com/2017/02/21/liberals-donald-trump-activism-gop-town-halls-making-sad.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous4:02 PM

    I've never read anything about this creep and won't start now. All I know is he's a creep and the world that used to love him now hates him (too late) but the peeponders are diligently defending him (because Sarah Palin hasn't given them orders not to) and creepy Julian Assange is bitching about his treatment.

    It feels like there is something very dark and disgusting being exposed in wingnut land.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:35 PM

      Yeah, agreed. They will pretty much accept anything if it's done by a GOP. And they are so desperate for those connections they have that involve non-traditional aspects of the GOP. They complain about Hollywood but really hype every actor who is GOP. And when a GOP is young and seems hip and part of an "in" crowd, they so badly want that facet of their party. If someone's gay and GOP, that's like hitting the jackpot (as long as no one really has to look at the "it" of the gayness). Megan McCain is one of those young people the GOP and Fox love as an example of their young up-and-coming people in the political world, but she's still never been really what you'd call cool and really out of the box, like Milo.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous4:05 PM

    Sometimes it goes just an inch too far for "conservatives" to stomach. Just like Garrison on South Park running for POTUS as a Trump-like candidate speaking to a crowd and referencing going a little too far sexually and mistaking anal for vaginal and all the women leave the room.

    The context was basically that he's denigrated blacks, muslims, jews and women but his sexually charged joke goes a little too far?

    Kind of like Milo; I guess they drew the line at possible pedophilia?

    ReplyDelete
  14. So -- will Sarah fill his slot as a CPAC speaker?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:04 AM

      Please! I want to hear what Track has been up to. What else does she screech about?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:11 AM

      Heh heh, O.R.
      Nahh, ANYTIME $he leaves home, one of her bastards fucks up royally.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous4:32 PM

    OT:
    Virginia governor vetoes bill defunding Planned Parenthood

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-virginia-plannedparenthood-idUSKBN1602L2?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=58ace3c004d3014e40973f40&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous4:37 PM

    Who would fund something like this you ask?

    The exact same people that are now denouncing him will fund him through channels that can't be traced back to them.

    His message of hate is too important to their cause than just a little bit of his sanctioning underaged sex between two consenting parties can stop.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous4:38 PM

    There's a lot more to this little bastard than meets the eye. I'm reminded of the Republicans' Franklin sex scandal and how its tentacles reached into the most surprising and shocking places.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:00 PM

      http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/Franklin/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

      "
      This was the biggest pedophile scandal in the history of the U.S.A. The story received some newspaper coverage but there was a TV News Media blackout on the subject. For this reason, most Americans have never heard of it."

      http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/Franklin/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:40 PM

      REAGAN-BUSHs-CHENEY >BOYS aftadark in then White House.....

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:12 AM

      How about Jeff Gannon?

      Delete
  18. Anonymous5:14 PM

    OT:$100.00 fine to the victims.
    http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/couple-fined-100-for-refusing-to-remove-racist-graffiti-on-their-home-until-cops-catch-culprit/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous5:44 PM

    I've been following this story since the UC Berkeley violence sr
    broke. YM's movement is not about free speech, but rather about justifying offensive or hate speech.
    I hav been following me his story since protests at UC Davis story broke. I believe YM is now under FBI investigation, as similar events surrounding his appearances go back to GamerGate. I sincerely hope, and now suspect he is under investigation by FBI. I have questioned link between him and College Republicans for a while. These are KIDS. Who mentors this group and would even suggest he is an appropriate speaker? Leads me to believe: 1) these kids are being manipulated and exploited; 2) CPAC, who cancelled his speaking appearance is the group mentoring these kids.
    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.