Friday, July 07, 2017

Sarah Palin will not appear at the opening day of her defamation case against the New York Times.

Courtesy of the New York Daily News: 

Conservative activist Sarah Palin won’t be attending the first court proceeding in her defamation case against The New York Times, according to her lawyer. 

The former vice presidential candidate and Alaska governor filed a lawsuit on June 27 alleging The Times ran a “fabricated story.” The initial conference in the case is set for 11 a.m. Friday. 

Asked Thursday whether Palin will be in the courtroom, her lawyer, S. Preston Ricardo, replied “No” in an email to the Daily News.

"Conservative activist?" Well I guess that sounds better than "failed reality show performer," or "political has been."

I love this part of the article: 

Palin wants The Times to pay up for “falsely stating to millions of people that she, a devoted wife, mother and grandmother, who committed a substantial portion of her adult life to public service, is part of a pattern of ‘lethal’ politics,” the suit contends.

"Devoted" wife, mother, and grandmother? 

If the court will indulge me I'd like to make an objection. Or vomit in my mouth, whichever is the more convenient.

And who is she kidding with this "committed a substantial portion of her adult life to public service?"

The only public that Palin ever served was her the public that looked back at her from a mirror every morning.

Remember this case is only seeking $75,000 in damages.

And since the Times has declared they are planning to aggressively fight this thing Palin could end up with hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

89 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:17 AM

    OT?
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/07/06/fox_business_network_host_payne_suspended_after_sexual_harassment_allegations.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:35 AM

      100% off topic. Trying to hijack this blog to insert your own copy/paste is bullshit.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:12 AM

      $eXxx and Law>
      "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith>
      where Joseph Ratzinger lived for decades"ed-up neighbors were simply sick of what they described as a “steady stream of young men” who frequented Ratzinger’s former apartment, which had been given to Monsignor Luigi Capozzi, the secretary for Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, who heads the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, which busies itself with deciphering and clarifying various points of canon law."The Vatican police showed up to find an ORGY IN PROGRESS, with an untold number of naked men allegedly writhing around the floor with Capozzi and his cohorts, who were apparently under the influence of hard drugs according to the Italian newspaper"took Capozzi straight to a detox center in the hills outside of Rome. He is now supposed to be at a convent outside of Rome where wayward priests go to repent. He will face misdemeanor drug charges" but ORGIS aren’t illegal and there were no underage boys on the premises when the bust took place so he will not face sex-related charges."

      http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-vaticans-swiss-guards-break-up-a-drug-fueled-gay-orgy-in-pope-francis-backyard

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:32 AM

      Agreed, 6:35. Happens far too often, wish Uncle G would just NOT.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:38 AM

      @7:32

      Off topic crap helps pad the comments section. Remember when there used to be hundreds of comments here?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous9:04 AM

      Yep, that was until the sunshine of this blog did it's job, sarah Palin is a little recognized neverr-was on teh national stage has been, chasing a middle class (five figure) annual salary lawsuit.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:58 AM

      I don't mind the o/t comments. I learn a lot from what people post that would not fit under a specific topic.

      However, I don't read them or click on them if the person posting doesn't make the little effort to say WHY they are posting it.

      If it's important to one of our readers, great, share. But please share what it's about and why I should bother with my time and my click to give them a look.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous6:22 AM

    "instructing same-sex couples not to “celebrate the Constitution” because it “had nothing to do with” the ruling. Roberts insisted that states may make same-sex partners legal strangers, prevent them from adopting their own children, and keep them off each other’s death certificates."

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/07/how_the_supreme_court_could_overturn_obergefell_v_hodges.html

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2015/scotus_roundup/supreme_court_gay_marriage_john_roberts_dissent_in_obergefell_is_heartless.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:33 AM

      So is $ara getting gay-married or is one of her spawn?
      Or are you too stupid to stay on topic? Uh huh.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:00 PM

      7:33 Are you trying to prevent us from learning new info that is pertinent to this blog?

      Do we have to wait until Gryphen posts something on 'gay-married' before learning about this Supreme Court case?

      Delete
  3. She'll just stiff everyone. Can she go to jail? That would be nice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6:33 AM

    She's probably figuring it'll cost her 75 grand, and it will. Mrs Don't Retreat, RELOAD has a whole history of inciting and glorifying violence and she can't try and word-sausage her way out of that- all of that evidence is in the public domain.

    Her bragging about how effective her gunsights were, AFTER Gabby Giffords said it was a dangerous thing to do... everything she does shows Sarah Palin to be the bloodthirsty attention whore that she really is.

    Fuck you, Sarah Palin, go away you dried-out old failure. You're only after easy money as usual, why don't you get a job like a normal person?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:35 AM

      Oh please oh please, $arah, have yer day in court! I SOOOO want to read the transcript of her deposition, the stupid woman.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:11 AM

      She may not have to appear in court. Her high fallutin' lawyer can do it all.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous6:49 AM

    I think she's just hoping they will take the bait and write her a check for 75K to make her silly claim go away. She's already thrilled that she was able to get her name in the news for a minute again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:51 AM

    Sarah Palin is and always has been "devoted" to no one other than herself. In that, she greatly resembles the present occupant of the White House. And, yes, her hateful behavior during the 2008 presidential campaign demeaned the political process forever.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
  7. Randall6:53 AM

    I laughed out loud when I read the words "Conservative activist"

    Mean-spirited fluff-head would've been more accurate, don't you think?

    Nasty-minded has-been?
    Snotty zipper-head?
    anyone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:35 AM

      Splodey heads keep splodin'!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:17 AM

      Oh oh, 6:53 be prepared to be sued.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:09 AM

      I laugh that her Facebook page still says Politician under her name. Yeah right.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:11 PM

      I used to check out her twitter feed, but i cant anymore. Same shit different day. Shocking, triggered,"can't believe the left did this" red meat clickbait shit. Most of the comments tell her to get a life in not so nice terms. She must not read the comments to most of her tweets. They are not very nice and they used to make me smile. Now im just sick of her and what she did to America.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:36 PM

      It's the same shit at bristol's instagram. Same old commenters asking the same questions,making the same old tired compliments about a bland,no talent breeder and her unemployable fuckup dude of the moment.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:58 AM

      @8"36
      Your comment is funny as hell and true!

      Delete
  8. Anonymous6:53 AM

    OT?"has published a paper that argues that the entire universe may be capable of consciousness.
    This concept, called "panpsychism,"
    it is hard to think of any greater expression of that feeling than continuing the quest to find out if our human minds are just tiny components of a much greater cosmic brain."

    https://futurism.com/could-universe-conscious/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:36 AM

      Could your cosmic brain not stay on topic?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:46 AM

      Jeez, 7:36. Give it a freaking rest. You've posted a dozen comments complaining about people being off-topic. Get your own blog and let Gryphen police his own, we all learn things from each other through "OT" posts.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous6:58 AM

    I hope this process is long and drawn out and costs her a small fortune, only to be overturned.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous7:02 AM

    Aren't frivolous lawsuits against the law?

    Let's hope this lands her either in orange, or on the street corner with a tin cup.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:31 AM

      frivolous civil lawsuits are punished by having to pay the other parties atty bills.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:25 AM

      Captain Zero helped that along in Alaska. Funny how she goes outside her legal buffer zone. Must be broke.
      Welcome back to childhood!

      Delete
  11. Grifting has a new name-public service? She prolly saw that in her alphabet moose stew she didn't shoot or gut r cook.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:30 AM

    Palin could also end up getting stuck with the atty fees of the NYT also too.
    But a better description of Sarah be unemployed fishwife?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:39 AM

      Oh Honey, I love that one!

      "Unemployed Fishwife"

      BWahahahahahah! Still stinks of old fish, old sarah!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:26 AM

      No problem if she still has SarahPac money here or there?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:00 AM

      @9:26
      Her spawn's(Truck beating his pregnant girlfriend) legal bills ate up the last of $araPAC monies.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous8:17 AM

    The filing says in excess of 75k. They have to do that for court assignment reasons, I.e. It's not small claims. She will be going for millions.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8:22 AM

    Look at her hairline in that photo.
    You can see the 'join' where her wig and her hairline(what's left of it) meet up. Note the brown powder there, along side of her stringy bangs remnants, to hide the fact that's she's balding!
    FAIL!!! BALDY!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8:31 AM

    Beefy's instagram for July 4 was a terribly staged scene where she's once again peddling her shit-tea, wearing a flag around her neck, while holding her latest brat in a kitchen that looked like a ghost town. Yeah, a fat, mooby hubby, and 2 small children and a kitchen that screams "Why am I here" You can't cook!! I'm a show-kitchen!!". Does anybody in that house eat? MOH sure looks like he can't keep his hands off food, but maybe that's the booze calories we're seeing on him.
    While usually only allowing complimentary, fawning, drooling comments, some of the comments on this one took her ass to task for grifting with her kid on July 4. Probably removed by now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:08 PM

      After reading your comment, I checked out Instagram pages for Barstool and Dumbkota.

      She's at home with the kids, hawking her "weight loss energy tea" and her "Food-Fun-Fit subscription box" scam.

      Meanwhile, her devoted husband and father to one of her three pups is out on the Gulf with his redneck companions, wearing his red-white-blue onesy, drinking beer, chasing women - - - real tightly-knit family there.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:00 AM

      Your last paragraph almost made me spit out my coffee!

      Delete
  16. Anonymous8:37 AM

    This case comes down to Palin being defamed in some way. She is unemployed, an ex D list celebrity with no political future, damages are non existent. This is Palin waiting for a payday, PERIOD. Shit, she even had to pay her own way to see Trump and rant her bs during the election.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:20 AM

      Sarah is not unemployed. Isn't she receiving income from her Facebook hits?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:22 AM

      Palin's political ambitions are not over. Sarah's saying is she never says no!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:10 AM

      9:20 There is a difference between being employed and receiving income. Since she no longer publicly speaks for money, she's unemployed.0

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:02 AM

      $ister $ara aint making that much from her Fecebook spew. Not nearly enough to compensate for the cost of the life to which she (and her brats) has become accustomed.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:27 AM

      Long way down that well Sarah!

      Delete
  17. Anonymous9:00 AM

    Legal fees which someone else is likely paying for - The question is who is that someone else? Could it be Donald the Rump?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:55 PM

      This is an interesting question. Remember Trump said he wanted to open up the libel laws so the press could be sued. This may be a test case that someone else is bankrolling. Just watched a documentary on the Gawker / Hulk Hogan case that turned out to be bankrolled by Thiel and after it was over I got on to see the news and BuzzFeed is being sued by a Russian who was in a dossier they posted. I think there is a concerted effort to destroy the press and anyone who reports on the absurdity of the "fake news" being flooded into the discourse. Today Rachel had an article about someone disseminating fake leaked documents to see if the media will report on them and then be shown to be passing along fake news so no one trusts them. Something is being orchestrated so that no one knows who to trust anymore. Wierd and scary times.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:23 PM

      Russians. How's the old man?

      Delete
  18. Anonymous9:06 AM

    What the hell makes her think $he's going to win this case?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:59 AM

      She's fucking Sarah Palin that's why. According to Sarah Palin, she can do whatever she wants until the court says she can't.

      Delete
    2. Pathological greed?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:21 AM

      She assumes the NYT will settle - and for big bucks. That's all she's interested in. The NYT article was a godsend to Sarah Palin now that her withered dead PAC is no longer supporting her and her family. It sure beats getting a job in Wasilla!
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:05 PM

      Well now, if she's in court for Defame then, by all means, lets court order a DNA sample shall we? Smirk.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous9:54 PM

      What and make Sarah understand trigonometry?
      I mean Trigisnotmybaby?

      Delete
  19. abbafan9:48 AM

    Simple $arah is just "tough talk"; she is shitting her drawers in fear of being deposed in an actual court room! She will retreat; there is fuck-all to "re-load" - the Times' lawyers will see to that!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous9:53 AM

     "who committed a substantial portion of her adult life to public service,"


    What did Sarah Palin get out of it?

    Well coincidentally, a two story home built by first time home builder Todd (wink wink) who never built a house before that or after that as far as some people know.

    Not to change the subject, Todd, the first time two story house builder (wink wink), ironically built a wooden good neighbor fence that didn't last that long.

    If I remember correctly the wooden fence was structurally unstable and had to be removed. I guess it was a danger to their children and who would want that fence built by Todd, the first time home builder (wink wink), falling on their children and their children's friends?

    If I remember correctly, one question at the time was who built Sarah's house that was built down the road from a new ice rink built by the winning contractor of the city ice rink under Sarah's mayorship.

    If I remember correctly, it was said Mayor Sarah's house was built by Todd and some contractor friends. But if I remember correctly we will never know who built Mayor Sarah's house and where did the materials come from because if I remember correctly, coincidentally under Sarah's mayorship, she may have revised city building ordances regarding structures built in areas like Mayor Sarah's house did not require plans filed with the city or inspected by city inspectors to see who built her house and if it complies to city building ordances.

    At the time, if I remember correctly, some say some materials used by first time two story home builder Todd (wink wink) is similar to a neighboring ice rink that was built by the winning contractor under Sarah's mayorship.

    If I remember correctly, some say Sarah's house was built by the winning ice rink contractor under Sarah's mayorship. But who really knows who built Sarah's house?

    If I remember correctly, structures like the house built by first time home builder Todd (wink wink) was never inspected by city inspectors for small things like structural and electrical compliance standards. I don't know, maybe it was inspected? Does anybody know?

    Would I ever buy a house or worst case, even a two story house built by just anybody without being assured the house is safe with plans and periodic inspections filed and assured by city or county my family is going to call home? No way!

    As a father with a family, I would not know if her house is structurally sound or would catch on fire because of shoddy workmanship that violated city building ordances that would have been caught by inspectors who are highly trained in these matters to catch shoddy workmanship and materials if what was said is true?

    Mayor Sarah's house built by Todd down the road from the ice rink is a very nice looking house on the outside that Todd should be very proud of and I believe as a mother with five children, Sarah would be convinced her new house is safe and sound for her family and for family and friends who frequent her house.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:53 AM

      That reminded me of George Jones, and Tammy Wynette's country song, Two Story house.

      Delete
  21. Anonymous10:19 AM

    sarah you mispelled agin. its spelled p u b i c without the L?

    That is OK you may call it "service" it it what you do. Besides lip service . You are funny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:42 AM

      You're a fucking disgrace.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:31 AM

      It's all about sex doncha no!
      Gag.

      Delete
  22. Crystal Sage10:41 AM

    Sarah Palin is largely responsible for the bullying, nasty attitude evidenced today by some leaders. She started it all with her "sassy" retorts to real questions and almost rode that wave to the vice presidency. Thankfully, the better candidates won and we had eight years of adult leadership. Now, her celebrity reality TV idol is in the White House. Time to cash in. Anyone see her latest PAC financial report? Must be about zero by now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:36 AM

      It's been closed for 6 months.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:26 PM

      Isn't SarahPAC long gone?
      But, yes, she took this country down the ghastly road to where we are now, the worst of the deplorables emboldened by hateful rhetoric, whipped into a frenzy by bigger and badder demagogues, and even more so-called Christians happy to check their values at the door. She deserves to rot in hell. But an orange jumpsuit would be a good start.

      Delete
  23. Anonymous11:50 AM

    Today Sarah Palin posted a Tweet cheering on "the 14 words." For those not up on their murderous white supremacist lingo, the 14 words refer to a particularly vile Nazi slogan. There is nothing else this could be referring to in the context of Palin's comment. Nothing. It's a shoutout to white, Christian supremacy.

    Even for her, this is breathtakingly low.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous12:00 PM

    Sarah has just stepped into a huge steaming pile of trouble!!

    From Raw Story:


    -- quote

    Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin whipped up a social media firestorm on Friday after a tweet praising President Donald Trump included a phrase associated with the Neo-Nazi movement.

    “Trump Gives Speech to the People of Poland, Says 14 Words That Leave Americans Stunned,” Palin wrote, with a link to a story about the president’s recent address in Warsaw. The article itself makes no mention of 14 words used by Trump.

    -- end quote

    The phrase "14 words" is a huge dog whistle to white supremacists and neo-Nazis. The "14 words" are: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

    Twitter was not kind to Sarah:
    http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/please-delete-your-account-sarah-palin-slammed-for-using-neo-nazi-slogan-to-praise-trump/

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/heres-why-sarah-palin-tweeted-the-neo-nazi-slogan-14-words

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:20 PM

      I'm sure that Sarah Palin does not have a clue about the real history of 20th century Europe.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:51 PM

      She's too stupid to understand that that statement basically says her own children and grandkids should be murdered.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:59 PM

      When she became Governor I am sure she found out "it's not who you know it's what you know". Then went Neo- Nazi on targets, because, well, you know, Sarah will do it until the courts say she can't.
      I guess we shall see what the courts have to say. Shrug.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:41 AM

      The replies to her racist Nazi tweet are awesome!

      https://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/883271897605185536

      Delete
  25. Anonymous12:00 PM

    I mean the whole United State saw and heard this woman in her raspy holier than thou voice screaming hateful rhetoric.
    She juiced up all the hate mongers. Before that we didn't give them the time of the day, and chocked them up to the thing of the past, then along comes she and lets it be known that it's okay to super hateful in the limelight. I didn't think of her as Hitler like I do Putin, but I knew before there was Hitler someone came before him to lubricate the train tracts.
    Now we have Donny boy doing just that. Thanks Sarah. You were obviously chosen to bring down humanity by the devil himself. I believe it says in the bible something about not leaving yourself wide open to Satan. Oops. Too late .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:18 PM

      That was her job during the 2008 campaign. And she never stopped it throughout President Obama's two terms in office. That's the one job she didn't quit. Hate and fear mongering; Sarah Palin's chose field of endeavor.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:10 PM

      She hasn't stopped punishing the American public for her loss 8 yrs ago. She's old and has lost her looks.. Sarah's jobless,desparate and looking for a payday.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:25 PM

      Amen to that 9:10

      Delete
  26. Anonymous12:07 PM

    Maybe Sarah is skeered to leave Wasilly in case those kids get to partying and shit stirring. Again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:01 PM

      Yeah that RR graffiti.
      Cracked out chit I'd say!

      Delete
  27. Anonymous12:32 PM

    Here is a comment I found on Sarah Palin's face book page from one of her followers. I hope this site and many others bring to attention the kind of people she attracts.

    "I wouldn't include Abraham Lincoln on the list either. The emancipcation proclamation is the worst piece of legislation next to what followed with the civil rights act in the 1960's. Setting them free has only destroyed formerly white neighborhoods. Too bad Lincoln wasn't assassinated before he signed the emancipation proclamation. Then we'd still have a great W society instead of the N's that are indoctrinating and dumbing down white kids."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:17 PM

      Any sane person would have deleted that kind of comment or at least chastised the person who made it.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
  28. Anonymous12:59 PM

    Ok, this case is easy to throw out. Everyone knows she is involved in lethal politics. She just proved it once again with her 14 words post.

    If she goes through with this lawsuit, the NYT will lay out for all to see her pattern of hate and the damage she has done to our country. Sarah is seriously stupid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:49 PM

      Bingo.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:29 PM

      Shiny objects you all chase!

      Delete
  29. Anonymous1:14 PM

    http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/please-delete-your-account-sarah-palin-slammed-for-using-neo-nazi-slogan-to-praise-trump/

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous2:23 PM

    Times Lawyers Say They'll Seek Early Dismissal of Palin's Defamation Claim. Lawyers for The New York Times came out swinging on July 7
    http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202792505571/Times-Lawyers-Say-Theyll-Seek-Early-Dismissal-of-Palins-Defamation-Claim?mcode=1202617075062&curindex=0&slreturn=20170607181947
    Lethal Politics: https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE4.HTM
    Trump accepts Putin's claims that Russia did not meddle in US election. It was a meeting that had been weeks in the planning
    It's Settled: Trump Either Did or Did Not Accept Putin's Denial of Election Interference
    https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/07/07/its-settled-trump-either-did-or-did-not-accept-putins-denial-election-interference

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous4:08 PM

    The Times acted with actual malice? PROVE IT.

    Christopher Hayes‏: "Looking forward to Sarah Palin's 88 tattoo." - 7 Jul 2017

    https://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/883271897605185536


    Sarah Palin‏ @SarahPalinUSA "SEVERE: North Korea Will Be Shaking In Their Boots When They See What Trump Just Did" - 7 Jul 2017

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous6:54 PM

    Sarah, you Judas, look what you have wrought. History will not be kind to you, Trump, Bannon, and Putin. If we survive the nukes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:31 PM

      Rest assured, no nukes.
      There is no profit in it.
      Can't sell arms to a graveyard. Shrug.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:10 AM

      We should eat, drink, and be as merry as possible. :(

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.