Friday, December 08, 2017

So the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas gave James O'Keefe an award. I didn't know they gave awards for being a douchebag.

Courtesy of The Hill: 

James O'Keefe, the conservative activist who attempted to plant a false story in The Washington Post this month about GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore, was presented Wednesday with an Impact Award, handed to him by Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. 

O'Keefe accepted the award on behalf of his organization, Project Veritas, at an event hosted by the conservative group United for Purpose at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.. 

"Proud to receive the Impact award from Ginni Thomas on behalf of the @project_veritas team," O'Keefe wrote on Instagram, before praising other 2017 award recipients such as Fox New host Sean Hannity and Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton as "fighters." 

Thomas is a tea party activist and president of Liberty Consulting.

I have no idea what they are rewarding O'Keefe for doing, since most of his childish stings only reveal that he is a rank amateur and embarrassment to the conservative movement.

His last "expose" blew up in his face so spectacularly they he ended up reinforcing the integrate of his target and exposing one of his pathetic little operatives to ridicule.

And by the way how is it okay for the wife of a sitting Supreme Court Justice to participate in this kind of partisan bomb throwing?

17 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:34 AM

    Most articles about this have pointed out that the event happened at Trump DC hotel --- of course it did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:02 AM

      We have entered an Alice in Wonderful world -- "Off with his head" will be heard next and the court will just nod in agreement, glad it isn't THEIR necks.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous4:38 AM

    They're Republicans - beign douchebags is their forte.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4:39 AM

    /integrity?/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:08 AM

    More like project_LIEatus.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:34 AM

    IOKIYAR

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:11 AM

    http://www.politicususa.com/2017/12/07/trump-justice-department-planned-parenthood-based-insane-fetal-tissue-conspiracy.html

    YourMonEy

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7:50 AM

    OT?
    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/co-founder-of-nations-largest-christian-rock-festival-abused-minors-for-16-years-authorities-say/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Spell Check = integrate should be integrity.

    Yeah, it is early in the morning.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Clarence Thomas shouldn’t even be on the bench. Yeah, there’s the wife’s affiliations issue. There’s the Anita Hill issue. There’s the he never opens his mouth, probably so you can’t prove he’s unqualified. (Then he can’t be shown for the fool like Kagen did to Gorsucks.)

    He never should have been confirmed.

    And that Trump BRIBE disguised as a hotel? Why is that still allowed to go on? It is a clear violation for the president to profit from it. We all know it is used for bribes and influence. Fuck, people rent rooms there and never show up. Organizations hold events there to line Trump’s pockets. It’s blatant. They don’t even try to hide it.

    James O’Keefe was bad enough but SEAN HANNITY!? Well, I guess he is the only name left at Fox. Why hasn’t he been taken down for sexual harassment? You telling me he acts like a “gentleman” in the midst of the rest of the misogynist locker room?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:01 PM

      Remember long dong silver?

      Delete
  10. Anonymous10:30 AM

    What a shame and waste to have Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.
    How far we've come?

    Judy Woodruff: Finally tonight, it was 20 years ago this week that the Senate held confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. That's when sexual harassment became the focus of a national debate. The subject was raised by a young black law professor named Anita Hill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:02 PM

      Well Clarence played the race card to the max in those hearings.

      Delete
  11. SpCk = "reinforcing the integrate of his target " should be reinforcing the INTEGRITY of his target

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8:33 PM

    "And by the way how is it okay for the wife of a sitting Supreme Court Justice to participate in this kind of partisan bomb throwing?"

    She is her own person, she can do as she pleases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At the very least he should recuse himself from anything having to do with his wife’s business dealings, investments etc.

      But he NEVER HAS.

      I’d with him a coronary only then Trump would pick his replacement who would probably be worse, if that is possible.

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.