Courtesy of the National Review:
Ted Nugent should resign from the board of the National Rifle Association. And if he does not, he should be pushed from his position.
This week, in the course of “defending” the right to keep and bear arms, Nugent enthusiastically shared a choice piece of anti-Semitic propaganda. Then, shamefully, he refused to acknowledge or to address his mistake. If Nugent wants to behave like a fool, that is, of course, his prerogative. But he must do so in quarantine, a long, long way from the rest of us.
This is not an enjoyable or typical thing for me to write. As a rule, I like hyperbole. As a rule, I don’t think that there is anything wrong with harsh, indignant defenses of fundamental rights. And, as a rule, I like eccentrics and wish dearly that our culture gave them a little more latitude to be themselves. But there is nothing hyperbolic or eccentric about Nugent’s post, and nor does it channel his righteous indignation in support of a righteous cause. Contrary to some of the protestations I have seen, this is in no way a question of “political correctness” or of effete “elite sensibilities”; it is anti-Semitism, plain as day. To anybody with eyes, his message was as clear as it was indefensible: Disloyal, money-grabbing, Israel-preferring Jews are “really behind” the gun-control movement, and they should be cast out of American society in consequence.
Now make note that this is coming from the National Review, not exactly the kind of "liberal rag" that Nugent is always haranguing against.
These are usually his kind of people.
So for them to call for his resignation, well that might actually result in his resignation.
Whether it's his choice, or forced upon him, that is another matter entirely.
Oh well, you know he will always have at least one staunch supporter.
Well until Donald Trump commands otherwise of course.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label National Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Review. Show all posts
Monday, February 15, 2016
Friday, January 22, 2016
RNC boots the National Review from upcoming debate for daring to offend Donald Trump.
![]() |
| Source |
The Republican National Committee has now booted both of its media partners for the February 26 Republican presidential debate in Houston, Texas. The reason for the drastic punishment: Daring to offend Donald Trump.
After the editors of the conservative National Review published their “Against Trump Symposium” Thursday night, the party swiftly moved to sanction the magazine, stripping it of it’s media partnership for the pre-Super Tuesday debate on CNN. A debate they were to share co-hosting duties with Telemundo and Salem Radio Network.
But then National Review editor Rich Lowry corralled “22 prominent conservative thinkers,” including The Weekly Standard’s William Kristol, RedState’s Erick Erickson and The Blaze’s Glenn Beck, for a collection of essays assailing the dominant Republican frontrunner.
Here are the 22 conservatives calling out @realdonaldtrump in a special edition of @NRO https://t.co/4qhYjjDUsI pic.twitter.com/hvmCnfrtfy
— Independent Journal (@INJO) January 22, 2016
Of course it's easy to guess how Trump responded to all of this.
National Review is a failing publication that has lost it's way. It's circulation is way down w its influence being at an all time low. Sad!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2016
The late, great, William F. Buckley would be ashamed of what had happened to his prize, the dying National Review!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2016
Actually I'm pretty sure that if William F. Buckley were alive today he would have his hands firmly around Donald Trump's chubby neck and would be attempting to choke the life out of him.Okay what does it mean that the RNC is now punishing news outlets for irritating the Donald?
Have they simply given up and reconciled themselves to the fact that he is going to be their candidate in 2016?
Seriously?
Labels:
debate,
Donald Trump,
National Review,
Republicans,
RNC,
Twitter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


