Showing posts with label glamorous. Show all posts
Showing posts with label glamorous. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Once relatively famous bag lady spotted at LAX.

I know what you're thinking, "Gryphen, WHY would you pick on the lovely Paz de la Huerta, famous model, and one of the stars of HBO's scintillating series "Boardwalk Empire?"

Well I wouldn't obviously. I have no bone to pick with Paz de la Huerta, and in fact have watched several episodes of "Boardwalk Empire," and enjoyed them immensely.

I'm not talking about her. I'm talking about the pathetic creature behind her.

Yep that one. The one staring daggers into the back of the actress/model.

Oh you can almost see in her bloodshot eyes how jealous she is that the cameras are trained are the much more glamorous starlet, while at the same time hoping like crazy that nobody recognizes her in her frumpy woolen poncho/comforter from her bedroom in Wasilla.

I assume that since this picture was posted yesterday that she was arriving to support her daughter's last night as the most pathetic contestant to ever appear on Dancing with the Stars.

Though I have to say I don't remember seeing her in the crowd.

Is it possible that she had other business in the City of Angels? Or perhaps the dress code for audience members demanded that they not be wearing the bedding from their house in lieu of actual clothing.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

The line between journalist and bimbo. One woman exposes the makeup secrets behind the Fox News gals.

Courtesy of the Daily Mail:

Though all female news anchors are required to look perfectly polished on air, it is widely acknowledged that women who appear on Fox take it to an entirely different level. 

The subject of both admiration and ridicule, the network's women typically favour a heavily made-up aesthetic, that is unlike that of any of its rivals. 

Now one writer has revealed exactly how the 'Fox Glam' look is realised, and what purpose it serves for the network. 

She tells how the make-up artist commented that she favoured a 'natural look' before proceeding to outline the outside of her lips, coating her eyelids in so much shadow 'I felt I should be wearing a sash and tiara'. 

Then, though she admitted to the hair stylist that she wore her hair curled under, it was flicked out regardless because it looked 'cuter'. 

The 'Fox Glam' look, to the unfamiliar, is identified by heavily-applied make-up. Plenty of bronzer and gloss are de rigueur, as are false lashes and eyeliner. 

And it does not stop at make-up. Fox women typically wear figure-hugging garments in bright colours that work well on high-definition TV screens.

Well that seems awfully sexist in this day and age.  How in the hell do they justify objectifying their female co-workers?


They blame it on the viewers of course.


Fox's male viewers, in particular, tend to be older than those of other networks and so are attracted to women who are a little 'brighter', make-up artist Meli Pennington says. 'The Republican Party welcomes looks in a woman - Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Nikki Haley - and so does Fox' 

She tells Ms Mundy: 'They’re definitely pandering to a male audience... You think of Hugh Hefner’s girlfriends. As he [gets] older, they all get brighter and blonder. 

'Look at Anna Nicole Smith. It’s like the large-print edition of women.'  (Seriously? They use Anna Nicole Smith and Hefner's "girlfriends" as their blueprint? Jesus no wonder!)


As for Fox's female viewers, sociologist Catherine Hakim argues that conservative women are more likely to embrace their 'erotic capital' - or, as Ms Mundy more bluntly puts it, 'using your looks to get ahead.'

Well if you don't have the brains, I guess you use whatever works. At least that's what they tell the girls in the Men's magazines.

So apparently the women on Fox News are caked with makeup so that their elderly viewers can see them simply as objects instead of as people. It must be such a joy to be a woman and work in that environment don'tcha think?

But here's a question. Why does Fox News trowel makeup onto MOST of their female "talent" until they look like creepy adult Kewpie dolls?

Gretchen Carlson
Models for toothpaste or hair coloring advertisements?
Monica Crowley
Or soft porn actresses?

Megyn Kelly
Yet they still allow this sad little woman to go on camera looking like this?

I mean that just seems cruel, don't you think?

It's almost like they have no respect for her, find little value in having her appear on their program,  and just wish she would crawl off and.......oh!