As I have said there are a LOT of damaging facts coming out about Sarah Palin this year.
And literally since I first posted that statement on this blog there have been numerous others brought to my attention that I was not even aware of before! Remember I wrote that before I had ever even HEARD of Shailey Tripp.
However, though I never shared it with all of you, I began to realize that the "babygate" story may not be the one that finally finished Sarah Palin's political "Wild Ride." In fact I began to seriously wonder if I would ever get the truth out at all.
Then the phone rang on January 25th.
Somebody wanted help identifying some photographs, and to ask what WE knew about Sarah Palin's last pregnancy. This was not just some commenter or conspiracy theorist, this was somebody who we had been waiting to hear from for a very, very long time.
Information was exchanged, dates were confirmed, and jaws dropped in unison. They were completely satisfied that they had what they needed to put the "final nail in the coffin" of Palin's faked pregnancy. (A little inside humor for those of you in the know.)
Of course as usual we were sworn to secrecy. So we begged, "Isn't there something we can reveal to let people know what is coming?"
Below is a picture that Audrey had showing Sarah Palin at the Spouse's Luncheon on March 31, a mere twenty days before she gave "birth" to Trig Paxson Van Palin. Apparently as revealing as this picture is, the ones THEY have make it obvious beyond any doubt that this woman is certainly NOT almost 33 weeks pregnant!
And just for clarification, THIS is not some simple blog or website making that statement!
Think more along the lines of "lamestream media" types. In other words when THEY come out with this evidence there will be no wiggle room left for Sarah Palin. This will receive national exposure and EVERYBODY will suddenly focus on the "pregnancy." Which also means that all the evidence that we have painstakingly gathered these last two and a half years will be re-examined until there is no doubt that Palin did something unspeakable in 2008, quite possibly for purely political reasons.
Let's see the Palin-bots, Teabaggers, and Right Wing nutcases put a positive spin on THAT!
I have said it before, but it bears repeating, 2011 is going to rock!
P.S. I am also working to get a VERY special interview. More on that later.
Update: For those who may not get the significance of the Spouse's Luncheon photographs please go here and spend some time looking at the amazing chronology of photographs that Audrey put together. And then keep in mind that ONLY fifteen days after that above photograph was taken that Palin looked like this.
So it is not just that at certain angles during the Spouse's Luncheon she did not look at all pregnant, she CERTAINLY did not appear as pregnant as she claimed, nor did she look ANYTHING like the above photograph taken just two weeks later.
The evidence has always been there, we just needed somebody with a bigger bullhorn to put it all together.
I sure hope this is it!!!
ReplyDeleteWell, well, well.
ReplyDeleteThis is great news. Thanks, G.
That NAILS it.
Actually Gryph, she looks pretty chunky there. If anything, I'd say that picture proves she was pregnant. Not all pregnant women get as big as houses, you know. In fact, these days women are encouraged to put on no more than 15 or 20 lbs. If you do it right its all in the stomach and can really be concealed more easily by slimming clothing, open jackets and scarves.
ReplyDeleteLook, I don't care much for our dear Sarah, but she looks pregnant to me there.
Finally! Hopefully! Maybe now a friend of mine can continue working at their job w/o fear of retribution at an Anchorage hospital. Yes, I said ANCHORAGE hospital. Too many honest people have been manipulated and/or threatened to keep their mouths shut. And the not-so-honest, paid off.
ReplyDeleteLet's hope this "news" is revealed by a reputable source.
WOW - just wow - what an awesome surprise - so glad I checked your site just one more time before logging off and getting ready for work.
ReplyDeleteI'm going away this weekend for a retreat type class - no internet! I will have to be extra focused to keep myself from obsessing on what may be revealed and anxiously awaiting Sunday evening to get back online. But knowing that once and for all the truth is going to be out for all to see is wonderful news and I'll try to concentrate on relaxing this weekend and give myself a couple of Palin-free days - which hopefully will be something we have a lot more of once the truth is out and we can all have Palin-free days - weeks - months and years. (However, we can't take our eye off the ball entirely since there are more wingnuts in the wings and of course the corrupt Repubs across the nation - including the govenor of my state NJ.)
CAN.NOT.WAIT. I'm giddy as a schoolgirl!
ReplyDeleteThanks Gryphen!!
T
Off topic, but it looks like MCain will not support a palin presidential run. That has got to hurt.
ReplyDeleteMcCain told Politico, “I think I’m staying out of this for the first time in many years.” If there is one contender who was counting on McCain’s endorsement, it is Sarah Palin.
http://www.politicususa.com/en/mccain-endorse-sarah-palin
There is also DairyGate and the pipeline that has not been built.
I think there are several major 'errors' that palin made as Governor that will be brought to the public's attention.
She lied a lot about her record as Mayor and Gov, and if she declares her candidacy, the press and bloggers will have 2 years to investigate her instead of 3 months.
Plus those emails, I wonder what they will say!
Oh. Em. Gee.
ReplyDeleteIt's weird how nervous and excited I got scrolling down to read this post as fast as I could. I still think bots won't believe it, but it'll still be wicked awesome to see her scramble.
Yay Gryphen!!
ReplyDeleteWhen, when, when?? The suspense is killing me.
ReplyDeleteYou know, I have seen some pics where she was supposed to be with kid and I thought her face looked a little plump. But her tummy didn't. So where was the baby? In her cheeks? I really really want her to be a lying sack of not pregnant. I really do. Maybe it was the extra fluffy hair that made her face look puffy. Her front end was NOT puffy. I'm so confused. When do we sleep?
ReplyDeleteBring it on!!
ReplyDeleteI've seriously had about as much of this bitch as I can stand.
R in NC
OK well, this has sure made my day! Thanks and I sure hope it comes to fruition very very soon. I am sooooo done with this woman and her sick antics.
ReplyDeleteGo Go Go Go Go Go!!!!!
ReplyDeleteI feel like I'm having a baby!
Unlike Sarah did this last time.
giddy with excitement, G!
Way to go!
PS:
ReplyDeleteStill love love loving the Trenchcoat she wore at an indoor luncheon to help camo spongebob squarepillow.........or doesn't the Alaska energy expert know how to heat the govs mansion???
Sarah you are so BUSTED.
Interesting - the video about the luncheon/special session has audio but no video...anyone else have that issue?
ReplyDeleteAs the saying goes, you cannot prove a negative. And while that's not 100 percent true in this case, it's close to it.
ReplyDeleteBecause all the photos we've been seeing forever now, on other blogs, painstakingly detailed, and circumstantial evidence, has not been anything close to a final nail. And that is because a woman is saying she is pregnant, there are pictures showing her possibly pregnant, there are interviews with media types back then who stood right next to her and seem not not question the fact she was pregnant, she is telling us about a hospital she went to, and Todd was seen at a hospital, there are grandparents holding an infant, there is Mercede holding an infant,....etc, etc....and the "negative" to prove is that we're coming out and saying, this woman is NOT pregnant. And ultimately, no photo is going to prove that. Only a doctor's testimony or medical record will do that. Short of that, there is no proof, only MORE circumstantial evidence.
Now, at this point, Gryp you're suggesting SP did something "unspeakable" in 2008, which seems to suggest a witeout event. But the problem is, that would be an admission that she was pregnant at some point. Then you're faced with finding an exact timeline of when that event occurred and when she started using pillows. That scenario gives you more to prove, not less to prove. Then of course there is the problem of the appearance of an infant. There is also a problem of motive. Why wouldn't SP just terminate the pregnancy and call it a miscarriage, just like it was suggested she did before? Why go through an elaborate ruse to come up with a live infant? In the beginning it made sense if the child was Bristol's, but the theories have evolved to veer away from that. So if it's not Bristol's, why do it?
You need a medical record, a DNA test from Trig showing different parentage, or testimony from the real mother. If you don't have that there's no proof. What would help, and come close to putting the pressure on SP to produce a birth certificate or something, is the overwhelming questioning of LOTS of credible people. To the point where she would want to voluntarily prove it. But that isn't the case.
Caught my attention with that top photograph. Crossing my fingers and toes that this all happens - and soon.
ReplyDeleteSo much do I trust you, I am going to say "congratulations!"
I hope you're right, Gryphen. But as we've seen on these blogs, people have an amazing way of denying what their eyes tell them.
ReplyDeletegit 'er done!
ReplyDeleteWell... we'll see.
ReplyDeleteI'd love it if Babygate breaks. I work with a bunch of women whose attitude is, "So what?" And I say, "So it doesn't matter that the woman who could have been VP is batshit crazy? It doesn't matter that she's coopted a baby for political advantage?" Apparently not.
Ivyfree
Why don't you rename your blog "more on that later".
ReplyDeleteThat's all you ever promise.
Oh man, please let this pan out.
ReplyDeleteSending you much love, Gryphen!
Any time line? Hint of one?
Sarah will have some poignant excuse, like taking on Trig because of her "Christian" heart and blame the media for invading her privacy in this "very personal family matter" and her acolytes will love her even more.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see the truth out there but I am skeptical that this will finish her. Unfortunately.
p.s. - love that picture!
ReplyDeleteGryphen, better get your water zappers out, the first trolls will be climbing the fences as soon as they get their instructions from RAM or the grizzled grandma Scarah.
ReplyDeleteUh, oh...get ready for the Super Troll Bowl in 3, 2, 1. They will be all over this post like flies on shit, claiming they know Sarah, they were at the luncheon, sprinkling their fairy dust, in a desperate attempt to discredit you.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I hope this breaks sooner rather than later, I've been waiting over two years. As a mother who's had a couple of pregnancies, I knew Sarah faked it, back from Palin Deception days. The scarves, square pillow Élan Frank video, and mounds of photographic evidence, just don't lie (unlike Sarah), and the Wild Ride story sealed the deal for me years ago.
Your lamestream media comment doesn't really narrow it down, because that basically means anyone but Fox in Sarah speak.
Dear God, let this be true, people have died because of this evil woman and her poison rhetoric . Amen.
If this fully exposes Sarah's fake pregnancy, there are further implications which are even bigger.
ReplyDeleteThe McCaine & the RNC will be exposed as co-conspirators in their scrubbing of all the Sarah pictures from various places.
Apparently crimes like invading other countries for no just cause and election fraud aren't cause for criminal prosecution in this country.
My money's on Trig being Todd's baby. Would explain why he resembles ALL the other kids
ReplyDeleteWho wants to bet?
I still think people will find compassion for Sarah. Thats how most people are. I think it's been too long now for people to even care. Like it's been said, people nowadays are indifferent to "political sarah". They know shell never reach higher office so they pay no mind. Stories die quickly for a reason. Until Hollywood calls and asks John Edwards to make a movie.
Do we know why Levi said on facebook "I miss my babies"
or are we assuming he was talking about his gf and Tripp?
I'm so glad that this is going to get attention and that it didn't get dropped for good. Thanks to everyone that kept this going and did so much legwork.
ReplyDeleteNo comments yet, but I look to read that Sarah will spin this as helping someone out - the problem is her blatant use of Trig to sell her pro-life cred. How can she continue to speechify that people wanted her to have an abortion when she wasn't even pregnant? The whole lamestream media will loop clips, hopefully including the belly-slap tight abs one and the "wild ride" story in her own words.
ReplyDeleteGood job, Gryphen. Approximately, when is all this going public?
ReplyDeletei hope they have other pictures , because this one is not that conclusive to me. Personally i'm just tired of her.
ReplyDeleteAin't we got fun!
ReplyDeleteI think we will save our excitement for when the news actually breaks.
ReplyDeleteSo far we've been getting too much of "It's gonna happen really soon! Promise!"
Sometimes it's best to let the bombshell drop for maximum impact.
Have you ever noticed, along with having the same ears, that Trig and Tripp had the same chin as infants?
ReplyDeleteOMG. I have been on this case since Aug 2008. I show the photos to everyone, and they are shocked.
ReplyDeleteThe evidence is all out there. Heather Bruce claiming Bristol lived with her while going to school and that could ONLY be in 2007-09, and so much more.....it has been so frustrating!
Here's to Truth!!
I knew when it broke it would be something out of the blue, when we were not expecting it.
fingers and toes crossed, so sick of this huge in-your-face middle finger to all of us...
What, do they have pics of her standing against a table or something? While I trust this (Id like to think more LSM have been quietly searching for answers as well) I feel more will be needed other than pics. I mean, the original 'nail in the coffin' pic is a perfect viewing of her stomach and that didn't even make waves.
ReplyDeleteThe truth still matters! Thank you!
ReplyDeleteGryphen, I understand your glee. Really, I do. But there's something to be said for "the element of surprise", and since I'm quite sure Palin and her bots read this blog, now THEY have a heads-up as well, giving them time to prepare for the inevitable. That takes away some of the fun for me. I want them to squirm like never before when the sh*t hits the fan, and warning them in advance something big is going to happen, no matter how vague, gives them an advantage, I'm afraid.
ReplyDeleteHope you are right. The interesting thing about this story is that I believe Sarah is sunk no matter what, so long as attention is put in the issue. If you are right, and Sarah has been lying about this for so long, it isn't the fact of a faked pregnancy that looks as bad as the continual lying about it for SO long, and viciously attacking those who have suspected the truth.
ReplyDeleteBut I have always thought that the more appalling narrative is the one she presented as the 'truth,' the wild ride story. If she attempts to stop this story by whipping out a birth certificate (finally - and don't all adoptive parents get one - with their names on it?) attention will shift to the wild ride story, which most people have never heard. And those details, the damning lack of concern for a supposedly wanted unborn child, will really sink her. I despise a woman who would behave in such a way, so selfishly endangering her child. Such a woman should have no position of authority ever again, let alone the presidency.
Had to re-read this post again (and savor the good news) -- can we have a guessing pool of who is going to break this story? I hope it is Rachel Maddow - she has the staff to do the research, she covers stories that no one else does, and she gets all her facts in order and then lays out the news in a way that any one can comprehend - plus I think she would lay out why the pregnancy lie is so important to reveal.
ReplyDeleteMy other hunch is someone at the top of the Repubs got those photos into someone's hands and gave the green light for them to surface - letting the "lamestream" media do the dirty work and clean up the Repubs monster they unleashed on all of us. They get to keep their hands "clean" - can claim they didn't know, they respected Palin's privacy and had no reason to question the pregnancy - and to their blind followers will believe that lie too. But has "powerful" as Palin was\is Alaska, she could not have pulled off this cover up for this long in front the of the whole nation without the help of some big Repub backing and money (i.e. scrubbing the web of evidence, intimidating folks, etc.).
Isn't it an interesting coincidence that the NE is revealing the Tripp-Todd affair and then this happens - could there be some hard hitting facts in the NE story that is now making it worthwhile and credible for the pregnancy lie to finally come to light as well. There are no coincidences, right?
Will be interesting to see how all this is related and hoping we also get the back story to all of it on how it came to light and who was helping to keep it covered up for so long too.
So, any word on when we can expect the news outlet to publish the photos and story?
ReplyDeleteOh dear Lord and the Universe, please let this be so.
ReplyDeleteI hope it is ... and that it gets huge coverage. And I hope the MSM finally has the balls (or permission from their masters) to cover ALL THE GATES.
Granny Grifter belongs in jail and that is where I hope this leads.
Of course, copious amounts of embarrassing stories are loads of fun, too! Especially since we will be able to stick it to the idiots still thinking she is presidential. HA!!
Thanks, Gryph!
i hope you are right. it's getting tiring being teased.
ReplyDeletebill in belize.
There may be TONS of dirt to air about Sarah Palin, but, IMO, only Babygate will make her the social pariah that she must be. Anything else will just take her out of the running for POTUS. Not good enough. She needs to be shamed, a joke to all but her MOST blind followers.
ReplyDeleteanon 4:05, did you even read the post? They DO have other pictures. That's the point.
ReplyDeleteG- You have made my Friday. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is GREAT news. Sounds like the beginning of the end.
ReplyDeleteWill be fun to watch Sarah explain away the fake baby...
ReplyDeleteHas the National Enquirer ever been known to collaborate with mainstream media on a story?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if the Nat'l Enquirer is holding back on their next installment of Sarah's soap opera for the sake of timing, to coincide with identical stories coming out.
It would be fun to wake up to stereo icebergs - radio, TV, newsprint "SARAH - YOU LIED!"
blah, blah, blah
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I think the truth is right under our noses. and it's not even remotely complicated. Summer 2007, Bristol gets knocked up by someone, she is freaked out. She leave WHS when she tells Sarah. Sarah doesn't want her to feel embarassed and Im sure family shame enters everyone's mind. Bristol is in agreement that she will remain on the DL. Family xmas portraits are taken in Sept. Sarah treats Bristol to a NY trip as a last fun event before she must actually remain in hiding. Sadie and Sherry wonder why BRistol won't come over for xmas presents. Levi must think fast. Bristol delivers a premature, downs baby in Dec 07 in Anchorage to be more inconspicuous. Bristol obviously wants to be closer to her baby and not go to Juneau so she temporarily moves to Anch.
ReplyDeleteSarah hears her name being seriously considered as a VP candidate and that mixed with protecting Bristol leads to wearing scarves and jackets up until John McCain is announced the GOP cand.
In the meantime, Bristol and Levi have taken another break since xmas. When Bristol becomes suspicious of her mother's actions, she gets angry and hooks back up with Levi to create another baby. (yes it is true bristol and levi were not together the whole winter/spring - myspace backs that up)
I believe this is pretty close to the truth because of the conflicting "when I told my mother" stories support it. In the spring, Levi and Bristol were in a VERY rocky place and there were other guys. (at least one anyway). I think BRistol was willing to go along with Sarahadopting the baby until she actually had the baby (think Danielle vandacamp and how she changed- yeah I know I just referenced a tv show but whatevs)
In mid 2007, Bristol was a normal teen who probably partied a bit too hard, dated a bit too fast, and didn't think too much about the future and ramifications. She even joked about getting pregnant, I imagine she felt, that will never happen to me.
Even in the few pics we have of her during the fall, she looked downtrodden and hopeless. Sarah perpetually sounded on the brink of tears. All of their interviews talking about how devastated the pregnancy was would make since if they were referencing a prior pregnancy. and things make even more sense if when BRistol had the baby, she finally matured a little and felt she wanted one now. But she needed a boyfriend who she could mold into a father. Enter doormat Levi.
In conclusion, we have a very tightknit family, one that had to place nice and bring Levi further into the fold if the concocted baby story was to work. That meant he had to step away from his family at least temporarily. There were many family events during the summer 08, all of which Bristol attended. Theres the rumor Todd pulled a gun onLevi in late summer. Threatening that the two would definitely marry perhaps? During the campaign, Bristol slowly pulled away from Levi and continued to avoid his family. She happily accompanied everyone at campaign events and SNL. Then once Tripp was born, she and Sarah had already thought of the advocacy career and Bristol decided now was the time she should ditch Levi.
Thoughts?
For those that are focusing on just the pregnancy, don't overlook that G said there are LOTS of other things coming out as well. The faked pregnancy is just one of the items.
ReplyDeleteI will say that even in the "white scarf altered pic", it looks like a slight bulge and her face does give off PG in most pics from this time. for some reason though, I had always believed Trig was born in March by Sarah and for some ridiculous reason, she didnt announce it until April. I now know that sounds ridic.
ReplyDeletecongrats. never doubted the story-- but certainly I doubted it would ever break through.
ReplyDeleteI still think compassion will end up reigning here
ReplyDeleteI love that one of the tags for this post is "vindication." I'm not sure evidence of a faked pregnancy will finish her off, but it certainly will make people wonder what else she's lying about. Unless, of course, Sarah was pregnant and didn't "choose life" and had to find a replacement fetus to cover ass. That would finish her off for good. Barring that (or, rather, in addition to that), I believe finding out about her faked pregnancy will open the flood gates on all her other indiscretions.
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping whatever brings her down takes a bunch of the GOP/religious grifters down with her. Who was keeping her. Secrets? Inquiring minds want to know.
Then we can turn out attention to the rest of the Republican hypocrites.
Thanks, Gryphen.
jk
Gryphen, In your post you say that "there is no doubt that Palin did something unspeakable in 2008, quite possibly for purely political reasons".
ReplyDeleteAdopting a special needs baby is not unspeakable. A family choosing to do so could be acting in a loving and generous fashion.
I have long feared that the story behind the infant in the kitchen, that babe that looked so fragile and had an ear deformity, would be sad and could be unspeakable. You first wrote the Tale of Two Babies nearly a year ago.
Will we finally understand the dimensions of what Palin did to polish her creds? Or should we not take the use of the word unspeakable too literally?
Too bad Alaska WTF is showing an inaccurate picture. Hopefully it will have no effect on the credibility of IM.
ReplyDeleteLots of folks over at Palingates are pulling for you, Gryphen. Hope this has legs -- big legs.
ReplyDeleteTo Sarah from Steely Dan lyrics:
ReplyDelete"...It's over now.
Drink your big black cow
And get out of here."
Let's all cross our fingers now.
ReplyDeleteThe Troll Bowl has begun in earnest.
ReplyDeleteI have also spoken to a reporter or two about the story in the past 12 months. Numerous times.
LOTS of them talk to each other. They even have parties together. It was always just a matter of time. She & Todd were too stupid to know that.
Wow, the 'Bots are speechless today. And they had gotten so good at being the first to comment. They must be frothing.
ReplyDeleteSomething must have been brewing...the HuffPo article about how the NE finally cornered John Edwards into telling the truth was timed well.
ReplyDeleteGryphen,
ReplyDeleteTomorrow is my birthday. Thanks so much for the early birthday gift, it's exactly what I wanted!!
have yall seen the NE story about Michelle O and Bristol? I have my doubts, as Bristol does NOT like President Obama. It's just weird. It's like they took that fake Bristol tweet where "Bristol" discussed working with Michelle
ReplyDeleteok the NE just went back to being a joke. They believe the fake Bristol twitter account is real and are reporting from it.
ReplyDeleteFloridaDem is another concern troll like BlueTX from the Palin Deception days...I see it in all his/her posts, always telling you what to do, blah, blah, blah...scurry away little troll, no one pays attention to your illogical ramblings.
ReplyDeleteNope, the MSM won't touch this story, never has and never will. This nail too will fall right thru the old coffin and get lost in the dirt (ok that's stretching the metaphor lol).
ReplyDeleteThis endless parsing of ambiguous photos ain't gonna sink the good ship Palin. Remember commenting for weeks about vanishing points and photoshopping and fake bellies back on PD, until pfffft it all evaporated. As will this.
I want to see her shoved back into her trailer (or better, a comfortaby secure corrections facility) as much as anyone, but as to preggers pictures, eh fool me twice shame on me. I think a more likely iceberg is the pilferred materials and under the table labor that built her luxy castle on Lake Lucille, just like the Girdwood chalet brought down uncle Ted.
Makes you wonder if some of those STATE SECRET level e-mails will reveal something.
ReplyDeleteMy question has always been "Why a fake prego story?" If she was creating a story to cover for a family members boo boo, yet wanting to look good in the process, why not just say you and Todd were adopting a baby with DS????? Easy and simple. No fuss no muss. And she comes out looking good to the general voting public. Just say you became aware of a young unmarried girl that was prego w/ a DS baby. Wanting to help her and push your pro-life agenda makes you look like a giving generous family. No wild ride story to create. No fake belly to wear. SP would have come out smelling like roses.
ReplyDeleteGrown-up's, as debatable that company is in the GOP Presidential camp surrounding the only frontrunner in a shallow pool of candidates must have known about the rumors about Palin's bizarre 'pregnancy' and her even more fantastical, irresponsible and endangering 'wild ride,' to birth Trig in Wasilla from Texas.
ReplyDeleteBut the lure of a young, attractive and seemingly dynamic Governor with her Right to Life creds and an 80% approval rating of a fiscally sound State was too irresistible to worry. They thought they were dealing with a rational and competent personality. I mean, who wouldn't with that narrative?
But this was whack-job Sarah who beguiled a worn-out and cynical electorate with populist slogans and the promise of accountability and transparency.
This cynical Alaskan wasn't impressed with her, there were at least three other Gubernatorial candidates that were competing for my vote. I, along with these seasoned politico's took for granted that this ho-dunk Mayor who wasn't ready to lead and yet to reveal that she wasn't fit to lead could convince at least 40% to put her at the head of the pack.
We all thought we couldn't put CRAZY in the office. So she was a gutsy up-start that was going to 'shake things up,' and restore honor to Alaska State Government.
Even if strange stories and glaring signs of her incompetence started to spring up in the days leading up to Inauguration, we thought we were dealing with a sane adult fully cognizant of the importance of her luck and how to leverage it to lean on the job and grow as a leader.
But no, we are talking Sarah Heath Palin, who doesn't get nuance, irony, satire, decorum, conflict of interest, statesmanship. We got a raging egomaniac who manipulated her narrative with the State dime to preen and appear ready, willing and able to the national party that she could be worthy of VP consideration.
When she was coy about Trig's special needs status, it dawned on me that this woman was going to maximize the extent of this nuclear family make-up. I don't think Trig is her's, but I think he's from somewhere within the family (bastard or not) and this scheming, conniving bag of bones was going to make political capital out of it.
Get ready for those supporters, even simpletons who don't support her, to come out in support of her ruse in the name of her being brave enough to adopt and care for a special needs child as her own despite the responsibilities she campaigned for in being a State's CEO. Her plate was already full, but she just HAD to crowd it with an over the top Right to Life heroism.
It is staggering, how far this woman would go to conflate her accomplishments, including "carrying" to term a Down Syndrome child at her age and station. She can't even raise her own children, but let's throw a vulnerable little one in to tip that scale.
@anon 4:39: My guess is very close to yours, but I always assumed Sarah Palin was pressuring the teens to adopt the baby before he was born. You are right, though, it could also have been after.
ReplyDeleteTo me, the only scenario that makes sense with the more believable statements and little slip ups is the one in which Bristol is Trig's mother: Levi's claim that Sarah was pressuring them to adopt the baby, Bristol's statement that she couldn't go to prom because she was pregnant, Bristol's determination to tell Greta Van S. that it was her idea to keep Tripp, Sadie's statement that Bristol and Levi were trying to conceive Tripp: all of these together, to me, point to Bristol becoming pregnant with Tripp and delivering him much earlier than reported, Sarah pressuring the teens to adopt him (either before or after his birth), Sarah's surprise pregnancy announcement leaving the teens no choice but to go along with it, and Bristol intentionally trying to get pregnant again in order to replace the child that was claimed by her mother.
The timing of this doesn't surprise me. There are many Republicans who don't want her to run. If ever there was a time that any news organization was getting inside tips, this is it. And the opposition research of any of the major candidates would have a ton of info already. Believe me, they are ruthless. McCain's oversight was laughable by the standards of any modern campaign.
ReplyDeleteThe timing of this has the fingerprints on it of some high-level political operative. They want her out of the picture.
Don't believe compassion will save her at all, why lie and say you are pregnant and then make up more lies again? If Sarah was really trying to help someone else then why didn't she just anounce she was adopting a downs baby?
ReplyDeleteShe could have just said they were adopting a baby instead of all the big lies and wild ride and everything.
If she had said adoption then everyone would have accepted the story. But Sarah really wanted it to be all about her and she wanted to win an election period.
She used this baby to further her own agenda and that in itself is the nail in the coffin.
Sarah will go down. If the GOP wants her to go down. They have a lot of control over the propaganda machine and they can make or break her. I seem to remember how Bush had went AWOL? There were other cover ups:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm
Rove the GOP and with the help of FOX managed to cover-up and make the critics look like Fools. (remember Dan Rather)
Isn't it possible that they could turn a blind eye and let Sarah crash and burn to get her out of the running. I hope so...
Anon 4:39, the theory you're going on is that it is Bristol's baby. That was the original theory posed by PG and other sites, then the certainty about that faded. Even Mercede, who you would think would be in a position to know if Trig was Bristol's baby, is not supporting this theory. So it's hanging out there as to whose baby Trig is. Some have suggested it's Todd's and Sarah adopted it.
ReplyDeleteA similar thing has happened with Bristol and DWTS. The intense talk about her being pregnant has faded, and the timelines keep changing. I posted back then that we'll find out one way or another, if she gives birth. So far, no birth, and comments have been made that she actually looks slimmer now, not fatter. So it's likely she never was pregnant during DWTS, just fat.
Speculation and rumor creates a lot of different theories, certainly, and blog hits, but time will tell if any of them pan out.
In the last group of emails, there was one about adding the baby to Palin's insurance policy. Most babies are added automatically as of the date of birth. There shouldn't have been a question about whether or not the baby would be added--unless the baby was adopted. If adopted, it would be added as of the date of adoption.
ReplyDeletePalin did not "birth" the baby. I remember seeing a post on another obscure site by someone whose friend worked at the hospital and there was no evidence of a birth.
Watch for additional info in emails about insurance and the baby--if there are any.
If you are so small and fit, then a 5 pound baby is going to really, really show. Haven't you ever been around a pregnant woman?
ReplyDeleteIt's the FAT chicks that don't show.
I don't see the stunning photo here. I mean she is heavier than she was, no baby bump but if she was trying to look pregnant then she kind of pulled off about six months pregnant. What is the chronology of photos of her pregnant? Did she go from larger to smaller to larger?
ReplyDeleteI dislike everything about her but the NE actually seems to have strengthened her. I really think they have nothing more than they wrote about. One or two issues and then on to LL?
The thing is she's not teflon coated but her crimes, if any, are out on the edge of ethical scum. It won't hurt her with her base
Oh, please. What we've been waiting for. Is this pending story the reason the quitter has been so quiet of late? Are they having powwows to decide how to blame the media, the liberal haters, and the President (who I'm sure has nothing else to deal with at the moment than Palin's creepy lies?) Let this be the moment.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with some here that of all the pics out there, this one shows me that she is pregos. My preg photos show me with a fat round face towards the end and most women do swell up all over towards the final weeks. However, all the other supporting facts sure keep me in doubt. I just wish someone would put this ridiculous story to rest once and for all. Anon @ 4:39--nice summary. Much of what you write is plausible, especially in light of scara's behavior over the last two years. She sure has shown herself to be conniving, devious, and VERY self-serving above all else. I believe she is capable of the cover-up and keeping the loose ends together will hopefully cause her demise. Hurry Up Already
ReplyDeleteIf a "lamestream" media outlet is going to go with this, they must have more than photos. This topic has been radioactive for the media. I am on DailyKos too and babygate is BANNED there!!
ReplyDeleteSo, if it really is going to break, then they must have more proof or no one one would touch this. Andrew Sullivan gets slagged over this all the time.
So I have great hope this time.
Two items:
ReplyDelete1. Is this why Sarah turned down the keynote speech gig?
2. Is this why Sarah & Bristol are trademarking themselves? It would prevent handing Leno, Letterman, etc. a lifetime of Sarah-Bristol jokes.
Also, too, sure seems like the GOP is getting busy taken this women down behind the scenes. I truly believe that they want her out of the picture and are starting to flex their muscles. Oh this will be sooooooo fun!! They must be offering up some big bucks for the mice hiding in the corners to come out for some cheese.
ReplyDeleteGreat, Gryphen, rock on! IMO, the NE qualifies as the MSM now, since it's available on virtually every newsstand in the country, often displayed alongside the daily newspapers. If the NE is possibly breaking this story, I hope they arrange all their ducks neatly in a row before making that big iceberg splash. I've always thought this drama went deeper than lying about a pregnancy--if not, why wouldn't Quitsy just admit to adopting a DS child? The Bots would still worship the ground she walks on--heck, they'd make a humongous deal about choosing adoption over abortion if so. At this point, anything's possible!
ReplyDeleteFor those Sarah supporters that you think and probably will rally to support the sacrificing adoptive mother of a DS child, realize that they are the first to hate the lying, manipulative bitch on the soap opera's that fake pregnancies.
ReplyDeleteLOL. No wonder she appeals to them, they LOVE these storylines.
Well, if babygate comes out(and I don't think a photo is gonna do it), but if it does, it would be the thing that finally makes her sit down and shut up.
ReplyDeleteand if what you mean by "lamestream" media is anything less than ABC, NBC, CBS or Fox then it won't stop her.
So please tell me its one of those... and not some gossip mag or show.
I had always believed Trig was born in March by Sarah and for some ridiculous reason, she didnt announce it until April. I now know that sounds ridic.
ReplyDelete4:42 AM
This was one of my theories, too. The reason was clear to me though:
If Sarah announced she had a baby in early March, she would have seemed like a horrible new mother if she decided to nevertheless give that speech at the Rethug oil conference in Texas.
Sarah felt that speech was her ticket to running for VP, and nothing would prevent her from giving the speech - NOTHING!
If nothing else, the speech had to come before Trig was "officially" born.
Anon @4:15: I always wondered why the "nail in the coffin" photo didn't get more attention when it was first released, too. In general, I think most journalists didn't want to touch the story with a ten-foot pole because it is so personal and if they were wrong it would really damage their own reputations. I am wondering if whoever has been protecting Palin up until now is finally making previously unattainable, more compelling, evidence available to journalists and giving them the green light to explore the story. Why now? I don't know. Perhaps Palin has served her purpose and now they are cutting her loose.
ReplyDeleteGryphen, I hope that is not the only evidence? The picture is iffy, she is wearing black and it is a photo which can be deceiving. I hope you have "the real mother" evidence. Sorry to be a downer, I'm just losing hope that this woman will ever go down...
ReplyDeleteThe only things I can think of that could be called "unspeakable" here are having an abortion, forcing someone else to have an abortion (in these two cases, Sarah would have to scramble to find a baby to fake give birth once McCain tapped her for the republic ticket), or forcing someone to hand over a baby by threat or intimidation. Sarah would have done any of those things to further her political career.
ReplyDeleteI'll believe it when I see it. That is, I'll believe the MSM will expose major Palin scandals when I actually see them expose major Palin scandals.
ReplyDeletePalin blogs produce way too much smoke and not nearly enough fire when it comes to claims the MSM is finally going to expose Palin - "It's gonna happen, I tell ya! Any day now. Aaaaaannny day now."
How's that big Todd & Ho's story working out for ya? Right. Whenever. Meanwhile, enjoy the bump in traffic stats.
Don't get me wrong - I despise the Palins and I believe there is strong evidence she faked that pregnancy. The Palins have their self-serving agendas, but so too do the anti-Palin bloggers. They feed off the Palin phenomenon just like everybody else
Part of the bots strategy right now is a concerted effort called a "project" to write letters/comment to dispute anything unflattering about Sarah. It has always been like this-- but they are organizing it under "how to help." So expect the trolls. Organizing4Palin is leading the charge plus I'm sure Palin Promotions and C4p.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Palin trolls is they will ruin things for her. They are too rabid. Go to right wing site Race42012, sometime, and read a Palin thread. They don't appreciate her rabid followers.
I sent a tweet to her one time and shortly after was followed by some creepy, creepy follower of her's taunting me. I blocked him and then immediately some hateful AZ militia guy started following me. I blocked him and still some TeaPartier followed. That kind of stuff won't help Palin--especially when they do this to media types who can, will and have gotten the word out about her rabid followers.
Finally! Hopefully! Maybe now a friend of mine can continue working at their job w/o fear of retribution at an Anchorage hospital. Yes, I said ANCHORAGE hospital. Too many honest people have been manipulated and/or threatened to keep their mouths shut. And the not-so-honest, paid off.
ReplyDeleteLet's hope this "news" is revealed by a reputable source.
2:42 AM
If these are medicial or nursing professionals who ahve lied or anythying, REPORT THEM TO THEIR STATE BOARDS. Or encoursage them, if they feel threatened, if they have been asked to do illegal or shady things, to report themselves to their state boards....oh wait....all Sarah's friends are on the stste boards...Well ,then have them go to their professional organizations.
This is a very very interesting comment you have left.
Hey,
ReplyDeleteQuick question, what about Willow, last I heard she was pregnant. I have heard little about that since. Any sightings of her?
What's been happening with her?
Sarah will have some poignant excuse, like taking on Trig because of her "Christian" heart and blame the media for invading her privacy in this "very personal family matter" and her acolytes will love her even more.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see the truth out there but I am skeptical that this will finish her. Unfortunately.
3:49 AM
That's all fine and dandy, except Palin went on and on and on and on with the "story"..and made ALOT of money off regurgitating said story, with different versions to suite different audiences. People probably Would have "forgiven" her for fkaing if she just went on quietly with her life. Except, she didn't. Without Tri-G there would be NO VP candidate Palin. It is as simple as that. She did not birth him, but needs us to believe it for her "brand".
If she is given a pass from people, just keep on replaying speech after speech after speech when she blatantly continued to lie. That is sick.
To the third from the top anonymous commenter that "women are encouraged to put on no more than 15 or 20lbs."...you are wrong. I recently had a baby and the weight recommendation is 25-30 lbs if you are already of healthy weight. The 15-20 lb weight gain is only for overweight women. Palin was not overweight when she was supposedly pregnant. And, us healthy weight women show our prego bellies cause we're not overweight...so even more evidence that Sarah should have been showing a bump earlier than 7 months.
ReplyDeletePRIOR: Have you ever noticed, along with having the same ears, that Trig and Tripp had the same chin as infants?
ReplyDeleteRESPONSE: I don't think that means much beyond being related. I knew a couple of kids when I was a kid who passed themselves off as twin sisters -and they were really aunt & niece. And you can't tell my baby pictures from either of my children wtihout looking at the clothes (mostly diaper). A lot of facial traits change as the kids get older.
There is no way the mainstream media will assert that Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy on the basis of photographs alone. In fact, I don't think they would even brin the subject up again if all they had were photographs.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, you can be assured if it does hit the mainstream news outlets, they have something far more concrete than photographs. They will have testimony from Trig's real parents or from the physician.
Because of HIPPA, the physician cannot disclose anything about Sarah Palin without permission, but if Sarah Palin is not the one who had the baby and the baby's real parents give their permission, the physician can talk about it.
I always wondered why someone didn't just steal one of Trig's used diapers and an old soda can or something that Sarah tossed and order DNA tests.
If you throw things away, aren't they fair game for anyone to appropriate?
PRIOR: Really, I do. But there's something to be said for "the element of surprise", and since I'm quite sure Palin and her bots read this blog, now THEY have a heads-up as well, giving them time to prepare for the inevitable.
ReplyDeleteRESPONSE: On the other hand, those that know may be getting very uncomfortable and then do something revealing. or maybe just be uncomfortable. WAiting for the shoe to drop can be worse than the shoe dropping.
As for those who don't know the truth (whatever it is), they are just setting themselves up for a bigger fall.
this, and turning down CPAC (where every presidential hopeful HAS to go and speak) makes me think the SSPalin (trademark) is sinking faster than the Titanic. How many will jump overboard, instead of being sucked down with her?
ReplyDeleteTo Anon @ 4:44,
ReplyDeleteBy 'compassion' do you mean people should give Sarah Palin a 'pass' because she faked a pregnancy and claimed a child with DS was her own biological baby?
No. If she and Todd had said, "We are adopting this baby with DS because we want another child and we believe we can be good parents to a special needs child.", I would have been in her corner. I would not have wanted to see her as VP because I quickly realized that she wasn't capable of it, but I would have given her kudos for adopting a child that was going to need special help.
But that is not what she did. What she did was to fake a pregnancy! Then, she used this child, along with her tale of,"It crossed my mind to end this pregnancy. No one would ever know.", to advance her political agenda. She USED this child to build credibility with the Pro-Life group.
And if you don't believe that is the case, you need to really see the many pictures of him when Sarah pulls him out on her tours. Often, he is half naked in the cold. When everyone else is bundled up, he will not have on a coat, pants, socks or shoes. He rarely has on his glasses or hearing aids. It is important that he has these on at this age, especially since he also has DS. This is the age that he is learning about the world around him. By not bothering to use the medical aids that he needs on a consistent bases, she is putting him at a further disadvantage. This is not what a loving, caring, mother would do.
Look past the words that she says. Look at her actions. Those have all shown her to be devious, underhanded and manipulative. There is nothing about this woman that is compassionate.
What needs to win is the truth.
Additional pictures....Spouse's Luncheon....who do you suppose would sit on those pics all this time?
ReplyDeleteHoly crap!
ReplyDeleteI fully believe that Sarah faked this pregnancy. I just can't figure out why and it has driven me nuts for two years trying to figure out. I really hope that this story connects all the dots!
ReplyDeleteGryphen has dropped hints before about it all being in the timeline. That's just vague enough to make me question everything I know about babygate. I do think the Wild Ride is to cover for the birth of whatever baby she then called or now calls Trig. I can't figure out what other reason she would have such urgency to get home or why she would makeup such an incredibly stupid birth story. I definitely think she got a call that a baby was coming and high-tailed it out of Texas. What concerns me is her ability to garner sympathy from the bots if she was covering for another family member. Hell, they won't believe it unless the Queen herself says it's true. But, I can't help but wonder why Sarah wouldn't just claim that she and Todd were adopting a DS baby from some poor pro-lifer who couldn't raise the child herself. That would still boost her pro-life cred (not in the same way as having a DS baby, but it would nonetheless). Why invent a pregnancy? There has to be some reason Sarah was so desperate to pass this off as her own. Anyone?
It's funny that the luncheon photos would be the one's to expose babygate, I always thought that's where she looked the most pregnant, ie. a big ass.
ReplyDeleteBad news for Palin.
ReplyDeleteSen. John McCain will not back Sarah Palin for president
Arizona U.S. Senator John McCain says he will not be backing any of the potential Republican presidential candidates as they look to defeat President Barack Obama in the 2012 election.
“I think I’m staying out of this for the first time in many years,” Mr. McCain told Politico on Thursday.
The comment comes as Mr. McCain returned from a one on one meeting with President Obama at the White House. The Arizona Republican said he viewed the meeting as a sign of increasing bipartisanship on Capitol Hill, adding that his meeting with the president was “cordial” and that Mr. Obama has become more of a “centrist.”
http://www.thestatecolumn.com/blog/sen-john-mccain-will-not-back-sarah-palin-for-president/#
Anonymous 2:41 AM said...
ReplyDelete"Actually Gryph, she looks pretty chunky there. If anything, I'd say that picture proves she was pregnant."
====
Alas, you are WAY misinformed. In fact, Sarah Palin looked hugely pregnant in the "Gusty" photos taken only 2 weeks later.
If you want to claim Palin didn't look pregnant you have to give up something. (Like your logic, sanity, etc.)
As for your claim, "can really be concealed", you need to sell your magic to pregnant women everywhere. Especially to over 40 years old women in their SEVENTH pregnancy.
I think RAM is losing it...
ReplyDeleteFirst she can't spell naive...
(niave - no dictionary results)
@tomfitzgerald you dear sweet niave man. As if the press wanted accuracy in their coverage of Sarah Palin.
1:50 AM Feb 1st via web in reply to tomfitzgerald
Second RAM links to the wrong Sarah Palin twitter account...
(http://twitter.com/SarahPalin)
RAMansour
@cspan is carrying @SarahPalin's speech tomorrow (Fri) live for @yaf Reagan 100 Celebration on C-SPAN & @cspanradio #r100
4 minutes ago via web in reply to cspan
Sympathy for Palin? What are the people who say that not getting? Sarah LIED. She orchestrated a huge hoax and LIED to the American people. The RNC LIED to the American people. Lying is never ever acceptable. EVER. It's not like she was some run of the mill woman who was just weird and tried to pass off being pregnant and having a DS baby. It's not the movie of the week on LMN. Sarah Palin wants to be the President of the United States! Would anyone seriously think she was presidential material if this hoax is ever confirmed?? Folks, people who do things like that belong in mental hospitals.
ReplyDeleteAnon: 5:14: Why fake it?: There were rumors circulating that Bristol was pregnant and she did leave school. The Palins would know that if they adopted a baby at that particular time the rumors would continue to dog their family. Palin was ambitious. Since her family was central to her political image, she couldn't have questions about her home life get in the way of her career goals.
ReplyDeleteShe looks pregnant in this picture
ReplyDeleteOnly a DNA test will work, imho. Actually, several samples, tagged "anonymous", sent to several testing facilities. Somewhere there's a birth certificate that a desperate Sarah can bring out, with a neener neener neener grin, to prove Trig's parentage. It will have Dr. CBJ's signature on it. It will be the best fake the best fakers can create. And, unlike our President's, it will be accepted as gospel. DNA or nothing.
ReplyDeleteI've always had this unspeakable fear that the baby actually belonged to another daughter, one that would have been so young that it was far less scandalous to let the media consume the older one in hopes of taking any potential scrutiny off of the pregnancy (or lack thereof) and the actual birth mother. I've also always hoped equally that I'm completely off in left field. With what has come out about that family, nothing would surprise me.
ReplyDelete5:34... "If Sarah announced she had a baby in early March, she would have seemed like a horrible new mother if she decided to nevertheless give that speech at the Rethug oil conference in Texas."
ReplyDeleteSince when has Sarah worried about looking like a horrible mother? (And not even a new one, at that.)
Re: trademarking her name, trademarking Bristol's name. EVERYONE can still joke about them. They are public figures, and have willingly posed for covers of magazines and been interviewed/featured on TV. They are celebs. You can easily joke about them; they are in the public domain and Mrs. Palin was a VP/GOP nominee. Any comedian worth his/her salt will still be able to use the name Palin and make innuendo! My god, do you think they're going to stop the career of Michael Palin, formerly of Monty Python? They are not the first famous folks named Palin. Dream on. Whoever is advising her legally on this is wasting her money...
ReplyDeleteThe frosting on the cake would be a whiff of Rove's poisonous touch. Too much to hope I suppose. And Sarah Palin is too stupid to even realize the power of Rove.
ReplyDeleteFINALLY is right.
ReplyDeleteI'm more than excited. Do you know when we can expect this news? Weeks? Months? Days?
Three things:
ReplyDelete1. Nice to wake up to this post!!!
2. There will be more than pictures. There have been plenty of pictures around for two years and they haven't done the trick yet.
3. Unspeakable doesn't mean lying about covering for a kid's pregnancy - even lying in detail again and again to your base about a birth that never happened. It means unspeakable, like stealing a baby. This is the kind of thing you've been hinting at all this time.
I just love concern trolls. They usually start off or end with "I'm no fan of $arah, but ..."
ReplyDeleteSo predictable ...
and annoying. Pfffffft.
Someone scrubbed computers and many photos were disappeared.....so did the word go down from on GOP High to release them and get rid of her before the primary season starts?
ReplyDeleteThey are scrambling to NOT be the Palin/Bachmann crazy-train party, so this might be the first volly.
i hope its more pictures because that one alone i believe that she looks pregnant.
ReplyDeleteand in the other ones too. her face is chunky(er!!!).
i dont know gryph, i do believe she was pregnant. im sorry.
I would hope that this would bring her down but I think if a photo is the only proof it will remain conjecture in the public eye and fizzle out. But I think she is already down; Greta's not going to want to interview her anymore; Fox hasn't been using her; she's losing her steam on the public stage - however, she'll always continue to get rich through her speeches to adoring conservative fans that think she's the next messiah. But I think her political career is dying and I don't see her even wanting to run for president.
ReplyDeleteAnon 4:48
ReplyDeleteIf Palin adopted that is not "unspeakable" by most people's standards. However if an adoption took place many people would look at the big picture of Palin's devious and perverse pleasure to spin lies and con people or take credit for another woman's pregnancy.
Couldn't happen to a nicer (cough) gal!
ReplyDeleteThis looks very promising:
ReplyDeleteFilmmaker Sets His Sights On Palin
http://www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/
palin-item-criticism-lefties-already-creeping-murdochs-daily-24405
Nick Broomfield (the British documentary maker) has been spotted in Wasilla, Alaska interviewing enemies of the former governor for the last three months.
(This article was dated Weds., Feb. 2nd)
The church fire has something to do with all of this I am sure. Documents and information burned by an arsonist. Will Sarah be a suspect in that fire now?
ReplyDeleteSarah has a lot of Dark Red Secrets that are going to haunt her and her family for the rest of their lives. This is a family affair. Along with others.
AIP Mafia!!!!
Here's Palin with hands clasped easily over her belly on 02.25.08
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/calendar/days/022508.html
Here's Palin with hands beneath a bulging belly on 04.13.08
http://www.palindeception.com/calendar/days/041308.html
In the intervening 49 days, at some point, the "concealed it" theory because untenable.
Who knows why certain scandals catch our attentions and not others? I have followed Sarah's craziness with the same fascination that I once knew every detail of George Bush's AWOL status. It was inSANE that GB not only got away with that, but that the story pulled Dan Rather down. I'm with meemers at 5:23. Not only does every "i" need to be dotted and every "t" crossed in this l-o-n-g story, but a hundred editors need give both thumbs up. Reputations more important than Sar's are at stake. And whoever breaks the story in the mainstream media will earn a place in history. Hope it's you, Gryph!
ReplyDeleteGood news, but I won't hold my breath. I want the truth about the pretend pregnancy out there. If people still want to vote for her, well at least they are informed.
ReplyDeleteIf this does become a MSM story, I thank Audrey, wherever she is, for her blog and meticulous research.
Re: TriG and TriPP's chins. Many babies have recessed chins to help them nurse. Most then get chins.
Re: Pudgy tummy at Spouse's Lunch. First, to see how small it is, look at Audrey's versions that show where the belly actually is. Even more so, compare to Gusty photo. She couldn't go from Spouse's Lunch to looking 8 months in just 3 weeks (without an empathy belly).
The reason I think Sarah will find more compassion than anything is because most of america is not as crass and rude as some of the people who post here and at palingates. Most don't follow her personal life with a magnifying glass. Most aren't going to care in the long run. Sarah's far from being the only person with a colorful past. There's a reason other political scandals of personal natures died after a week. It doesn't mean she will gain respect, it just means people will eventually forget like all the others.
ReplyDeleteVery few see her as Presidential material. Just because her pact raises a lot of money, a lot of her supporters are successful/wealthy. There's a reason republicans are stereotyped as rich and greedy. Everyone I know who votes Repub has worked incredibly hard to build their fortune and businesses. It's perfectly understandable that FOX is still the #1 news org. It's also understandable that DEMS are stereotyped as either hollywood or welfare junkies. Govt is far from the answer to any problem and I believe more and more people are seeing this.
Back to the topic at hand. Yes, Sarah will never hold higher office in her future. No She isnt the MOST scandalous thing ever to happen to the US. We as a country have a long history of shady dealings and other events that would make anyone ill if the truth EVER were divulged. She's just a woman with a lage family and colorful, active past. Who has succeeded in making the citizens of this country finally question corrupt DC
I highly doubt Sarah stole a baby. Trig not only looks like a Palin/Heath but the family treats him as such
ReplyDeleteI want to believe. Really I do. It will be such happy day when this psycho-phony is finally exposed for what she really is.
ReplyDeleteI also hope that they have something more than pictures, so that it doesn't become some sort of "they photoshopped" thing or like the Bush military letter. If they can show some pictures were altered in any way, then they can make the story go away forever even if it is true -- just ask Dan Rather.
Anon 2:41 - I think you are looking at the other woman not Sarah.
ReplyDeleteThe photo when enlarged and the black scarf highlighted you can SEE that is is lying flat covering a totally FLAT stomach - which is NOT possible at the stage of pregnancy she claimed to be at.
Nice try though to toss doubt out there - but hopefully the photos that will be released soon will be even more revealing of the truth. And since she was faking a pregnancy it would make sense that she would allow a few extra pounds to creep on so her face was bit more "chunky" - that would not take much, just a few more runs to taco bell, the sodium content alone would add bloat - and since she normally lives on diet dr pepper and barely anything nutritous her metabolism is probably totally wrecked so she would bloat up fairly quickly
For those who want the full series of photos of the amazing pregnancy of Sarah Palin, the PalinDeceptions web site has a tidy little calendar with links to each appearance of the prego belly:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/subpages/subpage1.html
I'd love to know what happened at the Anchorage hospital. Seems like Trig wasn't born in the valley after all. What a surprise.
ReplyDeleteTo everyone asking why Palin would fake a pregnancy and not just adopt a baby and bask in the glory that would give her: None of you are acknowledging the rumors that Bristol was pregnant circulating at the time. They couldn't say "Those rumors are completely false, but.,.guess what? We just happen to be adopting a baby!"
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 6:36 AM said... "Everyone I know who votes Repub has worked incredibly hard to build their fortune and businesses. It's perfectly understandable that FOX is still the #1 news org."
ReplyDelete=====
You LIE.
I think she was as surprised as the rest of us that she was picked for VP candidate. I don't think that she ever thought that her fake pregnancy (or anything she did) would be this scrutinized and probably thought that it was all forgotten. She would never be able to pull that off now, although Bristol did a good enough job doing the opposite (hiding a real pregnancy) right in front of a national audience, so strange things continue to happen.... for now, it seems. Maybe, one-by-one, those in-the-know will be encouraged to add to the picture of the real Palin story.
ReplyDeleteBTW- The trademark story is interesting in that it is another attempt to control her image. Can you imagination the lack of transparency a Palin administration would create?
For the people who are saying "lying is never ever acceptable" I'd like to point you to youtue. EVERY leader in this country has told huge whoppers to further THEIR agenda. it happens EVERY DAY.
ReplyDeleteThe difference here is, Sarah is a conservative candidate, she is a woman, the lie includes a baby, the baby probably leads to a daughter's indiscretions. Lying to save face in a personal crisis is different from lying about a foreign policy predicament, different from lying/omtting one's true intentions for a country, it goes on.
Both should take the candidate in question out of politics without hesitancy but they are different lies.
It is absoutely crazy to say Sarah should be condemned to the lowest pit of political hell for lying when all political leaders do it
Capiche?
Ha ha. I remember some poll to vote whether Sarah had been pregnant or not.
ReplyDeleteI voted not.
Now I get to say "Told you so!"
I luv it.
Sarah Palin could have told a perfectly reasonable birth story. But she did NOT. She proudly prattled out her wild ride tale.
ReplyDeleteSarah Palin is stupid. She also thinks people are easily duped.
That's a fatal combination in a presidential candidate.
Correction: from Spouse's Lunch to Gusty in only 2 weeks. Thanks for adding Gusty, Gryphen, and of course for continuing where Audrey may have been forced to leave off.
ReplyDeleteIf you ask me, I think Greta knows the truth by using her intellect
ReplyDeleteThis is it? More false pregnancy stuff? Just more photos? This ain't gonna do it, I'm afraid. I thought you had something that could not be interpreted - some objective evidence of illegal activity. But more photos seemingly showing Sarah is not pregnant shortly before Trigg's birth will be treated about as seriously as photos of Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI can imagine what Sarah Palin would do in these days of foreign policy nightmare. The middle east is in turmoil. North Korea is lunching missiles at our ally - South Korea, Russia is stepping back towards the 'iron fisted' style of governing, the developing world is getting crushed under the weight of the global economic recession, and the United States of America is divided into two very distinct camps who genuinely hate one another. Not to add - our economic future is very bleak! You want Sarah Palin in charge to fix all of that and the hundreds of other issues that pop-up on the American presidents itinerary every single day?
ReplyDeleteDuring the 2008 presidential campaign - "Grizzly Mom" Palin and her cronies actually told their dead head followers - elementary school drop-outs - that Palin was more qualified and prepared to be president than then candidate Barack (yes) Hussain Obama. I use Hussain because in these days of Arab-Muslim revolution, a president with a name like that - not to mention his God-given abilities and diplomatic skills - is exactly what we and the world need.
Imagine if Ms. "crosshairs" Palin was president at this crucial time. Yea - she would no doubt "man-up" and use those "Cojones" of hers to blow-up egypt and all non-christian, non-gun toting, and educated people (aka liberal elite).
The fear-mongering, unpatriotic people would rather prove some strange point by following "Mama Grizzly" rather than do what is best for the country - and the world. What qualifies Sarah Palin to be president? She's all about cash - she can't even spell PACKASTINE (LoL)!!!
http://technorati.com/politics/article/sarah-palin-for-president-lol/
Check out a lightened version of this picture, and Many! More! Pictures! of non-pregnant SP in my video:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9ZtzPI2OMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_l8ARWykB4
Check out Sarah's recountings of the Wild Ride in her own words here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZSVMzeR5jU
Lidia17
She doesn't move around like a pregnant woman in the luncheon tape. She's wearing a TRENCH COAT inside during a luncheon? No other woman has a coat on. What a tangled web Ms. Palin has wove.
ReplyDeleteRon Reagan: Palin has nothing in common with dad
ReplyDeleteSarah Palin is honoring one Reagan and offending another with the same speech.
The former Alaska governor is scheduled to speak in Santa Barbara, Calif., on Friday at a tribute to former President Ronald Reagan - just one of the celebrations marking the centennial of the 40th president's birth on Feb. 6.
But his son, Ron Reagan, tells The Associated Press he doesn't see anything in common between his dad and the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, who was invited to speak by the event's sponsor, the conservative Young America's Foundation.
**"Sarah Palin is a soap opera, basically. She's doing mostly what she does to make money and keep her name in the news," Reagan says.**
http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1110ap_us_reagan_palin.html
Thanks for the hopeful news, Gryphen, but remember we are dealing with a personality that will lie and spin to her last breath.
ReplyDeleteI second Kimosabe in the expectation that personal use of money and material stolen from political funds will be the final rock that will put her behind bars.
Concerning the photo above - remember Morgan and her site? It was shut down with ruthless efficiency because of her skill in examining subtle details in a photo.
whoaaaaaa! Just had an extreme thought. Would Sarah have faked a pregnancy to cover up her own whited out pregnancy? Maybe too many people or the wrong person found out about a second whiteout, so she quickly faked a pregnancy to be able to say, see I've been PG for 9 months, How could I have had a whiteout 3 or 4 months ago?
ReplyDeleteAt this point, I wouldn't put anything past her.
Rick
Anon at 6:38 -
ReplyDeleteThere's more than one baby in this story. In April 2008 Sarah presented two different babies as Trig. Whether one or both are related by blood to the Palins is unknown.
I'm a southerner now living up north and battling my first bout of the winter blahs. Hopefully, this news will give me the lift I need. I hope it proceeds as imagined.
ReplyDeleteI think the McCain campaign and the RNC have had photos all along. I think they have plenty on Palin and could have used it any time but wanted to leverage her supporters as long as it benefited them. Now she's shown enough crazy and the midterms are over, so they have decided to unleash the material.
ReplyDeleteI would not be surprised if this was done by ABC News or equivalent. Notice how McCain is saying he's staying out of it? Yep, I don't think Dems are behind this at all. I think the GOP is four square behind this and the incriminating evidence they paid off in 2008 will be released slowly until she screams uncle.
The SeaofPee will be in a white hot rage and it will be their own party that does it to them. My guess is the GOP is getting behind Romney.
Gryphen if you are proved wrong on this what is your plan?
ReplyDelete@2.42 Sarah slipped and there are now two different versions of Trig's birth. The original one was at MatSu's little hospital, and he was 8 months old. A more recent version, from Sarah was Anchorage at 7 1/2 months. A mother doesn't forget how old, how premature or where her kid was born...not if she was there giving birth.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/calendar/days/041308.html
ReplyDeleteThis "Gusty" photo taken April 13, 2008 with the big belly tells me that Sarah Palin KNEW that she was going to be presenting a baby to the public shortly. It's inconceivable that a belly of that size fly to/from Texas with a high risk pregnancy.
"She's just a woman with a lage family and colorful, active past."
ReplyDeleteThat's one way to put it! If she hadn't already poisoned the well with her divisiveness and didn't continue to flirt with the idea of running for President, I might agree with you. She'd just be a real-life Darlene McBride!
In terms of all of this blowing over and being forgotten: I don't care what Sarah Palin does as long as it's not illegal and she stays out of politics and the national political dialogue for good. She is unfit for public office. When enough of the truth is revealed to finally accomplishes this, I'll forget all about her happily!
It sounds like some people are starting to open up about Sarah. Perhaps they are encouraged by her drop in the polls and her continued slide into irrelevancy and madness. The indications that Sarah is moving to Arizona have also helped loosen tongues. Like everyone, I have theories about what really happened regarding Trig's birth, but Gryphen's remark about Sarah doing something "unspeakable" is very intriguing - and scary. The woman is plainly mad - and dangerous - to both the United States and her own family. We can only hope that the Palin Nightmare will soon be over.
ReplyDeleteMeh, I don't think it's that conclusive.
ReplyDeleteOne question I would like answered, though, is why, after she announced she was pregnant, Palin continued to dress to disguise her pregnancy.
Funny how she claims she hid her pregnancy through the clever use of jackets and scarves. Why continue to do it after the announcement? What was there to hide? Isn't she proud to be a mother again?
I wish the second picture had been taken 2 weeks before the first. Would really have made your case.
ReplyDeleteThe picture I'd like would be a medical record showing Sarah had a hysterectomy before April of 2008.
ReplyDeleteBut the Dan Rather experience is certainly a concern. We could get a smoking gun picture or document that had the right information, but was faked so that it could be disregarded.
Gryphen, while you are bound to secrecy regarding the material, can you give us a hint about when we can look forward to reading/seeing/learning the bombshell info?
ReplyDeleteYa'll need to tone down the schadenfreude just a skosh. It's really not healthy.
ReplyDelete"It is absoutely crazy to say Sarah should be condemned to the lowest pit of political hell for lying when all political leaders do it"
ReplyDeleteBut you are forgetting that Sarah is different! She is a "breath of fresh air," a "maverick" takin' on the "Old Boys' Club!" She is not like other politicians! She is going to clean up Washington and get rid of corruption! She's a "straight shooter" who "calls like she sees it!" How can you even stoop to compare her to other politicians!
You get the idea...
Also, what did you make of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal? It seemed awfully important and relevant to a lot of people at the time.
All I can say is-about fucking time! Gryphen thank you for all your hard work and dedication on this. I hope it breaks by Feb 20. That would be an awesome birthday present for me.
ReplyDeletehttp://sarahpalinhasaserpentsheart.blogspot.com/
@7.12
ReplyDeleteShe continued to wear scarves after she announced the pregnancy to hide the fact that she wasn't pregnant. The scarves prevented people seeing her non-pregnant belly.She couldn't be bothered to wear the empathy belly.
Unless this was coming out tomorrow, you really should NOT have tipped your hand. I agree with another poster who stated that you give the Palin machine way too much lead time by posting things too soon. You could still get the credit for breaking the story, but there will be no story if the Palin's can squash it before it comes to light, making you look like a liar and a gossiper once again.
ReplyDeleteDon't care if you post this or not, but really, you should by now know when to hold'em and know when to fold'em. The Palins' are quite devious, expertly so, and you are no match. So you need to use much wisdom in your fight to get the truth out or you will continue to be discredited.
Did you all know that Reagan's daughter posed for Playboy. That Mercede really chose well, now didn't she? Sarah can't mock her without mocking her Saint Ronnie's daughter. Ha!
ReplyDeletePatti Davis on Her Dad, Palin and Playboy
...When I tell her that Sarah Palin will be headlining one of the Reagan birthday celebrations, as keynote speaker of a lavish dinner at the former family ranch, Davis exclaims. "Are you kidding me?" She adds, "As far as Sarah Palin is concerned, I think he would be completely baffled at her fondness for shooting animals."
...Davis posed nude for Playboy in 1994, appearing on the cover, with her breasts cupped by male hands and the headline "Ronald Reagan's Renegade Daughter."
"I'm very, very proud of that," she tells me. "You know, my father was out of office by then, and had been for a number of years, so I think I might have still gotten a little bit of heat, but it wouldn't have been looked at as, 'Oh my God, this so in-your-face rebellious, da-da-da-da!'... I'm 58 years old, and I'm actually in better shape now, in terms of my muscularity and all that, than I was when I posed for Playboy at 42."
...In the meantime, Davis is watching the current political scene with a mixture of fascination and horror. Of right-wing superstars Palin and Michele Bachmann, who constantly invoke Reagan as their political love-object, "my father was a Rhodes Scholar compared to them."
...She adds: "I think people ultimately reveal themselves to everybody. I think that's the case with Sarah Palin's conduct, particularly after the Tucson shooting, I think she's sort of digging herself into a hole. I hope—I really hope."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-03/reagans-daughter-patti-davis-on-his-centennial-alzheimers-family-feud/full/
Which media? It better not be the national enquirer. Can you let us know if it is of the gossip mag kind or the serious reputable news kind? I want to say I told you so to everyone who thinks I'm nuts (they can't get past daily kos pulling the story and factcheck saying it's a myth) but they won't admit defeat until it's all over cnn, nbc, and abc. And WHEN????
ReplyDeleteGryphen, Your statement, "They were completely satisfied that they had what they needed to put the "final nail in the coffin" of Palin's faked pregnancy. (A little inside humor for those of you in the know.)", is what's tickling my fancy!
ReplyDeleteNail in the coffin....someone who is no longer with us had the final proof prior prior to their passing? Am I warm?
When when when?? I hope not long! It's about time! And notice a few trolls already!
ReplyDeleteI don't care that her bots will still cover for her, at this point, I just want vindication!! And so does Andrew Sullivan who has taken a lot of grief over this.
ReplyDeleteThis has been stated elsewhere before but bears repeating.
ReplyDeleteThese photos date from a point at which Palin should have been around 33 weeks pregnant, based on her own announcement that the due date was mid May. Given the "birth" three weeks after this Spouse Lunch of a baby that weighed six pounds, by the end of March, that baby would have weighed around five pounds.
Take five pounds of beef roast and put it on your counter. Look at it. That's just the baby. Now add the extras.
A five pound baby plus the fluid plus a placental plus the increased weight of a pregnant uterus - that has to add up to at least ten pounds.
One gallon of fluid weighs eight pounds. That's a gallon of milk. LOOK at these pictures. LOOK AT THEM. Where in this body is there a gallon jug of milk and more hiding?
Everyone who says that fat women can hide pregnancy but thin women can't are right on! You can stare at these pictures and say OH her face is a little full, or OH the scarf is pooching out a little bit, but that's not cutting it when you are looking at someone who is supposedly hiding ten plus pounds of baby and fluid.
Anon 7:12, yes, why keep "hiding" a pg you announced? that is just so nutty and obvious.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 6:46 AM said... "I think she was as surprised as the rest of us that she was picked for VP candidate. I don't think that she ever thought that her fake pregnancy (or anything she did) would be this scrutinized and probably thought that it was all forgotten. ..."
ReplyDelete======
Ah, but the point is that Sarah Palin had a big secret and STILL accepted the VEEP tap. That shows her stupidity. If she wanted to keep the secret, she could have politely declined McCain's invitation.
There is ZERO possibility that the GOP knew the faked pregnancy story BEFORE asking Palin. Only the horror and swiftness of the GOP machine saved Sarah Palin from brutal exposure in 2008. It was not her skill, it was PR in over-drive.
Sarah Palin has come to think that the GOP scrub was adequate and she is safe. Poor, stupid, vain little Sarah.
Anon @6:36AM
ReplyDeleteThat's an A+ for malarkey.
The whole pregnancy scenario is one big mired mess; so many discrepancies, it's mind boggling.
ReplyDeleteThe gutsy picture shows a very pregnant looking Palin at that date and yet the personnel on the airline she took back to Alaska said she showed no signs of being with child.
Did she appear to be as big during her Texas speech as she was in the gutsy photo, and if so, how did the airline personnel not notice her protruding belly?
I can't abide this woman and want the iceberg to do its work, however I went to the link, Gryph, and looked through all the provided photos. Her face looks bloated, she looks like she is retaining water, and frankly...pregnant to me.
ReplyDeleteI WANT to believe she wasn't, I really do. I carried much differently with the second than I did the first one. Also, with my first, I literally popped out in the belly OVERNIGHT one night. Weirdest thing.
I don't see anything crazy about expanding that much in 15 days, it happened to me. Weird but true.
That said, I hope that I am wrong, and that all of these things come together so that we can relegate her to a C or D list reality-celebrity.
no WONDER Geoffrey Dunn's book is coming out in June, instead of April! :-)
ReplyDeletethe palindeceptions web site, did designate one photo as "nail in the coffin".
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/calendar/days/032608.html
The photo was taken March 26, 2008. This photo was taken eighteen days prior to the announced birth of Trig Palin who was listed at 6+ lbs.
The photo is just 3 days before the Spouses Luncheon. The people saying Sarah's face is pudgy at the luncheon, need to check her face just 3 days earlier, it is NOT pudgy.
And the belly is a farce on 3/26.
Also, the GOP had been footing Palin's legal bills (why, who the fuck knows) and there are people who still back her fervently, in AK and nationally. Again, who, I don't know. The fact is, they still live in AK happily.
ReplyDeleteSo, who's staking out the iron dog, banquet and race?
Someone posted a link to a site ikbis.com that shows a vid of Palin as sportscaster. On that same page there's a link to a vid of pictures of a young Palin. It's a mix of pics of her as a girl up to now.
ReplyDeleteAs I watched the video, I felt admiration for her, how she reached her goals, how lovely she is, and how fortunate she is to have such a big family.
However, the overwhelming feeling I had is regret, regret that she has never lived up to the myth, regret that her journey to success was paved with such deviousness and deception, and regret that she squandered a very enviable opportunity.
The makeover she needed to have after the 2008 election was the one that took her back to Alaska to mend fences with everyone she ever abused (all those mentors, what a shame!) and to focus on governing her "beloved" state through one of the most difficult economic times in our history. To come clean about Trig. I think she would have found forgiveness. And, yes, to learn. To really open her heart and become the servant she falsely claims to be.
Instead, she turned into a hateful pot-stirrer, even more ugly than the woman we saw on the campaign trail. Her hatred and resentment of Obama is so obvious. The very depth of it can't possibly be all due to a difference in politics.
For all her talk, Sarah Palin is short on principles and moral fiber. I've watched her words and actions for far too long now and what is clear to me is that there is always a lie on her lips. She never explains anything, she only deflects, denies, or smears others. She does it somewhat cleverly, with a memorable, snarky one-liner that makes people forget the original question.... but for those of us looking for an answer, we aren't fooled.
I know I'm rambling, but I guess what I'm trying to say is that I have mixed feelings about her. I see what she is and have from the night of her RNC speech. However, I also am sad that the myth isn't reality. As a woman and a working mom, I think that would have been so cool.
Everyone knows that even if a woman doesn't get really large in the abdomen during pregnancy, their breast size ALWAYS increases. Sarah's NEVER does.
ReplyDeleteAnon 7:44,
ReplyDeleteDon't get too excited, it's just a joke back from the days of Audrey's blog. She would post what we thought was a nail in the coffin photo that proved she faked the pregnancy, and we would be all excited that the truth was finally coming out, and then...nada from the media. Then there would be another nail in the coffin photo... and nada. And another and another and another and we are still waiting on that final nail to be hammered into Sarah's coffin! This supposed final nail in the coffin photo had better be sans scarf! In my dreams it is a photo of her posing and not realizing that her pillow has slipped down and is showing out the bottom of her shirt...lol
The picture called the "Gusty picture" shows a "pregnant" Sarah being interviewed in an empty hallway. Yes, that's some belly. A couple of weeks later, she took two different planes to Texas to deliver her speech, and then two more airplanes to hurry home to give birth to Trig. Not one flight attendant noticed that the Governor of Alaska, a pretty well know person, was pregnant. Some people argue that she would have required a seat belt extender, which would have brought more attention to that belly. The flight attendants are required to make seat belt checks on take on, landing, and whenever that sign lights up. Minimum two seat belt checks per flight times four flights, and no one noticed that belly. That's amazing! (I have been on an airplane where the flight attendant noticed a small black cast on the foot of a passenger in the middle seat, in the exit row and asked them to change seats because that would not allow the person to respond well in case of an emergency).
ReplyDeleteHer's Palin supposedly a mere 6 weeks from delivering a 6+ lb. It's a video not just a photograph. It shows Palin casually crossing her legs and leaning forward.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/calendar/days/030308.html
I have NEVER yet seen a commenter claim they could perform this gymnastic feat so close to the birthday of a bouncing baby.
For those saying that Palin's face looks "fat" in the picture at the luncheon and so she might have been pregnant... First of all, was she carrying the baby in her face?
ReplyDeleteI've had 3 kids and my face never changed. Not all pregnant women have that happen. Also, please consult pictures of Sarah Palin. In some her face looks quite wide and in others, less so. I think that her weight has yo-yo'd over the years. If you want to see how Sarah Palin looks pregnant, just consult the pic of her in her pregnancy with her oldest son.
I too think it makes sense that the GOP wants a shot at this next election without being a laughingstock.
ReplyDeleteSo it's time to clean Palin off the clock, delete her from the national dialogue. So someone who owns or influences a major MSM entity has said "Okay, you can go ahead with it now," and that is what Gryph is reporting. And as soon as some critical mass is reached, other people who know something will come forward. Like the person who has the ADDITIONAL photos of this event, who just now allegedly has come forward with them. The long-available video of SP at this event shows fleeting glimpses (screen shots are available) of a VERY flat profile, although the scarf does its job of obfuscating a lot of the time.
The problem of "Who knew what, and when," seems to be being handled, by major figures distancing themselves from SP. They will prob say they only just now found out about the hoax (and therefore the distancing now, among all the other reasons), and many voters will buy that -- because it will just have come out in the news. McCain is one example. Although realistically, who could believe that he did not know from almost the beginning? All he had to do was have a staffer read the blogs and probe a bit (which they surely did).
But let's not forget how wily SP and her enablers have been so far, with so many almost-icebergs that have been diverted.
And yes, let's re-emphasize one more time: it's not about Trig or his adoption. Or about SP's family members. It's about the endless gleeful, holier-than-thou LYING, about strapping on the fake belly for the Gusty photos, it's about hoaxing the American electorate, it's about the faked medical letter SP issued via the GOP, it's about the long-winded Wild Ride lie, it's about who enabled SP and why, and it's probably also about the degenerate nature of the sad story that initiated all of this, and SP's bankrupt response to it. --Amy1
2:41, yes, but, in Sarah's past pregnancies, she DID "get as big as houses." So, your general comments about hypothetical pregnancies don't really apply here. You need to stay within the confines of known facts about Palin rather than try to paint a picture based on your own pregnancies, or that of your friends.
ReplyDeleteBoy I am excited for this story to finally break. Shortly after she was chosen to be VP, I heard the Wild Ride story and knew that there's no way it was plausible. Luckily, soon after, I found Palindeception.com and the INCREDIBLE investigatory work of Audrey who worked tirelessly to lay the groundwork for the truth that will be revealed at some point soon. Since August 2008, I have been an avid reader of the PD, IM and PG blogs and want to take this opportunity to thank Audrey, Gryphen and Regina for keeping the "babygate" story alive. I always knew that the story didn't add up and I can't wait to see it hit the "lamestream media." Congratulations to all.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteGryphen if you are proved wrong on this what is your plan?
7:03 AM
Then he has all the material for a great novel, since no one would have reason to sue for "likeness to real-life characters", now would they?
A baby typically is only about a third of the "baby weight". The plancenta, fluid, and increased uterus size makes up the majority.
ReplyDeleteWhen I researched Palin in 2008 to know about her as a candidate as I did the other candidates I discovered Palin lied about most things. An example was her false claim the pipeline existed. I thought she has actual credits yet is compelled to embellish fact with personal fiction. My observation of such people is they can't learn their ganrications, lies or lying by omission actually discredits their self and negatively taints what is factual about them.
ReplyDeleteI found it to be a red flag when caught in her lies Palin lies again spinning her tangled web and becomes vindictive like throwing the McCain team under the bus as if everyone around her must submit and lie along with her selling their integrity out down at her level.
What would really cinch is some video of her walking around, bending over, etc.
ReplyDeleteSince this was not her first pregnancy, those hips start to get loose around the 4th month. By nearly 7 months, the preggers waddle is distinctive, especially if she was carrying low and on the inside like she claims. Even if her staffers didn't notice a baby bump, you can't miss the waddle.
Just last night, we were watching Amy Poehler on Parks & Rec. You could tell by the shots that they were hiding her real pregancy because it's not in her character's storyline. But they had her sitting or standing behind something--very few shots of her moving, and then only a few feet. Anything more than that and the waddle would be noticed.
Personally, I think it looks worse on her if
ReplyDeletewe actually believe her story--the wild ride.
She hid her pregnancy----why???? Was she
going to abort if McCain lost? Was she hoping
she'd miscarry so she could tell everyone she
lost her poor little retarded baby? Why was
she ashamed to show-off that pregnancy? Was
she ashamed because Trig wasn't "normal" or
because he wasn't her husband's? Why did she
fly to Texas for a dumb speech and risk going
into labor? Why didn't she go to the hospital
when she did go into labor? Why did she
bypass all the hospitals & head for the airport?
Was she hoping Trig would be stillborn, or
in distress & die mid-flight? These questions
that go with her story look much worse than faking
a pregnancy to cover for her floozy teen daughter.
Waving at Cathy Baldwin Johnson. Are you getting nervous yet?
ReplyDeleteFor all those of you ragging on Gryphen for not spilling his guts on every post... people don't tune in to soap operas because all the loose ends are tied up every day. They love the day to day suspense and the dribbles of clues, with a "culmination" of sorts that is really only the beginning of another drama.
ReplyDeleteThat's how I see the Palin side-show. One incredible day-time soap.