She lives! Sarah Palin responds to the kerfuffle between Donald Trump and John McCain by essentially taking no position and instead attacking "lazy media lapdogs."

Courtesy of Hypocritical Hattie's Facebook page:

I have the good fortune of knowing both John McCain and Donald Trump well. Both men have more in common than the today's media hype would have you believe. Both blazed trails in their careers and love our great nation. Sen. McCain dedicated his life to serving our country, and in my humble opinion the sacrifices made by all ethical service members are heroic – putting it all on the line to defend freedom IS heroic – and Donald Trump is a hero in another arena. (The blowhard arena?) Trump is the candidate giving voice to untold millions of fed-up Americans witnessing a purposeful destruction of our economy and the equal opportunity for success that made America exceptional. 

(Here is a picture of some of those "fed-up Americans" that Donald Trump is giving voice to.)

We're watching career politicians throw away our kids' future through bankrupting public budgets and ripping open our porous borders which, obvious to all us non-politicians, puts us at great risk. Everywhere I go, hard-working patriotic Americans – not "crazies" or "wacko birds" – ask me to pass on to Mr. Trump encouragement to keep educating the masses about true ramifications of illegal immigration, and in general the real state of our union. (So to be clear these people passing on encouragement to Trump calling for a boycott of Mexico and insulting just about every GOP candidate running in this election cycle are NOT "crazies or "wacko birds?") I encourage both leaders to resolve the media driven wedge between them, and we can keep the debate focused on significant issues at hand. I leave politics of personal destruction to those on the Left and lazy media lapdogs (Hah!) whose only take away from any debate is any salacious slip-up, as if they've never wanted to restate something they've publicly uttered. I'll fight the exhausting, divisive strategy that's taken hold under the current crop of politicians who refuse to allow our United States to unite. (How is she going to fight an "exhaustive, divisive strategy?" Through the power of Facebook?) Both Mr. Trump and Sen. McCain can contribute their gifts and talents to join that fight to work together, because the Left is headed the other direction, and under their desired division we will fall. 

- Sarah Palin

"I leave the politics of personal destruction to those on the Left?" Who in the hell does she think she is kidding?

Palin goes on the attack as easily and often as some people eat a sandwich. In fact I think viciously attacking people has now become a form of sustenance for her.

Okay well at least now we know that we can call off the search team (What do you mean there was no search team?) because clearly she is alive and at least conscious enough to tell her ghostwriter to type out a response on Facebook.

You have to hand it Palin for taking a conflict between two politicians on her side of the aisle and somehow twisting it around and into an attack on the media and those on the Left.

And they say she is talentless.

How IM will be covering the new Sarah Palin Channel.

Boy if Sarah Palin wanted to make sure that people are still talking about her she certainly found a way to do so last night.

It seems that just about EVERYBODY is talking about her new pay-per-rant web based TV channel.

And in response journalists are signing up for the free first month's subscription in order to adequately cover the lunacy that is sure to emerge from a Sarah Palin without a media filter to make her appear at least slightly sane.

But not I.

If I had a religion it would forbid me from doing anything to contribute to Palin's monetary gain, EVEN if by doing so I could more effectively dissect her lunacy, call her out on her lack of education and intelligence, and generally mock her at will.

No the way I figure it, if Palin says some thing on her silly little channel, to her handful of silly little paint eaters, that is not news.

And if it IS news, then some poor schlub who is being forced to follow it by his editor will write something up, and I will gladly report on THAT.

I also would discourage all of you from signing on even for the free trial.

As somebody already pointed out, those numbers will be used to suggest Palins' level of popularity and even if the majority of them are critics, journalists, and trolls, a subscriber is still a subscriber in Palin's book.

By the way perhaps the most interesting thing about this new endeavor is that Palin called on the "lamestream" media folks to help her with it.

This from the Daily Beast: 

Jonathan Klein, the former president of CNN’s United States operation, and Jeff Gaspin, the former chairman of NBC Universal Television Entertainment, are just the sort of lamestream media elites that Sarah Palin is constantly railing against. 

But, because this is America, where capitalism is the great equalizer between liberals and conservatives alike, a little difference of opinion hasn’t stopped the former governor of Alaska, Republican vice presidential nominee and right-wing political icon from joining forces with two blue-state media entrepreneurs to launch her own subscription-based online TV channel.

That means that at least these two believe that there is money in them thar fake bolt on hills, and they are hoping to get a piece. (Of the action, not Palin.)

Will it actually be successful however? I seriously doubt it.

For example get a load of this: 

“We’ve been talking to the Palins for a while”—since their initial contact last year her with the ex-Guv’s lawyer-agent, Beltway establishment gatekeeper Bob Barnett—“but we really began talking in earnest a few months ago as her timing came together,” Klein said. “She’s got a complicated life. She does have five kids and three of them are at home, and she’s got a handful, running around the country giving speeches.” 

Two of those kids—sexual abstinence advocate and former Dancing with the Stars contestant Bristol, 23, mother of Tripp and the ex-girlfriend of Tripp’s father, Levi Johnston; and middle school student Piper, 13, her mom’s frequent travel companion to all those high-dollar speeches—are also starring on the new channel’s web site. Bristol has her already-established blog on the site while Piper has begun to record her own video commentary. Meanwhile, Sarah’s mother, Scrabble aficionado Sally Heath, will be providing a word of the day, Klein said.

So the question you have to ask is what kind of subscriber is going to be interested in the ghostwritten posts of Bristol Palin, that they can find for free on Brancy's blog, and the video diary entries of the prepubescent Piper Palin?

My guess would be only those the MOST intoxicated from drinking the Palin brand of Kool-aid, and recent SarahPAC filings have shown that number to be dwindling at quite a clip.

Sarah Palin may have come to realize that the Palin curse is real and aims it at reporter who undermined Republican's attacks on White House concerning Benghazi.

There's something different, certainly refreshing, about Jake Tapper. I call it integrity and professionalism.... fb.me/Kjg5B3MR
— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) May 21, 2013

That of course links to the Arizona snowbird's Facebook page which says this:

There's something different, certainly refreshing, about Jake Tapper. I call it integrity and professionalism. What would you call his conscientious approach to news coverage?

The Facebook post links to a news story that gushes about Tapper and seems to laud him for the fact that he was one of the first "Lamestream media" types to cover the Kermit Gosnell story. (Others covered that story as well, including MSNBC and many network news programs.)

"I'm sorry. Who's a fan of mine now?"

However the fact that Tapper talked about Gossner does not seem like it would be enough to attract Palin's attention, though who can really figure out what rattles around in that empty head of hers?

However what she CANNOT help but know is that it was Jake Tapper who undercut the Right Wing's argument that there was a conspiracy about Benghazi by revealing that the Republicans had purposefully misquoted e-mails in order to mislead the public.

So the question before is "Does Palin really get all moist at the idea of Jake Tapper's masculine no nonsense reporting style?" or "Is she faking her adoration because she hopes to unleash the unholy demonic affects of her unstoppable Palin-curse on him for daring to tell the truth about the Benghazi e-mails?"

All I know is that if I were Jake Tapper I would quickly do something to make Sarah Palin tweet how much she hates me and wishes I would die a slow agonizing death.  THAT, as far as I know, is the only thing which might possibly immunize him against the curse.

Photo courtesy of Breitbart, where the original article is posted.

 In other Wasilla Wendigo news Palin apparently had RAM type out some attack against President Obama:

“For the president to deny any knowledge of what was brewing [with the IRS] and to claim to know nothing about the Benghazi cover-up or anything about anything White House-related lately, he’s either a liar or a hugely incompetent CEO. You decide,” Palin wrote in an op-ed published Tuesday night on the conservative website Breitbart. 

“These Obama administration scandals are a sad and stark reminder that only limited government can ensure liberty. At our core, we Americans just want to be left alone to live freely, peacefully, and productively. Last year the Obama campaign told us that government is something we all ‘belong’ to. I guess they’re right because when the government is powerful enough to target, intimidate, and harass us, we do “belong” to them. The real question is: Will we stand for this?” Palin wrote. 

She added: “These atrocious government actions are bigger, uglier, and much more dangerous than ‘a few rogue employees.’ It’s time for all Americans to stand together and join in the growing outraged chorus that looks at our out-of-control government and says, ‘Enough is enough!’” 

Since these are not really Palin's words, but instead a Right Wing op-ed typed by a ghostwriter, and then stamped with her hoof, I will not bother to pick it apart.

After all it is nothing we have not seen before.

Minding my own business watching a Passat commercial when suddenly.....Palin-speak!

Courtesy of Mediaite: 

The ad, which ran nationally on MSNBC this afternoon, features one man named “Gary” approaching his friend’s new Passat. 

The driver opens the window and breaks the bad news to his buddy: “I bought the last one.” 

“But it says here you can get one for $199 a month,” Gary insists, pointing to a newspaper ad in his hand. 

“You can’t believe the lamestream media,” the driver responds. “They’re all gone.” 

“Maybe I’ll get one,” Gary persists. 

But nope, “they’re all gone.”

So apparently THIS is Sarah Palin's contribution to American culture.

A ridiculous, easily mocked smear of the American media. 

I can live with that.

Thin skinned Sarah Palin reveals her vicious side to reporters.

"Hey Tawd, you better remember who wears the pants in this family. Got it buster?"

Now as you read this REMEMBER it comes from uber-right wing blog, the American Spectator:

What happened was that Alex Pappas of The Daily Caller, one of the rising stars among political scribes and a meticulously careful and wonderfully polite, fair-minded young man (an aside: I've known him since he was in junior high school), wrote a perfectly fine story about Palin's current stances vis-a-vis the presidential race. In it, one of the things she said was that if Mitt Romney is the nominee, well, of course she would endorse him over Barack Obama.

Fox Nation picked up the story and, in its own headline (not Pappas', not the Daily Caller's, but its own headline completely apart from anything Pappas ever wrote) played up the "Romney endorse" angle in a way that apparently did not make it clear that the endorsement might be in the general election, rather than the primary campaign. (The headline is no longer available at Fox Nation, so I can't say exactly what the wording was.)

Anyway, the Palin team pounced. Specifically inviting over reporter Kasie Hunt from Politico so she could hear the exchange, Palin called Pappas' cell phone and began berating him in a very scolding manner for writing a headline suggesting she supports Romney.

Courtesy of Politico:

"So you’re saying that I said that I support Mitt Romney?" she said to the reporter. "And what’s your headline? You need to be clear, otherwise people really lose faith in the state of journalists today and that is, I said ‘ABO’—anybody but Obama. And I would support the candidate who surfaces to take on Barack Obama. But no, your headline leads readers to believe that I’m supporting Mitt Romney at this time in this process, and no that’s not accurate." Pappas didn't even know what she was talking about. When he tried to say that neither he nor his editors had written such a headline, she said she didn't have time for this, that she needed to go back to the "real people" at the State Fair, and hung up on him.

Later, when it became clear that Fox Nation, not Pappas or The Daily Caller, had written the semi-offending headline, a Palin press aide called Pappas back not to apologize but to say that they now realized it was Fox and that the headline had been taken down.

"No," Pappas said, far more bemused than angry or upset, "he didn't come close to apologizing." 

Now see THIS is the Sarah Palin that Alaskans have come to know and loathe. The "attack first and get the facts later" Palin that once chased me out into a parking lot. The same woman who tried to destroy the career of an ex-brother-in-law, as well as her Public Safety Commissioner when he refused to help with that endeavor. The same woman who once penned a poorly crafted screed to the ADN after confusing a reference to Lisa Murkowski's father to one aimed at her own dad. (By the way if you have never read that letter, do yourself a favor and look it over.  It is one of the few authentic examples of Palin's writing that you will find on the internet.)

You see the reason I have never really been terribly concerned that Palin was ever going to win the White House, or even win the GOP nomination, is that no matter how hard people work to groom the pitbull to look like an inside house poodle, sooner or later it will rip your throat out.

And eventually even the MOST supportive conservative cable news networks and right wing blogs were going to have no choice but to call her out on that kind of behavior.  As evidenced by the last line from the American Spectator article:
 
If Palin wants to get rid of the image of being a difficult diva with a rude streak, she needs to stop acting like a difficult diva with a rude streak.

In other words folks, the next time you are looking for Sarah Palin in a crowd, just look for the giant fork sticking out of her.

Joe McGinniss calls out the media for their cowardice in dealing with Sarah Palin.

From The Rogue Blog:

Daum writes, “Palin has gumption…But that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t have gone after her harder on many fronts. I didn’t do it because I didn’t want to come across as a mean-spirited smarty pants.”

She also admits, “Because the Palin machine ingeniously rebrands any criticism…as bilious emanations of the ‘lamestream media’(this being code for liberal elitist, which is code for educated…) it’s all but impossible to challenge her without being discredited…”

I think we should read and re-read the above. One of the hottest Gen-X writers on the radar screen says she pulled her punches at Sarah because she was afraid of being attacked by Palinists. Now that she sees Sarah as down and probably out (“Sarah Palin probably isn’t running for president”) she expresses remorse, because she feels it’s safe to do so.

While we might not applaud her careerism, we should at least give her credit for ‘fessin up, even at this late date. Very few of the many worse offenders have had the courage to do so.

It has been my experience over these last several years that intelligent, often fearless bloggers and journalists have blanched at the very idea of poking the Mama Grizzly for fear of angering her barbaric horde of supporters. So frightened were some of these individuals that they would avoid all contact with me for fear that they could be too easily smeared by Palin-bots who used me as a bludgeon to scare them away from potentially damaging stories that I had covered.

Now that the flying monkeys are down to only a few platoons, we see some journalists discovering their backbones, and yet there are still potential scandals that send them screaming into the night.

My question is how long must we wait for the media to really take Snowdrift Snooki to task for her hateful activities, her many lies, and her potentially criminal activities?

Oh wait, I do believe that question starts receiving an answer on May 10th.

RAM is NOT happy that the "Lamestream" media is ignoring her queen. Welcome to irrelevance Becky!

This was all over RAM's Twitter feed yesterday:

Hi @HuffingtonPost I noticed that you didn't really cover @SarahPalinUSA's speech in Madison. How come? @jjmnolte
13 hours ago via web

Hi @mitchellreports did you cover @SarahPalinUSA's speech in Madison? If not, why not? @jjmnolte
13 hours ago via web

Hi @ABCNews how come you didn't cover @SarahPalinUSA's speech in Madison very much? What gives? @jjmnolte
13 hours ago via web

Hi @CBSNews I know no one watches you, but how come you didn't really cover @SarahPalinUSA's Madison speech? What gives? @jjmnolte
13 hours ago via web

Hi @CNN did you cover @SarahPalinUSA's Madison speech? Did it upset you that she made Obama look bad by saying the stuff you gloss over?
13 hours ago via web

Hi #MSNBC did you cover @SarahPalinUSA's Madison speech? Oh never mind... #whybotherasking #barkingmadnetwork
13 hours ago via web

Hi @washingtonpost I didn't see much coverage of @SarahPalinUSA's Madison speech. What gives? I suppose @JRubinBlogger didn't approve of it.
13 hours ago via web

At some point RAM must have realized how sad and pathetically needy she sounded so she then went to offensive instead.

I don't think the MSM understands we amuse ourselves by exposing their hypocrisy. RT @jjmnolte Full disclosure: I'm just getting started.
12 hours ago via web

Whew!  Now THAT was just pathetic.

You know whenever you are wondering what is happening behind the scenes in Palin-land, and Klondike Kardashian is too emotionally distraught to tweet, or Facebook, or answer softball questions from Greta Van "Sucks to be Sarah Palin's puppet," all you have to do is take a look at her alter ego RAM's Twitter feed. 

Becky suffers from a sort of "narcissism by proxy" on behalf of her idol, as well as Palin's lack of perspective when it comes to how people REALLY see the failed half-term Governor.

I can only imagine that even more of these desperate cries for positive attention will be issuing forth from the Palin camp in the months to comes. As for negative attention?  THAT they will have in abundance with the help of Joe McGinniss, Geoffrey Dunn, Frank Bailey, etc, etc, etc..

It is going to be a GREAT summer!

Sarah Palin to "Lamestream" Media: " I won’t spend any more precious, limited time responding to personal, vulgar, sexist venom spewed my way." So there!

The Mama Grizzly's very public nervous breakdown after her attempts to gain political credibility by playing tourist in India and Israel continues as she takes to, where else, Facebook to have RAM write out a hissy fit for her. ("Make me sound indignant, and long suffering, but make sure I don't sound like a venom spewing harpy bitch.  Oh, and make sure to put in lot's of that punctuation stuff!  I love it when you make me sound coherent!")

However apparently RAM's anger at her recent introduction into the harsh light of media scrutiny has made her just as thin skinned as her mistress, which means that her attempt to sound reasonable and justified in her frustration came out like this:

“Let’s keep pivoting around media bias, and not get distracted with the vulgar personal shots. Call out lies and set the record straight, but always keep the ball moving. No one ever won a game only playing defense.”

Upon my return from an outstanding and productive trip to India and Israel, (What? Did she go on ANOTHER trip to India and Israel that was not the embarrassing debacle we all reported on?) I’ve been inundated with requests to respond to petty comments made in the media the past few days, including one little fella’s comment which decent people would find degrading. (I won’t bother responding to it though, because it was made by he who reminds me of an annoying little mosquito found zipped up in your tent; he can’t do any harm, but buzzes around annoyingly until it’s time to give him the proverbial slap.) (For those who are interested, the "mosquito" referred to here is Bill Maher and this is what he said. For the record I laughed.  Every single time I've heard it.)

I’ve given this a lot of thought, and I’d like to share my thoughts on the never-ending issue of media bias. (And remember if you are playing at home kids, that "media bias" means the MSM reporting on any truths that Sarah Palin does not want her potential supporters to hear.)

When it comes to responding to the media, the standard warning is: Don’t pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel because calling out the media and holding them accountable is a risky endeavor. Too often the first instinct is to ignore blatant media bias, crudeness, and outright lies, and just hope the media instigator will grow up and provide fairer coverage if you bite your tongue and not challenge the false reporting of an openly hostile press. But I’ve never bought into that. That’s waving the white flag. I just can’t do it because I have too much respect for the importance of a free press as a cornerstone of our democracy, and I have great respect for the men and women in uniform who sacrifice so much to defend that First Amendment right. Media, with freedom comes responsibility. (In other words Sister Sarah simply MUST respond to EVERY negative thing said about her in the press or else our fighting men and women will have died in vain. Quick, somebody cue the Lee Greenwood music!)

Friends, too often conservatives or Republicans in general come across as having the fighting instinct of sheep. (Baahh'd Republicans, Baahh'd!) I don’t. I was raised to believe that you don’t retreat when you’re on solid ground; so even though it often seems like I’m armed with just a few stones and a sling against a media giant, (And an army of crazed winged monkeys prepared to send massive amounts of misspelled e-mails to my critics at the slightest provocation.) I’ll use those small resources to do what I can to set the record straight. The truth is always worth fighting for. Doing so isn’t whining or “playing the victim card”; it’s defending the truth in fairness to those who seek accurate information.

I’ll keep attempting to correct misinformation and falsehoods about myself and my record, and I will certainly never shy from defending others who are unfairly attacked. This is in the name of justice. (For example like the time I stood up for Dr. Laura who was simply practicing her First Amendment right to say the word "ni--er" 11 times on the public airwaves. I will always TOTALLY stand up for the right of people to use racist or homophobic language like Willow did, and to not have to watch what they say so as not to offend people who would never vote for me in an election anyhow.)

But two decades in politics have taught me that when it comes to picking battles, often it’s best to ignore the truly petty, ugly personal media shots because engaging in a counter argument with disreputable, intolerant people doesn’t vindicate me; it merely gives those people the attention they seek. It wastes my time and it distracts from what we should focus on. (Seriously, can you imagine how long Palin's enemies list would be if she went after EVERY person who said something she did not like? Um..yeah but...never mind.)

We must always remember the big picture. The media has always been biased. Conservatives – and especially conservative women – have always been held to a different standard and attacked. This is nothing new. Lincoln was mocked and ridiculed (Yes Abraham Lincoln, what a very appropriate example of a conservative woman who was held to a different standard and attac...wait what?). Reagan was called an amiable dunce, a dangerous warmonger, a rightwing fanatic, and the insult list goes on and on.  (And the fact that those things were true about Reagan is no reason not to take offense at them. Why is the truth so left-wing? Stupid truth!)(But somehow Reagan still managed to win two major electoral landslides, and this was in the days before the internet and talk radio when all he had were three biased network news channels spinning reports on him. If he could do so much with so little and still be such an optimistic and positive leader, then surely we can succeed with the new media tools at our disposal.) (Yeah Reagan was able to pull the wool over the eyes of Americans even BEFORE Fox News.  Imagine how much more effectively the Republicans can lie to the voters now!)

Let’s just acknowledge that commonsense conservatives must be stronger and work that much harder because of the obvious bias. And let’s be encouraged with a sense of poetic justice by knowing that the “mainstream” media isn’t mainstream anymore. That’s why I call it “lamestream,” and the LSM is becoming quite irrelevant, as it is no longer the sole gatekeeper of information. (The Grizzled One makes a valid point, information IS being disseminated outside of the now dried up media news teats.  However what Klondike Kardashian fails to realize is that these outlets are as a rule far MORE progressive and left leaning than their MSM precursors. Nice try though!)

Let’s keep pivoting around media bias, and not get distracted with the vulgar personal shots. Even with limited time we can try to call out lies and set the record straight, but always keep the ball moving. No one ever won a game only playing defense. (So we can take this as a promise from Palin to continue to be as offensive as she has always been in the past.  No change there.)

I’ll keep correcting false reporting, and I’ll defend others to the hilt; but I won’t spend any more precious, limited time responding to personal, vulgar, sexist venom spewed my way. (Okay, okay, hang on just a minute here.  "Venom spewing" is totally MY phrase!  I have been using that to describe Palin, and the lunatic fringe she calls supporters, for over two years now.  In other words, the bitch is stealing my best lines!  Can't RAM make up her OWN phraseology?)

(Oops, almost at the end, time to launch an attack on Obama before wrapping this thing up.)

Today, our country is faced with seemingly overwhelming challenges. We have an unsustainable and immoral $14 trillion debt problem which, combined with a self-inflicted energy crisis, could bring America to her knees. The President of the United States is manipulating an energy supply by refusing to develop our U.S. energy resources. Shouldn’t that be the media’s focus today? Wouldn’t you like more information on the deficit that for last month alone was the highest in our history at $223 billion? That single month’s deficit was more than the entire deficit for the year 2007! We still have a 16% real unemployment rate. We had 2.9 million home foreclosures last year alone, with this year predicted to be even worse. Americans who are struggling to make ends meet are now hit by rising food and energy prices – exacerbated by the Fed’s decision to drop that $600 billion money bomb known as QE2 on us. Gas has already hit $4 per gallon in some areas. And let’s not forget that our men and women in uniform are deployed far from home today. From Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, to who-knows-where tomorrow under a clouded, confused Obama Doctrine, our armed forces are in harm’s way, defending our interests and protecting our freedoms. (Is it just me. or did that seem a little "venom spewy" to you guys?)

Now these are the real concerns to Americans. These are times when real leadership is needed. We must never be distracted from these real concerns. (Like sending donations to SarahPAC so that Palin can hide in her hotel room with the lights off in exotic locations all over the world for instance.)

Petty comments from the small-minded are used to distract. Stay focused, America. Don’t wave any white flag. Simply put, let’s spend our precious time on causes that are worthy.

- Sarah Palin

Well all I have to say is thank goodness Palin/RAM wrote this long response to the personal, vulgar, sexist venom spewed her way, in order to let the world know that she is going to STOP responding to the personal, vulgar, sexist venom spewed her way.  I mean how else could we possibly have known?

Well of course we might have noticed that Palin had suddenly started to act like a grown up, and was no longer responding to the personal, vulgar, sexist venom spewed her way. But what if the "Lamestream" media did not pick up on that? 

Then Palin could not get credit for taking the high road.  And what good is taking the high road if nobody notices?

You know as I was reading this Facebook rant it dawned on me that this is not the first time that Palin has declared essentially that, "Sticks and stones, may break my bones, but names will never hurt me."

Let's take a trip in the wayback machine to November 5th, 2008.  The day after Palin, and that old guy she was running with, were defeated in the election and she was sent scurrying back to Alaska.


Sarah Palin on "hurt feelings" from Dennis Zaki on Vimeo.

Boy that "thick skin" sure lasted a long time back then didn't it?  Let's see how long Snowdrift Snooki can keep her acid tongue in check THIS time.

The Shailey Tripp interview draws more media attention.

I wondered how long it would take before the story would start gaining traction this week, and it looks like now we have the very popular Wonkette on the case.

Right now they are being careful and referring to it only as a rumor, but I have a feeling that when more information comes out they will be more than happy to promote the story.

On my end I have received a bunch of documentation in the mail pertaining to Shailey's arrest and am going through it right now for an upcoming post, which will hopefully include another interview with Shailey.

I have also heard reports that there are a number of "Lamestream" media types clamoring for interviews with Ms. Tripp.  Like I said, this story definitely has legs.

Finally! Updated.

As  I have said there are a LOT of damaging facts coming out about Sarah Palin this year.

And literally since I first posted that statement on this blog there have been numerous others brought to my attention that I was not even aware of before! Remember I wrote that before I had ever even HEARD of Shailey Tripp.

However, though I never shared it with all of you, I began to realize that the "babygate" story may not be the one that finally finished Sarah Palin's political "Wild Ride." In fact I began to seriously wonder if I would ever get the truth out at all.

Then the phone rang on January 25th.

Somebody wanted help identifying some photographs, and to ask what WE knew about Sarah Palin's last pregnancy.  This was not just some commenter or conspiracy theorist, this was somebody who we had been waiting to hear from for a very, very long time.

Information was exchanged, dates were confirmed, and jaws dropped in unison. They were completely satisfied that they had what they needed to put the "final nail in the coffin" of Palin's faked pregnancy. (A little inside humor for those of you in the know.)

Of course as usual we were sworn to secrecy.  So we begged, "Isn't there something we can reveal to let people know what is coming?"

We were told I could post the following: "A major news outlet has received additional photos from the Spouse's Luncheon that prove Sarah Palin was not pregnant." (For those who may not be familiar with the "Spouse's Luncheon" just click here to visit Audrey's very informative site to learn more.)

Below is a picture that Audrey had showing Sarah Palin at the Spouse's Luncheon on March 31, a mere twenty days before she gave "birth" to Trig Paxson Van Palin.  Apparently as revealing as this picture is, the ones THEY have make it obvious beyond any doubt that this woman is certainly NOT almost 33 weeks pregnant!

And just for clarification, THIS is not some simple blog or website making that statement!

Think more along the lines of "lamestream media" types. In other words when THEY come out with this evidence there will be no wiggle room left for Sarah Palin.  This will receive national exposure and EVERYBODY will suddenly focus on the "pregnancy." Which also means that all the evidence that we have painstakingly gathered these last two and a half years will be re-examined until there is no doubt that Palin did something unspeakable in 2008, quite possibly for purely political reasons.

Let's see the Palin-bots, Teabaggers, and Right Wing nutcases put a positive spin on THAT!

I have said it before, but it bears repeating, 2011 is going to rock!

P.S. I am also working to get a VERY special interview.  More on that later.

Update: For those who may not get the significance of the Spouse's Luncheon photographs please go here and spend some time looking at the amazing chronology of photographs that Audrey put together. And then keep in mind that ONLY fifteen days after that above photograph was taken that Palin looked like this.

So it is not just that at certain angles during the Spouse's Luncheon she did not look at all pregnant, she CERTAINLY did not appear as pregnant as she claimed, nor did she look ANYTHING like the above photograph taken just two weeks later. 

The evidence has always been there, we just needed somebody with a bigger bullhorn to put it all together.

Sarah Palin's relationship with the media summed up in one cartoon.

Courtesy of The Political Carnival

Todd Palin responds to leaked e-mails slamming Joe Miller.

From the Weekly Standard:

My family has worked hard in supporting Joe Miller, so when I heard he'd said something less than supportive of my wife's efforts, I responded. But it turns out we'd gotten our wires crossed and Joe hadn't said anything like what I'd been told. So there's no story here except the fact that the press put our personal emails online again, and again couldn't even be bothered to conceal our email addresses or take any steps to protect our privacy.

Okay number one, THAT is a prepared statement.  If you want to see how Todd really communicates just go here:

So here let me see if I can translate that carefully crafted response by somebody on Palin's staff (RAM?) into Todd-speak.

My famly put there ass on the line for Joey, so when I thinked he was dissing the family moneymaker, I got pissed off and try to Palin-ize his worthless ass.  But as it turns out I didnt use my thinker and misudd...mismemeber....couldn't fucking figure it out. So there is nothing to see here lamestream media so move alng before I lose my cool and send YOU a poorly written e-mail too!  The real problem here is that the media once again gave out my PRIVATE e-mail address and I have to get me anudder one. And I just fucking memoralized that one!  Besides it has sentimental value becuz Sarah made it up for me and said that TOAD was a more sophis...sofistful....uh...fucking cooler version of TODD.

Update: Sarah took to Twitter to weigh in as well.

There's no "there, there" but the lamestream media will keep on tryin'. See: http://is.gd/fOc4X
about 5 hours ago via web

Hold on a minute.  That is a tweet "from the web."  That brings into doubt that Sarah was the author, since she is a Blackberry girl all the way. This could mean that Sarah is still much too pissed off to respond.

Speaking of too pissed off to respond, has anybody heard from Joe Miller?

Sarah Palin goes after the Alaska media for not doing their jobs. For once Palin and I are in agreement.

The Twit tweets:

Alaska media slept on the job for how many years re: Obama senior advisor Pete Rouse's claim to be AK resident and "local" voter? For shame.
about 16 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

Now for those of you who are asking themselves "Pete Rouse who?", Rouse is a Democrat who spent a four years working in Juneau for then Lt. Governor Terry Miller.  Since then Rouse has worked for Senator Tom Daschle for a number of years and now works as President Obama's Senior Advisor.  There is also a lot of talk recently about Rouse taking Rahm Emanuel's Chief of Staff position once Rahm leaves to run for Mayor of Chicago.

Palin's particular bitch "du jour" with Rouse may be that she doubts he is really eligible to be a registered voter in Alaska after all of these years, and blames the local media for not ferreting out the truth.  However it appears that Rouse is, or at least was as of January 21, 2009, still registered to vote in Alaska as reported by the very "Alaska media" that Palin swears has fallen down on the job.

Of course Sister Sarah has had a bee in her bonnet about Pete Rouse for a number of years now, even "suggesting" in her book that HE stole Obama's "CHANGE" theme from her.  She also believes that he is part of the shadowy conspiracy of Obama operatives that inspired the filing of ethics charges against her and is behind the Alaska bloggers.

Like I said in the title I AM in agreement with Sarah on this issue. NO, not the part about Pete Rouse going after her on behalf of Barack Obama!  The part where she points out that the Alaska media did not do its job for "many years."  Because let's face it, if the Alaska media HAD done their jobs there would have been no need for the investigative reporting, and scrutiny provided by the bloggers.

In fact if the media had been doing their jobs all along there is a fairly good chance that today Sarah Palin would be nothing more than an ex-mayor of Wasilla and a stay at home mom.  And the only damage she would be doing would be to the embattled psyches of her children Track, Bristol, Willow, and Piper.

Because do you know what else?  I would bet dollars to donuts there would never even have BEEN a Trig Palin!  I mean if she had simply remained a stay at home mom, and part time political dabbler, WHY would she need her little pro-life poster child?

So now don't you find yourself agreeing with Sister Sarah about the failure of the Alaska media as well?

And here I bet you thought you would NEVER agree with Sarah Palin about ANYTHING!

P.S. By the way to address that ridiculous meme that the Obama administration is behind the ethics charges, let me just say that I have met and talked with a number of people who filed them, and not ONE person has ever been approached by a representative from President Obama either before, or after, he took office.

Ands as for the Alaska bloggers?  Well we were simply responding to a request by Sarah Palin herself who famously said "Hold me accountable!"  So we did!

Palin accuses media of seeking Christine O'Donnell's destruction.

From the Twit's Twitter account:

C. O'Donnell strategy: time's limited;use it 2 connect w/local voters whom you'll be serving vs appeasing nat'l media seeking ur destruction
about 8 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

Leave it to Sarah Palin to equate asking questions to clarify past statements, and to answer charges of incompetence by her own party, to the "the nat'l media seeking ur destruction!"

However I guess it makes sense if what Palin is implying is that once the media gets the answers to their questions it will mean the destruction of O'Donnell's political ambitions. Gee thanks Sarah, that is what I was thinking too!

Of course the same could also be said for one Sarah Palin, now can't it?

The thin skinned Mama Grizzly is also still pissed off about the media saying she advised O'Donnell to speak "only" through Fox News.  Another of her Tweets, an hour later in the day:

The Hill: get it right, please; I did NOT tell O'Donnell to only speak to Fox News. Where do u all get this stuff? Pls report truth. Thanks

about 7 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

Okay here let me report the truth. Here is her exact quote from the Bill O'Reilly show:



Clear as day Palin can be heard saying, “Go with her gut, get out there speak to the American people, speak through Fox News.” To be fair she did not say to ONLY speak through Fox News, but she also did not give any other acceptable media outlets for O'Donnell to choose from now did she?  So to be fair, since Palin was attempting to direct O'Donnell toward a friendly platform to speak though, and ONLY identified Fox News as such a platform, then what is implied is that O'Donnell should only trust Fox News.

If Sarah wanted her protege to trust other media outlets then it falls to Palin to identify them by name for her younger, prettier doppelganger.  Don'tcha think?

Proof there is no God. Sarah Palin says "I am THE biggest proponent of the freedom of the press in this country!" And yet lightning does not strike her dead.

Let me explain this to you you ignorant sow.

Refusing to allow yourself to be interviewed by anybody who is not a groveling sycophant or a talking head from Fox News does not make you  "the biggest proponent of freedom of the press in this country!"

Constantly referring to the hard working journalists of this great nation as the "Lamestream media" does NOT make you "the biggest proponent of freedom of the press in this country!"

Having your pathetically under educated Palin-bots viciously attack ANYBODY who dares write a critical word about you does NOT make you "the biggest proponent of freedom of the press in this country!"

Coaching other politicians, like fellow Teabagger and anti-masturbation advocate Christine O'Donnell, to avoid ALL other media outlets except Fox News does NOT make you "the biggest proponent of freedom of the press in this country!"

No it does not.  It makes you the exact opposite.  But of course that will not make any difference will it?  Because the people you are talking to have taken your hatred toward the liberal blogs and the mainstream media to heart, and have learned long ago to ignore any unflattering truths they might tell about you,  haven't they? 

But do you know what Bible Spice?  There are a whole lot of new eyes being opened all over this country. And on the day that you officially announce your candidacy for the most important political job in this country, is the day that I have been assured that tongues long silenced will finally start to wag with a vengeance.  And when that happens there will be millions of Americans anxious to hear the truth about Sarah Palin.  Not the mythology promoted by the Palin-bots and Fox News, no the REAL truth.  You can call it "gutless", "limp", "impotent", or "lamestream" until you are blue in the face because it will not matter one little bit to those who are truly seeking the truth about the woman who would do ANYTHING to gain political power, including faking the birth of a Down syndrome baby.

So you keep right on building that little house of cards you have going over there on Fox News, the Palin supportive blogs, and Right Wing radio, because the sand in your hourglass is running out. One jagged little grain of sand at a time.