Showing posts with label baby bump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label baby bump. Show all posts

Sunday, December 06, 2015

Posted without comment.

Courtesy of Bristol Palin's Pikore account
Here was the caption:

2 1/2 weeks(ish) until we become a family of 3!!

I have had a long day, so I will let you guys take this one.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Why I don't think that Bristol Palin will EVER identify her new baby daddy.

Like I told you in an earlier post I spent the afternoon with some friends that live in Wasilla this weekend, and the subject of the identity of Bristol Palin's sperm donor came up in conversation.

These friends do have some connections close to the Palin family, but were at a loss as to who the father might be.

However one of them suggested that once the baby was born she would have yet another source of income in the form of child support payments.

After they left I thought about that for awhile and I have to say I disagree. I don't think that Bristol WILL pursue child support from this as yet unnamed father.

The reason I say that is because I don't think that the Grizzled Mama wants the kind of publicity that would surely occur if Bristol named a father who did not believe it was his child.

As we already know, Dakota Meyer, who Bristol was living with at the supposed time of conception, has said NOTHING about impending fatherhood, nor has Bristol publicly named him as the poppa, which indicates to me at least that it is very unlikely that he is willing to be named as the baby daddy.

So that means if Bristol wants to be paid, like Levi is already paying her for popping out his kid, she is going to have to identify the father on the birth certificate and then start proceedings with CSSD to get her money.

However since Bristol is a "Z" list celebrity that means the man she targets could make a shit ton of money by going to the tabloids and denying paternity, which is EXACTLY what they are likely do.

And that is certainly something that Palin absolutely does NOT want to have happen.

Hell, so far she is refusing to even acknowledge that Bristol is knocked up again. If Bristol's greed turns this into fodder for the tabloids Palin's head is likely to explode.

So no, I do NOT think that Bristol is first, going to ever even name the father, and second, try to squeeze any money out of him.

Having said that let me also add that I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY hope I am wrong about all of that because it would be endlessly entertaining to blog about the tabloid war that would result from Bristol reaching out to some random dude and saying "Bitch better have my money."

Sunday, August 30, 2015

Bristol Palin takes the baby bump out for some sunshine.

Source
Caption reads:

Start of my sixth month, feeling like a tannnkk already! Eek

Okay so if this is the sixth month that means that the baby is due sometime at the end of December which matches with what I had heard previously.

And that also means that Bristol would have had to get knocked up right about the same time she was announcing her engagement to Dakota Meyer.

So the mystery remains, since Dakota is certainly not talking about soon becoming a father, just whose baby is this?

P.S. Oh an what is it with the hair covering the face thing? Did somebody recently receive some new plastic surgery that has not quite healed yet? Or is it maybe just some of those irritating pregnancy pimples that she does not want to share with the world?

Friday, August 14, 2015

Bristol Palin angry that her baby bump picture attracted negative comments.

Courtesy of Brancy's blog: Last week I did what a lot of pregnant mom’s do, I posted a “bump pic,” and per usual, the Left showed their true colors. I quickly began trending on social media and was blasted with vile and hateful comments. How dare I be excited about this baby!

Nancy French then links to an article by some lady I've never heard of to support the contention that "The Left" was attacking Bristol because she was pregnant and not considering an abortion.

The author seems to have based this belief on the fact that some people on Twitter had suggested that Bristol would benefit from a visit to Planned Parenthood. Clearly this person does not understand that Planned Parenthood is really in the business of PLANNING PARENTHOOD and is not simply an abortion mill that makes all of its money from selling fetal tissue to evil medical practitioners like Dr. Ben Carson.

The Twitter users were NOT suggesting that Bristol get an abortion (Well most of them anyway,) but rather that she would benefit from some training on just where babies come from, and perhaps a wheelbarrow full of prophylactics.

Nancy French/Bristol Palin sums up her/their stupidity with this:

Every time I feel my baby kick or see an ultrasound, I know I am making the right choice. Life is a gift and I am going to celebrate this precious baby no matter how loud the Left chants their hateful empty messages!

Look as the official spokesman for the Left (Don't look at me like that, you don't know that isn't true.), just let  me say this.

We do NOT care if Bristol Palin gets pregnant a dozen times or more, and decides to keep the babies. So long as she can afford to care for them properly.

We also don't care if she gets pregnant a dozen times or more, and decides NOT to keep the babies. (It's really none of our business.)

We also do not care if Bristol Palin has sex with every sailor who arrives with the fleet each year, and never gets pregnant because she has taken precautions. (Also not really our business.)

It is ONLY when Bristol Palin gets paid for telling young women that THEY should abstain from sex until they get married, and poses as a holier than thou Christian on her ghostwritten blog, all while she goes out and gets knocked up repeatedly while still unmarried, that we have a problem.

The word is "hypocrisy." And we fucking hate hypocrisy.

Does that finally clear that up?

Thursday, August 06, 2015

Lois Lerner e-mail allows Bristol Palin to play the victim again. Update!

Hey look at me! Don't judge, just look.
Courtesy of On Politics: 

One email, cited by Chairman Orrin Hatch as an “example of Lerner’s interest in conservative organizations,” asked whether the IRS should open an audit of Candie’s Foundation, which paid Palin $332,500 in compensation to be a celebrity spokesperson. Lerner was concerned that the salary figure could violate IRS rules against charitable groups being for the private benefit of individuals. 

Palin is the daughter of 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, and she became a household name when it was revealed during that campaign that she had become pregnant at age 17. She later performed on ABC’s Dancing with the Stars and was briefly engaged to Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer. 

“Thoughts on the Bristol Palin issue?” Lerner, then the director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations unit, wrote to her staff in 2011. “I’m asking because I don’t know whether to send to Exam as a referral.” There’s no evidence from the Senate report that an audit was ever opened.

As the article states there was no investigation launched, so this was really nothing more than open question as to whether there was anything suspicious about how much money Candies was funneling to Bristol, and whether or not she was doing anything to earn that amount.

I think most of us would answer that first question with a "yes," and the second with a "hell no."

I also think most of us realize that there are all kinds of methods, from bulk book sales, to political PAC donations, that allow wealthy, and not so wealthy, individuals to provide certain conservatives with a substantial amount of cash that they lack the talent and intellect to earn on their own.

Of course this news report allowed Brancy to puff up and demonstrate some faux outrage, as was expressed on the blog this morning:

By now, you’ve heard that the IRS under the Obama administration targeted, harassed, and intimidated tea party, pro-life, and patriotic groups. 

Today, I saw this news… they also considered targeting me! 

(Links to article.)


Looks like I almost got caught up in her assault of people who love America. 

I’m honored.

Oh yeah Bristol was "targeted" because she "loves America."

I think Nancy French is just happy that there is an article about Bristol which doesn't mention that she is once again pregnant out of wedlock.

Because there are certainly numerous others that are hot on that topic.

Update: Well of course if Nancy French is going to ghostwrite one post about this, she might as well write two.

Courtesy of Palin's Facebook page:

If 7 years ago I had predicted the Obama administration was targeting my family and all conservatives who posed a threat to their radical agenda you never would have believed me, right? Well..... hmmm

Nope, and there is no reason to believe you today either.

Sunday, August 02, 2015

Bristol Palin's baby bump finally makes its appearance on social media.

Courtesy of Bristol's Pikore account and dated August 1st.
Caption: #5months ..

Okay maybe she is five months along, which of course would mean that she was actively banging Dakota Meyer around the time of conception, but the first thing that I noticed about the photo is that Bristol is taking her selfie in a mirror which appears to be positioned to give the impression of slimness.

The entire reason that Bristol had to announce her pregnancy in the first place is because people in Wasilla had noticed the baby bump and were telling both the National Enquirer and myself that she was knocked up.

So yes from what I hear she is bigger in person than she appears in this photo.

I also found it interesting that of the three most recent photos that Bristol posted, two of them featured her BFF the exotic model Marina Lupas.

#throwback to Vegas with my BFF, back in the good ole days
I think this helps to underline the rift that seems to have occurred between Bristol and her mother since the whole Dakota Meyer debacle. Cause you just know that Sarah is not endorsing this public friendship.

Perhaps Bristol is now ready to say "I'm done with men" and embrace her feminist side, or perhaps an even more exotix side?

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Bristol Palin announces that she's pregnant. Update!

 Courtesy of Brancy's blog:

(I’m announcing this news a lot sooner than I ever expected due to the constant trolls who have nothing better to talk about!!!) 

I wanted you guys to be the first to know that I am pregnant. 

Honestly, I’ve been trying my hardest to keep my chin up on this one. 

At the end of the day there’s nothing I can’t do with God by my side, and I know I am fully capable of handling anything that is put in front of me with dignity and grace. 

Life moves on no matter what. So no matter how you feel, you get up, get dressed, show up, and never give up. 

When life gets tough, there is no other option but to get tougher. 

I know this has been, and will be, a huge disappointment to my family, to my close friends, and to many of you. 

But please respect Tripp’s and my privacy during this time. I do not want any lectures and I do not want any sympathy. 

My little family always has, and always will come first. 

Tripp, this new baby, and I will all be fine, because God is merciful.

Okay so here's the thing, for awhile now there has been this humming in the background about Bristol being pregnant.

At first it was kind of sporadic and none of her Instagram pictures seemed to really support that claim. (Though this one did make one reporter who contacted me ask "Has she always had boobs that big?")

However in the last few days I have been hearing from people in the Wasilla area who are all but convinced that Bristol is indeed pregnant. And then one who WAS convinced she was pregnant.

So today I had already written part of this post to tell all you that I had just had it confirmed that she was indeed pregnant. (I guess that makes me one of the "constant trolls" that she refers to.)

But it looks like Bristol decided to get out ahead of the story. And good for her for doing so.

However what she is not admitting is what my sources are also telling me, and that is that she is back with Joey Junker.

Which of course brings up the question of who's the baby daddy?

Dakota Meyer?

Or Joey Junker?

And of course THIS news comes right after we also learned that the Mama Grizzly just lost her job with Fox News. 

 Boy it must be so much fun around the Palin compound these days, don't you think?

P.S. Is this where I should point out that Levi Johnston is married, employed, and that his two babies with Sunny were both born in wedlock?

Or is that just mean?

Update: For those wondering about the timing, there was a National Enquirer reporter who was working with me on this, and we both got confirmation around the same time so we both were about to break the story, and HE texted that fact to Bristol. 

That story is now published in Radar Online.

Update: Holy Crap, Bristol is naming Dakota Meyer as the father!

I have my doubts about that.

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

Sarah Palin and the fastest growing baby bump in the west!

For all of you who are still clinging to the idea that somehow Palin WAS pregnant, and that the photographic evidence suggesting that she wasn't is not compelling enough, I would like you to explain this.

Image courtesy of my friend Emrysa.
It does not take a doctor, a nurse, or even just a person who has been pregnant, to recognize that a fetus simply does not develop THAT quickly in such short amount of time.

As evident from my post yesterday, Palin appeared to be no more than a few months pregnant (With, apparently, Sponge Bob Squarebaby) on March 26, 2008, and then suddenly on April 13, 2008, ballooned up to the image you see on the right.

I think what is obvious is that Palin was simply winging the fake pregnancy thing at first, and then realized that she needed a more convincing disguise to fool the lazy reporters, and constituents she might bump into further down the line, so she purchased something a little more convincing to wear toward the end of her incredibly short "pregnancy."


Does anybody disagree, or think they have a better theory?

If so, I would love to hear it.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Remember how everybody just assumed that Track Palin married his girlfriend because she was pregnant? As it turns out everybody is pretty damn smart.

So to bring you up to speed on May 19, I wrote a post about Track and long time girlfriend Britta Hanson tying the knot up at Hatcher Pass.


My assumption at the time (and the assumption of every other rational person with at least two brain cells they can rub together), was that based on the history the Palins have with marriage and pregnancies, Britta was undoubtedly "in the family way."  However nobody was absolutely positive such was the case.

About two weeks later I received a tip that Britta was indeed pregnant and that fellow students in her nursing classes were all talking about it, and the family was afraid it would soon come out. Then not much later I received yet ANOTHER tip saying that Britta was definitely with child and was avoiding certain casual friends so that the word would not get around and embarrass the families.

Yet it was still all hearsay and I did not feel it was enough to say definitively that the quickie marriage was due to the impending birth of yet another baby into the Palin family.

That is it WAS all hearsay until I received this picture in my email inbox of Britta opening up gifts at her.....wait for it.....baby shower. (Apparently the shower took place just a couple of days ago at the Palin compound in Wasilla.)


So based on the tips mentioned above, and this photographic evidence, I think we can safely move this story out of the rumor category, and into the "no shit" category.

So what have we learned here today kiddies?

Number One: That there is a 90% probability that any rumor you hear about the Palin clan will turn out to be true. (Even the crazy ones.)

Number Two: That Bristol is the world's WORST abstinence spokesperson since she could not even convince her own brother's girlfriend not to have premarital sex. ("Stop! Stop it right now, Track! Dammit I'm telling Mom!")

Number Three: That the Palins simply DO NOT get married unless there is a fetus and a loaded shotgun involved. Sarah's mother, Sally Heath, was pregnant when SHE got married, so was Sarah, and then Bristol (Who did not even bother to get married.), and now Britta.  Apparently it's a family tradition.

Not that there is anything wrong with that of course. Well that is unless your future mother-in-law is constantly pimping herself out as a family values fundamentalist Christian savior of America, and your husband's sister is a famous abstinence spokesperson. But whose crazy ass family does that descr....oh yeah, almost forgot!

Well anyhow I wish both Track and Britta nothing but good luck with the new addition to their family.

Based on what we know of the rest of the family, you're going to need it.

Friday, May 06, 2011

Just another visual reminder of how preposterous Sarah Palin's pregnancy story truly is. Updated!



This was sent to me yesterday by our friend Professor Scharlott.

I guess those who believe in Palin's immaculate deception might simply suggest that Demi Moore has padded her self to look bigger, except of course where would she put it?  Now THAT is a woman who would not have had to show her (covered) baby bump to prove she was really pregnant.

Seriously, who in their right mind cannot put these clues together?

Update: Newly corrected composite photograph has replaced original.  Thanks Professor Scharlott!

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Andrew Sullivan gets his second wind, easily deflating the arguments of the "journalists" aligned against him.

From The Daily Beast:

There is also the matter of consistency. When a politician has publicly claimed she has produced a birth certificate and hasn't, is it illegitimate for the press to ask why she simply lied about this? Can any sane person misremember such a thing? And if she's claimed she has released it, what on earth is the ethical reason for not asking her to do it along with medical records? When she publicly derides skeptics in speech after speech, is it not the press's duty to see if her derision has empirical validity? Or are we skeptics supposed to just sit back and be mocked by a pathological liar putting her own credibility against ours?

We all have cognitive biases. I have one - profound skepticism of anything Palin says - and may be judging evidence in ways that others wouldn't. But so do Justin and Ben and Weigel who have an interest in dismissing the possibility that they may have missed uncovering the biggest hoax in American political history. That same cognitive bias question applies to Loy and Quinn. It does not mean they they may not be right. It just means that their cognitive bias is as real as my own.

Now we're talking!

Time to tighten up our defensive armor and sharpen our rapier like wits, for the battle to reveal the most egregious Sarah Palin lie of all has really just begun.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Huge crowds greet Tina Fey at book signing.

From Mail Online:

It's a rare thing to be able to infiltrate the hearts of sharp, discerning New Yorkers in vast numbers, but actress and writer Tina Fey has done just that.

A 500-hundred strong crowd, the kind more usually associated with a rock star, turned out for a Q&A to promote her book Bossypants at Barnes and Noble in Union Square.

Some eager fans had even camped outside the book shop from the early hours of the morning to ensure a spot at yesterday evening's event.

Hmm, let's examine this.

A bestselling book.

Huge adoring crowds, that are willing to camp out for hours for the opportunity to meet her.

And look! She even has an actual honest to goodness baby bump! NOT a fake one.

Gee I wonder who might feel pangs of jealousy over all of that?

Update: Apparently Bill Maher noticed the irony of all of this as well:

Tina Fey, 5 months pregnant at 40 not showing and no one knew - boy, when she does a Sarah Palin impression, she really commits!
8 Apr via OpenBeak

Update 2: I just bought "Bossypants" for my Nook.  How could I NOT support Tina Fey?  After all she did so much to help us with the Grizzled Mama.

Friday, February 04, 2011

Finally! Updated.


As  I have said there are a LOT of damaging facts coming out about Sarah Palin this year.

And literally since I first posted that statement on this blog there have been numerous others brought to my attention that I was not even aware of before! Remember I wrote that before I had ever even HEARD of Shailey Tripp.

However, though I never shared it with all of you, I began to realize that the "babygate" story may not be the one that finally finished Sarah Palin's political "Wild Ride." In fact I began to seriously wonder if I would ever get the truth out at all.

Then the phone rang on January 25th.

Somebody wanted help identifying some photographs, and to ask what WE knew about Sarah Palin's last pregnancy.  This was not just some commenter or conspiracy theorist, this was somebody who we had been waiting to hear from for a very, very long time.

Information was exchanged, dates were confirmed, and jaws dropped in unison. They were completely satisfied that they had what they needed to put the "final nail in the coffin" of Palin's faked pregnancy. (A little inside humor for those of you in the know.)

Of course as usual we were sworn to secrecy.  So we begged, "Isn't there something we can reveal to let people know what is coming?"

We were told I could post the following: "A major news outlet has received additional photos from the Spouse's Luncheon that prove Sarah Palin was not pregnant." (For those who may not be familiar with the "Spouse's Luncheon" just click here to visit Audrey's very informative site to learn more.)

Below is a picture that Audrey had showing Sarah Palin at the Spouse's Luncheon on March 31, a mere twenty days before she gave "birth" to Trig Paxson Van Palin.  Apparently as revealing as this picture is, the ones THEY have make it obvious beyond any doubt that this woman is certainly NOT almost 33 weeks pregnant!


And just for clarification, THIS is not some simple blog or website making that statement!

Think more along the lines of "lamestream media" types. In other words when THEY come out with this evidence there will be no wiggle room left for Sarah Palin.  This will receive national exposure and EVERYBODY will suddenly focus on the "pregnancy." Which also means that all the evidence that we have painstakingly gathered these last two and a half years will be re-examined until there is no doubt that Palin did something unspeakable in 2008, quite possibly for purely political reasons.

Let's see the Palin-bots, Teabaggers, and Right Wing nutcases put a positive spin on THAT!

I have said it before, but it bears repeating, 2011 is going to rock!

P.S. I am also working to get a VERY special interview.  More on that later.

Update: For those who may not get the significance of the Spouse's Luncheon photographs please go here and spend some time looking at the amazing chronology of photographs that Audrey put together. And then keep in mind that ONLY fifteen days after that above photograph was taken that Palin looked like this.

So it is not just that at certain angles during the Spouse's Luncheon she did not look at all pregnant, she CERTAINLY did not appear as pregnant as she claimed, nor did she look ANYTHING like the above photograph taken just two weeks later. 

The evidence has always been there, we just needed somebody with a bigger bullhorn to put it all together.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Bristol Palin might want to work on her poker face.

Here is the video of Bristol coming out of the Cheesecake Factory that caused such a buzz yesterday.

Check out her expression at the .49 second mark after the paparazzi says "I am sure your baby is looking forward to Disneyland, Bristol."



EVERYTHING about her demeanor instantly changes.  If she thought he was talking about Tripp why would she clam up? 

Just asking.

Monday, November 08, 2010

Just for fun, here is part of Bristol's appearance on the Ellen Degeneres show today. Update!



First I need to say that I agree with Bristol's assessment of Levi's interest in politics and his ability to run for public office.

Visually the clip also seems to provide further evidence of the phenomena that we have all been watching since the beginning of the show.

I have begun to try and understand just how Bristol could have been convinced to go on DWTS. But all I can come up with is that she was either forced at gunpoint or somehow believed that Hollywood magic would cover up what nature was doing to her physique.

I also have to wonder if she was not counting on being voted off well before she got to this stage, and whether the Palin-bots are actually working against her personal wishes.

What do you all think?

Update: Even DWTS's executive producer realizes that it is Sarah's political supporters keeping Bristol on long past when she should have been voted off.

"There's a strong popular movement behind Sarah Palin at the moment and she's receiving a lot of support from the Tea Party," Conrad Green, executive producer of the program, said in an interview. "It's entirely possible some of those people are behind Bristol for political reasons."