First notice how bulky her shoulders and back appear.
It almost looks as if she wore a bunch of sweaters or tops tops under her trench coat to give the appearance of being pregnant, but did NOT put on her empathy belly, which you can see by the lack of a bulge as well as by how easily she bends over to sign the bill. Just try to get a pregnant woman to bend like that at 33 weeks into her pregnancy!
Now did you see that flash at about the 24 second mark? Imagine what that picture would show taken almost head on and just as she was bent over.
Now do you get it?
Here is the famous picture of Sarah when she was REALLY pregnant just for comparison.
(You can see my earlier post on this subject here.)
Can not wait!!!
ReplyDeleteI'm glued to the puter. I have a paper to write for school but can not stop coming here!!!
She looks so stoopid in her trench coat. Did anyone ask her why she is wearing a trench coat inside at a luncheon? Everyone else took their outerwear off. Why didn't the hostess governor? Oh Yeah. Cause she didn't want anyone trying to touch her fake belly.
Was she running in and out of the luncheon - just to sign that thing? Why is she wearing a rain coat inside? If I had lunch with her I would have thought her very rude to not take her coat off. It would give the appearance that she is in a hurry to leave. Course, maybe she was.
ReplyDeleteThe video isn't there. Or is it just me?
ReplyDeleteWrong end of the video. I think you need to freeze frame :28 seconds and look at Sarahs face as she suddenly grabs her coat and changes direction. Something fall?
ReplyDeleteThe black Scurf, was an obstruction.Huh!!!
ReplyDeleteYou're right; those shoulders and the back look overly-padded. Those are not natural places to gain weight. Furthermore, the ridge on the back indicates that she is wearing sweaters or some sort of vest underneath that coat.
ReplyDeleteWho in the heck did she think she was kidding? Her sense of reality is truly out of kilter if she thought to hide a real pregnancy or to appears as if she was trying to disguise the fact that she was pregnant.
Someone should have shown her the footage so she could have at least sought out costumers who know what they are doing.
Bless her heart, her overblown sense of self undermined her sense of reality. Still does.
Shouldn't the grifter have been invited to the Louse's Luncheon instead?
ReplyDeleteThe people of Alaska have lots of candid photos of Sarah Palin during her "pregnancy". And some of those people know how much money those casual photos are worth.
ReplyDeleteMcCain is writing his omg speech right now.
Also, she hunches forward rather than lean backwards when walking. No pregnant woman at that stage of gestation can walk in such a manner.
ReplyDeleteGreat. Not a nail the coffin, but great.
ReplyDeleteHowever, not seeing anything at :38 except the crowd. Am I missing something?
Gryphen, I tried last night to get Dirk to change the photo on his post, but he has yet to do so. Lots of readers are commenting that he is losing credibility over this. Can you get him to listen to you?
ReplyDeleteOne of your commenters used the word waddle to describe the gait of a pregnant woman. This made me flash on Bristol referring to herself as a Mother Duck. Maybe she was referring to herself in a state of pregnancy, instead of or in addition to, babysitting the kids.
There is no other book like The Palin Matrix. I hope you have read it. Thank you for your good work!
I am sorry I missed the mark. I was referring to the flash that happens at the 24 second mark, not 38 second mark.
ReplyDeleteSorry I wrote this while getting ready to leave the house.
Who sits down for a meal with a trench coat on? She is beyond bizarre. And no, she does not look pregnant at all in this video. Looking forward to when these photos finally make an appearance.
ReplyDeleteThe other give away is her quick, jerky, twisting movements when she leans over to signs the bill and then turns away. You just can't move like that when you're 7 or 8 months pregnant. Even if you're a tiny Hollywood starlet starving yourself so that you don't get fat, a baby effects the way your body is aligned and makes you awkward. That's just reality.
ReplyDeleteShe didn't bother to wear an empathy belly, she didn't bother to mimic the movements, stance, and walk of a pregnant woman, she just wore scarves and coats and said "I'm pregnant!" Everyone keeps saying, "How did she think she could just get away with it?" But she did!
AND, as a bonus, beginning at the 0:11 mark, we are treated to the scarf swinging away from her body as she leans forward, twice no less. Between her body and the scarf there is AIR, not a baby.
ReplyDeleteShe wasn't bending over that far, Gryphen, and she wasn't "that pregnant." Supposedly she's not due until May. I wouldn't have had a problem bending over that far 9 months pregnant (and I was 9 months pregnant 3 times.)
ReplyDeleteHowever she does look extra bulky under that coat, doesn't she? It looks far too tight across the shoulders. Considering most pregnant women consider their babies a private heater, what on earth is she wearing under that coat? 3 layers of sweaters?
It looks far more like she's hiding something than proud-mother-to-be.
Gryph: Sarah does appear in the :38 mark, just at the end. She can be seen in the upper left corner, sitting down. And twisting.
ReplyDelete...to leave the house to go talk to someone???
ReplyDeleteFascinating. For a first baby, it is not unusual to look not so pregnant until the 7th month or so, but for a FIFTH pregnancy, it is unheard of, frankly.
ReplyDeletePlus, Palin is a small woman. Pregnancy is harder to hide when one is short and petite.
Why was she hiding it anyway? Did Alaska journalists wonder why a mother of 4 felt shy about #5?
yikes.
at :26, is she wearing a belt or is that a lighter color in the scarf?
ReplyDeleteI thought when one is pregnant, they get very, very warm....so why would she be wearing a coat inside if that's the case?
ReplyDeleteAnyhoo. I'm beyond excited to see which media outlet gets this out, and when. After two years my friends and family won't think I was so crazy after all. Can't wait to say 'I told you so!'
The full face could be recent Juvederm filler. And we know she may have visited a "spa" for botox while supposedly "pg."
ReplyDeleteWatch the video. Say, "this women will birth a 6+ lb. in 20 days".
ReplyDeleteLaugh.
Repeat.
Funny how the caption during reporter's intro is Alaska Gasline INDUCEMENT Act. That clip definitely looked like a face "inducement act".
ReplyDeleteFirst, she does not appear pregnant. And it would be extremely painful to bend like that. Trying to straighten up with all that weight would take time and effort, similar to an older person with a backache trying to get up. I cannot imagine how she could believe the others sitting there did not observe this.
ReplyDeleteIt's almost disturbing that someone would go to the lengths of stuffing heavy clothing under that 3-quarter-length jacket in the back shoulder upper arm area thinking it would make her look heavy; without the obvious baby bump. It gives me chills to think at what length she'd go to to get her way.
The trench coat could be part of her outfit.Sarah didn't dress very well before McCain's handlers scrubbed her up and taught her how to dress.
ReplyDeleteBut her posture was a bit odd for a pregnant woman.
She was totally using that oversized book to hide Spongebob. Watch as she walks away. She walks like a man, also.
ReplyDeleteWhoops, at Anon. 11:42 - meant "fake" not "face".
ReplyDeleteAnd was referring to labour inducement, although both inducements didn't seem to produce anything.
Awfully much extra padding in back and something else in back covering her butt and hips, extra fabric.
ReplyDeleteFor the record, this was supposedly Sarah Palin's SEVENTH pregnancy. There were 4 previous children and 2 previous miscarriages.
ReplyDeleteJust a reminder: not only is she wearing a coat in the house, but it's her OWN house. This event occurred at the Gov's Mansion in Juneau. She is the hostess.
ReplyDeleteCould be that traditionally the spouse of the governor hosts the spouses of the legislature. Maybe Todd was actually supposed to be doing hosting duties. Not sure about that, but still, the whole thing is odd. Look how nicely dressed the women are you can see earlier in the vid. This is an elegant luncheon and they are dressed for it.
Palin looks like she just crawled out of bed. Her hair is not brushed. Something is very awry here.
At 0:30, the man putting the camera onto the table in front of him is my candidate for being the photographer of the newly "discovered" photo of Palin.
ReplyDeleteRonald Reagan's son again says that SP is a "soap opera." Spread this link!
ReplyDeletehttp://dailycaller.com/2011/02/04/ron-reagan-palin-has-nothing-in-common-with-dad/
There appears to be some form of bump, but the fast swift movements aren't possible at that phase.
ReplyDeleteI cannot imagine someone concocting such a thing; usually, when people lie, it's a one-time event and hard to disprove. But faking a pregnancy so shamelessly and in-your-face kind of way would be hard for anyone to pull off. Imagine her sitting at the luncheon table with all those ladies, answering questions about "how are you feeling", "how far along are you", and talking about bablies, smiling and makin' stuff up. Most people just would not have the nerve to try that. Only someone an IMF agent in Mission Impossible would try that.
Maybe Sarah thinks she's that smart.
Fascinating. For a first baby, it is not unusual to look not so pregnant until the 7th month or so, but for a FIFTH pregnancy, it is unheard of, frankly.
ReplyDeletePlus, Palin is a small woman. Pregnancy is harder to hide when one is short and petite.
Why was she hiding it anyway? Did Alaska journalists wonder why a mother of 4 felt shy about #5?
yikes.
Yep. I am 5'9" and was 140 pounds when I got pregnant with my first boy. By 6 months there was no question I was with child. So, a short women in her 7th yes 7th pregnancy would show alot sooner, esp given her previous photo proofs.
Absolutely the dumbest story of all time.
ReplyDeleteIf this is all a giant conspiracy, why can't you produce one nurse or tech that can tell you ANONYMOUSLY that they were there when someone else gave birth to a Down Syndrome kid that became Trig?
Why did Levi tell you this story was false back when he was being paid to spill his guts? Ditto Mercede?
This is just a transparent scheme to keep generating web clicks from the faithful who are desperate to believe.
It's pretty simple.
ReplyDeleteMat-Su does not deliver premature infants. Pregnant mothers are all sent over to Providence in Anchorage because they have the NICU facilities.
It's not possible for Palin to have delivered at Mat-Su because it was not allowed at the time.
Speaking of AGIA...Alaskan Repubs are putting forth legislation to yank it. I'm sure we'll be getting a Facebook post any minute now from the Quitter defending AGIA...wait, that's right. She never mentioned it again once it was obviously doomed. I cannot believe she has supporters, it is so obvious what a fake she is.
ReplyDeleteWell her butt looks really wide and huge--which is very odd since butts dont double in size during pregnancy, especially if you have small hips, which it appears she does.
ReplyDeleteHer face looks different--more fat on it. I think that this is where people are getting confused because they are confusing how she looks now with how she used to look.
It appears that she only got super super skinny during or after the campaign--which thinned her face. And then on top of it, she got those cheek implants when she was supposedly writing her first book. So her face is totally different, she no longer has the soft young look, but a hard, aged, sculpted look.
So I think when people look at any of her old pictures, she does look fatter, and so they think that implies that she's pregnant, when really it has nothing to do with her alleged pregnancy, it's just that she was 10 pounds, maybe more, heavier pre-VP run. She looked younger and prettier before losing weight and getting the facial surgery done. Although there are the pictures during the early part of the campaign or maybe just before where her face sags a bit so maybe it was all catching up to her--the youthful fat on the face--so she just got anorexic thin on Red Bull and go the 'work' done.
But the view from the back in that coat is weird--it's like the coat is lifted away from her back, shoulders and butt, and the butt is really wide. Mabye the pillow slipped to the back of her?!
Even AFTER she announced her pregnancy, she continued to use coats indoors, and scarves. Why?
ReplyDeleteI remember seeing a video of her being able to cross her legs with ease when she sat down. There is no way a pregnant woman can do that.
She sure seems to move pretty quickly, too. I don't remember my wife being able to scoot like that across a room.
ReplyDeleteOf course that picture is of Sarah! She was pregnant with Track then. And that's her mother Sally standing behind her. It was taken on the deck of her parents home off the Palmer-Wasilla Hwy.
ReplyDeleteNever seen that picture of the very pregnant woman in red with the woman to her left before.
ReplyDeleteIMHO the one on the left is Sarah Palin.
Not a bot here, it is UK Lady.
In the photo Sarah's face is round and fat and she is as big as a house!lol.... In the video, she show no sign of being pregnant in the face...
ReplyDeleteHow much good is all of this information going to do if it comes out in a British paper or TV?
ReplyDeleteFirst, I don't believe she is pregnant in these photos. That being said, I think this is a long over sized blazer with shoulder pads and several layers underneath, making her look larger than she is, rather than a trench coat. The reason I say that is that I have a number of these longer blazers in my closet. Yes, I am a little self conscious about a large arse!! Maybe there is a belt, i.e. trench coat, but I didn't see one.
ReplyDeleteGosh, guys, this hardly breaks new ground. The "nail in the coffin" photo from Audrey's old site (palindeceptions) is much stronger, as are various other still photos. I'm not disagreeing with your comments, I'm just saying you're not going to change many minds with just this.
ReplyDelete11:28. I think what you might be seeing is the corner of the portfolio she is holding. I enlarged the video to full screen and stopped it at short intervals. The portfolio moves and the light spot follows.
ReplyDeleteI don't know how anyone can doubt that the older picture of pregnancy number 1 is not Sarah.... look at the mouth and chin... even with the work she has had done it is still the same....
ReplyDeletecheck out the mini waddle. however,we know she pretty much alway walks like that. all she did was gain weight (probably intentionally)
ReplyDeleteShe was good with the weight gain. her "post partum" pics looked decently authentic. esp in Philly where it showed in her legs and waist. I think the campaign was good for her because most people lose shitloads of weight when working in a pres campaign.
I dont think anythings over padded. She gained weight during that time, esp in her sides and back. Rmember the pic of her at a bball game (or some game) when Pipers standing in front of her? She's wearing her blk blazer, and dark rimmed glasses. Her belly looks the same but shes awfully thick around the hips, ass, and back
ReplyDeleteI've never been pregnant, so it is possible
ReplyDeleteto be huge with one baby, and puffy/chunky
looking with another?
Can you believe this. Like mother and father,like daughter I guess
ReplyDeletehttp://www.starmagazine.com/britstol_ex_boyfriend_levi_sister/news/17876
I hope, I hope, I hope that the media outlet that breaks this story is CBS...could you see Scarah's face if Katie Couric is the one to out her fake pregnancy??? It would be priceless!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThe deal is this, as I have mentioned numerous times, her first pregnancy is proof that this last one was faked. A woman "could" go through an entire pregnancy without ever looking pregnant. But that is with a first pregnancy not a 5th.
ReplyDeleteIf you get that big in a first pregnancy you will get big in all of them. Not necessarily "as" big in all of them but you will NEVER get huge in a first and not show in a 5th.
I had zero stomach with my first baby. I mean literally zero stomach, but OMG my ass looked like it was giving birth. LOL The baby will show somewhere.
The other damning evidence (and any woman will tell you this) you are HOT when you're pregnant. Much too warm to be wearing a coat indoors as Sarah tried to do so many times.
I have known very few women who even bother wearing a coat in the winter when they are pregnant. Generally a light jacket or sweater is more than sufficient.
Having said all this these pictures and the video do very little to prove she wasn't pregnant. But you DO have photos that clearly show she isn't. You may want to send the ones of her in the gray skirt to these people. That and a few others are beyond damning.
She would have had to remove the coat with her restrictions of how one must disrobe to see her.
ReplyDeleteThere are also 2 pictures of Sarah pregnant with Piper available. I think they are over at Audrey's site. They are pretty grainy because they are scans from the newspaper. But you can tell that's she's obviously pregnant. Unlike with Trig. (apart from the questionable Guthrie picture.)
ReplyDeleteYou know I sometimes get confused, but my god she doesn't even WALK like a pregnant woman, she doesn't stand like a pregnant woman. Pregnant women can't stand bending forward, they stand bending backward for support; look at her offical pregnant photos. They walk sending their tummy forward as well, but she is slouching over.
ReplyDeleteI mean I find it unbelievable she'd have a fake a pregnancy, I mean what crazy person does that.
Thank god she is not a convincing liar!
Oh Jiminy christmas...just noticed that Pipper is with mommy at the luncheon, wearing a pink shirt. How cute. My husband and I always bring our kids to work functions.
ReplyDeleteShe didn't bother to wear an empathy belly, she didn't bother to mimic the movements, stance, and walk of a pregnant woman, she just wore scarves and coats and said "I'm pregnant!" Everyone keeps saying, "How did she think she could just get away with it?" But she did!
ReplyDelete11:22 AM
Perhaps she didn't fool lots of people, maybe they just didn't confront her and get in her face. They probably just talked behind her back and discussed the reasons why she would go to this extreme??
JMO
I remain skeptical about the whole Trig thing, but she did seem to want to turn away awfully quick once she turned to the crowd.
ReplyDeleteBristol Palin Will Split Her Time Between Arizona And Alaska! Exclusive!
ReplyDeleteBristol is excited to get out of the house, but she’ll still be spending plenty of time in Alaska!
Bristol Palin may be gearing up for her big move to Arizona, but friends say Alaska will always be her home!
“Bristol is pretty much a homebody,” a source close to Bristol, 20, says. “The Arizona home is a part-time residence. Her primary place of residence is in Alaska.”
Her boyfriend, Gino Paoletti, is not too concerned about the move putting distance between them.
“Gino has come to visit her a few times but he is currently in Alaska,” the sources says. “She doesn’t go out much and has only been to Phoenix a few times.”
Her strategic move to Arizona seems to be less of a PR move and more a case of a young girl wanting to get out on her own.
“She doesn’t seem to be the mastermind of her media empire. The Arizona move is more like a chance for her to live somewhere else besides Alaska and its cheap,” the source said.
http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/02/04/bristol-palin-sarah-palin-arizona-alaska/
Sarah Palin Fails in First Attempt to Trademark Own Name
ReplyDeleteAll of America's awesomest products are trademarked, and fear-generating machine Sarah Palin doesn't want to be left out in the unbranded cold! And like any good Mama Grizzly, she seeks to protect her most/least beloved daughter's "brand" as well.
Unfortunately, her initial effort was stymied by the notoriously liberal Ye Ole U.S. Trademark and Patent and Huntin' and Fishin' and Dancin' Office…
"Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, SARAH PALIN, consists of a name identifying a particular living individual whose consent to register the mark is not of record," the patent and trademark office said in an office action.
"Please note this refusal will be withdrawn if applicant provides written consent from the individual identified in the applied-for mark," the patent office said.
They refused her application because it wasn't signed. Well, did God sign the Ten Commandments, or the covenant he made with that one old Jewish dude, or that thing where he sent the Flood? No, no he did not. Therefore, Sarah Palin, who is at least as famous as God and probably has nicer hair, should not be expected to lower herself to sign some sort of official document. And to ask her daughter to do so is honestly tantamount to harassment.
One day, when the blessed One-Palin-Government is established, these concerns will be but a thing of the past. But until that blessed revolution, we can only offer Sarah Palin our deepest sympathy, as well as a reminder that every application we've ever heard of in the history of the world generally does require a signature from someone at some point.
http://www.indecisionforever.com/2011/02/04/sarah-palin-fails-in-first-attempt-to-trademark-own-name/
@Vaughn, - if it's the BBC, it will be pretty darn good.
ReplyDeleteDo they have a pic of her drinking some adult beverages at this event G?
ReplyDeleteABC News' John Berman reports: Sarah Palin will apparently not appear at one of the first Republican Presidential debates, skipping-out on Politico, in favor of veterans.
ReplyDeleteOn May 2nd, the former Alaska Governor will be the keynote speaker at a fundraising event for soldiers and veterans in Denver. In a press release, the SKP foundation announced that Palin will address their annual, “Patriots & Warriors Gala and Fundraiser on Monday, May 2, 2011.”
The gala is designed to “honor service members and those who have given of themselves in service and/or sacrifice to our country,” and will also raise money for “at risk youth.”
The date of the event is interesting, because it is the same night as a Republican presidential debate hosted by Politico and NBC News at the Reagan Library. Palin, who has said she currently considering whether to run, will obviously not be there.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/02/sarah-palin-to-skip-may-2nd-debate.html
Is anyone else having trouble accessing Alaska WTF?
ReplyDeleteThank you Gryphen for giving us one ice cube which is going to go to making up your iceberg. I didn't know that Palin faked a pregnancy. Where did you get that information?
ReplyDeleteleu2500 -
ReplyDeleteComparison of the pregnancy with Piper (the newspaper pic) with the 2008 'pregnancy at 24/25 weeks:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49830475@N04/5009494291/
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete“Bristol is pretty much a homebody,” a source close to Bristol, 20, says. “The Arizona home is a part-time residence. Her primary place of residence is in Alaska.”
2:27 PM
Yeah, sure. Free thousand dollar handouts for her and all of her babies each and every year? Grifters can't pass up an opportunity to get money for nothing, no matter how large or small the sum, if another wee lie will put the check into their account.
Am I missing something here? A video of her stuffing herself with coats and sweaters and things is supposed to "prove" she's not pregnant? How is this different than everything documented in PG archives? And they probably have this video as well.
ReplyDeleteOne of the posters suggested this may be about web clicks, and I am starting to believe that because we're rehashing the same stuff, and there are too many teasers. We're constantly told people are "in the know" and promised timebombs that never seem to materialize.
I would love to see proof, and love to see SP proved a liar. But let's see it happen and show it to me when it does. Until then, let's move on.
I saw that photo of pregnant Palin in the red dress a long, long time ago - it isn't a new release by any means.
ReplyDeleteI remember looking at it because, even for a pregnant young woman, she seemed awfully fat. And was able to easily verify that it was indeed just an old family photo, however unflattering.
I remember thinking good thing she is pregnant in that photo; otherwise all the old horny republican men who are salivating over her will dump her like a hot rock if she was a former fat chick - those kind of guys are extremely shallow about such things.
Are some of the posters here not comprehending what they are reading or is it me? The picture's Gryphen posted and the video are NOT the new evidence. Someone has a full on picture of Palin while she is bending over, right? That is the new evidence.
ReplyDeleteThank you Gryphen for giving us one ice cube which is going to go to making up your iceberg. I didn't know that Palin faked a pregnancy. Where did you get that information?
ReplyDelete2:58 PM
Wasilla was in the house earlier....I guess they left this comment.
Or the BotBus has arrived.
Also, the photo of Sarah with her first pregnancy is so contrived to purposely show how frickin big she was with that baby. You can tell that her aunt or whoever is with her is sucking in her gut, and sarah is arching her back to make her belly even more pronounced. She was as big as a house with that baby.
ReplyDeleteAnon 2:46, Yeah I'm having trouble accessing AWTF unless I use hidemyass.com and then I get on right away. I suspect the owner of the blog wants to discontinue it and is discouraging traffic.
ReplyDeleteImagine what that picture would show taken almost head on and just as she was bent over.
ReplyDeleteA scarf hanging away from SpongeTrig SquarePants?
Andrew Sullivan has seen all the photos and documentation on the deceptions site. But he abandoned attempts to bring the issue to the mainstream media.
ReplyDeleteOne more new photo may or may not be the tipping point for mainstream media. But any reporter that could not date a Palin photo themselves doesn't sound hungry enough to do the leg work and get the story out.
UNLESS, they've been given outside incentive from interested parties.
(I know Andrew Sullivan has been ill. He's posted a comment on the Dish that he hopes to be back on the blog soon.)
I recently read the details of Dairygate and holy crap, maybe that's the iceberg should put Palin and her friends in jail. For her to take over the dairy, fire the whole board, replace them with her high school buddies, then get tons of government loans and grants to pour into the place, while it loses money and her friends fail at running it, with no accounting for millions in missing money????
ReplyDeleteWhat a ponzi scheme! All while Palin makes political speeches about how she made a small business sucessful and took big government out of the picture!
FloridaDem, perhaps what you're missing is the content of the posts. You say you've been around for a while. If that's true, you should know by now that it'll be the MSM, and not Gryphen, who will report the "nail in the coffin". He's mentioned it several times. He said very clearly in the earlier post that all he could reveal was, "A major news outlet has received additional photos from the Spouse's Luncheon that prove Sarah Palin was not pregnant." I realize that just because you commented on it doesn't mean you read it, but that was in big, bold letters. Why do you still think there is no other proof other than what Gryphen has posted?
ReplyDeleteAnon 3:30, until then " let's move on?" LOL
ReplyDeleteAre you dictating to Gryphen, the blog owner, what his agenda is for his blog? Or are you telling the readers not to discuss it. Gryphen can bring up what he wants on his blog and he swears this is it, the truth of babygate will be revealed. Read his previous posts. He has never once said a MSM outlet has contacted him and said they were going to this story. Not once!!!
Let's just hope leaking it won't give Scarah a chance to put a stop to this. It better come out soon. Like this week soon.
That is definately, without question, bulk from layers of clothing.
ReplyDeletejust wait on that story. like you said it's all goiing to come out in the wash. she'll put in her nomination which person does not want all that perks awarded to presidential candidates. she'll also get to hide behind that cloak. she'll blame everyone in the media for exposing her, there is going to be so much stuff that comes out the people will not believe all the important stuff i.e. pregnancy. the national enquirer will have nothing on the mainstream media.
ReplyDelete@3:33--"One of the posters suggested this may be about web clicks, and I am starting to believe that because we're rehashing the same stuff, and there are too many teasers. We're constantly told people are "in the know" and promised timebombs that never seem to materialize."
ReplyDeleteI think this is what it feels like to have achieved partial victory. You kind of lose interest in the Grifter because she's kind of keeping her maw shut...actually she's not been quiet at all, but I really don't care much anymore. I think she jumped the shark with Tuscon. No one could take her as a leader after her disgusting displays of coldness and bad judgment and self-involvement, and lies, of course. But even if I felt safe enough to ignore her altogether, I could never let go of babygate. EVAH. The bloggers know that's true of most of us. So I don't really blame G for wanting to maintain his traffic with a revisit to babygate. There's always another mind to be enlightened about it, and it keeps the ex-gov on her toes.
Let’s remember – the reporter knew enough to contact Gryphen regarding the photos, so he/she is familiar with the blog. Also on the blog is clear photo evidence of two babies – Ruffles and the child presented at the RNC as Trig. That could very well be part of the expose, or a follow-up for any news organization. She may try to gain sympathy for adopting a special needs child, but the media will need to put that in the context of all of her other behavior:
ReplyDelete• Telling huge lies regarding her pregnancy and birth over and over again
• Publicly passing off a 2nd child as Trig
• Accepting the VP nomination while having a special needs infant in the household who cannot be raised the same way as the other children (i.e. having special medical and physical needs), a teenage daughter who has dropped out of school and is pregnant, and a son heading off to war. It is apparent that both she and Todd made the decision that her political career was way more important than their kids. If it comes out that she was protecting Bristol by raising the baby, she’s in a worse position. Her career, more important than a child who is screwed up enough to get pregnant immediately after giving birth to another baby. Not a well-adjusted teen.
She continues to drop in the polls, which means her base is continually slipping away. She has zero shot at being president, and I think it’s safe to say that all of us here would like her to go away – period. I don’t want her vicious talk polluting the airwaves again.
Maybe Babygate won’t bring her down – but it will hurt – hard. It may also give people confidence to speak up about the other skeletons in her closet. And it may be a reminder to the media and journalists that questioning and vetting leaders is the right thing to do.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete"Oh Jiminy christmas...just noticed that Pipper is with mommy at the luncheon, wearing a pink shirt. How cute. My husband and I always bring our kids to work functions."
@2:14 PM
Piper is Sarah's security blanket. Plus, having a cute kid around means any conversation will revolve around the kid and not around issues that you know nothing about but should.
FloridaDem - Please don't slam the door on your way out.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I would like to see Palin go down I don't this this pregnancy scandal will pan out. If there was a fake pregnancy don't you think someone would have sold this story by now. Believe me someone in the valley would have. Time to move on
ReplyDelete4:43, wasn't the failed Dairy then dismantled, with all those old friends of Sarah's running off with all the assets at rock bottom prices?
ReplyDeleteNice. Now that's a time-tested, common-sense solution.
For anyone out there who is a doubter, I've followed the Trig birth issue from the very start of Palin's VP nomination, collecting all the information that appeared anywhere. No matter how hard you try, you can't confirm ANYTHING official about his birth -- not the hospital, not a single person in attendance, not the date, etc. (Don't believe me? Go ahead, Google it all.) Additionally, Bristol DID leave school, and there are no photos of her during the period when someone was pregnant with Trig. No matter how deep you dig, you just find more and more evidence suggesting Sarah is not the biological mother.
ReplyDeletePalin "announced" her pregnancy supposedly in the seventh month (the day after McCain locked up the nomination), and an article that appeared in Alaska's main daily newspaper the next day focused on how she did not look pregnant at all and how shocked everyone was, including her own staff. Then for two months she wore scarves to kind of hide that fact that there wasn't much to see -- except for two staged pictures taken on the same date in the state capitol building. Unfortunately for Palin, a picture that appeared a week or two before the supposed birth in fact clearly showed something like a small pillow fastened around her stomach -- she carelessly left her coat unbuttoned at a signing ceremony in a museum. If you don't believe me, I'll email you the picture.
Look, she's just not the biological mother of Trig. Don't believe me? Then surely you can prove me wrong with just 10 or 15 minutes of Googling to find something that contradicts me. So go ahead. Prove me wrong. Then post your proof here for the benefit of all. (If you come up with Dr. Cathy Baldwin-Johnson's statement conveniently released just hours before the voting started, I'll point out how she managed to not give a date, name a hospital, or say that she was in attendance at the birth -- she avoids first-person pronouns in the section about Trig, unlike the other parts of that too-clever statement that was drafted, seemingly, by lawyers and publicists for both parties.)
Don't forget - if her mouth is moving then she is lying.
ReplyDeleteShe cannot help herself, she is mean and vindictive and would stop at nothing to get her way.
She has raised Bristle to be just like her, multiple affairs, multiple babies.
On April 8, 2008 Sarah Palin was filmed in a stairwell with some students. And there is a still photo. Sarah Palin does NOT have the belly that bulges out in the April 13 "Gusty" photo.
ReplyDeletePhil Munger blogged about the "unsettling" pics in
http://progressivealaska.blogspot.com/2009/09/two-interesting-photos-i-caught-today.html
The comments include a very extensive discussion by an adult with information about the students and the date.
It's the real "nail in the coffin".
So the hostess of this event shows up in a trench coat, signs something in an impressive folder and leaves? HuH?
ReplyDeleteAccording to what is shown in the video, her appearance was not acknowledged. Is that because it was the SPOUSE's Luncheon and SHE is not the spouse? Where is Toad?
This was a stunt to look preganant...:) ...and she don't.
at the :13 mark, she is bending over with NOTHING even close to extended beyond the edge of her jacket. There is no way there is a 33 week pregnant belly under there.
ReplyDeleteI was as big as a house with my first, stayed smaller with my second. However, at 33 weeks, there was NO mistaking I was pregnant and while the rest of me stayed small and my overall weight gain was half that of my first, my belly was still out there for all to see.
That woman was NOT pregnant with her 5th child.
Anon @6:11 - thanks for the link. Wow. Some of those comments were chilling.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what ever became of Eileen. She obviously wasn't afraid to speak out. It seems she gave enough information to identify herself. Hopefully she was just scared off, and is safe.
I know I've seen ProChoiceGrandma around, either here or at HP or both. But I don't ever remember her comments giving any inside info.
The fact that these two people (and God knows how many others) have been silenced somehow leads me to believe the iceberg is much bigger than a fake pregnancy. Repercussions of a fake pregnancy? Maybe. But far more unspeakable.
Sarah Palin is so damn dumb, with out realizing it, she just announced she is not running for POTUS, she is running for the big $$$ and it is in Denver!
ReplyDeleteIt’s official sportsfan! Sarah Palin is not running for president.
Sarah Palin will be in Denver on May 2 to speak at the Sharon K Pacheco Foundation's annual Patriots and Warriors Gala. “Tickets are already on sale.” LOL
IMPORTANT INFO:
As the Denver Post notes, the event conflicts with a Republican Presidential primary debate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/04/sarah-palin-to-speak-at-p_n_819040.html#comments
From the video- what the heck is the strange lump in her side just behind her elbow?
ReplyDelete8:33 - No big surprise she's not running. First of all, the whole world knows she's unelectable. Second, I think there are a lot of people (Gryphen included) who will risk the repercussions of telling the truth to make sure she isn't elected.
ReplyDelete"If you come up with Dr. Cathy Baldwin-Johnson's statement conveniently released just hours before the voting started, I'll point out how she managed to not give a date, name a hospital, or say that she was in attendance at the birth -- she avoids first-person pronouns in the section about Trig, unlike the other parts of that too-clever statement that was drafted, seemingly, by lawyers and publicists for both parties.)"
ReplyDeleteThat letter doesn't even get Piper's birth year right. No one should rely on it for anything.
"Denver will host one of the nation's most well-known and divisive political figures when Sarah Palin serves as keynote speaker at a May 2 fundraiser for military families.
ReplyDeleteThe former Alaska governor and U.S. vice-presidential candidate will speak at the Patriots & Warriors Gala at the Infinity Park Events Center in Glendale, according to an announcement from the Sharon K. Pacheco Foundation.
The event time conflicts with the May 2 NBC/Politico Republican Presidential Candidates debate scheduled at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California."
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_17295500
Why would Palin skip the Republican Presidential Candidates debate scheduled on the same day as her paid speech in Denver?
Women all know that when you gain extra weight, you get back fat, which just makes a little bulge where your bra comes around your back. And it doesn't appear LUMPY, it just shows as a bulge sticking out of the back of your bra. This video is SO clear she is trying to bundle and layer up to distract from the truth. Hey Sarah WE know YOU were not the birth mother of Trig. Why don't you sue if this is not true.
ReplyDeleteBilling an insurance company for a birth that DID NOT happen would be insurance FRAUD. And HIPPA doesn't apply to FRAUD. Spoke with an attorney who specializes in medical law, and if fraud is involved HIPPA doesn't cover your ass.
ReplyDeleteI'm really looking forward to the truth finally coming out. I found it difficult to believe the hypocrisy of her defenders and of Palin herself when it came to the alleged pregnancy. They wanted us to believe that this woman who supposedly took on the CBC, the Republican Committee in Alaska, and the "Big Oil" companies was AFRAID to admit she was pregnant because she was worried about what they would say??? I never believed it from the start but this was one of her most hypocritical statements. Although she was not responsible for taking down anyone, let alone for them being jailed, she let people go on thinking that, especially after the nomination. I still see it being used on one forum after another by her groupies, talking about how Palin put the "bad guys in jail", LOL! Yeah, right! She was so afraid of everyone in the Alaska legislature that she had to "hide her pregnancy"! We all know there was no pregnancy for her to hide but why would she ever try to pull that stupid excuse when she had been bragging about how she took on the good old boys all by herself?!
ReplyDeleteI know there are a lot of people who think it won't matter but you seem to be forgetting that she used Trig to get ahead in politics and cement her pro-life credibility. She told such elaborate stories about how she felt during her alleged pregnancy. How can you explain any of that away just because the baby was adopted? Nope, won't happen. She's done for once this is revealed. She'll always have those who idolize her no matter what but if you think her poll numbers look bad now, wait until after this comes to light.
"I know I've seen ProChoiceGrandma around, either here or at HP or both. But I don't ever remember her comments giving any inside info."
ReplyDeleteProChoiceGrandma rocks! Her posts have always been so insightful. I read them on Palin Deceptions, and also PalinGates.
I think it was on PalinGates, she gave a very reasoned post, with many references to media sources and unfolding events, explaining why she thought that Bristol's pregnancy was a much darker story than merely a teenage indiscretion.
Why would Palin skip the Republican Presidential Candidates debate scheduled on the same day as her paid speech in Denver?
ReplyDelete9:02 PM
Sarah wants to be handed the Repug nomination by acclamation. She doesn't want to waste time at debates. You don't get paid for attending a debate.
Once the field bloodies itself, she may step into the fray, or declare none of the candidates are true rethugs and then run as a third party candidate. This assumes that Murdoch and the Koch boys will do all the actual work.
Yep...missing a debate at Ronnies library is s sign she is not running in 2012....although I don't know if there is a requirement to participate in debates. This could be another mavericky move.
ReplyDeleteAnd even of she doesn't run in 2012...we still need to expose her 'gates so we don't hear back from her in 2016
Sarah Palin will not be running for President, she knows the game is almost up and she has decided to make as much money as she can before someone cuts the lights off for her.
ReplyDeleteShe will continue grifting for dollars and stay in the background more than before. Is RAM still on the payroll? RAM has helped to bring Palin down by all her tweeting and made up BS. The majority of things that RAM releases is 100% wrong. She was a failed screen writer and is a failed PR spokesperson for the Grifter Queen. She also has put out fake stories about Bristle.
Poor ole Bekkky, she will be thrown under the bus if not already.
Sarah must have a lot of stretchmarks.
ReplyDeleteRe: how chubby Sarah's face was in the Red Shirt pix.
ReplyDeleteShe has 80's hair. Come on, I defy anyone to look skinny in 80's hair.
What's more telling in the Trig "birth" story is how skinny & chipper she looks in the pix where Mercedes is holding Trig. Nobody looks that good that fast.
Any reporter interested in this story has studied Audrey's blog as well as Gryphen's Babygate posts.
ReplyDeleteWhat we are doing here is answering specific questions of people who weren't followers of Audrey from 9/08-8/09.
Gryphen isn't saying the Spouse's Lunch pictures he has are the best case. He's saying someone has an even more telling one.
She had her picture taken with at least one spouse, the pregnant one in slacks and a sweater. She probably had her picture taken with every attendee who wanted a souvenir photo.
As to the "If she faked the pregnancy we would know by now," we all thought so too. The evidence is there, though perhaps not packaged in a short-attention-span briefing paper. What we learned was that the media bent over backwards to avoid "sexism" by accepting as truth anything Palin said that was "personal."
Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish stood alone in saying Palin's story didn't add up, and in being alarmed that one of our two major parties could foist such an unvetted, unqualified VP candidate on us. Sullivan was roundly ridiculed.
Similarly, even fellow Palin critics Shannon Moore and AK Muckraker have publicly ridiculed those who keep saying there's a story with Babygate, talking about our tin foil hats.
Since the 2008 election, the value to Palin in speaker fees of having Trig and her tearful recountings of her courageous decision to carry a special needs child to term, have called into question whether the political capital from the DS baby may have been Palin's motivation.
Whatever the reason she pretended to be pregnant, she showed a level of deceit inappropriate for anyone near the White House. (That's on top of the fact that she lies about everything.) She has also fraudulently deceived well-intentioned Americans into giving her votes and money and respect.
"Why did Levi tell you this story was false back when he was being paid to spill his guts? Ditto Mercede?"
ReplyDeleteliar. Levi never said this story was false. He claimed ignorance. Mercede doesn't know anything about anything.
Just a thought, though it seems unlikely. What if Trig really is Sarah Palin's son but they used a surrogate mother? I cannot think of any reason why they would want another child at that stage in Sarah's life, but people are strange sometimes.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the surrogate found out the child would have Down Syndrome, and Sarah and Todd took so long to decide whether to have the surrogate go through with the pregnancy that by the time Sarah announced "she" was pregnant, it was late in the game.
And maybe they had to rush back to Alaska because the surrogate went into labor unexpectedly.
I could see why Sarah might want to use a surrogate if she wanted to have a baby--she was older, she had an important job and didn't want to be pregnant again, she had been working harder to get into shape and lose weight, etc.
I just can't fathom why they would *want* a baby.
Unless...they conceived before through in vitro and had some leftover embryos that they just couldn't destroy because Sarah really is a conservative whack job.
Billing an insurance company for a birth that DID NOT happen would be insurance FRAUD. And HIPPA doesn't apply to FRAUD. Spoke with an attorney who specializes in medical law, and if fraud is involved HIPPA doesn't cover your ass.
ReplyDelete11:10 PM
Thank You!!! I have been saying this for over a year now. There are also other ways to get around HIPAA. Lots of loopholes which I have posted the link to on various websites over the year. If she DOES decide to run and no one "in charge" exposes her shit, we need to get a class action suit with a good lawyer to show that she is batshit crazy, faked a pregnancy , yada yada yada. The loophole will be that she is a THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY becaue she is a batshit crzy woman who faked a pregnancy for political credibility and went on and on talking about it forever.
Who is in with me? We can raise money, get a suit going,if she runs as third party candidate, which I think she will do later. She can't be bothered with all the work up front.
Enough is enough with this idiot.
Anon 5:11, I agree. She jumped the shark a long time ago. I think it was way before Tuscon though, but after Tuscon I think that's when the MSM started to recognize it a little more, and the pile-on started.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that someone posted that she scheduled an event during a planned Repub debate. And although she could cancel it of course, it's more indication, (like having no boots on the ground in Iowa) that she's not seriously running. Which, I've been saying for the past year.
Sarah's worst enemy, remains, Sarah.
Annie: The part about an outlet receiving additional photos can be considered fact, if it is indeed so. The part about it "proving" SP's not pregnant is the opinion part.
I don't see that we're any closer to proving babygate, and frankly an old video, or photos from that luncheon, where we see a chubby-faced Sarah with piled-on clothing, is not instilling me with a lot of confidence that proof is forthcoming. What we are likely to see are some intriguing shots to fuel more speculation.
I just feel weary from the Bristol DTWS pregnancy thing, and the Todd Hooker thing, with absolute proof nowhere on the horizon on either one,...and this is probably not a good time to be telling me, wait! I've been whispered to! Someone is soon to be proving babygate! I'm sorry, but there's too much fatigue for that. I'd much prefer some honestly and to just say, "hey...we've got some juicy new shots on the way of Sarah which show her not looking pregnant, and that will hopefully give babygate a new start." Something along those lines.
I am all for new info, any bits here or there, but lately we've be pronouncing everything proof, which is something different altogether.
I don't think we know if Palin billed any insurance company.
ReplyDeleteThere's an email asking for TriG's birth certificate for insurance purposes. Todd was going to "take care of it."
Bristol has said Tripp is on the free Native American health care. TriG may be too, though if he isn't Todd's or Bristol's son, there could be fraud there.
One theory was TriG was a Heath baby and he was passed off as Todd's (and Sarah's) to get lifelong free health care, which he will likely need as long as Sarah's party fights universal health care--letting everyone have paid access to what Sarah's kids and grandkids have for free.
One of my coworkers is 8 mos pregnant. She is little, too. She probably wears a size 2.
ReplyDeleteShe waddles. (refering to Floyd's post below)
And she has a little 'outie' basketball, too!
Why is everyone dissecting the video and the screengrab? Didn't you read what Gryphen wrote?Someone has still pictures from the event and is asking questions about whether Sarah Palin was pregnant based on those pictures, pictures we haven't seen... yet.
ReplyDelete