Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Thursday, June 02, 2011
It looks like the biggest challenges to Michele Bachmann's plans to run for President are all coming from high school students.
First Bachmann was challenged to a debate by Amy Myers, a sophomore at Cherry Hill High School East in Camden County. (A challenge that she ignored by the way.) And now she finds herself facing another challenge from seventeen year old Zack Kopplin:
I’m a 17 year old from Louisiana, and I’m calling Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’s bluff when it comes to creationism and Nobel Laureate scientists.
In 2004, while she was in the Minnesota State Senate, Congresswoman Bachmann tried to pass SF 1714, a bill similar to my state’s creationism law, the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA), which I’m fighting to repeal. This misnamed and misguided law creates a way to sneak the teaching of creationism into Louisiana public school science classrooms.
The LSEA is hurting my state and the students in it. And now, as the congresswoman is laying the groundwork to run for President, she is upping the ante for the rest of the country by bringing an anti-science, creationist stance to the national stage. Why is this a junk hand for students? Just look at the lessons from Louisiana. Colleges both at home and across the country may question our science education and withhold admission because of our dubious science background. In addition, Louisiana students may lose out on cutting edge science jobs to kids from countries like China and Britain where they teach accurate science and the theory of evolution.
This law gives Louisiana an anti-science reputation, which hinders the state’s ability to attract scientists who can help find innovative solutions to rescue the Louisiana seafood industry from disasters such as the BP oil spill and stop our coast from disappearing. The LSEA also handicaps our bio-tech start ups and efforts to attract investment in companies that do scientific research.
According to the 2009 survey of 8th grade students’ science education by the National Center for Education Statistics, Louisiana was at the bottom of the list, ranked lower than all but one state. Do not let Michele Bachmann drag the rest of the country down to Louisiana’s level.
In 2006, Congresswoman Bachmann claimed “there is a controversy among scientists about whether evolution is a fact… hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel prizes, believe in intelligent design.”
Intelligent design is another name for creationism. Teaching these exchangeable theories in public school science classrooms was found unconstitutional in the 2005 Dover vs. Kitzmiller case because they are not science.
Bachmann’s ongoing misrepresentation of science and scientists at a national level adds fuel and false authority to the lobbyists and politicians in my state who have an agenda to undermine evidence-based science.
Does Congresswoman Bachmann really think the public will fall for her sleight of hand and believe she has Nobel Laureate scientists who support these unscientific theories?
Congresswoman Bachmann, I see your “hundreds” of scientists, and raise you millions of scientists.
For the next hand, I raise you 43 Nobel Laureate scientists. That’s right: 43 Nobel Laureate scientists have endorsed our effort to repeal Louisiana’s creationism law.
Major science organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which represents over 10 million scientists, have publicly endorsed the repeal.
Congresswoman Bachmann, you claim that Nobel Laureates support creationism. Show me your hand. If you want to be taken seriously by voters while you run for President, back up your claims with facts. Can you match 43 Nobel Laureates, or do you fold?
Have I mentioned before how much I LOVE the young people in this country?
Labels:
Congress,
Creationism,
education,
High school,
Michele Bachmann,
students
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
O/T "Piper pipes up"
ReplyDeleteCNN's Jeanne Moos nails it!
Some very telling clips of Piper and her interactions with Sarah and the LSM.
http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/
offbeat/2011/06/01/moos.piper.
pipes.up.cnn#
I LOVE these kids!!!
ReplyDeleteCarrie
I agree, great kids. I have hope again today despite the slide in the DOW. What a kid and what a way to frame the challenge. Seeing how he is dealing with Batshitcrazy Bachman, he had to dumb down the analogy so that the congresswomen could understand his question. Go Get her Zach Kopplin.
ReplyDeleteJeanne Moos does nail it. Thank god someone is doing their fucking job. You can take the day off Gryphen, CNN is helping you out today.
ReplyDeleteJeanne Moos did a great job. Thank you CNN!
ReplyDeleteMr. Kopplin, I salute you. This country needs lots more young people like you and lots fewer people like Michele Bachwardsmann. Good luck with your repeal campaign.
ReplyDeleteWe will never see one of the half term governor's cubs making an intelligent statement.
ReplyDeleteBill
If our future relies on youth like this, instead of someone like, say, Bristol Palin, than I think I can go back to sleep at nights.
ReplyDeleteWonderful!
ReplyDeleteFrom what I've seen of this upcoming generation (they call themselves Generation WE), we will be in very good hands. What we have to do is back them up, get barricades out of the way, and cheer them on.
ReplyDeleteWhat bothers me is that challenging Bachmann is being left to high school students.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the media? Where are the heavy hitters willing to call her out?
That is why Palin gets away with all the lies she has. No one has had the courage to step up and call her a liar when she spews her bile or rewrites history.
It's a little late for babygate. How old is Trig now? Three? It should have been done almost as soon as she announced or soon after. And the pressure never should have let up. If it had, she would not have been the nominee. The McCain campaign would not have touched her if Babygate, Troopergate, the ethics complaints, etc. were all hot while he was looking. He would have passed right over her and we wouldn't be subjected to her now.
In a Louisiana small town, when I was a sixth grader, every Friday afternoon our public school teacher read the class the So. Baptist Sunday School lesson. No explanation, no mention of this being her beliefs, and certainly no one objected. This was school and you obeyed the teachers.
ReplyDeleteThat is one of my biggest problems with laws such as the one Zack is fighting - children soak this indoctrination in like a sponge. After all, the teacher said so - it must be true is how it was and is for elementary school students.
Thank you Zack for artfully pointing out that public school is for learning not for religious training.
Let's give the conservatives what they say they want: Let them have a state (like, say, South Carolina). Let them build their religious/cheap labor/family values Wingnut Paradise (tm). Leave science and environmental laws out if they want.
ReplyDeleteI predict it may go well for a few years. But eventually they would either turn on each other, splinter off because they all think that only THEY are the true conservatives, or it would become a feudal hellhole that makes Oliver Twist look like Club Med.
One good thing is we would probably not hear wingnuts like Michele Bachmann ever talk about controversies in science ever again.
Gryphen, did you edit that picture of Bachmann? Her eyes aren't blazing red.
ReplyDelete