Finding the pearls of truth among the moosepoop of Sarah Palin's deceptions.

Lately I have received a number of requests from people through the comments section or e-mails asking that I tell them my theory on what all of the evidence we have accumulated thus far concerning Sarah Palin's pregnancy, the "birth" of Trig, the birth of Tripp, and the possibility of numerous babies, tells us.

And my answer to that request is, "no."

I know that disappoints people, but the truth is that I don't necessarily have a working theory that combines every piece of the puzzle that we have gathered so far. In fact I feel that if I started to try and manufacture missing pieces in order to bring something imaginary into focus that it could very well keep me from recognizing, or correctly understanding, any new evidence that is certainly still out there yet to be discovered.

I KNOW that there are a number of other blogs and websites who have spent a great deal of time and energy creating possible scenarios, and I have seen some of them here in the comments section as well, but personally I really do not find any of that helpful.

My job, as I see it, is to find the new information, or reexamine old information to look for new clues. If I find something, then I attempt to determine in which direction it leads us, and then probe in that direction to see if it leads to more revelations.  If it does not then I have to go back to the beginning and start again.

I have done this numerous times. I do NOT simply make stuff up, and then see if my gullible readers will buy into it. I have more respect for all of you than to do that.

So essentially I stick pretty close to the few things we can know for certain.

The first being that Sarah Palin did NOT give birth to Trig Paxson Van Palin on April 18,2008. I believe that there is more than ample evidence to prove that in a court of law if called upon to do so.

I am also confident that Bristol also did not give birth to a baby on April 18, 2008, based on eyewitness sightings and pictorial evidence. Now whether or not she did give birth before that is still a rather strong possibility, however the only evidence for that is that she missed school for a number of months in both 2007 and 2008, that there were rumors she was pregnant going back to 2007, and of course Tank Jones eyewitness account of seeing Levi pick up a child from the Palin household who was not a newborn in March of 2009. I would be hesitant to go to court however until I had discussed this further with Tank, but if he could be compelled to testify under oath then I think this is provable as well.

Another firm piece of the puzzle in my opinion is the "ruffled ear" information.

Recently I have received a number of e-mails suggesting that we reexamine my "The Tale of Two Babies" post from February of 2010, and that perhaps I made a mistake. However I am not sure what the purpose of reexamining the post would be since I consulted a number of doctors before writing the post, and had others, including an ENT, corroborate my findings after I published it on the blog. Not to mention that Laura Novak also had a Neonatologist reach the very same conclusions. (Add to that the fact that Todd Palin suddenly dropped out of the Iron Dog snowmachine race four hours after my post and Meg Stapleton quit her job as Palin spokesperson two days later and I think you have enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that the post hit pretty close to home.)

This however has not stopped others from essentially creating their own diagnosis, and then explaining how it could have been remedied before Trig was presented at the RNC. Recently I did try to ask one of the doctors that I consulted back then if that was feasible based on the evidence at hand.  I will let you know his answer just as soon as he stops laughing.

Look the point I am making here is that those of us who have been attempting to get to the bottom of this egregious pregnancy hoax by Sarah Palin, and gather proof to convince others, have been marginalized, ridiculed, and even used by Palin to play the victim card.

If we just make shit up, and act like insane people, then by definition we are insane people.

This is still a very important and potentially explosive scandal to expose, but it does NO good to have people simply inventing things to attract hits to their websites that confuse fantasy for facts, and create scenarios that people begin to accept as truth with nothing to back them up but a fertile imagination and access to a keyboard.

In other words, you are not helping.

It is a free world, and people can do as they like on their blogs. But if you TRULY want to solve this mystery, perhaps you might want to think before you type.