Friday, February 22, 2013

Entering into sequester negotiations, new Bloomberg poll shows President Obama with highest job approval rating in three years, and the popularity of Republicans at record lows.

Courtesy of Bloomberg:

President Barack Obama enters the latest budget showdown with Congress with his highest job- approval rating in three years and public support for his economic message, while his Republican opponents’ popularity stands at a record low. 

Fifty-five percent of Americans approve of Obama’s performance in office, his strongest level of support since September 2009, according to a Bloomberg National poll conducted Feb. 15-18. Only 35 percent of the country has a favorable view of the Republican Party, the lowest rating in a survey that began in September 2009. The party’s brand slipped six percentage points in the last six months, the poll shows. 

Americans by 49 percent to 44 percent believe Obama’s proposals for government spending on infrastructure, education and alternative energy are more likely to create jobs than Republican calls to cut spending and taxes to build business confidence and spur employment. 

“The Republicans are not offering any new solutions,” said poll respondent Cynthia Synos, 62, a political independent who lives in the St. Louis suburb of Greendale, Missouri. “Their answer is always tax cuts and incentives for business. I’ve never heard them say anything innovative to spark the economy that would help the other 85, 90 percent of people that have to deal with the economy as it is.” 

Obama’s positive standing with the public provides him with political leverage as Americans assess blame for any furloughs, disruption of government services or damage to the economy if the spending cuts aren’t averted. The repercussions also could help shape the battleground for the 2014 midterm congressional elections. 

Public views of congressional Republicans’ record places an added burden on them in the standoff over automatic spending cuts. Americans by 43 percent to 34 percent say they are more to blame than Obama and Democrats for “what’s gone wrong” in Washington. Still, another 23 percent aren’t sure which side bears more responsibility. 

Republicans “are not willing to work at all with the president,” said poll respondent Horace Lee Boyd, 64, a political independent and retired wholesale merchandiser who lives in Cullman, Alabama. “When you cease to compromise, you cease to accomplish anything. We’re at a stalemate. He’s willing to compromise and they aren’t.” 

From most perspectives it does not appear that the Republicans have much to work with, especially since the public cannot help but notice that most of the fighting is actually going on within the party itself, between the establishment GOP and the upstart Teabaggers, instead of with the Democrats.

While it is clear that the President wants to do everything he can to avoid the sequester it is clear that he stands to benefit from it politically once it happens and that the Republicans will suffer an even larger slip in the polls as a result.

In other words it appears that the Republicans are still trying to play chess while Obama is beating the pants off of them in a game of three dimensional chess.

P.S. By the way for those still a little confused about what the sequester does, here is a great article which lays the whole thing out in easy to understand language and graphics.

23 comments:

  1. SHARON6:57 AM

    This is a great article....too bad most people won't read it, the people that love to complain and don't even vote. If all the facts are presented, it is quite clear what has happened to this country and what needs to happen now. All statistics clearly show where all the money has been flowing since Saint Reagan....hence the the 1%. Corps have increased profits on the backs of their employees, no salary or benefit increases for them, it all goes to the CEO's. How many trillions are hidden away in foreign banks? Hedge fund managers and corporate vultures (Robme) pay super low rates due to tax laws/loopholes. Not one Wall Street banker has gone to jail...millions lost their homes and jobs. I think we need to take all that stolen money back and cut defense. Steven Brill has a brilliant piece about how the hospitals rip everyone off...free enterprise is bullshit. It is just another way to steal, how much is enough...the rich will never have enough. Taxing the gun makers for ER victims...now there is an idea. What separates us is "free enterprise" in things that should be government run, not for profit....healthcare, oil production and prisons to name a few.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:50 AM

      The hospital system should NOT be under 'free' enterprise. We, as citizens, are paying more for our care (and it's going to continue increasing!), the care is worse when compared to other nations and more people die from American care when compared to other nations.

      People need to pay attention to the bills they receive from hospitals and counter them (if they have no insurance). I watched an interview on this matter last night and it was mentioned that breaking an arm can cost you $25,000 in our world today. Cancer patients are having to declare bankruptcy - the same drug in America costs 50% higher than they do in Canada and other countries - and on and on.

      This subject is very, very frightening to say the least!

      Delete
    2. SHARON11:20 AM

      I watched the same interview on Charlie Rose...Steven Brill wrote a brilliant piece on healthcare. PBS has all of Rose's shows on the web and it is well worth checking out. He was also on the Daily Show the same night.

      Delete
  2. After reading Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (John Perkins) some years ago, I felt that there are finite political boundaries no one can pass, not even the Queen of England, and she has admitted as much. President Obama deals with oil executives since he has no choice.

    That still leaves a big arena for him to run and invent moves to thwart the republicans, something he’s increasingly mastering, much like Bill.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:08 AM

    I have a suspicion that the Republicans intended to let the sequestration happen hanging Obama for the
    negative consequences. In October a glossy 8x10 mailer was sent proclaiming voting for Obama would
    have Obama causing a recession, destroying safety slashing the military, job losses etc. It was framed that Obama as president would do these things contrary to his record and proposals. The message was vote for Romney.

    Later I understood the allegations were specifics of sequestration.

    Would the Republican party choose severe economic hardship to regain power? I think it is possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19 AM

      "Would the Republican party choose severe economic hardship to regain power? I think it is possible."

      Possible???

      EVERYTHING they've done in the past 5 years has proven that they are more than willing to sacrifice the welfare and safety of the vast majority of Americans, endanger the security of the country, and risk the economic collapse of the world in their single-minded quest to regain power and control, while protecting their sacred 1%.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:30 AM

      The secret little meeting that took place the very night of President Obama's first inauguration where high-ranking members of the GOP pledged that their primary goal was to make Obama a one term President and plotted to obstruct everything he proposed proved that they have no interest in protecting or serving the American people.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous8:32 AM

    And here's more!

    Pew Poll Finds Little Support For Cutting Government Programs

    Republicans in Washington insist that the government has a spending problem and that the best approach to the imminent sequestration is to impose cuts on programs, but a poll released Friday by Pew Research Center indicates that the public does not have their back.

    The poll found that majorities would like the government to either increase funding or maintain current levels of funding for 18 of 19 government programs that were tested. The lone area wherein the public does not want funding increased or maintained is providing aid to needy areas throughout the world. Forty-eight percent believe that overseas aid for the world's destitute — a tiny fraction of the overall budget — should be decreased, while 21 percent said it should be increased and 28 percent said it should remain the same.

    But fewer than 20 percent of respondents said that funding for the likes of Social Security, Medicare, roads and infrastructure, education and natural disaster relief should be decreased.

    Read the entire poll here.

    http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/pew-poll-finds-little-support-for-cutting-government

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:33 AM

    Of course they would, just look at their refusal to cooperate with the President on any of his economic proposals over the last four years.

    I don't think it's going to work for them this time. Ask Newt Gingrich what this kind of grandstanding accomplished for the GOP with their government shutdown in the 90's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:33 AM

    Texas GOP Chair: State Could Be In Play In 2016 If Hillary Runs

    It's been more than three decades since Texas went blue in a presidential election, but a top Republican there fears that the GOP may not have the state's 38 electoral votes in the bag in 2016 if Hillary Clinton is at the top of the Democratic ticket.

    Steve Munisteri, chairman of the Texas GOP, told Real Clear Politics in a story published Friday that Clinton would strip the state of its "solid Republican" status and insisted that national Republicans are taking her candidacy seriously — even in the crimson red Lone Star State.

    "If she's the nominee, I would say that this is a 'lean Republican state' but not a ‘solid Republican state,'" Munisteri said. "I dont know anyone nationally who's scoffing at this. The national party leadership is aware and tells me they're taking it seriously."

    A survey released late last month from Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling showed Clinton more than holding her own in Texas when matched up against potential 2016 contenders such as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R). Democrats have not carried Texas in a presidential election since 1976, when former President Jimmy Carter won the state.

    http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/texas-gop-chair-state-could-be-in-play

    ReplyDelete
  7. Leland8:34 AM

    Possible? No, change that to probable. Especially since Ryan - you know, the ex-vice presidential candidate? - helped WRITE the darned thing and now claims that's not true.

    They wrote the darned sequestration law and now they are trying to blame POTUS for it!

    They WILL let it go through.

    Of course, they will bitch and moan when events prove them wrong, but they will never accept blame.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:36 AM

    Poll: Obama’s Popularity With Latinos Soars After Immigration Push

    President Obama is riding a huge surge in popularity in public opinion surveys among Hispanics, who are overwhelmingly excited about his second-term efforts to pass immigration reform.


    Obama’s approval rating stands at 73 percent among Hispanics, a 25-point swing from his low of 48 percent in late 2011.

    In particular, Obama enjoyed a major shift in support for his immigration policy. Some 63 percent of Hispanic respondents to a Pew Research/USA Today poll approved of Obama’s performance on the issue. In November 2011, only 28 percent approved of his work on immigration.

    While Hispanic voters turned out in droves to elect Obama in November, many were upset over the record levels of deportations carried out by his administration. Obama’s inability to pass either comprehensive immigration reform or the DREAM Act, which would grant citizenship to young undocumented immigrants, over GOP opposition did not help his standing either — even as it hurt Republicans far more.

    Led by senators like John McCain (R-AZ) and Marco Rubio (R-FL), Republicans are now trying to craft a bipartisan immigration deal that they hope will boost their standing with the community. But they’re starting from an exceptionally weak position: Hispanic respondents told Pew they favor Obama’s approach to immigration over the GOP’s by a whopping 73-15 margin.

    Obama’s relative popularity could complicate Rubio’s recent attacks on the administration for drafting its own immigration plan, which he called “dead on arrival” in Congress and warned would inflame Republican opinion against reform.

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/02/poll-obamas-popularity-with-latinos-soars-after-immigration-push.php?ref=fpnewsfeed

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:41 AM

    I read many comments by people in support of sequestration who pushed it is no big deal to be furloughed and have pay cut 20% justifying those people don't do much work anyway. An acquaintance imploded that social security be eliminated and too bad, if people starve and die not having those benefits they paid into. Her situation is a huge inheritance that makes SS benefits look like change. I notice people become angry thinking others who had no such means nor occupation income have done the same. Her position about Romney's tax rate 15% (11) is that is irrelevant because of his charitable donations...giving money away therefore he not be forced to give more

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:43 AM

    I hope the majority in America are paying attention as to whom they cast their votes for in the next election cycle and the one after that! Republicans need to be voted out of office in the U.S. Congress, on state levels (governors and legislators) and in cities (mayors, assembly members, etc.).

    They are a disgrace to our nation on ALL levels!

    Thank God we have President Obama in office for a second term!!! He is doing one hell of a job in spite of them and I hope he continues to run circles around them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous8:55 AM

    The Republicans do not give a shit what happens to our country! It is so obvious when looking at their lack of work and ethics in the U.S. Congress! They will be blamed for sequestration, not President Obama. Look at the polls, President Obama approval rating is higher than it has ever been.

    Vote the asshole Republicans out of office. Americans need to pay attention for whom they vote - more now than ever before.

    I so hope that Hillary Clinton runs next election so that we have a continuation of a Dem as POTUS! We will need her to continue President Obama's fine, find work.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8:58 AM

    OT: ted Nugent has deemed his next tour Black Power 2013. I am so disgusted I have no words.

    http://music.yahoo.com/news/ted-nugent-dubs-next-tour-black-power-2013-132052262-rolling-stone.html

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous9:02 AM

    And yet AGAIN, they are out of step with the majority of Americans!

    Climate Change Poll: Americans Think Government Can Affect The Climate

    A week after Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) responded to President Barack Obama's climate change push by arguing that "the government can't change the weather," a new poll shows that most Americans think the U.S. government can make some difference in combating climate change. But polls also show that people consider climate change to be a relatively low priority, underscoring the political difficulty of taking action on the issue.

    According to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll, Americans are divided over whether climate change is caused primarily by human actions or by natural patterns in the Earth's environment, with 41 percent choosing each option. Still, most agree that the U.S. government can have at least some effect in reducing the impact of climate change, though they're divided on whether the government can make a major or minor difference. Twenty-nine percent of respondents said that U.S. policies can make a major difference, 30 percent said they can make a minor difference, and 28 percent said they can make no difference at all.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/21/climate-change-poll_n_2733856.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leland11:28 AM

      Washington can't affect the global weather? NUTS! All we have to do is get the damned Repubes to shut up and the temperature in DC would drop drastically!!!!!!!!!!

      SNARK! (At least, I THINK it's a snark.)

      Delete
  14. Anonymous9:33 AM

    CHILLING.

    Whistleblower fired for revealing cops threatened Obama while protecting him

    ....“There was an officer providing exterior security to the president on that day on the phone with the supervisor,” the whistleblower explained to WTVR last May. “The supervisor said to that particular officer, ‘you’re down there right? So, you can take a couple of shots, you might have to kill yourself, but you can take a couple of shots.’”

    He said that the supervisor made those comments to a sharpshooter on the day of the president’s visit to Richmond.

    And “another officer in the background started talking and he said, ‘yeah, somebody should plant a bomb underneath the stage while they’re on there and blow it up,’” the source said.

    Raw Story (http://s.tt/1A4eI)

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/21/whistleblower-fired-for-revealing-cops-threatened-obama-while-protecting-him/

    ReplyDelete
  15. SHARON11:34 AM

    Not to belabor the point....but people need to remember how the GOP won so many state elections in 2010. They all campaigned on JOBS, JOBS, JOBS...all of them. Even now the congress still yells it is all about jobs. When elected, what did they all do? Abortion, voter suppression, union busting, education cuts, lower taxes on the rich, planned parenthood, cut unemployment, repeal Obamacare 34X, rename PO's..the list goes on. I hope the Dems hit rewind on their campaign promises in 2014..

    What is the news on the Post Office? One of the biggest disgraces in Congress, besides...well everything else they didnt do.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous1:45 PM

    Off topic but of interest to some.

    C-Span is having a special on First Lady's -- their influence and image.

    http://firstladies.c-span.org/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous1:49 PM

    Sorry, I take that back. It's a whole series, not just one show. Michelle Obama won't be featured until next year.

    Still, let's here it for the women behind the men, many, I'm sure were the reason the guys got into the White House in the first place!

    http://firstladies.c-span.org/

    Season Two:
    September 2013 - February 2014
    Edith Roosevelt to Michelle Obama

    ReplyDelete
  18. I just have to say..."I LOVE THAT GUY at the top of this page!!!!"
    Sorry Gryphen...I didn't read the whole article, nor the links (which I really do most of the time, promise), but I just LOVE that picture of President O! Classic! So awesome. And that purple tie!! It rocks! And I haven't liked purple since Donny Osmond and his socks. :-)
    Seriously..that picture is classic. It just makes me smile, especially knowing that he has our backs. The man truly cares.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.