Courtesy of Raw Story:
Tony Perkins, president of the anti-gay Christian group Family Research Council, revealed this week that his home and been destroyed in a flood “of near biblical proportions.”
During a Monday broadcast on Family Research Council radio, Perkins called in from Louisiana to explain that he and his family had escaped his flooded home in a canoe.
“This is a flood, I would have to say, of near biblical proportions,” the Christian lobbyist announced.
Perkins said that he and his family were new living off of “God’s provisions,” and had relocated to their RV, which had been spared.
Seriously? Noah gets an entire ark, and Perkins has to make due with a shitty little canoe?
Hardly seems fair.
You know the thing about this that is so irritating is that you KNOW if the Louisiana headquarters for LGBT rights was washed away in a flood that every half baked Christian televangelist in the country would be thrusting their Bibles into the air and declaring that this was proof positive that God wanted to stamp out homosexuality in the world.
But if the house belonging to one of the foremost anti-gay crusaders gets washed away in the flood, the response is "Well shit happens sometimes."
I swear if every religious leader in the country suddenly woke up with leprosy tomorrow they would call it a coincidence and turn the anti-gay rhetoric up to eleven.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label biblical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biblical. Show all posts
Friday, August 19, 2016
Friday, August 21, 2015
As expected Josh Duggar's wife "partially blames herself" for his infidelity.
Courtesy of the Daily Mail:
Anna Duggar partially blames herself for her husband Josh's admitted infidelity, it has emerged.
The 27-year-old - who shares four children with Josh - will likely 'on some level.... absorb some of the blame' for her spouse's cheating and addiction to online porn, a Duggar family insider says.
And she will 'no way' leave Josh for his actions - which the 19 Kids and Counting star confessed to after he was named as one of the 37million spouses to allegedly have Ashley Madison accounts.
'Anna will not leave him. As with her in-laws, she is turning more to her faith than ever,' the insider told PEOPLE Magazine. 'She is fully and permanently committed to her marriage and children.
Can't say this surprises me. These women are trained to believe that everything is ultimately their fault, and that all they need is more faith to overcome it.
In fact Josh's mother even has a tip to keep marriages happy. Always offer up your body even if you are tired or sick. After all isn't THAT all women are really good for?
If Anna has been adhering to her mother-in-law Michelle's top marriage tip, she will have said 'yes' to sex whenever her husband has wished to have it - regardless of how tired she may have been.
'Be available. Anyone can fix him lunch, but only one person can meet that physical need of love that he has,' Michelle, 49, told TODAY Moms in an interview last year, citing a friend's advice.
'You always need to be available when he calls.'
You know I'm not gonna lie, the idea of my wife ALWAYS being in the mood when I want sex sounds pretty good to me.
However as a human being the idea that she would force herself to do it just to keep me happy is a little repugnant.
I am not a rapist, so if my partner feels pressured or coerced into providing intimacy, that makes me uncomfortable, and it is ultimately not at all sexy.
One has to wonder if Anna also feels partially responsible for Josh sexually abusing his sisters? Or is that simply THEIR fault for being females while in his presence?
Let's face it this guy has quite a number of problems as it pertains to sex, and those certainly did not start with his marriage.
Anna Duggar partially blames herself for her husband Josh's admitted infidelity, it has emerged.
The 27-year-old - who shares four children with Josh - will likely 'on some level.... absorb some of the blame' for her spouse's cheating and addiction to online porn, a Duggar family insider says.
And she will 'no way' leave Josh for his actions - which the 19 Kids and Counting star confessed to after he was named as one of the 37million spouses to allegedly have Ashley Madison accounts.
'Anna will not leave him. As with her in-laws, she is turning more to her faith than ever,' the insider told PEOPLE Magazine. 'She is fully and permanently committed to her marriage and children.
Can't say this surprises me. These women are trained to believe that everything is ultimately their fault, and that all they need is more faith to overcome it.
In fact Josh's mother even has a tip to keep marriages happy. Always offer up your body even if you are tired or sick. After all isn't THAT all women are really good for?
If Anna has been adhering to her mother-in-law Michelle's top marriage tip, she will have said 'yes' to sex whenever her husband has wished to have it - regardless of how tired she may have been.
'Be available. Anyone can fix him lunch, but only one person can meet that physical need of love that he has,' Michelle, 49, told TODAY Moms in an interview last year, citing a friend's advice.
'You always need to be available when he calls.'
You know I'm not gonna lie, the idea of my wife ALWAYS being in the mood when I want sex sounds pretty good to me.
However as a human being the idea that she would force herself to do it just to keep me happy is a little repugnant.
I am not a rapist, so if my partner feels pressured or coerced into providing intimacy, that makes me uncomfortable, and it is ultimately not at all sexy.
One has to wonder if Anna also feels partially responsible for Josh sexually abusing his sisters? Or is that simply THEIR fault for being females while in his presence?
Let's face it this guy has quite a number of problems as it pertains to sex, and those certainly did not start with his marriage.
Labels:
biblical,
cheating,
Christians,
hacked,
infidelity,
Josh Duggar,
marriage,
religious,
The Duggars,
website
Saturday, November 09, 2013
Rachel Maddow's chilling report about George W. Bush and his world ending, Rapture ready, foreign policies. If you have not seen this, you must take the time to listen now.
"It wasn't just an accident that we were almost bringing about the end of the world, that was the point."
I started this blog in November of 2004. And I started it right after George W. Bush beat John Kerry to start his second term.
In fact it is that victory which is the only reason that you are reading these words today.
Somebody had to speak out.
They had to speak out about politics, and religion, and more importantly religion's impact on our politics.
They had to talk about those subject that are always considered taboo in polite get-togethers, family holidays, and conversations with coworkers.
What Rachel is reporting is not new information to me, that was what I was blogging about way back during the Bush administration. I typed until my fingers bled, but it seemed to make little difference.
Until that is 2008 rolled around.
But we are by no means out of the woods yet.
There is a reason that you will rarely see me talk about Astrology, Scientology, Shintoism, Hinduism, or any number of other beliefs which I find ridiculous and potentially damaging. And that is because they do not present the kind of threat that fundamentalism in Christianity and Islam do to this country.
Currently these two, and to be honest mostly Christianity, are to blame for most of the problems we are dealing with right now with public policy toward education, women's health, terrorism, LGBT rights, foreign relations, and numerous others which may or may not seem directly tied to religion.
Like I have said before I do not care if you carry a rabbit's foot for good luck on your key chain, check your horoscope every morning before deciding whether to go into work or not, or if you drop to your knees in prayer when you are confused about what choice to make next. None of those are any of my business, until you force them into the public forum and use them to make public policy, or attempt to force those beliefs onto our childen.
THEN it is our business. And it is especially our business if you use superstitious nonsense as a factor when deciding when or where to wage war, who does or does not deserve to live, or whether the planet will be around long enough for us to worry about a little thing like man made climate change.
I started this blog in November of 2004. And I started it right after George W. Bush beat John Kerry to start his second term.
In fact it is that victory which is the only reason that you are reading these words today.
Somebody had to speak out.
They had to speak out about politics, and religion, and more importantly religion's impact on our politics.
They had to talk about those subject that are always considered taboo in polite get-togethers, family holidays, and conversations with coworkers.
What Rachel is reporting is not new information to me, that was what I was blogging about way back during the Bush administration. I typed until my fingers bled, but it seemed to make little difference.
Until that is 2008 rolled around.
But we are by no means out of the woods yet.
There is a reason that you will rarely see me talk about Astrology, Scientology, Shintoism, Hinduism, or any number of other beliefs which I find ridiculous and potentially damaging. And that is because they do not present the kind of threat that fundamentalism in Christianity and Islam do to this country.
Currently these two, and to be honest mostly Christianity, are to blame for most of the problems we are dealing with right now with public policy toward education, women's health, terrorism, LGBT rights, foreign relations, and numerous others which may or may not seem directly tied to religion.
Like I have said before I do not care if you carry a rabbit's foot for good luck on your key chain, check your horoscope every morning before deciding whether to go into work or not, or if you drop to your knees in prayer when you are confused about what choice to make next. None of those are any of my business, until you force them into the public forum and use them to make public policy, or attempt to force those beliefs onto our childen.
THEN it is our business. And it is especially our business if you use superstitious nonsense as a factor when deciding when or where to wage war, who does or does not deserve to live, or whether the planet will be around long enough for us to worry about a little thing like man made climate change.
Labels:
biblical,
blogging,
Christianity,
End Times,
George W. Bush,
Iran,
Iraq war,
Islam,
Israel,
jews,
MSNBC,
prophesy,
Rachel Maddow,
Rapture
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Fox News now ADORES Vladimir Putin and suggests that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. No, I'm NOT making that up!. Update!
![]() |
"Okay so this time I'm bad cop and you're good cop. Deal." |
The fact is Obama seemed headed for an attack on Syria that no one wanted and few thought would succeed. Most thought it would only end in disaster, either with the U.S. drawn into an attack/retaliation cycle of escalation that could go on for years and spread into a regional war, or result in the overthrow of President Assad by an Al Qaeda affiliated rebels.
While the Russians may have toyed with the idea of letting American get bogged down in yet another losing Middle East war, they didn’t want to risk a war that might pull them in, or lose control of the Assad government to radical Sunni jihadists.
So Putin stepped in and threw Obama a lifeline.
For a few hours it seemed Obama might not grab at it.
But he has, and will no doubt claim full credit for it being his idea all along.
The Washington press corps will no doubt believe him, as usual, and lavish their usual praise.
But the world knows that Vladimir Putin is the one who really deserves that Nobel Peace Prize.
It turns out that leading from behind left a big opening up front. Putin stepped right in. And Obama still hasn't figured it out.
Okay the "fact" is that anybody who believes that is is REALLY how things went down is a retard. Or a Fox News pundit. Assuming there is a difference.
Here is how the Daily Banter summed up the attempts to give ANYBODY but the President credit for this Syria/Russia solution:
Of course the truth about how the Obama administration’s national security team has handled the Syrian chemical weapons crisis was almost entirely obscured in the press when it was reported that Russian president Vladimir Putin, via his foreign minister Sergey Larov, had, at least on paper, convinced Bashar al-Assad to permit the dismantling and seizing of his military’s chemical weapons arsenal. In keeping with nearly every accomplishment of this president, whether center-right or center-left, liberal or conservative, the news was treated as somehow a loss for the administration — that Pooty-Poot had reared his head into the airspace over Syria and fulfilled the conservative fantasy of Putin The Peacemaker, not to mention Putin The Obama Disser.
This scenario entirely overlooked two things: 1) the Friday G20 meeting between Putin and the president, and 2) Secretary Kerry’s remarks on Sunday, which offered Syria a way out.
Naturally any enemy, much less one with a gun to its head, isn’t going to directly accept the demands of an aggressor while under duress. The enemy, of course, wants to be able to save face. So it’s entirely likely that Putin served as a facilitator, knowing that he and his mighty pectorals would carry some heft with the Syrian government without any direct linkage to the U.S.
Here was Forbes take on what actually took place behind the scenes:
And if you think that it was only a “discussion” President Barack Obama had with Russian President Vladimir Putin on September 6, you’ve missed one of the greatest “stealth negotiations” ever conducted.
You know it no longer seems that the President is playing chess while everybody else plays checkers. It now seems like he is playing chess while everybody else adds to their booger collection.
By the way Fox News is also the "news" outlet that recently suggested that the war in Syria might be the fulfillment of Biblical prophesy.
Yeah, I am certainly going to accept THEIR interpretation of what is happening over everybody else's.
Idiots!
Update: I think it is appropriate to provide this link to Putin's New York Times op-ed.
Let's see Fox News talk about giving him the Nobel Peace Prize now!
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Probably NOT the person with whom you want to discuss religion.
![]() |
Wait I can go to hell for drinking? What about that whole "water into wine" thing? Dammit, Jesus is SUCH a bad influence! |
Usually people like this try to keep the crazy on the inside.
Only driven on Sunday's. Of course it was driven OVER any atheists or Muslims standing too close to the curb.
(That's all I've got. Your turn!)
Labels:
automobiles,
batshit crazy,
biblical,
holy shit,
Jesus,
religion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)