Bristol Palin thinks it would be disrespectful to show her boobs in public. As a member of the public I agree.

Okay so ostensibly this post is about women breast feeding in public.

Which Bristol and her ghostwriter may or may not support. (Kind of hard to tell from the psycho babble on the blog post.)

However for some reason Bristol/Bristol's ghostwriter decides to add this: 

Personally, I am so anti-breastfeeding in public. I just wouldn’t ever want anyone to see my breasts! There are plenty of ways to cover, and I feel it would be disrespectful to my husband.

Now I assume that this was included as a little tease for the men out there who, for whatever reason, still think there is some part of Bristol's anatomy that is not all used up.

After all thinly veiled sexual innuendo is kind of a family tradition.

But here's the thing.

Among the many, many pictures that I have been sent over the years from people who hate the Palins  is at least one quite revealing picture of Bristol, and TRUST me nobody is going to be clamoring to see her boobs.

And as we know she never really was that into breastfeeding, except as a way of manipulating men.

Besides if you want to see Palin boobs here is a picture of a whole bunch of them standing in a kitchen.

For the record breastfeeding is both normal and natural and anybody who would shame a woman for doing so in public needs to reach down the back of their pants and yank that stick right out of their ass.

(P.S. Don't bother asking about those pictures of Bristol, I should never have received them and I have no intention of ever sharing them.)

Revisiting Bristol Palin's attempts to bully Dakota Meyer with her boobs. Update!

So yesterday I posted that Daily Mail story featuring texts between Bristol and Dakota, as well the information that Bristol is essentially using breastfeeding to manipulate Meyer's visitation rights.

To say that I received a lot of angry e-mails and instant messages from people in Wasilla who know FOR A FACT that Bristol is full of crap would be an understatement.

I was also reminded that we already have the evidence that she is lying to Meyer in our possession.

For instance there is this picture of Bristol and Piper coming out of a restaurant with both people food, and a baby bottle.

Okay well maybe this is how Piper carries her booze. But I sort of doubt it.

And then of course there was this from only days after Sailor's supposed birth.

Now one of my sharp eyed visitors mentioned that this bottle looks suspiciously like this product.

Which are actually prepared bottles of newborn formula that Bristol would only need to pop in Sailor's mouth without having to measure and prepare it herself.

And in case that was not evidence enough that Bristol is full of crap, there is also this from her Facebook page.

In case she deletes this post, it says: SPRING CLEANING! Just donated most of Sailor's newborn clothes, diapers, formula and maternity clothes to our nearest Pregnancy Center. Don't forget options like this when you want to donate gently used items

So the question is just how much newborn formula must she have that she wants to give it away, and if Sailor was only born in December then isn't she STILL considered a newborn?

Oh and for those who are inevitably going to suggest that somebody needs to contact Dakota with this information, just know that he has already been contacted. What he does with it is entirely up to him.

Update: Well look which blind item was just revealed:  

January 11, 2016 

This former A list celebrity who took a turn through several forms of reality television before heading back to her hometown and her celebrity family is worried. Apparently she is so worried that her family has been trying to reach a settlement that would keep her former lover from taking a paternity test. 

Bristol Palin

So raise your hands if you did not see this coming.

Of course all this does is raise more questions than it answers.

Chick-fil-A does not welcome homosexuals nor do they welcome heterosexual boobs. Gee, what's left?

Courtesy of WKRN-TV:  

A mom at a Knoxville Chick-fil-A was criticized last week for breastfeeding her five-month-old daughter in the restaurant's play area. 

Jennifer Day was not using a cover and an employee approached her after several customers complained. 

"An employee came up to me and told me some of the other parents were afraid of allowing their kids to play in the play area while I was feeding her, especially without any cover," she told Knoxville TV station WBIR. 

Day said she did not use a cover because her daughter does not like it and would've ripped it off. 

It should be noted that the breastfeeding law in Tennessee reads as follows:

68-58-101. Right to breastfeed in any location. — A mother has a right to breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where the mother and child are otherwise authorized to be present.

§68-58-102. The act of breastfeeding shall not be considered: 

(1) Public indecency as defined in §39-13-511; or 
(2) Nudity, obscene, or sexual conduct as defined in §39-17-901. §68-58-103.

Whoopsie!

Not only that but it looks as if this Tennessee Chick-fil-A may soon have even more boobs to contend with then just the ones working there.

According to WBIR, several of Day's friends are planning a "nurse in" in response to what happened. Similar to a sit in, they plan to revisit the Chick-fil-A as a group on Wednesday evening and nurse their infants together.

I have to wonder if the same people who complained about seeing a breast at Chick-fil-A are the same ones who go to Hooters for lunch? I bet they are!

Personally I would think it more acceptable to have one breast exposed to feed a baby then to have two silicone injected ones exposed in order to earn tips. But hey, that's just me.

You know I have another question. If Chick-fil-A is so focused on keeping offensive boobs out of their stores, how did these two get served?

SNL takes on the Time Magazine breastfeeding mom.

Nicely done.

I had actually started to write a post about this earlier in the week when the cover was first revealed but, like many men, I found myself really intimidated by the subject.

My first instinct then I saw this cover was that this mother was really screwing her child up.

But then I thought that I had no right to tell this woman how to raise her child. After all there are MANY ways that parents mess up their kids and at least this one is being well fed.

As I have already shared with all of you I have spent much of my life working with women, so I have had plenty of time to get used to being around breastfeeding. But oddly enough I have NEVER become completely comfortable.

I remember one incident when I was coaching gymnastics, and was teaching a class of four year old children that were brought to the gym by their mommies who carpooled together.

After the class I walked up to the group of mostly young moms to talk about their children's progress, and one of the younger, more attractive mothers engaged me in a one on one conversation. Part way through the conversation the shawl that she had draped over her shoulders and bosom fell away to reveal a nursing baby that for some reason I had not known was there at first.

The sight literally stopped me in mid sentence and I my eyes were suddenly riveted to her now revealed breast and the child attached.  I was completely embarrassed and realized that I was openly staring at this woman's naked bosom and had to turn my entire body in order to tear my now fixated eyes away.

In my mind all I could think of was that I had sexually objectified this woman and I immediately needed to apologize, However before I could, I was met with howls of laughter from the mothers who started to tease me for my discomfort. When I turned back to face the group, with my face now an unmistakeable scarlet color, they only laughed harder, with the breastfeeding mom saying, "It's just a boob Jesse. No need to be embarrassed. Surely YOU have seen a naked boob before."

Well of course I had seen many, but I certainly did not expect to see hers, and I certainly not expected it to make an appearance during a conversation about gymnastics.

After that when I walked by this group of ladies they would tease me by calling out that it was safe to come over and talk to them because "we have our breasts in storage."

The point of course is that even though breastfeeding is possibly the MOST natural thing in the world, it can STILL cause controversy and make otherwise perfectly progressive people uncomfortable, at least momentarily.

Which of course was my initial reaction to this Time magazine cover. And the fact that it was a four year old boy just made that discomfort all the worse.

 So I have shared my conflicted opinions on this topic, what are yours?

(BTW, apparently this woman has now had to deal with threats for appearing on the the cover.)

Sarah Palin shares her love of breastfeeding. Just not with Trig.

Here is a remark found in an e-mail dated March 11, 2008, from Debi Ballam, a nurse at Bartlett Regional Hospital:

Dear Govenor Palin,

Last year at the Juneau Health Fair , some nurses from Bartlett Beginnings at Bartlett Regional Hospital had a breastfeeding promotion table . We asked participants to share their thoughts about breastfeeding . You wrote , "I learned with 4 kids, the longer length of breastfeeding , the better . First baby 3 mon , Second baby 6 mon, 3rd baby 18 months, 4th baby 3 years."

We are making a PowerPoint slide show of many of comments , and want to include yours. We would like to quote you . i.e. add your name to your quote. Can we do that ? Many other quotes were wonderful too, but of course coming from the govenor , yours would be very powerful , and a great role model . Please consider letting as add your name to the PowerPoint slide.

Okay maybe I am not very up to date on what is considered the appropriate time to breast feed a child these days, but isn't three years a little long?  No wonder Piper never leaves her side, bonding is one thing but come on!

And if Palin really felt that breastfeeding for three years was appropriate then how do we explain this.

I know what you are going to say, "But Gryphen they COULD be feeding Trig breast milk that Palin used a breast pump to express herself!"

Really?  Does THIS look like a woman who was at that time breastfeeding a five month old infant?

What is that you are saying now? "But Gryphen there are other pictures of her taken on the campaign trail where her breasts look much fuller."

You are right, there are indeed.  But we already know that Palin has the ability to make her smaller breasts appear large any time she chooses.

But what is almost impossible to do is to make breasts that are in the process of breastfeeding a baby appear smaller. Even Harry Houdini would have trouble pulling off THAT trick.

So clearly Sarah Palin was NOT breastfeeding little Trig during his infancy.

But why not?

Did she not care about him as much as she did her other children?

Was she just too busy as a VP candidate to take the time?

Or is it that she simply did NOT have any milk to provide, since she had not recently given birth?

Ladies, I await your input.