Courtesy of Ohio's ABC News Channel 5:
A sexually-explicit novel written by a North Canton Hoover High School English teacher is raising eyebrows throughout the district.
Superintendent Michael Hartenstein said Carol Ann Eastman, hired by the district in 2006, admitted to writing the fictional book, "Schooled." However, she used the pen name, "Deena Bright."
The story revolves around a teacher getting revenge on her cheating husband by having sexual encounters with former students. Several of the passages contain raunchy details.
Oh, I get it. The book has that "sex" stuff in it.
Well no wonder she got in trouble, after all teacher's are only supposed to teach, not be actual human beings that think about or indulge in basic human behaviors.
Besides maybe she was writing about actual real life people and experiences?
On the dedication page, Eastman wrote, "This work is a work of fiction, fabricated in the author's mind. Names, characters, places, and events are either products of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual occurrences or people, living or dead, is purely coincidental."
Oh. Well it's still icky, right?
Or is it?
You know it just so happens that I have worked with a number of teachers, and guess what? I think some of them just MIGHT have been having sex. And, gasp, some of them were not even married!
Shocking I know!
And don't think I am simply imagining things. There were a couple of teachers that got pregnant, and though it has been years since I had a biology class, I think there just might be a correlation between sex and pregnancy. OMGD!
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label naughty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label naughty. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Sean Hannity airs snippet of upcoming Sarah Palin theatrical campaign commercial. This has "Lackluster" written all over it!
Courtesy of Media Matters:
Wow! That was...that was...wow, what the hell was that?
Fox News is trying to pimp this movie as this great opus that will resurrect Palin's hemorrhaging political career, and the only part they can get their hands on is about a legal argument with Exxon over oil lease agreements? If the whole film is like that they better spike the popcorn with amphetamines just to keep everybody conscious.
But I do have to say it was nice to see that they were able to drag Meg Stapleton back in front of the camera to help sell Palin to the masses yet again.
God how I have missed you Meg! You always know EXACTLY what to say to provide damage control for your erratic self destructive ex-boss. Such as in this quote from the ADN yesterday.
"I don't know where Sarah's mind is; I don't think anyone knows that," said Meg Stapleton.
(And hey folks, don't forget that Meg was a paid spokesperson for the Palin administration AND a journalist, so you can bet she knows what she is talking about!)
However a movie with a boring subject, and less than enthusiastic participants, may in fact be a moot point, as apparently theater owners in Iowa (The place where the filmmakers hope to premiere this steaming pile of cinema.), are not exactly enthused with the idea of showing it in the first place.
“Typical political movies don’t do two cents at the box office,” said Brian Fridley, a co-owner of R.L Fridley Theatres Inc., which has 22 locations and 89 screens in Iowa. “No one cares but the Kool-Aid drinkers, whether they’re on the right or the left.”
Denise Mahon, owner of the Varsity Theatre near Drake University in Des Moines, said no one has approached her about running the picture, and she has little interest in it. But out of curiosity, Mahon called her New York distributor today to try to track down details about where in Iowa the film will debut.
Fridley, who described himself as an independent-thinking Republican, said he hasn’t been asked to carry the film — and won’t unless film tracking surveys show it would be popular. “We give films priority as to what’s going to do business at the box office and what are good films we’d like the public to see that may have been looked over,” Fridley said.
Fridley said he personally finds Palin “annoying.”
“Why would you do a movie? Are you going to judge your candidacy on whether people want to see the movie or not?” he said. “I think she really shot herself in the foot when she couldn’t put up with the pressure as governor. How is she going to be as president? If she’s under pressure, is she just going to resign?”
Oooh, that has to hurt!
Not that I want to help Palin in anyway (Trust me, not in ANYWAY at all!), but I think these theatre owners are not visualizing the possibilities.
Just imagine marketing this movie as a midnight cult classic, in the tradition of 'The Rocky Horror Picture Show."
They could invite people to dress up like Palin in fake designer glasses, red Naughty Monkey Double Dare Pumps, and their very own strap on pregnancy belly!
They could even sell Red Bull and Atkins protein bars in the concession stands, and encourage audience participation.
For instance every time Palin says something stupid the audience could yell out "Ya Betcha!" Or every time Todd shows up on screen calling out "Have you SEEN Todd?" Or even having the film stop halfway through, which elicits an "I Quit!" from the audience, as they then stomp out of the theatre to the sound of geese honking in the background.
Hell, even I would go to see that!
After all EVERYBODY knows this campaign commercial masquerading as mainstream film will be nothing more than a joke, so why not be in on the joke rather than the butt of the joke?
Labels:
Alaska,
Iowa,
Meg Stapleton,
movies,
naughty,
pregnancy,
Sarah Palin
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Remember how confused we all were that New York Congressman Chris Lee resigned after some relatively tame shirtless photographs of him turned up on Craiglist? Well guess what!
From Gawker:
Lee's sudden exit took many people by surprise. Hadn't other members of Congress admitted to worse than an unconsummated, PG-13 flirtation and managed to stay in office? It turns out Lee may have had good reason to step out of the spotlight so quickly: It wasn't just women that the Craigslist Congressman was hunting for on the Internet.
In the past two weeks, two D.C.-area transgender women contacted us, each with a separate story about exchanging emails with the ex-congressman. One sent us an ad that Lee allegedly posted on Craigslist in search of trans women; the other sent us a never-before-seen photo that she says Lee sent her after they started chatting by email. Taken together, they present a possible explanation to those who have wondered why such a tame "sex scandal" forced Lee's hand so quickly.
Wow! Counting David Vitter's penchant for prostitution in Louisiana, Ted Haggard's totally "non-gay" gay sex and methamphetamine use with a male prostitute in Colorado, Senator Larry Craig's "wide stance" concerning male on male bathroom sex in airports, and Todd Palin's luring of impressionable young women into prostitution in Alaska, I would say when it comes to sex scandals and hypocrisy the conservative males have their more liberal counterparts beat by mile. And I was not even counting the $2,000 the RNC spent at an S&M club last year.
So clearly the Conservatives preaching "family values" is akin to Charlie Sheen preaching about the perils of drugs and alcohol or Bristol Palin talking about abstinence. Oh wait, that last one actually happened.
Lee's sudden exit took many people by surprise. Hadn't other members of Congress admitted to worse than an unconsummated, PG-13 flirtation and managed to stay in office? It turns out Lee may have had good reason to step out of the spotlight so quickly: It wasn't just women that the Craigslist Congressman was hunting for on the Internet.
In the past two weeks, two D.C.-area transgender women contacted us, each with a separate story about exchanging emails with the ex-congressman. One sent us an ad that Lee allegedly posted on Craigslist in search of trans women; the other sent us a never-before-seen photo that she says Lee sent her after they started chatting by email. Taken together, they present a possible explanation to those who have wondered why such a tame "sex scandal" forced Lee's hand so quickly.
Wow! Counting David Vitter's penchant for prostitution in Louisiana, Ted Haggard's totally "non-gay" gay sex and methamphetamine use with a male prostitute in Colorado, Senator Larry Craig's "wide stance" concerning male on male bathroom sex in airports, and Todd Palin's luring of impressionable young women into prostitution in Alaska, I would say when it comes to sex scandals and hypocrisy the conservative males have their more liberal counterparts beat by mile. And I was not even counting the $2,000 the RNC spent at an S&M club last year.
So clearly the Conservatives preaching "family values" is akin to Charlie Sheen preaching about the perils of drugs and alcohol or Bristol Palin talking about abstinence. Oh wait, that last one actually happened.
Labels:
Craigslist,
hypocrisy,
naughty,
Republicans,
sex,
sex scandal
Friday, January 21, 2011
Sarah Palin's much anticipated Twitter response to her husband's sex scandal.
After an entire day of waiting for Sister Sarah to finally respond to the embarrassing allegations that her husband has been dipping his Wasilla wick into the honeypot of a woman convicted of "maintaining a place of prostitution."
This is what Sarah Palin tweeted seven hours ago.
Uh.....Well clearly she is.....uh.....perhaps she felt that.....uh....oh hell I have no idea!
The Palins, who have previously been dogged by cheating allegations in 2008 and 2009 and have vehemently denied each and every accusation, though they have not commented on the Enquirer story.
Well THAT is a very salient point. The Palins have NOT responded, and usually you cannot shut them up!
Unless of course that last tweet was some kind of visual haiku that we simply have not deciphered yet. What do you think?
P.S. If you check you will notice that Sarah has removed this last tweet. Perhaps SHE did not know what she was trying to say either.
This is what Sarah Palin tweeted seven hours ago.
Here is a better look at the photo in case you think there might be a clue in there as to what in the hell this is supposed to represent.
However you would think she would have said SOMETHING by now.
And on that topic the New York Daily News made an interesting observation:
Well THAT is a very salient point. The Palins have NOT responded, and usually you cannot shut them up!
Unless of course that last tweet was some kind of visual haiku that we simply have not deciphered yet. What do you think?
P.S. If you check you will notice that Sarah has removed this last tweet. Perhaps SHE did not know what she was trying to say either.
Labels:
Alaska,
hanky panky,
naughty,
Prostitution,
Sarah Palin,
snowmachines,
Todd Palin,
Twitter,
Wasilla,
WTF
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)