Courtesy of Washington Examiner:
For Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, enough was enough.
The Senate's top Republican had watched a Tea Party-driven government shutdown sink the GOP's already-weak brand and jeopardize McConnell's own chances of ever becoming majority leader. The solution, he concluded, was that the party's so-called Establishment had to start fighting back against its most conservative wing.
McConnell, an ardent Obamacare opponent, and other Republican pragmatists in Congress, supported the conservatives' mission to defund Obamacare during budget negotiations, which led to the 16-day shutdown. But the pragmatists also accepted that their odds of success were virtually nil. Democrats ruled the Senate and White House, those lawmakers argued, and Obama was never going to allow his signature legislative achievement to be scrapped just because the political opposition demanded it.
Yet, Republicans who wanted to avoid a shutdown watched it happen anyway. Tea Party-aligned Republicans, backed by outside groups that threatened any GOP lawmakers who didn't go along, had prevailed despite the widespread concern that such a shutdown would be politically disastrous for the party.
Dismayed Establishment Republicans, frustrated again by an increasingly influential community of conservative insurgents, reasserted themselves in the wake of the shutdown and demonstrated a new resolve to fight back -- something they were once reluctant to do.
“There were people who were basically afraid of [conservatives], frankly,” McConnell told the Washington Examiner. “It’s time for people to stand up to this sort of thing.”
McConnell worries that the Senate Conservatives Fund and other insurgent groups are pursuing a confrontational, uncompromising strategy that makes it impossible for conservatives to govern.
“The Senate Conservatives Fund is giving conservatism a bad name. They’re participating in ruining the [Republican] brand,” McConnell said. “What they do is mislead their donors into believing the reason that we can’t get as good an outcome as we’d like to get is not because of a Democratic Senate and a Democratic president, but because Republicans are insufficiently committed to the cause — which is utter nonsense.”
"Utter nonsense." That is essentially a slap in the face of Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Sarah Palin, who believe that REAL conservatives, ie conservatives who refuse to work with the Democrats, could kill Obamacare and repair the reputation of the Republican party if only the establishment Republicans would get out of the damn way.
The truth of course is that while Mitch McConell is one of the sleaziest opportunists in the Senate, he is a sleazy opportunist who understands how politics works, and that the politician who compromises today lives to fight again, while the ideologues may burn much brighter but eventually flame out in the end. (Joe McCarthy anyone?)
The only question remaining is will the fall of the Teabagger movement happen before, or after, they oust Mitch McConnell from his position as the perennial GOP candidate from Kentucky, and allow his seat to be taken by the Democrats?
Well regardless of what happens all I know is that it will be a hell of a lot of fun to watch the establishment Republicans fighting it out with the Tea Party Libertarians/Republicans.
They have no one else to blame but themselves for not leashing and muzzling the crazies back when it would have a lot easier. There is a time in the life of every problem when it is big enough to see and small enough to solve.
ReplyDeleteThe Rise Of Obamacare McCarthyism
ReplyDeleteWhen House Republicans unveiled a proposal in the fall aimed at avoiding a dead-end government shutdown over Obamacare, the conservative backlash was swift and brutal: they called it a surrender, a betrayal, an appeasement of the health care law they all abhor.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) decried it as "procedural chicanery" that would make House Republicans "complicit in the disaster that is Obamacare," should they go along with it. FreedomWorks called it a "bait and switch to give the Senate a hall pass to fund Obamacare" and accused House GOP leaders of wanting to "cave and run."
Since then the phenomenon has grown and taken hold in the 2014 primaries as Republicans accuse their opponents of privately harboring sympathies for Obamacare.
"I've not seen anything like this before," said Norm Ornstein, a congressional scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "It is just such an interesting phenomenon -- call it anthropological or sociological or pathological. An obsessive hatred with all things Obamacare that has infected everybody on the Republican side. They can't say anything positive about any element of a law that is based on their own fundamental ideas. It means that when anybody says something that could in any way be construed as positive regarding Obamacare it becomes fodder for attacks. ... Conservatives are eating their own."
Read more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obamacare-mccarthyism
OMG, it's STUNNING how much Cruz resembles McCarthy! Two sickos, that's for sure!
DeleteMethinks someone is just a wee bit skeered of losing his seat in '14.
ReplyDeleteAs Healthcare.gov Bugs Are Fixed, the ‘Obama’s Katrina’ Script Continues To Be Shredded
ReplyDeleteAs Healthcare.gov Bugs Are Fixed, the ‘Obama’s Katrina’ Script Continues To Be Shredded
Bob Cesca on December 02, 2013
731 Views
obamacare_signing_obama
It’s been 11 days since The National Journal‘s Ron Fournier wrote that Obamacare is President Obama’s Katrina. Oh, and it’s also his Iraq, Fournier wrote. Obama’s Katrina and Iraq. Both.
Since then, however, the Healthcare.gov website has been vastly improved and many of the bugs initially reported have been fixed, according to the administration late Sunday.
Back on November 20, Fournier made sure to provide himself with an escape hatch, though, noting that Healthcare.gov isn’t the same in terms of the actual events during and after Katrina, or throughout the Iraq War. Instead, Fournier wrote, the similarities had more to do with incompetence in the execution of a major policy initiative.
Yeah, so incompetence that lasted literally for years in both Iraq and New Orleans, leading to massive body counts on both fronts, is the same as a glitchy website launch. Okeedokee. Roger that. In reality, yes, both administrations made mistakes, but those mistakes were vastly different in terms of magnitude — not to mention that the Bush administration’s response to its mistakes was to, well, make even more mistakes. Again, for years.
On the other hand, the Obama administration realized there were problems with the website and rushed to address those errors. Within two months most of those problems have been resolved, and, bonus, no one died.
Now, you might respond by noting that fixing a war and a botched reaction to a hurricane are each phenomenally different from responding to a website that crashes a lot. War and hurricanes are, you know, hard to fix. A website isn’t.
Exactly. Another reason why there’s no similarity between Katrina/Iraq and Healthcare.gov.
The only thing that binds these events is the traditional news media’s obvious loyalty to The Script. It’s a systemic deception that rivals any other news media fraud, and it goes like this: presidential administrations, as well as political events in general, will always follow the same pattern, as if read from a script or playbook. It’s a cheap way for writers like Ron Fournier or Dana Milbank or Bob Woodward to seem more omniscient than they really are. And it’s a big lie.
Here’s what many players in the news media think:
http://thedailybanter.com/2013/12/as-healthcare-gov-bugs-are-fixed-the-obamas-katrina-script-continues-to-be-shredded/
Benghazification Begins
ReplyDeleteHealthcare.gov is much better. It’s not running like, say, Amazon — but remember, mainly the government is trying to give you money, namely subsidized insurance, rather than to sell you something, so it doesn’t have to match commercial performance right away. There are still serious problems with the back end — the delivery of information to insurers. But the site is no longer a laughingstock, it’s going to get better, and a lot of people are going to sign up by the time open enrollment ends on March 31.
In short, the crisis is over — for Obama and the Democrats. It’s just beginning for the Republicans, who won’t be able to let go of the notion that it’s a criminal scandal, and that mobs with pitchforks will march on the White House if only they can find the right words.
They’ll try everything. They’ll hold endless hearings; they’ll get the usual suspects to publish many op-eds. Maybe they’ll get 60 Minutes to do a report that has to be retracted.
And yes, maybe they’ll gain some seats in the midterms, although those are a long way away.
But health reform is, almost surely, over the hump.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/benghazification-begins/?_r=0
BENGHAZI!!!
DeleteI will enjoy watching the various Repub factions try to destroy each other, severely damaging the GOP in the process. When the GOP is in shambles, and I believe it is headed that way, the right wing and even fewer moderates will point their fingers of blame at each other for their party's downfall.
ReplyDeleteWe progressives must not rest, however, but work hard to ensure that another Democrat follows our wonderful President Obama for two terms.
+1
DeleteGOP’s massive 2013 mistake: How the party ignored its terminal illness
ReplyDeleteCelebrating Obamacare's troubles, Republicans finish the year ignoring lessons it was supposed to learn from 2012
...Still, it may turn out that the ACA troubles were a brilliant Democratic plot to distract Republicans from their demographic terminal illness, and convince them that the Kill Obamacare playbook is all they need for 2014. Republicans have made absolutely zero progress in reaching out to any of the demographic groups – women, young people or Latinos – that the RNC’s autopsy agreed they had to, in order to stay alive as their older white base ages into that great Tea Party rally in the sky.
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/01/the_gop_ignores_its_terminal_illness/
That's absolutely correct. I have 7 children, the youngest of whom turned 18 in time to vote in 2012.
DeleteALL of them voted Democratic because of their contempt they hold for the Republicans.
They're smart, too. They read a lot and pay attention to politics. So do their friends, all Democratic voters also.
THAT'S what the Republican party should be worried about. Very, very worried!---Julie
Why the Christian right is so excited about 2014
ReplyDeleteA change to obscure procedural rules in the Senate could present a rare opportunity to enshrine their dogma as law
...The Christian Right, which is the GOP’s most reliable and agitated voting bloc, is obsessed with the courts, and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit is the nation’s second most important judicial body, which is why Republicans “gave the game away when all but a few of them opposed Obama’s three most recent appointments.”
Now that Democrats were forced into limiting the filibuster, the Christian Right has its incentive to mobilize for 2014. A simple majority control of the Senate gives it an opportunity to pack the courts with judges straight out of the Justice Scalia mold, who once said that separation of church and state would come under scrutiny under a Supreme Court with a Scalia majority. If the Christian Right sweeps Republicans to control the Senate in next year’s midterms, the anti-secularists will take a big step forward toward their stated ideological goals.
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/30/christian_right_sees_2014_as_a_crucial_election_partner/
Birthers are trying to smear the Obama girls now. It's not enough that they go after the President. It's pretty disgusting.
ReplyDeletehttp://freakoutnation.com/2013/12/01/birthers-are-asking-about-malia-and-sasha-obamas-birth-certificates/
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/11/29/where-are-obamas-daughters-baby-pics-and-birth-records/
I so hope Kentucky does NOT reelect this asshole. He is the one that didn't want President Obama to serve another term and has done everything he can to bring him down. Obstruction, obstruction, obstruction.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I dislike McConnell, I dislike the Tea Party even more. I would love to see McConnell beaten in the Republican primaries, and the Tea Party candidate lose the election to a Democrat.
ReplyDeleteMcConnell has always appeared to me as the ultimate definition of a politician, willing to lie, and make promises he has no intention of keeping, and blame the Democrat's for any damage they created. The best thing for the Democrat's is to see to it that McConnell loses his re-election. But it's not just good for the Democrat's, but for the country at large to see that the organizer of the "Party of NO" loses his re-election.
The only difference between the two GOP factions is that they're owned by different billionaires.
ReplyDeleteDid he really say he wanted to punch himself in the tea-nuts?
ReplyDeleteAnon 11:30, did you read that fellowship of the minds website? That is about the scariest shit I've seen in a long time. Completely unhinged from reality, floating about on a current of hate for pretty much everybody, but especially the Obamas. Halfway through the comments they threw out the explanation that Sasha must have been purchased at an international slave auction in Saudi Arabia.
ReplyDeleteIt pains me to think that such ignorant, hateful people exist. They are even way past the deluded messes on C4P.
I wonder what awoke the Turtle from his serotonin enduced turkey slumber? Hey, Yertle, you lie down with fleas, you get up with teabaggers ruling the roost. He's running scared now that he realizes his cushy job may be in jeopardy, only because he embraced the tea party by his silence (up until now, that is).
ReplyDeleteWho are the "establishment Republicans"? And why have they remained silent for so long?