Monday, October 26, 2009

Get ready to RUUUMMMBBLE!!! Professor "Protect environment at all cost" Steiner vs President "Freedom of expression lipservice only" Hamilton.

If you listened to Shannyn's show on Saturday, or recently read the Anchorage Daily News, or visited almost any of the Alaska Progressive blogs then you know about this incredible miscarriage of justice.

Professor Rick Steiner, educator at the University of Alaska for 30 years, and giant pain in the ass of the oil companies, had his funding stripped because he pointed out that selling the integrity of the Alaska education system for thirty pieces of silver from the oil companies was wrong. In Alaska that is a little thing they call "heresy".

Of course as all Palin watchers well know the beginning of the end of Professor Steiner's career undoubtedly coincided with THIS little episode.

Rick Steiner, a University of Alaska professor, sought the e-mail messages of state scientists who had examined the effect of global warming on polar bears. (Ms. Palin said the scientists had found no ill effects, and she has sued the federal government to block the listing of the bears as endangered.) An administration official told Mr. Steiner that his request would cost $468,784 to process.

When Mr. Steiner finally obtained the e-mail messages — through a federal records request — he discovered that state scientists had in fact agreed that the bears were in danger, records show.

“Their secrecy is off the charts,” Mr. Steiner said.

That's right! Professor Steiner DARED to question the "truthiness" of Queen Ester of the North's declaration about Polar bears. HOW DARE HE!

Anyhow things pretty much went downhill form there.

But Professor Steiner is no shrinking violet. No he wants to debate the man who refused to stand up for his right to freedom of expression, University of Alaska President Gen. Mark Hamilton.

Here is Professor Rick Steiner's challenge to President Gen. Mark Hamilton. (Why does this guy have TWO titles?)

President Hamilton –

Given recent circumstances, I would like to invite you to debate with me, openly and publicly, re: the issue of academic freedom, and the influence of corporate donations to the university.
You have said many things in support of academic freedom over the years, but when push came to shove in my case, you made a decision in opposition to free speech.

In 2002, you received an award for your support of academic freedom from a group calling itself the “National Association of Scholars”, who it turns out, actually opposes sustainability movements on today’s college campuses. They say that sustainability is “deceptive, coercive, closed-minded, a pseudo-religion, distorts higher education, shrinks freedom, programs people, is anti-rational, by-passes faculty, and is wasteful.” This group apparently supports free speech only when they agree with what is spoken, and opposes it when they disagree with what is spoken. Apparently this is your position as well. That you chose to accept an award fro this group calls into serious question the progressive character of the University of Alaska.

All of this is an extremely serious transgression of the very role a university is supposed to fulfill in civil society.

I look forward to your reply, and to debating this issue publicly and honestly.

Sincerely, Rick Steiner, Professor

Oooh now there are some very articulate fighting words. But does Rick Steiner REALLY believe that President Hamilton will actually take him up on his offer? I mean that is pretty nai.........wait he said what? No kidding!

Here is the response that Professor Steiner received from Hamilton:

"Dr Steiner, you have peaked my interest. Mark"

Wow, it looks like the President might actually be open to debating Professor Steiner on this fascinating topic. Sounds like a popcorn eating occasion to me!

And it should be a good one. On one side you have a Professor who has spent 30 years using his vast intelligence to battle governments and corporations in order to protect the precious environment of planet earth, and on the other side you have a man with two titles who cannot use the word "piqued" in the proper context. Anybody want to take bets on the outcome?

By the way there is a remote possibility that President GENERAL Mark Hamilton will get a case of "frosty feet". We can help him avoid that by letting him know how much we are looking forward to his tour de force performance in the debate, by calling his office at (907) 450-8000, or dropping him a friendly e-mail at sypres@alaska.edu.

I don't know why people say that living in Alaska is boring, there is excitement around every corner!

15 comments:

  1. Should the debate occur, I would love to watch it but I am not from Alaska. Can it be put on You Tube? The Progressive Alaska Bloggers' issues and interests are what makes the state interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7:48 AM

    This is all very interesting. Quite a few years ago, when I was a student at the University of TX, Austin. (mid 90's I think), There was a HUGE issue about nameing a new building for an oil magnate or oil company I believe. Interesting thought, especially since they had donated the money for the building.

    But lo and behold, some professors and many, many students signed petitions and protested that it was to prejudicial to give the building that name would be pandering to industry and would not be in line with academic freedom of study and thought.

    Well, the students and professors (and higher education, btw) won. The building was given another name that better reflected the studies doing on inside.

    I was surprised at this and very glad that it happened that way. I believe this was all prebush days. It was a bi step for the University anbd academic freedom. I wonder if that would still happen. UT is a great school and also has a very large department devoted to oil exploration and industry.

    Universities need to stay open to everything. Even Alaska.
    10catsinMD

    ReplyDelete
  3. FYI:

    Peak vs. Pique
    February 26th, 2007 by Zonker
    Here’s another writing pet peeve — when folks confuse peak (or peek), and pique. Here’s an example of proper usage: I live in Denver, Colorado, so I have a lovely view of the mountain peaks when I look to the West, but my interest is piqued when I find a good book about world history.

    Instead, what I see most commonly is “this really peaked my interest,” or “I thought this would peek your interest.”

    This doesn’t trouble me too much when I see it on blogs, mailing lists, and so forth. I’m used to seeing language atrocities there… but it’s just a different story when it’s something from a communications professional, i.e., from a PR person.

    Or a university president, mebbe? Oops, a university president general. My bad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I tried to post this once before, and it wouldn't, so please forgive if this turns into a double posting.

    I don't normally post about incorrect spelling or grammar, or typos: they happen to us all. But does President General Hamilton really not know that the phrase is "piqued" his interest?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This "educator" says that Professor Steiner has "peaked" his interest? !!! It's 'piqued', children. Fire that uneducated educator! grammy

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am wondering if someone (with media contacts) could get coverage of this event. If so, Prof. Hamilton would likely be even more "piqued."
    Dennis Zaki has contacts (CNN if I remember correctly). Zaki could also do the filming. The global warming topic is hot right now (no pun intended). Gryphen, can you ask Dennis if he could do a short proposal to CNN and set up the date and time for the debate? I say that CNN WILL be very interested in this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:25 AM

    Hamilton is a retired Army general, is he not? I think he graduated from West Point, which might explain why he's not so concerned with "academic freedom".

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:27 AM

    Folks, same old same old.
    Alaska is one of the most corrupt states and it gets proven again and again.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous11:08 AM

    I enjoyed Shannyn's show. Dr. Steiner was great and no doubt passionate about his work. I hope things change so he will remain at the university. A great loss for the university if he doesn't. Anyway, kudos to Dr. Steiner; I have a great appreciation for all his good work!

    Thanks again, Gryphen!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous12:12 PM

    Geezum, read the guy's biography on the University of Alaska site. He not only has a Master's in English Lit, he taught it at West Point!

    Oik.

    He announced his resignation on June 5 of this year. I guess he feels he's "peaked".

    ReplyDelete
  11. Gryph,

    Look at the title, you spelled Stiener...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:01 PM

    President Hamilton is a brilliant man. He is a retired General who really turned the University around. I recall him going to bat for freedom of speech on campus many years ago, a relatively short time after being hired. He may have written a public opinion piece in the News-Miner on the subject. I don't have the inside scoop on this situation, but I am sure we would all learn something by listening to these two dedicated and intelligent men debate the issue.
    Oil money drives this state. Is it the oil companies or the republicans that decided to stop funding those who bite the hand that feeds?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous9:52 PM

    It is unfortunate that Anonymous 7:01 believes a scientist who has presented findings that contradict big oil and who has spoken out against bias and dangerous practices is "biting the hand that feeds". What a cynical point of view, certainly one that is not in line with the idea of academic freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nan (aka roswellborn)5:32 AM

    I cringed when I saw the word "peaked" (mis-)used, and was stunned to realize that it was *not* a typo, but a quote.

    I'm really looking forward to the next chapter in this story!

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.