Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Meet the inspiration for the Occupy Wall Street movement, Elizabeth Warren.

Courtesy of the Daily Beast:

Elizabeth Warren is running for office in the most high-profile race in the country not involving Barack Obama. It’s a position that calls for some tact. So what does she think about the Occupy Wall Street protests that are roiling the country? 

“I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do,” she says. “I support what they do.” 

Warren’s boast isn’t bluster: As a professor of commercial law at Harvard and the force behind Obama’s consumer-protection bureau, Warren has been one of the most articulate voices challenging the excesses of Wall Street. Still, she enjoys an outsize celebrity for an academic and bureaucrat: a favorite guest of Jon Stewart, Warren, 62, has become a hero to the left, a villain to the right, and a fascination for everyone in between. Now that she is challenging Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown, she has emerged this year as a poster child for what some of America loves, and an increasing swath of America hates, about the president. 

No one else has Warren’s gift to send the right into a sputtering frenzy.

I KNEW I liked these protesters!

Elizabeth Warren may end up being just about the best hope for the future of progressives in this country.

Which is surprising when you consider the following:

For all those quaking on the right at the sight of an ascendant Warren, rest easy. Warren’s no lefty. In fact, Warren was a registered Republican into her 40s. When it comes to ideology, Warren makes for a rotten heir to Kennedy. 

“I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets. I think that is not true anymore,” Warren says. “I was a Republican at a time when I felt like there was a problem that the markets were under a lot more strain. It worried me whether or not the government played too activist a role.” 

It wasn’t until later in life, when Warren was 46, that she had her political awakening. At the time, she was serving on a committee recommending changes to the nation’s bankruptcy laws. Until then, Warren says, “I said, ‘No, no, no, not for me on the politics.' ” 

Warren decided then, in 1995, she could no longer retreat into the ivory tower. “I can’t just leave this to people who are going to wreck the lives of millions of American families if they get the chance,” she says. “I waded in.”

You know there may be no better Democrat, than a reformed Republican. Warren is smart, fearless, and determined to make a positive change in this country. And if she is not completely deprogrammed from her conservative past she is certainly light years away from the anti-women's rights, anti-middle class, anti-intellectual conservatives that we have seen far too much of lately.

As far as I am concerned Warren embodies much of what I hope to see from future candidates in this country, regardless of which political party they emerge from. Especially potential candidates like Elizabeth Warren who clearly scares the hell out of the corporations who are pulling the puppet strings of the vast number of our current politicians, on BOTH sides of the partisan divide.

19 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:00 AM

    She's 62?! I had no idea. I thought she was in her early fifties, maybe even late 40s. And yes, she's one of my heros, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:59 AM

    I just listened to one of the many long interviews with her, and she only gets better as you listen to her more.

    Don't understand why Obama didn't pick her to head the consumer protection agency she founded -- maybe he was saving her for his VP or wanted her for governor of Massachusetts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anne In DC6:06 AM

    She has an extremely valuable perspective, since she was once on the other side of the political aisle. If I were living in Massachusetts, she would definitely get MY vote, because she is a fresh breath of air who is for all Americans, in contrast to the reactionary GOP, who hate this president enough to make millions of Americans suffer needlessly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6:38 AM

    I absolutely love President Obama, but I would also love a Clinton/Warren ticket in 2016. Can you imagine how those two incredible women could mop the floor with the likes of Palin and Bachmann.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not What You Want To Hear6:46 AM

    I don't know if she created as much of the intellectual foundation for OWS as she stated, BUT her book "The Two-Income Trap" was the first one I read that really shed light for me on the deteriorating state of the middle class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Speaking as a reformed Republican, I agree. We do tend to become strong Democrats. That's because we really have seen both sides of the coin.

    We also know that most Republicans stay Republicans because they adamantly refuse to look or listen to the other side. I was that way. I remember thinking, 'they will just twist issues around and confuse me'. I believed that. I also believed the mantra, "Both sides are equally bad." I have come to find out that is just not true.

    I can still remember when I was a little girl, my father excusing Nixon for Watergate. He would always say, "The Democrats have done the same thing. They just haven't been caught."

    They tell themselves things like this or something similar so they can justify why they stay Republican.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7:12 AM

    Warren for President 2016.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Elizabeth Warren 2016!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kimosabe7:21 AM

    Another of my heros (heroines?) is Sheila Bair, recently head of the FDIC. She and Warren have the right stuff all around, and would make a formidable team.

    I used to think that the more women in public life the better. Seems that it's usually an excess of testosterone that gets us into trouble. But SP, MB, and their ilk prove that no longer computes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Those "who clearly scares the hell out of the corporations who are pulling the puppet strings of the vast number of our current politicians" have been made to disappear, or have an accident.

    "Michael Connell, the Bush IT expert who has been directly implicated in the rigging of George Bush's 2000 and 2004 elections, was killed last night when his single engine plane crashed three miles short of the Akron airport."

    "Andrew Maguire is an independent bullion trader and a whistleblower. He notified United States regulators that fraud had been committed, manipulating prices in the international gold and silver markets. Maguire and his wife were injured in a hit-and-run accident March 26, 2010, a day after he was identified as the source of the allegations." [Wikipedia]

    And for the way-out-there crowd: "Danny Jowenko, Dutch demolition expert and (involuntary) whistle blower of the 9/11 bombings (watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc) was killed in a one-sided car accident in the village of Serooskerke, The Netherlands, on July 16, 2011. For unknown reasons, his car veered off the road and hit a tree. He was killed instantly."

    I hope Elizabeth Warren is taking proper precautions for her safety.

    /paranoia

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous7:45 AM

    Where did "The Beast" get the data to support this statement: she represents what
    "an increasing swath of America hates, about the president. "? Yes, the President has dropped a little in most polls, but it hasn't been as huge as the media would have you believe, nor would I consider it a "swath". I think it's biased reporting (what else is new?)
    ~physicsmom

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm in love.

    (Yeah, 62? YOU ROCK, LIZ!

    Can you imagine what a pathetic, shriveled prune SP will look like at 62? hahaha)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8:26 AM

    Wow KaJo...I hadn't heard about Danny Jowenko.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8:41 AM

    Please understand us ex-Republicans.Most of us were never the Bible thumping,women controlling,gay bashing social control freak types.Most of us were fiscal conservatives.Age and experience have taught us that the inherent goodness of humanity that we thought could be counted on as a social safety net,does not work.Most of us thought that things like education and taking care of the elders who came before us was a conservative thing to do.And they were.Somehow over the years the conservatives turned into the party of mean spirited selfish people who want more for themselves,think they are superior to everyone else morally while being so un-Christian like. When did education become a bad thing for Conservatives?I don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8:56 AM

    See what happens when you rely on an education and not a push-up bra to get things done? People take you seriously because you have something of value to offer to others. Ms. Warren will be around a lot longer than fly-by-night Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous10:02 AM

    Anonymous 5:59 wrote: Don't understand why Obama didn't pick her to head the consumer protection agency she founded --

    He did. The loyal opposition (hah!) made it clear that they would go to whatever extremes were necessary to keep her out of the post.

    See this article by James Surowiecki, June 13th of this year, for more information.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kajo--could you tell us more about Danny Jowenko?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous3:45 PM

    Every time Palin's or Bachmann's names are mentioned in connection with the Presidency, I cringe and feel a little nauseated.

    When I think of Elizabeth Warren as the first woman President of the United States, it gives me the warm fuzzies!

    I believe she has a bright and unlimited future in politics and I'd be proud to support her.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous11:34 PM

    Yes!

    THIS is a Woman of Substance and Conviction who is one of the best at getting her point across accurately and confidant enough to defend herself with facts.



    Bravo, and Thank You!

    Your post and comment says it all.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.