Courtesy of NPR:
Hobby Lobby, the Oklahoma-based chain of arts and crafts retail stores, has agreed to pay a $3 million fine and forfeit thousands of ancient clay tablets and clay bullae that were smuggled into the United States with improper labels.
The announcement by the Justice Department says Hobby Lobby bought over 5,500 artifacts, such as clay tablets and blocks with cuneiform writing, and cylinder seals for $1.6 million. The artifacts, originally from Iraq, were shipped to the company from the United Arab Emirates and Israel with labels that described them as "ceramic tiles" or "clay tiles (sample)."
In a statement, Hobby Lobby President Steve Green said the company "was new to the world of acquiring these items, and did not fully appreciate the complexities of the acquisitions process. This resulted in some regrettable mistakes."
"We should have exercised more oversight and carefully questioned how the acquisitions were handled," he said.
But the Justice Department prosecutors say the company should have realized that its acquisition of the artifacts "was fraught with red flags."
As it turns out Hobby Lobby was warned about these "red flags" by their own expert.
Courtesy of CNN:
"In October 2010, an expert on cultural property law retained by Hobby Lobby warned the company that the acquisition of cultural property likely from Iraq, including cuneiform tablets and cylinder seals, carries a risk that such objects may have been looted from archaeological sites in Iraq," the DOJ said.
"The expert also advised Hobby Lobby to review its collection of antiquities for any objects of Iraqi origin and to verify that their country of origin was properly declared at the time of importation into the United States. "
But hey, why listen to THAT guy?
As if all of this were not embarrassing enough to Hobby Lobby, there is also the fact that they may inadvertently be funding ISIS.
Courtesy of Newsweek:
Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq are netting between $150 million and $200 million a year from illicit trade in plundered antiquities, Russia's ambassador to the United Nations said in a letter released on Wednesday.
"Around 100,000 cultural objects of global importance, including 4,500 archaeological sites, nine of which are included in the World Heritage List of ... UNESCO, are under the control of the Islamic State ... in Syria and Iraq," Ambassador Vitaly Churkin wrote in a letter to the U.N. Security Council.
"The profit derived by the Islamists from the illicit trade in antiquities and archaeological treasures is estimated at U.S. $150-200 million per year," he said.
These artifacts were scheduled to be displayed at the Hobby Lobby's Museum of the Bible.
But here's the thing, MOST so called "biblical artifacts" turn out to be bullshit, and are either actual ancient artifacts unrelated to events in the Bible or outright fabrications of pottery and cuneiform tablets that sell like hot cakes to Christians desperate to prove that the Bible is accurate.
In fact Archeological finds rarely support events occurring in the Bible, though that often does not stop charlatans from offering them up as proof.
I think the only thing that one could learn by visiting this "Museum of the Bible" is that the folks who own Hobby Lobby have money to burn, and that it would undoubtedly be better spent helping the poor, building a REAL museum, or at the very least not wasted fighting against having to provide access to contraception in their employee's health care plan.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label Hobby Lobby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hobby Lobby. Show all posts
Friday, July 07, 2017
Wednesday, July 01, 2015
The Hobby Lobby's "Museum of the Bible" a monument to misinformation currently being built within walking distance of the Smithsonian Institute.
Courtesy of TPM:
The museum will be a living, breathing testament to how American evangelicalism can at once claim it is under siege from secularists, the LGBT rights movement, or feminism—yet also boast of acquiring a prime private perch, strategically located at the nation’s epicenter of law and politics, and nestled among its iconic public monuments. If you ask its creators, it’s meant to protect American Christianity from persecution. But it may be the most strident example yet of how that expression of religion, which in many ways is running counter to trends in American public opinion, continues to flex its political—and financial—muscle.
The building is being built by the Green family, owners of the Hobby Lobby arts and crafts stores, and it is supposedly being built to educate people about the "facts" of the Bible and the history of its creation, so the building will of course be awash in misinformation, much like Ken Ham's Creation Museum in Kentucky.
Oh but folks will not have to actually visit the museum in order to be confronted with religious propaganda:
“The subway stops in Washington are ugly, so we will put on there an electronic billboard talking about the museum,” he (The museum director.) said recently at an event for donors. “So when people are just coming to Washington, they’re going to hear about the Bible even if they’re just coming to see Congress.”
I can see the brochures now: "Come to Washington DC for the history and the politics, stay for the Christian indoctrination."
It just must be terrible to be so persecuted in this country that you are able to build a giant museum to celebrate your holy book.
How do these people get through their days?
The museum will be a living, breathing testament to how American evangelicalism can at once claim it is under siege from secularists, the LGBT rights movement, or feminism—yet also boast of acquiring a prime private perch, strategically located at the nation’s epicenter of law and politics, and nestled among its iconic public monuments. If you ask its creators, it’s meant to protect American Christianity from persecution. But it may be the most strident example yet of how that expression of religion, which in many ways is running counter to trends in American public opinion, continues to flex its political—and financial—muscle.
The building is being built by the Green family, owners of the Hobby Lobby arts and crafts stores, and it is supposedly being built to educate people about the "facts" of the Bible and the history of its creation, so the building will of course be awash in misinformation, much like Ken Ham's Creation Museum in Kentucky.
Oh but folks will not have to actually visit the museum in order to be confronted with religious propaganda:
“The subway stops in Washington are ugly, so we will put on there an electronic billboard talking about the museum,” he (The museum director.) said recently at an event for donors. “So when people are just coming to Washington, they’re going to hear about the Bible even if they’re just coming to see Congress.”
I can see the brochures now: "Come to Washington DC for the history and the politics, stay for the Christian indoctrination."
It just must be terrible to be so persecuted in this country that you are able to build a giant museum to celebrate your holy book.
How do these people get through their days?
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Gun toting Hobby Lobby supporter, and Right Wing agitator, caught cheating on her combat veteran husband with former Tea Party staffer. Because you know 'Murica.
![]() |
Holly Fisher in photo first seen on Brancy's blog in July. |
![]() |
In a follow up photo directed at liberals. |
Conservative provocateur Charles C. Johnson recently contacted Fisher after hearing rumors that she had engaged in an extramarital affair last fall with Joel Frewa, then a video editor with the Tea Party News Network.
In a screen capture of their text conversation, Fisher strongly denies having an affair and asks Johnson why he would publish that information when the country is “literally going to hell.”
“Look, I have multiple people saying this and I have the messages your husband wrote,” Johnson said. “Do you want to stop lying?”
Fisher admitted to the affair less than an hour later in a Facebook post, saying she had been overwhelmed by the media attention but had since reconciled with her husband.
Her giggling daughter and God saved her life? Well we certainly know which demographic SHE'S pandering to.
Here is my favorite part of this story:
The affair allegedly took place during the Restoring the Dream event, a Faith and Freedom conference, and on Election night.
Nothing like cheating on your combat veteran husband at a Faith and Freedom conference right?
Gotta love those Christian values.
(H/T to Addicting Info.)
Labels:
Bristol Palin,
cheating,
Christianity,
Hobby Lobby,
Military,
Nancy French,
religion,
Right Wing
Friday, November 28, 2014
Oklahoma cancels Hobby Lobby bible course in response to protests.
An Oklahoma school district scuttled plans to offer an elective religion course developed by the head of the Hobby Lobby retail chain.
The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) said on its website on Tuesday that the Mustang Public Schools district canceled the course, “The Book: The Bible’s History, Narrative and Impact.”
“The topic of a Bible course in the Mustang School District is no longer a discussion item nor is there a plan to provide such a course in the foreseeable future,” superintendent Sean McDaniel was quoted as saying.
The district’s decision came after the foundation made a second open-records request in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United.
Hobby Lobby allegedly did not provide the district with “legal coverage” for offering the course, nor did it allow the district to review the final curriculum beforehand.
Though I am very glad that this course will not be offered in Oklahoma public schools, I am still more than a little concerned that it might have been offered at all.
If students wish to learn about Christianity there are these almost impossible to miss buildings called "churches" where that information is readily available.
I also understand that there might be some kind of a handbook available that explains it as well.
I wonder if the people who decided to introduce this class had even considered that doing so would open the schools up to challenges from OTHER religious groups demanding equal time?
Could you imagine a class schedule that offered "Islam 101?" Or "Buddhism for Beginners?" Or "An Introduction to Scientology," with guest instructor Tom Cruise?
No I think the Oklahoma public school district really dodged a bullet with this one. And the students certainly did.
Labels:
ACLU,
Bible,
Christianity,
Hobby Lobby,
public schools,
religion
Sunday, August 17, 2014
Hobby Lobby Crafts is a MUST see.
Courtesy of the You Tube page:
Disclaimer: Miss Sandy is a fictional character for entertainment purposes only. She is in no way affiliated with Hobby Lobby. This is a satire. All craft materials purchased at Michael's.
"Burqa for Amurka."
Okay that was really good.
(H/T to the Political Carnival.)
Disclaimer: Miss Sandy is a fictional character for entertainment purposes only. She is in no way affiliated with Hobby Lobby. This is a satire. All craft materials purchased at Michael's.
"Burqa for Amurka."
Okay that was really good.
(H/T to the Political Carnival.)
Labels:
arts and crafts,
burqa,
conservatives,
Hobby Lobby,
humor,
YouTube
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
The Satanic Temple thinks that they have found a way to make the recent Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision work for them as well.
Courtesy of Raw Story:
In a statement, the Satanic Temple said that it will use the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby decision to exempt its believers from state-mandated informed consent laws that require women considering abortions to read pro-life material.
Informed consent or “right to know” laws state that women seeking elective abortions be provided with information about alternatives to the procedure, often couched in language that attempts to personify the fetus. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 35 states currently have informed consent laws, and of those, 33 require that the woman be told the gestational age of the fetus.
In some states, that information consists of pro-life propaganda that links abortion to a higher incidence of breast and ovarian cancers, or discusses “post-abortion syndrome,” a mental condition not recognized by any major medical or psychiatric organization.
Because the Satanic Temple bases its belief “regarding personal health…on the best scientific understanding of the world, regardless of the religious or political beliefs of others,” it claims that state-mandated information with no basis in scientific fact violates its “religious” beliefs.
Spokesperson Lucien Greaves said that the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby decision bolsters their case. “While we feel we have a strong case for an exemption regardless of the Hobby Lobby ruling,” he said, “the Supreme Court has decided that religious beliefs are so sacrosanct that they can even trump scientific fact. This was made clear when they allowed Hobby Lobby to claim certain contraceptives were abortifacients, which in fact they are not.”
Seems fair to me. Not to mention fairly brilliant.
I wonder if this kind of thing might lead to a substantial increase in the number of women turning to Satanism? And just imagine how fundamentalist heads will start exploding if it does!
In a statement, the Satanic Temple said that it will use the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby decision to exempt its believers from state-mandated informed consent laws that require women considering abortions to read pro-life material.
Informed consent or “right to know” laws state that women seeking elective abortions be provided with information about alternatives to the procedure, often couched in language that attempts to personify the fetus. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 35 states currently have informed consent laws, and of those, 33 require that the woman be told the gestational age of the fetus.
In some states, that information consists of pro-life propaganda that links abortion to a higher incidence of breast and ovarian cancers, or discusses “post-abortion syndrome,” a mental condition not recognized by any major medical or psychiatric organization.
Because the Satanic Temple bases its belief “regarding personal health…on the best scientific understanding of the world, regardless of the religious or political beliefs of others,” it claims that state-mandated information with no basis in scientific fact violates its “religious” beliefs.
Spokesperson Lucien Greaves said that the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby decision bolsters their case. “While we feel we have a strong case for an exemption regardless of the Hobby Lobby ruling,” he said, “the Supreme Court has decided that religious beliefs are so sacrosanct that they can even trump scientific fact. This was made clear when they allowed Hobby Lobby to claim certain contraceptives were abortifacients, which in fact they are not.”
Seems fair to me. Not to mention fairly brilliant.
I wonder if this kind of thing might lead to a substantial increase in the number of women turning to Satanism? And just imagine how fundamentalist heads will start exploding if it does!
Labels:
abortion,
Hobby Lobby,
pro-life,
religion,
Satanic Temple,
Supreme Court,
women's health
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Elizabeth Warren's 11 Commandments for Progressives. Oh yeah!
Courtesy of Vox:
You know after reading that I want Warren to be Hillary's running mate in 2016 do badly I can taste it.
Damn that's good stuff!
- "We believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher enforcement, and we're willing to fight for it."
- "We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth."
- "We believe that the Internet shouldn't be rigged to benefit big corporations, and that means real net neutrality."
- "We believe that no one should work full-time and still live in poverty, and that means raising the minimum wage."
- "We believe that fast-food workers deserve a livable wage, and that means that when they take to the picket line, we are proud to fight alongside them."
- "We believe that students are entitled to get an education without being crushed by debt."
- "We believe that after a lifetime of work, people are entitled to retire with dignity, and that means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and pensions."
- "We believe—I can't believe I have to say this in 2014—we believe in equal pay for equal work."
- "We believe that equal means equal, and that's true in marriage, it's true in the workplace, it's true in all of America."
- "We believe that immigration has made this country strong and vibrant, and that means reform."
- "And we believe that corporations are not people, that women have a right to their bodies. We will overturn Hobby Lobby and we will fight for it. We will fight for it!"
You know after reading that I want Warren to be Hillary's running mate in 2016 do badly I can taste it.
Damn that's good stuff!
Friday, July 18, 2014
Hobby Lobby owners plan to open museum dedicated to the Bible in Washington D.C.. Oh goody, another museum dedicated to Christian mythology.
Courtesy of the New York Times:
The evangelical Christian family that owns Hobby Lobby, the chain of craft stores, made history two weeks ago when the Supreme Court overturned the Obama administration’s mandate that family-owned companies must provide contraceptive coverage to their employees.
Now, the family is looking to build a permanent presence on the Washington landscape, by establishing a sprawling museum dedicated to the Bible — just two blocks south of the National Mall.
The development of a Bible museum has long been a dream of the Oklahoma-based Green family, which has built Hobby Lobby into a $3 billion company in which its religious beliefs infuse every aspect of the business, from the music played in its stores to being closed on Sundays.
But on the heels of the company’s legal victory, the project is raising concern in some quarters that the Greens’ museum could blur the line between educating and evangelizing. Steve Green, president of Hobby Lobby and the son of its founder, has referred to the Bible as “a reliable historical document,” and, as part of the museum project, he is developing a curriculum to “reintroduce this book to this nation.”
Just what we need, a powerful corporation dedicated to giving Creationsist Ken Ham a run for his money in dumbing down American schoolchildren.
You may remember that Steve Green, of the Hobby Lobby owning Green family, has also been working to introduce a Bible curriculum into public schools in Oklahoma.
Apparently these people are determined to push their religious belief into every facet of our lives, and after their Supreme Court victory they may believe that there is nothing to stop them.
Of course if the millennials are any indication their days of spreading misinformation and lies may well be coming to an end in the very near future.
The evangelical Christian family that owns Hobby Lobby, the chain of craft stores, made history two weeks ago when the Supreme Court overturned the Obama administration’s mandate that family-owned companies must provide contraceptive coverage to their employees.
Now, the family is looking to build a permanent presence on the Washington landscape, by establishing a sprawling museum dedicated to the Bible — just two blocks south of the National Mall.
The development of a Bible museum has long been a dream of the Oklahoma-based Green family, which has built Hobby Lobby into a $3 billion company in which its religious beliefs infuse every aspect of the business, from the music played in its stores to being closed on Sundays.
But on the heels of the company’s legal victory, the project is raising concern in some quarters that the Greens’ museum could blur the line between educating and evangelizing. Steve Green, president of Hobby Lobby and the son of its founder, has referred to the Bible as “a reliable historical document,” and, as part of the museum project, he is developing a curriculum to “reintroduce this book to this nation.”
Just what we need, a powerful corporation dedicated to giving Creationsist Ken Ham a run for his money in dumbing down American schoolchildren.
You may remember that Steve Green, of the Hobby Lobby owning Green family, has also been working to introduce a Bible curriculum into public schools in Oklahoma.
Apparently these people are determined to push their religious belief into every facet of our lives, and after their Supreme Court victory they may believe that there is nothing to stop them.
Of course if the millennials are any indication their days of spreading misinformation and lies may well be coming to an end in the very near future.
Tuesday, July 08, 2014
The obvious response to the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision.
Labels:
corporations,
Hobby Lobby,
religion,
Supreme Court
Monday, July 07, 2014
Gitmo detainees cite Hobby Lobby case in new request for religious freedom.
Courtesy Mother Jones:
In a new court filing, attorneys for two Guantanamo Bay detainees have invoked the Supreme Court's controversial decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, which allowed certain corporations to ignore the Obamacare contraception mandate if their owners object to it on religious grounds. The motions, filed with a Washington, DC, district court on behalf of Ahmed Rabbani of Pakistan and Emad Hassan of Yemen, ask the court to bar military officials from preventing Gitmo inmates from participating in communal prayer during Ramadan.
"Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons—human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien—enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the [Religious Freedom Restoration Act]," the lawyers argue.
A spokesman for the Department of Defense told Al Jazeera America on Friday that the "Defense Department is aware of the filing," and that the "government will respond through the legal system."
Gee I wonder if the Justices who were supposedly trying to protect the non-existent religious freedom of corporations recognized the can of worms that they were opening?
I also wonder how all of those Right Wing supporters who touted the decision as a victory for religious freedom will feel if it helps these prisoners get more of their own religious freedoms back?
Yeah I somehow doubt that Chad and Christie Christian will be terribly thrilled with their newly protected religious freedom being extended to people who pray to Mecca five times a day and think that Jesus was a great prophet but no son of God.
In a new court filing, attorneys for two Guantanamo Bay detainees have invoked the Supreme Court's controversial decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, which allowed certain corporations to ignore the Obamacare contraception mandate if their owners object to it on religious grounds. The motions, filed with a Washington, DC, district court on behalf of Ahmed Rabbani of Pakistan and Emad Hassan of Yemen, ask the court to bar military officials from preventing Gitmo inmates from participating in communal prayer during Ramadan.
"Hobby Lobby makes clear that all persons—human and corporate, citizen and foreigner, resident and alien—enjoy the special religious free exercise protections of the [Religious Freedom Restoration Act]," the lawyers argue.
A spokesman for the Department of Defense told Al Jazeera America on Friday that the "Defense Department is aware of the filing," and that the "government will respond through the legal system."
Gee I wonder if the Justices who were supposedly trying to protect the non-existent religious freedom of corporations recognized the can of worms that they were opening?
I also wonder how all of those Right Wing supporters who touted the decision as a victory for religious freedom will feel if it helps these prisoners get more of their own religious freedoms back?
Yeah I somehow doubt that Chad and Christie Christian will be terribly thrilled with their newly protected religious freedom being extended to people who pray to Mecca five times a day and think that Jesus was a great prophet but no son of God.
Labels:
Guantanamo,
Hobby Lobby,
law,
Mecca,
Mother Jones,
Muslims,
prayer,
prisoner
Thursday, July 03, 2014
Don't forget bitchez, today is #HobbyLobbyLoveDay! Update!
I actually tried to put this whole ridiculous thing out of my mind, but fucking Wonkette wouldn't let me:
We know that the Hobby Lobby decision is dangerous and terrible for the nation, but for filthy liberal bloggers, it is for sure going to be the gift that keeps on giving, mostly because there is so much post-decision derp from the Hobby Lobbyists. We should have known that Bristol Palin, queen of being best at not using birth control, would weigh in with some extra-special stupid about how to celebrate the fact that now all ladies can be saddled with an unwanted unmarried teen pregnancy, which is what freedom is all about. Bristol’s plan? Shopping selfies, of course.
July 3! You guys, that’s today! Get excited!! It even has a cool hashtag: #HobbyLobbyLove.
Holy god, Bristol Palin, you are even dumber than your mother if you think that the entirety of Twitter isn’t going to hijack the fuck out of that hashtag and fill your supporters’ timelines with dick pics to show how they hobby and lobby and love. Bristol was also kind enough to give the world her email address so that you can send pix directly to her.
Okay that's pretty good so maybe I will forgive Wonkette for making me remember that Sarah Palin's loser offspring continues to chase relevance by having her ghostwriter create blogposts that make it seem she can both read and understand current events.
So I traipsed on over to Brancy's blog to read how the campaign is going thus far.
And thus far there is nothing happening at all, as the most recent post is from yesterday.
So as you can see things are going just as they usually go when the Palin's try to start some kind of socially relevant protest.
But have no fear, apparently Brancy's blog also has a twitter account. (Okay seriously how come I did not know that?)
Let's take a peek at the raging activism shall we??
Well it is still early so perhaps eventually one of Bristol's fans will actually be able to find a Hobby Lobby store and take a picture of themselves protesting the right of women to have access to certain birth control that the Bible clearly states were manufactured by Satan.
I mean anything's possible.
Update: Okay well since I wrote this post Brancy finally got off her ass and updated the blog.
And there has been some response:
Yes the courage to deny women birth control is so admirable.
Some could not be bothered to go in, but they participated as well.
You know kind of.
However the REAL fun is happening over at the #HobbyLobbyLove Twitter page.
But hey, it's at the expense of a Palin so who could blame them?
We know that the Hobby Lobby decision is dangerous and terrible for the nation, but for filthy liberal bloggers, it is for sure going to be the gift that keeps on giving, mostly because there is so much post-decision derp from the Hobby Lobbyists. We should have known that Bristol Palin, queen of being best at not using birth control, would weigh in with some extra-special stupid about how to celebrate the fact that now all ladies can be saddled with an unwanted unmarried teen pregnancy, which is what freedom is all about. Bristol’s plan? Shopping selfies, of course.
July 3! You guys, that’s today! Get excited!! It even has a cool hashtag: #HobbyLobbyLove.
Holy god, Bristol Palin, you are even dumber than your mother if you think that the entirety of Twitter isn’t going to hijack the fuck out of that hashtag and fill your supporters’ timelines with dick pics to show how they hobby and lobby and love. Bristol was also kind enough to give the world her email address so that you can send pix directly to her.
Okay that's pretty good so maybe I will forgive Wonkette for making me remember that Sarah Palin's loser offspring continues to chase relevance by having her ghostwriter create blogposts that make it seem she can both read and understand current events.
So I traipsed on over to Brancy's blog to read how the campaign is going thus far.
And thus far there is nothing happening at all, as the most recent post is from yesterday.
So as you can see things are going just as they usually go when the Palin's try to start some kind of socially relevant protest.
But have no fear, apparently Brancy's blog also has a twitter account. (Okay seriously how come I did not know that?)
Let's take a peek at the raging activism shall we??
@BristolsBlog @RuthMalhotra @HobbyLobbyStore On my way! Will stop and get a milkshake at Chick-fil-a too!
— Mrs.Prim (@PrimMrs) July 3, 2014
Wow a day of buying sparkly glue and adding a few extra pounds, sounds like heaven.
July 3, 2014 --->> #HobbyLobbyLove day!! Go buy something in a store or online. 💵💸💰
— Mamaholzhauer (@Jensavedbygrace) July 2, 2014
Not to nitpick, but since the idea is to take selfies of yourself while shopping at a Hobby Lobby store, how would shopping online help accomplish that objective? I'm over thinking this aren't I?
@Jensavedbygrace @NancyAFrench Just about my favorite store! I love the tranquility that is ever present there.
— toni (@lorent5709) July 3, 2014
Okay does anybody else think that "toni" sounds suspiciously like a certain half term governor turned Facebook troll?Well it is still early so perhaps eventually one of Bristol's fans will actually be able to find a Hobby Lobby store and take a picture of themselves protesting the right of women to have access to certain birth control that the Bible clearly states were manufactured by Satan.
I mean anything's possible.
Update: Okay well since I wrote this post Brancy finally got off her ass and updated the blog.
And there has been some response:
Yes the courage to deny women birth control is so admirable.
Some could not be bothered to go in, but they participated as well.
You know kind of.
However the REAL fun is happening over at the #HobbyLobbyLove Twitter page.
Feeling the #HobbyLobbyLove, tying my wife's tubes has never been easier! Thanks #DrHobbyLobby pic.twitter.com/kEt5ryhFhX
— Scott Wooledge (@Clarknt67) July 3, 2014
Dear, #DrHobbyLobby, I indulged in a little #HobbyLobbyLove. And now it burns when I pee. Should I sacrifice a lamb or will a goat do?
— Scott Wooledge (@Clarknt67) July 3, 2014
Best way to show #HobbyLobbyLove is to go in fill up your shopping cart and just before you finish pull out
— King k Damon (@kingkdamon) July 3, 2014
A lovely Hobby Lobby visitor snapped this today... Sharing the #HobbyLobbyLove pic.twitter.com/75IOqiQb2k
— Brett Dewey (@BrettDewey) July 3, 2014
Me thinks that certain people are having WAY too much fun with this.But hey, it's at the expense of a Palin so who could blame them?
Labels:
blogs,
Bristol Palin,
contraception,
Hobby Lobby,
protests,
stupid,
Twitter,
Wonkette
The slippery slope created by the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision, threatens to knock new protections for LGBT Americans right off their feet.
Courtesy of The Atlantic:
This week, in the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court ruled that a religious employer could not be required to provide employees with certain types of contraception. That decision is beginning to reverberate: A group of faith leaders is urging the Obama administration to include a religious exemption in a forthcoming LGBT anti-discrimination action.
Their call, in a letter sent to the White House Tuesday, attempts to capitalize on the Supreme Court case by arguing that it shows the administration must show more deference to the prerogatives of religion.
"We are asking that an extension of protection for one group not come at the expense of faith communities whose religious identity and beliefs motivate them to serve those in need," the letter states.
The Hobby Lobby decision has been welcomed by religious-right groups who accuse Obama of waging a war on religion. But Tuesday's letter is different: It comes from as group of faith leaders who are generally friendly to the administration, many of whom have closely advised the White House on issues like immigration reform. The letter was organized by Michael Wear, who worked in the Obama White House and directed faith outreach for the president's 2012 campaign. Signers include two members of Catholics for Obama and three former members of the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.
"This is not an antagonistic letter by any means," Wear told me. But in the wake of Hobby Lobby, he said, "the administration does have a decision to make whether they want to recalibrate their approach to some of these issues."
In other words if the Hobby Lobby can use religion as protection from treating people equally then why do we have to?
In fact this is exactly what Ruth Bader Ginsburg predicted would happen in her dissent:
“Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]
…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision. [...] The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”
I would predict that this is just the beginning.
This week, in the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court ruled that a religious employer could not be required to provide employees with certain types of contraception. That decision is beginning to reverberate: A group of faith leaders is urging the Obama administration to include a religious exemption in a forthcoming LGBT anti-discrimination action.
Their call, in a letter sent to the White House Tuesday, attempts to capitalize on the Supreme Court case by arguing that it shows the administration must show more deference to the prerogatives of religion.
"We are asking that an extension of protection for one group not come at the expense of faith communities whose religious identity and beliefs motivate them to serve those in need," the letter states.
The Hobby Lobby decision has been welcomed by religious-right groups who accuse Obama of waging a war on religion. But Tuesday's letter is different: It comes from as group of faith leaders who are generally friendly to the administration, many of whom have closely advised the White House on issues like immigration reform. The letter was organized by Michael Wear, who worked in the Obama White House and directed faith outreach for the president's 2012 campaign. Signers include two members of Catholics for Obama and three former members of the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.
"This is not an antagonistic letter by any means," Wear told me. But in the wake of Hobby Lobby, he said, "the administration does have a decision to make whether they want to recalibrate their approach to some of these issues."
In other words if the Hobby Lobby can use religion as protection from treating people equally then why do we have to?
In fact this is exactly what Ruth Bader Ginsburg predicted would happen in her dissent:
“Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]
…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision. [...] The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”
I would predict that this is just the beginning.
Wednesday, July 02, 2014
My new go to guy for explaining Right Wing politics, John Oliver, explains the Hobby Lobby lawsuit. Update!
Yes I realize that this aired the night BEFORE the decision, however it is still the best take on it that I have seen thus far.
Oh, and it's freaking hysterical too.
Update: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have now weighed in on this decision as well. As you can imagine they are very displeased.
Oh, and it's freaking hysterical too.
Update: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have now weighed in on this decision as well. As you can imagine they are very displeased.
Labels:
comedy,
contraception,
HBO,
Hobby Lobby,
John Oliver,
Supreme Court,
YouTube
Tuesday, July 01, 2014
Just a reminder that Hobby Lobby may have abandoned women, but they have no problem providing for men. Update!
Courtesy of HuffPo:
Hobby Lobby -- now free to drop emergency "morning after" pills and intrauterine devices from its workers' health insurance plans -- has given no indication that it plans to stop helping its male employees obtain erectile dysfunction treatments.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the craft store chain, owned by evangelical Christians, doesn't have to pay for health care coverage of contraceptives prohibited by its owners' religion.
But pills and pumps that help a man stiffen his penis in preparation for sex are perfectly acceptable.
Yes that's right ladies, Hobby Lobby is all about helping your man get a boner, but if that throbbing scepter of conception fertilizes one of those slutty eggs of yours they do not want anything to do with the fact that you may be saddled with an eighteen year commitment that will seriously hijack your life.
You know it dawned on me today that the ratio of men to women that come into a Hobby Lobby store must be about one or two for every hundred. I mean I looked through their online store and I quickly realized that this is the kind of store that most men would only enter if their wife was dragging them in by their hair.
And, though I have never been to one, I have to imagine that the number of women working in the store must outnumber the men by similar margins.
No, I'm sure there are SOME men working there. You know in a managerial capacity, because though the ladies look nice and are great at selling fabric they simply don't have the intellect for maintaining inventory or handling the money.
Right Mr. green?
And after considering all that I had only one question.
This is an organization that relies almost one hundred percent on female clientele and yet they went to the Supreme Court in order to be excluded from providing to their female employees the kind of health insurance that virtually every other company in the country MUST provide to them, and yet found nothing objectionable about providing males employees (All six of them) health insurance that helps to pay for a pump which allows them to get an erection anytime they want.
And if that were not enough hypocrisy for you do not forget that Hobby Lobby's retirement plan invests quite heavily in contraception manufacturers.
And yes that includes the emergency contraception medications that they seem so adamantly against providing to their employees.
Update: Just when you thought all of this could not be more galling, it also seems that before Hobby Lobby was against providing access to emergency contraception on their health care plans they were for it.
Hobby Lobby -- now free to drop emergency "morning after" pills and intrauterine devices from its workers' health insurance plans -- has given no indication that it plans to stop helping its male employees obtain erectile dysfunction treatments.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the craft store chain, owned by evangelical Christians, doesn't have to pay for health care coverage of contraceptives prohibited by its owners' religion.
But pills and pumps that help a man stiffen his penis in preparation for sex are perfectly acceptable.
Yes that's right ladies, Hobby Lobby is all about helping your man get a boner, but if that throbbing scepter of conception fertilizes one of those slutty eggs of yours they do not want anything to do with the fact that you may be saddled with an eighteen year commitment that will seriously hijack your life.
You know it dawned on me today that the ratio of men to women that come into a Hobby Lobby store must be about one or two for every hundred. I mean I looked through their online store and I quickly realized that this is the kind of store that most men would only enter if their wife was dragging them in by their hair.
And, though I have never been to one, I have to imagine that the number of women working in the store must outnumber the men by similar margins.
No, I'm sure there are SOME men working there. You know in a managerial capacity, because though the ladies look nice and are great at selling fabric they simply don't have the intellect for maintaining inventory or handling the money.
Right Mr. green?
And after considering all that I had only one question.
This is an organization that relies almost one hundred percent on female clientele and yet they went to the Supreme Court in order to be excluded from providing to their female employees the kind of health insurance that virtually every other company in the country MUST provide to them, and yet found nothing objectionable about providing males employees (All six of them) health insurance that helps to pay for a pump which allows them to get an erection anytime they want.
And if that were not enough hypocrisy for you do not forget that Hobby Lobby's retirement plan invests quite heavily in contraception manufacturers.
And yes that includes the emergency contraception medications that they seem so adamantly against providing to their employees.
Update: Just when you thought all of this could not be more galling, it also seems that before Hobby Lobby was against providing access to emergency contraception on their health care plans they were for it.
Labels:
contraception,
health insurance,
Hobby Lobby,
Obamacare,
Supreme Court,
war on women,
women
Well I think this seems very appropriate this morning.
I don't usually like to wish ill on anybody but it would be awfully great if a couple of our least favorite justice's had some health concerns that forced them out of the Supreme Court either before the need of Obama's term, or during Hillary's eight years in office.
It does not have to be fatal or anything, just severe enough to force them into an early retirement.
It does not have to be fatal or anything, just severe enough to force them into an early retirement.
Monday, June 30, 2014
Well you knew this was coming. Sarah Palin celebrates the Supreme Court decision in favor of Hobby Lobby, and against women's health care rights.
Courtesy of Miss Wite-out's Facebook page:
The Supreme Court has handed down a great victory not just for Hobby Lobby, but for all people of faith today! (You know unless they are young females of course.) But who could imagine that five judges are the only thing standing between us and a violation of our First Amendment freedom of religion by an out of control administration at war with people of faith? (At war with people of faith? if only.)
My recent book “Good Tidings and Great Joy” (Which nobody read.) and Bristol’s blog (Which nobody reads.) have covered the Hobby Lobby case. Our friend David French (The husband of Nancy French. The woman who REALLY writes Bristol's blog posts. ) with the ACLJ writes today:
“This is a victory for religious liberty and for common sense. Closely-held corporations cannot be forced to violate their religious convictions for the purpose of funding the Obama Administration’s radical pro-abortion agenda. The owners of Hobby Lobby and all the other employers who challenged the Obama Administration should be commended for their courage.”
Bristol is calling for “Hobby Lobby Love Day” on Thursday to show our gratitude to this courageous family business that stepped up to fight on behalf of all people of faith!
They were truly David vs. Goliath!
Palin then links to Brancy's blog for more:
Well, this is a great way to start the day!
The Supreme Court says that Obama can’t force Hobby Lobby to provide “contraception” that cause abortions. Way to go, Hobby Lobby!!
We should all go to Hobby Lobby and buy something to celebrate. Who will join me in making Thursday “Hobby Lobby Love Day?”
Here’s how it will work. On Thursday, July 3rd, everyone go to their local Hobby Lobby and snap a picture in the store — it can be with your favorite product, a cashier, or a selfie with the store logo in the background. Hold up your message to Hobby Lobby — you can say “Thank You!” or whatever else. Or, if you want, you could hold up a message to the President.
If I did that, mine might say “You can’t make us!”
You know to be more accurate that sign should read "You can't protect us against the religious oppression of women."
You know I was already pretty pissed off about this ruling, but after seeing the Grizzled Mama and her mangy cub's ghostwriter celebrating this setback for women in America, I am now officially livid.
Here is what I think would make a great counter protest.
On July 3rd walk into Hobby Lobby and ask for the manger.
When they arrive ask them if they can give you directions to Michael's saying that you prefer to spend your money at a craft store that respects women.
The Supreme Court has handed down a great victory not just for Hobby Lobby, but for all people of faith today! (You know unless they are young females of course.) But who could imagine that five judges are the only thing standing between us and a violation of our First Amendment freedom of religion by an out of control administration at war with people of faith? (At war with people of faith? if only.)
My recent book “Good Tidings and Great Joy” (Which nobody read.) and Bristol’s blog (Which nobody reads.) have covered the Hobby Lobby case. Our friend David French (The husband of Nancy French. The woman who REALLY writes Bristol's blog posts. ) with the ACLJ writes today:
“This is a victory for religious liberty and for common sense. Closely-held corporations cannot be forced to violate their religious convictions for the purpose of funding the Obama Administration’s radical pro-abortion agenda. The owners of Hobby Lobby and all the other employers who challenged the Obama Administration should be commended for their courage.”
Bristol is calling for “Hobby Lobby Love Day” on Thursday to show our gratitude to this courageous family business that stepped up to fight on behalf of all people of faith!
They were truly David vs. Goliath!
Palin then links to Brancy's blog for more:
Well, this is a great way to start the day!
The Supreme Court says that Obama can’t force Hobby Lobby to provide “contraception” that cause abortions. Way to go, Hobby Lobby!!
We should all go to Hobby Lobby and buy something to celebrate. Who will join me in making Thursday “Hobby Lobby Love Day?”
Here’s how it will work. On Thursday, July 3rd, everyone go to their local Hobby Lobby and snap a picture in the store — it can be with your favorite product, a cashier, or a selfie with the store logo in the background. Hold up your message to Hobby Lobby — you can say “Thank You!” or whatever else. Or, if you want, you could hold up a message to the President.
If I did that, mine might say “You can’t make us!”
You know to be more accurate that sign should read "You can't protect us against the religious oppression of women."
You know I was already pretty pissed off about this ruling, but after seeing the Grizzled Mama and her mangy cub's ghostwriter celebrating this setback for women in America, I am now officially livid.
Here is what I think would make a great counter protest.
On July 3rd walk into Hobby Lobby and ask for the manger.
When they arrive ask them if they can give you directions to Michael's saying that you prefer to spend your money at a craft store that respects women.
Labels:
Bristol Palin,
Hobby Lobby,
protests,
Sarah Palin,
Supreme Court,
war on women
Supreme Court hands down decision favoring Hobby Lobby in their case against Obamacare provision requiring companies to offer health insurance that covers birth control. Update!
Courtesy of the Chicago Tribune:
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that business owners can object on religious grounds to a provision of President Barack Obama's healthcare law that requires closely held companies to provide health insurance that covers birth control.
The court held on a 5-4 vote on ideological lines that such companies can seek an exemption from the so-called birth control mandate of the healthcare law. The decision means employees of those companies will have to obtain certain forms of birth control from other sources.
In a majority opinion by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, the court said the ruling applies only to the birth control mandate and does not mean companies would necessarily succeed if they made similar claims to other insurance requirements, such as vaccinations and drug transfusions.
This is a very unfortunate decision by the Supreme Court, and very discriminatory toward women.
I can assure that Hobby Lobby has no such objection to offering health insurance that covers Viagra for men. It is only preventing the potential pregnancies that might result from those medication induced boners that gives them the vapors.
And the argument against providing this coverage due to religious beliefs is itself completely indefensible. It is essentially some mutation of the pro-life argument against providing abortion, however the majority of the medications restricted by this decision are for the prevention of conception, not the termination of conception.
The Bible says NOTHING about birth control and even if it did there should NEVER be an instance where an employer's religious beliefs superseded the family planning or health concerns of their female employees.
Update: Here are the five top takeaways from Justice Ginsberg's dissent.
5. The ruling is too broad: “In a decision of startling breadth, the Court holds that commercial enterprises, including corporations, along with partnerships and sole proprietorships, can opt out of any law (saving only tax laws) they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”
4. For-profit corporations are not religious organizations: “Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community.”
3. The ruling violates separation of church and state: “The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage”
2. The ruling favors an extreme form of “Christianity” over other religions: “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.”
1. Where does it end?: “Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision.
[...] The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”
You can read her entire dissent at the link at the top.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that business owners can object on religious grounds to a provision of President Barack Obama's healthcare law that requires closely held companies to provide health insurance that covers birth control.
The court held on a 5-4 vote on ideological lines that such companies can seek an exemption from the so-called birth control mandate of the healthcare law. The decision means employees of those companies will have to obtain certain forms of birth control from other sources.
In a majority opinion by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, the court said the ruling applies only to the birth control mandate and does not mean companies would necessarily succeed if they made similar claims to other insurance requirements, such as vaccinations and drug transfusions.
This is a very unfortunate decision by the Supreme Court, and very discriminatory toward women.
I can assure that Hobby Lobby has no such objection to offering health insurance that covers Viagra for men. It is only preventing the potential pregnancies that might result from those medication induced boners that gives them the vapors.
And the argument against providing this coverage due to religious beliefs is itself completely indefensible. It is essentially some mutation of the pro-life argument against providing abortion, however the majority of the medications restricted by this decision are for the prevention of conception, not the termination of conception.
The Bible says NOTHING about birth control and even if it did there should NEVER be an instance where an employer's religious beliefs superseded the family planning or health concerns of their female employees.
Update: Here are the five top takeaways from Justice Ginsberg's dissent.
5. The ruling is too broad: “In a decision of startling breadth, the Court holds that commercial enterprises, including corporations, along with partnerships and sole proprietorships, can opt out of any law (saving only tax laws) they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”
4. For-profit corporations are not religious organizations: “Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community.”
3. The ruling violates separation of church and state: “The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage”
2. The ruling favors an extreme form of “Christianity” over other religions: “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.”
1. Where does it end?: “Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision.
[...] The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”
You can read her entire dissent at the link at the top.
Labels:
Bible,
birth control,
Christianity,
Hobby Lobby,
religion,
Supreme Court,
women's health
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Bible study course, created by Hobby Lobby president, will soon be taught in Oklahoma public schools.
Courtesy of Raw Story:
According to the Religious News Service, the “Museum of the Bible Curriculum” created by Hobby Lobby’s President Steve Green (pictured above) will be beta-tested in Oklahoma’s Mustang Public School district beginning in the Fall of 2014.
Green hopes the program — which will be overseen by Jerry Pattengale, head of the Green Scholars Initiative — will be placed in “hundreds” of high schools by 2016, and “thousands” by 2017. It is a four-year elective course in which students will study the narrative, history, and impact of the Bible on Western Civilization. Because the book is being taught within an academic purview, it does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Abington School District v. Schempp.
“Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible,” the Court decided, “when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment.”
I actually agree with the judge up to a point.
An elective course that studies the impact of the Bible on Western civilization could be an interesting and informative class.
However since this is coming from the ultra religious Hobby Lobby people, it's goal is far more subversive than simple education about the impact of the book.
“The goal is to show that the impact of this book, when we apply it to our lives, has been good, because it has. So it’s good, and it’s true,” Green said, before moving on to discuss the other section of the curriculum, which would be “the story of the Bible.”
“We’re as ignorant [as] we’ve ever been, would be my argument,” Green said, “because we aren’t teaching it in our schools.”
“That would be the goal,” he continued, “to reintroduce this book to this nation, because it is in danger, because of its ignorance, of what God has taught. There is [sic] lessons of the past that we can learn from the dangers of ignorance of this book. We need to know it, and if we don’t know it, our future is going to be very scary.”
Green also labeled the Bible a "reliable historical document" which is far from the truth as you can get.
In my opinion, if this course is offered in Oklahoma public schools then it opens up the door for a course about Islam, in which the Koran is describes as a "reliable historic document."
Or a course about Sikhism where the Adi Granth is taught as a "reliable historic document."
Or perhaps an elective course that studied the Vedas as a "reliable historic document."
Each and every one of them deserve the same consideration in an academic environment, unless it can be proven, scientifically, that one book is more reliable than another.
And THAT should be the test before this course is introduced into the Oklahoma public school classrooms.
According to the Religious News Service, the “Museum of the Bible Curriculum” created by Hobby Lobby’s President Steve Green (pictured above) will be beta-tested in Oklahoma’s Mustang Public School district beginning in the Fall of 2014.
Green hopes the program — which will be overseen by Jerry Pattengale, head of the Green Scholars Initiative — will be placed in “hundreds” of high schools by 2016, and “thousands” by 2017. It is a four-year elective course in which students will study the narrative, history, and impact of the Bible on Western Civilization. Because the book is being taught within an academic purview, it does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Abington School District v. Schempp.
“Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible,” the Court decided, “when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment.”
I actually agree with the judge up to a point.
An elective course that studies the impact of the Bible on Western civilization could be an interesting and informative class.
However since this is coming from the ultra religious Hobby Lobby people, it's goal is far more subversive than simple education about the impact of the book.
“The goal is to show that the impact of this book, when we apply it to our lives, has been good, because it has. So it’s good, and it’s true,” Green said, before moving on to discuss the other section of the curriculum, which would be “the story of the Bible.”
“We’re as ignorant [as] we’ve ever been, would be my argument,” Green said, “because we aren’t teaching it in our schools.”
“That would be the goal,” he continued, “to reintroduce this book to this nation, because it is in danger, because of its ignorance, of what God has taught. There is [sic] lessons of the past that we can learn from the dangers of ignorance of this book. We need to know it, and if we don’t know it, our future is going to be very scary.”
Green also labeled the Bible a "reliable historical document" which is far from the truth as you can get.
In my opinion, if this course is offered in Oklahoma public schools then it opens up the door for a course about Islam, in which the Koran is describes as a "reliable historic document."
Or a course about Sikhism where the Adi Granth is taught as a "reliable historic document."
Or perhaps an elective course that studied the Vedas as a "reliable historic document."
Each and every one of them deserve the same consideration in an academic environment, unless it can be proven, scientifically, that one book is more reliable than another.
And THAT should be the test before this course is introduced into the Oklahoma public school classrooms.
Labels:
Bible,
children,
education,
Hobby Lobby,
Oklahoma,
public schools,
religious indoctrination,
students
Wednesday, April 02, 2014
Hobby Lobby hypocrisy alert.
Courtesy of Mother Jones:
Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012—three months after the company's owners filed their lawsuit—show that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).
Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby's retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby's health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.
Seriously?
These assholes are making money off of the companies which manufacture these medications while also suing so that their female employees don't get access to them through the company health plan?
And just when I thought I had seen it all.
Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012—three months after the company's owners filed their lawsuit—show that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).
Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby's retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby's health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.
Seriously?
These assholes are making money off of the companies which manufacture these medications while also suing so that their female employees don't get access to them through the company health plan?
And just when I thought I had seen it all.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Senator Elizabeth Warren weighs in on the Supreme Court's upcoming Hobby Lobby decision and her prognosis is not good.
Courtesy of Elizabeth Warren's blog:
Hobby Lobby doesn't want to cover its employees' birth control on company insurance plans. In fact, they're so outraged about women having access to birth control that they've taken the issue all the way to the Supreme Court.
I cannot believe that we live in a world where we would even consider letting some big corporation deny the women who work for it access to the basic medical tests, treatments or prescriptions that they need based on vague moral objections.
But here's the scary thing: With the judges we've got on the Supreme Court, Hobby Lobby might actually win.
The current Supreme Court has headed in a very scary direction.
Recently, three well-respected legal scholars examined almost 20,000 Supreme Court cases from the last 65 years. They found that the five conservative justices currently sitting on the Supreme Court are in the top 10 most pro-corporate justices in more than half a century.
And Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts? They were number one and number two.
Take a look at the win rate of the national Chamber of Commerce cases before the Supreme Court. According to the Constitutional Accountability Center, the Chamber was winning 43% of the cases in participated in during the later years of the Burger Court, but that shifted to a 56% win-rate under the Rehnquist Court, and then a 70% win-rate with the Roberts Court.
Follow these pro-corporate trends to their logical conclusion, and pretty soon you'll have a Supreme Court that is a wholly owned subsidiary of big business.
Warren goes on to warn that this could just be the beginning and that future rulings could be even worse. You know because I was not already freaked out enough.
And she's right.
This court was packed with conservative big business sycophants, who seem to care less about the law then they do political ideology. And isn't it always the OTHER side complaining about "activist judges?"
I hate to wish for any ill to come to anybody, but perhaps the best thing for the future of this country is for Justice Scalia or Justice Thomas to choke to death on a chicken bone so that President Obama, or President Hillary, can put some young whippersnapper with a strong heart and a progressive outlook to take their place.
As it is there really is a fairly reasonable chance that this decision might actually come down on the side of Hobby Lobby. Which in my opinion should remove any doubt that the Supreme court is now a subsidiary of big business and religious zealots.
Hobby Lobby doesn't want to cover its employees' birth control on company insurance plans. In fact, they're so outraged about women having access to birth control that they've taken the issue all the way to the Supreme Court.
I cannot believe that we live in a world where we would even consider letting some big corporation deny the women who work for it access to the basic medical tests, treatments or prescriptions that they need based on vague moral objections.
But here's the scary thing: With the judges we've got on the Supreme Court, Hobby Lobby might actually win.
The current Supreme Court has headed in a very scary direction.
Recently, three well-respected legal scholars examined almost 20,000 Supreme Court cases from the last 65 years. They found that the five conservative justices currently sitting on the Supreme Court are in the top 10 most pro-corporate justices in more than half a century.
And Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts? They were number one and number two.
Take a look at the win rate of the national Chamber of Commerce cases before the Supreme Court. According to the Constitutional Accountability Center, the Chamber was winning 43% of the cases in participated in during the later years of the Burger Court, but that shifted to a 56% win-rate under the Rehnquist Court, and then a 70% win-rate with the Roberts Court.
Follow these pro-corporate trends to their logical conclusion, and pretty soon you'll have a Supreme Court that is a wholly owned subsidiary of big business.
Warren goes on to warn that this could just be the beginning and that future rulings could be even worse. You know because I was not already freaked out enough.
And she's right.
This court was packed with conservative big business sycophants, who seem to care less about the law then they do political ideology. And isn't it always the OTHER side complaining about "activist judges?"
I hate to wish for any ill to come to anybody, but perhaps the best thing for the future of this country is for Justice Scalia or Justice Thomas to choke to death on a chicken bone so that President Obama, or President Hillary, can put some young whippersnapper with a strong heart and a progressive outlook to take their place.
As it is there really is a fairly reasonable chance that this decision might actually come down on the side of Hobby Lobby. Which in my opinion should remove any doubt that the Supreme court is now a subsidiary of big business and religious zealots.
Labels:
contraception,
Elizabeth Warren,
Hobby Lobby,
Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)