Sarah Palin never lets a criticism slide, but sometimes it takes awhile for her ghostwriter to make sense out of her screeching, this one is a week overdue.

"I don't know WHAT this blonde chick is talking about, I am too busy trying to figure out how to get that Daily Beast guy."

This courtesy the Wasilla Wendigo's ghostwritten Facebook page:

(She starts off by hitting CNN with a low blow.)

CNN: it’s no wonder your ratings still aren't matching competitors. American viewers are smarter than you assume, and we simply want truth in reporting. 

(Ouch right in the jewels!)

Please see the article linked below. (The article linked below actually takes you Breitbart's page, but I have not included it because, well it links to Breitbart's page.) Wolf Blitzer’s recent coverage of this story (Here is the link to the actual story, written in late March that Palin has finally gotten around to being pissed off about. You may remember it as the Daily Beast article that pointed out that SarahPAC's ad featuring snippets of her CPAC speech mocking consultants, was ironic since so much of SarahPAC's money went to Palin's consultants. I posted about it here.) really was blisteringly dishonest. First, because he didn’t reach out to me or the SarahPAC staff for rebuttal. (Yes because those people are so easy to get on the record, right?) Second, because he failed to disclose the anti-tea party associations of the “architect” (Karl Rove dig?) of this story whose organization is a competitor of my efforts to advance the candidacies of genuine grassroots conservatives – not those handpicked by the permanent political class. (I read the article at Breitbart so that you don't have to and the crux of it was an attack on the Daily Beast journalist for being an anti-tea party guy, a strange rationalization that since Palin's consultants are paid a salary they are not actually "consultants," and then an ad hominem attack on Obama for stopping the White House tours due to the sequester.) As the article explains, in my recent CPAC speech I gulped and denounced the consultants who engage in campaign hopping and have made a racket out of multi-million dollar failures each election cycle for themselves and their cronies. What a shame CNN continues to plug away in a floundering direction with reports like this. The shame is that they employ some top-notch reporters who no doubt believe in truth in journalism, but examples like this diminish the good reporters’ good efforts. (I love it when Palin gives journalism advice to news outlets. You know because she has that Bachelor's degree in communication and all.)

Now you may think that the example above is a good representation of how Palin NEVER gets over a criticism, but you have not seen anything yet. As our President would say, proceed oh ignorant one.

As a side note, I find it interesting that CNN recently disclosed that their old “Crossfire” show might hit their airwaves again. Wasn’t CNN among those who issued blistering criticism about the use of a “crossfire” icon in 2010 to represent political districts we wished to see represented by commonsense conservatives? CNN, among others, implied that using a “crossfire” icon (which was a tactic first employed by Democrats to illustrate political maps of districts they “targeted” to win) was inciting violence. 

 - Sarah Palin


Wow! So clearly Palin is STILL steaming over the criticism she received for putting those crosshair symbols on that map, and to her response after Gabby Giffords was shot.

Here is the old Crossfire logo that Palin is referring to:

Oh yeah, totally the same, don't you think?

Only difference is that the CNN logo is not identifying actual human beings, and targeting them for elimination. Oh AND it did not correspond to an actual assassination attempt on somebody targeted by the symbol.

But you know other than those two minor differences, totally the same.

I think in Palin's case the old adage, you can take the girl out of middle school, but you can't take the middle school out of the girl, has never been more accurate.