Early endorser Sarah Palin finally comes out of hiding to confront the Trump controversy. And look it only took her 24 hours!

"Sexualized behaviors? What would I know about sexualized behaviors.?"

Courtesy of Dora the Endorser's Facebook page: 

Crass Heard 'Round the World 

Disgusting, shameful, totally disrespectful "locker room" garbage, privately shared between two Hollywood playboys over a decade ago, is now made to be "the crudeness heard 'round the world." The old Bush and Trump braggart comments were beyond abhorrent and offensive, though both boys apologized for them. 

Oh my God! Has Palin, like numerous other GOP women, finally reached the end of her patience with Donald Trump and is now willing to condemn his actions and withdrawal her endorsement for the good of the party? 

Please, just who do you think we are talking about here?

As offensive, however, is media obsession with a very old conversation between non-political figures when we're in a crucial time facing earth-altering shifts in our future. The Supreme Court, international tinderbox relationships, global security, and our entire economy hang in the balance. With the question of what kind of country we will leave our daughters and sons unanswered, I wisely look at today's candidates' positions and what they have accomplished, while being well aware there are no perfect candidates. I encourage all to quit putting faith in flawed human beings. 

You first lady.

Going around media filters you clearly see one candidate offering a bold vision with solid plans to build a stronger, safer, greater America (Wait, "one candidate offering a bold vision with solid plans to build a stronger, safer, greater America?" Is she getting ready to endorse Hillary Clinton?), while the career politician in the race offers only tired, sad, unsustainable, illogical ways of the past that will leave our children unsafe, broken and abused. 

 Oh I forgot, in Palin's world everything up is down, and everything down is up.


In today's Presidential race, it's only telling which candidate participated in cruder past conversations if both candidates' communications were all exposed, but alas, that won't happen. (Oh so since the completely imaginary possibility exists that Hillary has said things just as shocking as what Trump said on that tape, we should assume that one is no more guilty than the other? Oh yeah, there's some logical thinking for ya.) This, despite the fact that just one of Hillary Clinton's leaked conversations told us all we needed to know about her respect for a woman's life. Tellingly, there was never an apology for this.

At this point Palin links to that completely discredited You Tube video of Hillary supposedly laughing about getting a rapist off during her days as a public defender. It is yet another sad attempt to create a false equivalency, and it fails completely.

It's undeniable that it's only politics allowing characterization of Trump's old comments as more outrageous and offensive than Hillary's comments, as she's caught on tape gleefully defending a child rapist, laughing behind the victim's back, bragging about her disgusting, shameful, totally crude act in defense of a man's worst perpetration of evil on a little girl.

Damn she went all out at the end there. I think she even managed to dredge up some faux outrage. 

Palin then used this image to illustrate her post.

 Well I could not agree more.

In fact I guess we should all have expected that the wife of a man accused of pimping women out for the sexual pleasure of men, and the mother of a man who drunkenly beat his future wife so badly that he was hauled away by the cops, would have little difficulty coming to the defense of a man who has sexually harassed women for over thirty years, and who once raped his own wife in anger over the fact that the procedure he had to reduce his bald spot hurt his big orange head.

For the record Sarah, there is NOTHING supported by the facts in Hillary or Bill Clinton's past that even comes close to the disgusting nature of what's on that tape.

And when you add it to all of the other despicable things we now know about Donald Trump (Twitter rants, fat shaming, lies about his wealth, racism, sexism, links to Putin, etc.) our choice for the next leader of the greatest nation on earth becomes clear.

Though to be fair that actually became clear for most of us on the day that you endorsed him for president.

Okay so let's talk gossip.

So yesterday a bunch of you sent me a link to an article on Celebitchy concerning Bristol Palin.

Now the article itself was addressing that post on the Daily Mail about Levi and Bristol having resolved their custody issues, which of course we all know to be bullshit.

However what was interesting about the post was not the article itself, but rather what showed up in the comments section:  

mimif says: 

October 22, 2015 at 11:58 am 

Cannot tolerate these assholes. A woman I know had an affair with Todd Palin’s brother, James, and oh lawd the tea she spilled. Screen caps and all.

Wait, what?

Other commenters asked for more, and more is exactly what they got:

mimif says: October 22, 2015 at 2:42 pm 

Sorry! I completely spaced out. Okay, I have to be kind of delicate because… f-ck it. 

So my bf is a commercial fisherman up in Bristol Bay (occasionally I crew for him), and he fishes alongside Todd Palin in the summer. Additionally, one of our good friends is a longtime Palin family friend (we constantly tease him but by all accounts he swears Todd is a good dude), so I always get the insider stories and it’s why my face turns purple every time there is a post about them here. Anyhow, the year the Palins had their stupid documentary Sarah and her brood were crawling all over the town we fish out of. This town is teeny tiny btw, there is like zero anonymity. It’s also a very pro-Palin town too, as they have Alaska Native roots there, so one does not speak unkindly of them in public. A friend of mine starts telling me that she’s boinking James Palin, and I was like, yeah whatever, who cares. And then she starts telling me these stories…like super lurid stories of shit that he was into, stuff you wouldn’t make up unless you were a sociopath, but I was busy fishing and couldn’t be bothered. So THEN, she starts sending me screen caps of their FB convos and dude, a) the guy is a total dog (supposedly on a trial separation from his wife, whom eventually divorced him), b) not even going into the sexual details because it makes me want to com (NASTY), but c) he talked so much shit about Sarah it was unreal. That she was cheating on Todd (apparently James and Sarah had a fling too, something about being a knob gobbler, but she broke it off), she’s a total drunk who lets her kids do whatever they want, Bristol is the town bicycle and the rumors about Sarah’s last baby being Bristol’s were true, how her thirst for fame completely destroyed Todd & Sarah’s marriage, talk about swinging…should I go on? He sounded like a jilted lover, he totally despised her. So take that all with a grain of salt, people. 

Then this douche James invited my friend to Hawaii with his kids, wanted to marry her, (also wanted to f-ck her friends) guy was just a piece of work. FWIW, my friend isn’t exactly playing with a full deck so he was 100% taking advantage of her. Ick. The whole family is revolting. From personally experience, Sarah is a hag. Literally. I’ve met her more than once and her voice makes me want to rip my hair out. The End. 

P.S. I’m mad at all of you now for making me type that out AND I’m going to hell.

And then there was more: 

mimif says: October 22, 2015 at 3:00 pm 

Lol knob gobbler is pretty good, but I’m still mad at you (also keep remembering more tidbits!). It’s not too much of a stretch tho, is it? I mean, she’s just a horrible person, and so is her daughter. My bf’s FB feed is a gem of info, too, as most of his buddies are Alaskan. Very few people (outside some of the rural villages) hold them with any kind of regard. They are a disgrace to the great state of Alaska and I can’t wait for them to go far, far away. RANT OVER. 

ETA omg I can’t edit my OG post. **makes me want to VOM, not com. That sounds so wrong. 😫

And even more:

mimif says: October 22, 2015 at 3:38 pm 

I’m trying to remember what year this was…2009 or 2010, so back when Palin was kind of a big deal (to some folks). But yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if James Palin started the whole Sarah pretended to have Bristol’s baby rumor, dude was out to get her. Which was equally odd because he was technically working for her/part of her entourage, not to mention her BIL.

After that this MimiF person started talking about other topics before stating that her boyfriend was mad at her for divulging what she did and then she clammed up for good.

So the first thing I have to mention is that this is a gossip site and one should always take posts by commenters with a big ole grain of salt. However the thing that kept catching my eye was this talk about Todd's brother James.

And the reason why is because it closely matched what my own source had once told me in great detail about this particular family member, whom she referred to as JD.

According to her he was a full blown alcoholic, and sexual deviant, who was considered the black sheep even in a family almost made up entirely of black sheep.

Some of the things she told me were even too graphic for an adult blog like this.

You may remember that in this post my source had told me that the entire family had dealt with substance abuse problems, but what I did not say at the time is that she felt JD, or James if you will, had the worst problems of all.

There was a reason at the time that I did not focus on JD, and it had to do with the identity of my source. At the time we had agreed that she would eventually come out of the shadows and talk openly, but then the Palins essentially shut her up and that was that.

Now the one thing about MimiF's comments that I do not necessarily agree with is her statement that Trig was actually Bristol's child.

The reason for that is due to the fact that my other sources cannot account for a time where Bristol was MIA long enough to have been pregnant and then given birth without their knowledge.

Now they will say that she could have been pregnant up to a year or more earlier, but that around the beginning of 2008 they saw Bristol quite frequently.

Trust me, these folks would NOT cover for Bristol or the Palin family as there is NO love lost between them.

As for the deviant sex and talk of affairs? Oh yeah that matches perfectly.

Pop star Miley Cyrus has a rather blunt opinion of religion. And it ruffles a few conservative feathers.

Courtesy of Fox News: 

In Miley Cyrus’ super revealing Paper magazine cover story, the actress, who appears nude inside the mag, says she is the least judgmental person ever, yet she has some harsh words for Christian fundamentalists and her parents. 

The magazine’s story on Cyrus notes that though she was raised Christian, the singer “maintains a particular contempt for fundamentalist lawmakers who rally against this sort of progressive, potentially life-saving changes [for the LGBT] community.” 

The pop star told the mag, "Those people [shouldn't] get to make our laws.” 

The article touches on what Cyrus thinks of people who believe Noah’s Ark was a real vessel, "That's f--king insane,” she told the magazine. “We've outgrown that fairy tale, like we've outgrown f--king Santa and the tooth fairy." 

You tell'em Hannah Montana!

Cyrus also identified herself as having a rather fluid attitude about gender and sexuality.  

"I am literally open to every single thing that is consenting and doesn't involve an animal and everyone is of age. Everything that's legal, I'm down with. Yo, I'm down with any adult -- anyone over the age of 18 who is down to love me," she said. "I don't relate to being boy or girl, and I don't have to have my partner relate to boy or girl."

Well this is going to make a couple of conservative heads go "pop."

Oops, here is one now, Creationist Ken Ham who wants to know why Miley does not do the dirty with animals.

Sick boy:

Question for her: Why not involve an animal? On what basis does she decide that? Besides, if there’s no God and she’s just a result of evolution, then she is merely an animal anyway. And those she interacts with sexually are just animals—so why not any animals? In other words, she has decided to draw a line for some reason—but what reason? It’s actually because in her heart she knows God exists (Romans 1), she knows she is different from the animals as she is made in God’s image (Genesis 1)—and she has a conscience (as seared as it is because of her sinful rebellion) because the law is written on our hearts (Romans 2). 

Question for her: Why only those over the age of 18? On what basis did she decide that? If there’s no God, why have any age restriction? On what basis would she argue against pedophilia? Why not do whatever anyone wants to do?

Why do these fundamentalist types ALWAYS first think about sex with animals or children? Eeew!

Apparently Ham missed the part where Cyrus talked about "consent."

You see it's the same reason you do not have sex with a person who is drunk, or mentally ill, or passed out.

Miley Cyrus may seem to have questionable morals to certain religious people, but at least she knows not to force herself sexually onto a person unable to give their consent.

That is certainly a hell of a lot more than can be said for Josh Duggar.

But wait there's more. Apparently Bristol Palin's ghostwriter has her panties all in a wad over this as well:

Miley later went on to drop lots of profanity as she described her parents’ conservative political views and anyone who might believe Biblical stories like Noah’s Ark are actually true. (Profanity? Do you mean like the profanity found in these police tapes from the Drunken brawl in Anchorage last year?)

Is it just me or does it seem more than a little fake that someone claiming to be accepting of everyone and everything would spew such judgment towards her own parents and their deeply held religious beliefs? 

She wants everyone else to let her be “free to be Miley,” but seems unwilling to offer the same respect to her parents and those who wish to live out their Christian faith. 

(Actually in the article Cyrus specifically identifies her mother as being very accepting and supportive despite her Christian faith, and "praises her parents throughout the interview." Hardly seems disrespectful.)

Oh, Miley. Thanks for giving us the best example of what “tolerance” looks like in Hollywood: it looks a lot like contempt.

No contempt is what you show by paying a grown woman to make up things to attack somebody you disagree with while posing as a millennial, to make it appear a peer is doing the attacking.

Which seems to be working, as a number of sites are now quoting the post as if Bristol actually wrote the stupid thing.

When will they learn?

P.S. I actually don't listen to Miley Cyrus on the radio, but I did really enjoy this Wrecking Ball song. (Warning video is a little NSFW.)

She kind of reminds of a young Madonna. Remember how SHE freaked out the religious right?

Michigan GOP candidate would like everybody to kindly ignore his arrest record for masturbating in cars and elect him to office.

Jordan D. Haskins, candidate for the state legislator, and public masturbator.

Courtesy of Raw Story:

A candidate running to represent Michigan’s 95th House district in the state legislature wants you to know that once you look past his bizarre sexual fetish and multiple felony convictions, he is a rock-ribbed conservative Republican, whose “stool of conservatism” is held up by “faith, family and freedom.” 

Michigan Live reported Friday that Saginaw’s Jordan D. Haskins dismisses the arrests and prison time as the results of youthful indiscretion and said that he is ready to “move on from that and do what I can” to serve his state as a Republican state Representative. 

“I have dreams,” Haskins said to Michigan Live, “and I want to make a difference.” 

Haskins, 24, has served prison time in two states and is currently on parole, but there are no rules preventing him from running for the state House. 

On four occasions between April of 2010 and January of 2011, Haskins broke into vehicles on public and private property, disconnected the ignition wires, then started the engine. As the wires snapped and spit sparks, Haskins would masturbate to climax in a sexualized ritual he calls “cranking.” 

Haskins has lived in Michigan and North Carolina and has lengthy criminal records in both states, dating back to the age of 15. Early offenses had mostly to do with breaking into cars and going on joyrides. 

“I was just a lonely, angry kid at the time,” he said. “If anything, I could be put on ‘World’s Dumbest Criminals.’”

Valid point, after all who hasn't broken into cars, hot wired them, and then polished the bishop while listening to the vehicle's engine turning over?

Well me for one. 

And here I thought I was fairly well versed in deviant behaviors, and yet I have never even HEARD of this one.

And look I don't like to judge other people's sexual proclivities, but he guy DID get convicted for his, and this did not happen when he was an adolescent, but instead only three or four years ago.

Yeah if I were a voter in Michigan's 95th district I am pretty sure this would be more than enough to dissuade me from casting my vote for this guy.

Vehement Republican anti-gay crusader indicted on charges of engaging in unlawful sex acts with a 13-year-old boy. Seriously, is ANYBODY surprised?

Courtesy of Washington Blade:

 A Republican candidate for the Delaware State Senate who boasted of being a member of the anti-gay Delaware Family Policy Council was indicted this week on multiple charges of engaging in unlawful sex acts with a 13-year-old boy. 

The indictment came less than a week after Eric Bodenweiser, 53, abruptly dropped out of his race for a State Senate seat in a conservative-leaning district near Rehoboth Beach that includes the City of Georgetown. 

The indictment includes 113 felony sex charges, including 39 counts of unlawful sexual intercourse — first-degree and 74 counts of unlawful sexual contact — second-degree. Although the indictment doesn’t identify the gender of the victim, the Gape Gazette identified the victim as a boy who allegedly was sexually abused by Bodenweiser between Oct. 1, 1987 and Aug. 31, 1990 when he was between the ages of 10 and 13.

You know one of the main talking points as to why homosexuals should be vilified and kept away from children is because a lot of people still equate being gay to simply being a deviant who are predisposed to do something terrible to innocent children. But the facts are that the LGBT community is no more, or less likely to be a pedophile than are those in the straight community.

But do you know which group evidence suggests is the MOST likely to be a threat to our children? The Christian conservative homophobe, that's who.

I think the evidence is almost overwhelming to suggest that anybody screaming about somebody else's "deviant" behaviors is more likely than not to be the one that you should never, and I mean never, turn your back on.

Do you know my favorite part of this story?

Democratic candidate Jane Hovington, who was expected to lose to Bodenweiser by a wide margin, is now the only candidate on the ballot in the race for the 19th Senate district. She is being challenged by Republican former Georgetown Mayor Brian Pettyjohn, who is running as a write-in candidate.

That my friends is karma coming back to bite the GOP right in their lily white asses for constantly fanning the flames of hate in order to get their people elected using that "family values" bullshit.