Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Sarah Palin's ghostwritten website mocks Democrats' emotional response to the Florida shooting because they also support a woman's right to choose.

Now I would never suggest that you actually visit Palin's ghostwritten blog, so here is the essential argument: 

Watching liberal responses to the devastating shooting in Florida on Wednesday is like driving by a car accident on the side of the highway. You don’t want to look. You know you shouldn’t look. But, you look anyway. 

We knew that liberals were going to say something dumb about guns before the smoke even cleared and before we had any idea where the guns came from.

The article then focused on California Senator Kamala Harris, and attempted to shame her for calling for better gun laws.

The excuse they use for mocking Senator Harris is her use of the word "babies" in this tweet.

The blog then presents a tweet  from last month and proceeds to make a false equivalency between the two.


Palin is literally so caught up in partisan hatred that she cannot seem to differentiate between an unborn fetus and a teenager riddled with bullets bleeding out onto a classroom floor.

And let me remind everybody once again, that the vast majority of women do not seek an abortion after 20 weeks unless the fetus has a serious birth defect or the birth endangers the life of the mother.

Sunday, September 10, 2017

The media is bitching about Hillary Clinton being whiny in her new book, but have you seen the book Bernie Sanders published right after the election?

So he is complaining because the Democratic party was quick to get behind the Democratic nominee who barely lost the primary the last time she ran?
So essentially Sanders is pissed that Hillary wrote a book giving him some of the blame for her loss, even though his book is ALL about blaming her and the Democratic party for his.

And that crap about him having a better chance up against Trump is pure bullshit.

Bernie was barely known in many places throughout the country, and this was an election where marquee names played a huge part in attracting votes.

That's like suggesting a poodle would have a better chance in a fight against Godzilla than King Kong.

And this book kerfuffle is not the only place where Sanders is running a cheese grater across Democratic nerves.

Courtesy of Politico:  

Prominent Democrats are increasingly riled by attacks from Bernie Sanders' supporters, whose demands for ideological purity are hurting the party ahead of the 2018 midterms and 2020 presidential election, they say. 

But it’s not just the outside agitators that Democratic lawmakers, operatives and activists are annoyed with: They’re tired of what they see as the Vermont senator’s hesitance to confront his own backers, either in public or through back channels. 

Tensions boiled over recently when a handful of Sanders loyalists bashed freshman Sen. Kamala Harris — a rising star in the party and potential 2020 hopeful — as an establishment tool. Democrats were also rankled that other prominent Sanders allies said support for single-payer health care should be a litmus test for candidates. 

In response, Democratic senators and outside groups have begun telling Sanders and friendly intermediaries that if he wants to be a leading figure for Democrats ahead of 2020’s presidential election, he needs to get his supporters in line — or at least publicly disavow their more incendiary statements. 

The confrontations, they insist, threaten party unity ahead of a critical midterm election cycle, when Democrats have a shot at winning the House and several governor’s offices. 

“The Democratic Party has treated Sen. Sanders exceptionally well. We collectively let him run in our primaries when he declared he wasn’t a Democrat — I count that as a great favor, and an opportunity almost no one else has ever received,” said former Democratic National Committee Chairman Don Fowler, who has called for the independent Sanders to formally join the party.

That last part is important to keep in mind.  The Democrats allowed Sanders to run, and while inside their house he got up to all kinds of mischief and even caused some long lasting damage.

Sanders and his supporters were key to the Russian's ability to damage Hillary's reputation as they provided legitimacy to some of the most outlandish allegations made against her by retweeting them and posting them on their Facebook pages.

If Sanders had run as an Independent, and his supporters had remained on the outside of both major parties, the impact of what they promoted on social media would have been essentially innocuous.

But once they were making those allegations from what appeared to be the inside of the Democratic party, the damage was much more severe.

And it STILL is. Not so much to Hillary, but to up and coming Democratic stars like Kamala Harris who are still finding their way and can be fatally damaged by negative attacks from those who demand the kind of purity which is ultimately political suicide in a general election.

We have to face facts that a number of those who supported Sanders in the 2016 primaries, are not really Democrats, and have no intention of ever becoming Democrats.

They wanted to change the status quo, start throwing the furniture out of the windows, and undermine the whole process which they essentially view as corrupt.

Trying to woo them is a total waste of time and energy.

What we need to do instead is to remember who we are as Democrats, find ourselves some good talented candidates, and then circle the wagons around them for the battle that looms ahead.

If we do a good job of defining who we are, and what we represent, those Sanders supporters may find that they have a whole lot more in common with those of us on the Democratic side of the aisle than Donald Trump or even a Jill Stein.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Jeff Sessions during his Senate hearing today, "I don't recall, I don't remember, I don't like to be rushed." Update!

I wanted to embed the Kamala Harris questioning because I loved how unrelenting she was in trying to get Sessions to tell the truth.

And this is my favorite part of her questioning.
Kamala Harris tore Sessions a new one today and he got his tiny little elfin feelings hurt, which inspired John McCain, who is not a member of this committee, to ride to his rescue.

Earlier in the hearing Sessions called any accusation that he helped or was aware of any collusion with the Russians an "appalling and detestable lie": 

"Further, I have no knowledge of any such conversations by anyone connected to the Trump campaign," Sessions said. "The suggestion that I participated in any collusion or that I was aware of any collusion with the Russian government to hurt this country, which I have served with honor for 35 years, or to undermine the integrity of our democratic process, is an appalling and detestable lie." 

Sessions also refused to talk about any of this conversations with Trump:

Sessions confirmed that he had left Comey on his own with Trump in the Oval Office alone February 14, though declined to say whether he was ordered to do so by the President citing the need to keep his conversations with him private. He also said that Comey had later told him he was concerned about the meeting, but he did not say that something improper occurred. 

Oddly enough Sessions also claimed that he had never been briefed on the Russian hacking: 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said during new sworn testimony that he has never received a briefing on Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election. 

"It appears so, the intelligence community seems to be united in that," Sessions said Tuesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee, in response to a question from Maine Senator Angus King about whether Russia worked to influence the election. "But I have to tell you Senator King, I know nothing but what I've read in the paper. I've never received any detailed briefing on how hacking occurred or how information was alleged to have influenced the campaign." 

King asked Sessions, now the top law enforcement officer in the country, to confirm that he never received any briefing on the Russian measures in the election. "No, I don't believe I ever did," Sessions replied.

Now either Attorney General Jeff Sessions just perjured himself, or he is completely unfit for the position of Attorney General, because it would seem to be impossible for an AG to do their job without having many substantive briefings on the fact that the Russian government hacked into our election in an attempt to manipulate the results.

Update: Al Franken weighs in.