Courtesy of WaPo:
Workers at a factory in China used by the company that makes clothing for Ivanka Trump’s fashion line and other brands worked nearly 60 hours a week to earn wages of little more than $62 a week, according to a factory audit released Monday.
The factory’s 80 workers knit clothes for the contractor, G-III Apparel Group, which has held the exclusive license to make the Ivanka Trump brand’s $158 dresses, $79 blouses and other clothes since 2012. The company also makes clothes for Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger and other brands.
Inspectors with the Fair Labor Association, an industry monitoring group whose members include Apple and Nike, found two dozen violations of international labor standards during a two-day tour of the factory in October, saying in a report that workers faced daunting hours, high turnover, and pay near or below China’s minimum wage.
The inspection offers a rare look at the working conditions of the global manufacturing machine that helped make Trump’s fashion brand a multimillion-dollar business.
Its release also comes as the president’s daughter has sought to cast herself as both a champion of workplace issues and a defender of her father’s “buy American, hire American” agenda. Trump, whose book “Women Who Work” debuts next week, was in Germany on Tuesday for public discussions about global entrepreneurship and empowerment.
“We can add billions to the global economy by creating an enabling environment, increasing women’s labour force participation and business ownership, and improving the productivity of their work,” Trump wrote in a Financial Times essay Monday.
Well it would certainly be hard to improve productivity past 60 hour work weeks now wouldn't it?
And since it is quite likely that a clothing manufacturing plant would hire mostly women, I guess this is how Ivanka Trump empowers women in the workforce.
Clearly Trump's own High Society Barbie is just as full of shit as her Cheeto tinged father.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label clothing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clothing. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Tuesday, May 03, 2016
Old Navy uses interracial relationship in new ad. The response is exactly what you would expect.
Courtesy of News Mic:Oh, happy day! Our #ThankYouEvent is finally here. Take 30% off your entire purchase: https://t.co/nGQ9Pji1pN pic.twitter.com/vq4mIczm6A— Old Navy Official (@OldNavy) April 29, 2016
Old Navy was hoping to kick off a happy day of Sunday internet shopping for online consumers when it tweeted an advertisement featuring a smiling interracial family, along with a 30% off coupon. But rather than an immediate boom in sales, the retail giant saw an explosion of racist trolls in their Twitter mentions, lambasting the company for showing what they referred to as miscegenation: the mixing of races.
To it's credit Old Navy tried to be diplomatic and address their potential customer's concerns.
Trying to reason with racists. When will we ever learn that there is nothing more futile.
So is it any wonder that if these idiots are still this hung up over racism that they lose their minds over trans folk using the restrooms?
Labels:
advertisement,
clothing,
conservatives,
Old Navy,
racism,
Twitter
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Are there really people who think this way?
Just speaking personally, I have had more women come on to me while wearing skirts that would be considered "proper" of even "old fashioned" than I have ones wearing clothing that would be considered "provocative" or "asking for it" as defined by this picture.
I once had a one time fling with a woman wearing paint overalls. So what does that tell you?
I once had a one time fling with a woman wearing paint overalls. So what does that tell you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



