Courtesy of The Hill:
"Throw them out into the cold," Trump ordered security, as protesters shouted "Bernie! Bernie!" during his rally Thursday night in Burlington, Vt.
"Don't give them their coats," Trump added. "No coats! Confiscate their coats."
The Sanders supporters had planned to infiltrate the Trump rally but many were thwarted as Trump security screened attendees and ejected those who didn't declare allegiance to the billionaire.
But about half an hour into the speech some Sanders supporters began chanting.
Trump said it was "fun" to have the protesters attend his events and kick them out.
"It's about 10 degrees below zero outside... You can keep his coat; tell him we'll send it to him in a couple of weeks," Trump told security.
You know if this is not a metaphor for how Donald Trump would treat the American people if he became President I don't know what is.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label inhumane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inhumane. Show all posts
Friday, January 08, 2016
Monday, May 27, 2013
Kansas Republican Congressman talking about Gitmo hunger strike "It looked to me like a lot of them had put on weight."
I liked how Craig Melvin immediately asked him how he could possibly know if the detainees had put on weight unless he saw them BEFORE they started their hunger strike. After which the candy ass tries to change the subject in order to save face.
Too late!
"I have no idea what that woman is talking about?" Yeah just like a Republican. When faced with facts just refuse to examine them. POS!
Too late!
"I have no idea what that woman is talking about?" Yeah just like a Republican. When faced with facts just refuse to examine them. POS!
Labels:
Craig Melvin,
detainees,
Guantanamo,
hunger strike,
inhumane,
justice,
Kansas,
MSNBC,
politics,
Republicans,
YouTube
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Mitt Romney shrugs off questions about cruel and inhumane treatment of his dog Seamus during a 12 hour family trip in 1983.
That is one of the most disingenuous laughs I have ever heard. And horribly inappropriate in this context.
So Romney is now claiming that the dog carrier was "completely airtight?" How in the hell does a dog breathe in an "airtight" kennel?
And he left the poor animal in there for twelve hours?
I also call bullshit on the idea that the dog climbed up onto the roof of the car in order to get into the kennel on his own. How would he even manage that?
I could not help notice that Romney seemed relatively unconcerned that he had also broken the law by doing this. You know regular human laws are for the little people, and do not pertain to Romney.
By the way I also learned that Romney's story may in fact be MUCH worse than previously thought.
Check this out.
The original story claimed that Mitt Romney strapped his dog to the roof of the car in a crate and drove the family 12-hours to Canada. Along the way, the poor, scared dog (Seamus) had a bad case of diarrhea (some say in fear) that ran down the side of the car. Romney stopped the car at a gas station, the story went, and hosed down the poor beast and car before getting back on the road.
But is that what REALLY happened?
In today's article, Swidey reveals that in the first version of the story he'd heard from a Romney "family friend," Mitt Romney did not hose down the dog but instead "drove the station wagon right through a car wash" with poor Seamus strapped atop!
Knowing he had a remarkable story in his hands, Swidey says, he worked diligently to ensure he had every detail correct. He spoke to Tagg Romney, one of the Romney children who was in the car at the time. "Far from being tone-deaf, Tagg realized as I dug deeper that the story could cause his father grief," Swidey wrote.
And the story changed.
Is it really possible that he drove his dog though a car wash? An animal that he claims was "a good friend of the family?"
Just when you thought Mitt Romney could not appear less compassionate.
I would not let this guy water my houseplants, much less run my country.
So Romney is now claiming that the dog carrier was "completely airtight?" How in the hell does a dog breathe in an "airtight" kennel?
And he left the poor animal in there for twelve hours?
I also call bullshit on the idea that the dog climbed up onto the roof of the car in order to get into the kennel on his own. How would he even manage that?
I could not help notice that Romney seemed relatively unconcerned that he had also broken the law by doing this. You know regular human laws are for the little people, and do not pertain to Romney.
By the way I also learned that Romney's story may in fact be MUCH worse than previously thought.
Check this out.
The original story claimed that Mitt Romney strapped his dog to the roof of the car in a crate and drove the family 12-hours to Canada. Along the way, the poor, scared dog (Seamus) had a bad case of diarrhea (some say in fear) that ran down the side of the car. Romney stopped the car at a gas station, the story went, and hosed down the poor beast and car before getting back on the road.
But is that what REALLY happened?
In today's article, Swidey reveals that in the first version of the story he'd heard from a Romney "family friend," Mitt Romney did not hose down the dog but instead "drove the station wagon right through a car wash" with poor Seamus strapped atop!
Knowing he had a remarkable story in his hands, Swidey says, he worked diligently to ensure he had every detail correct. He spoke to Tagg Romney, one of the Romney children who was in the car at the time. "Far from being tone-deaf, Tagg realized as I dug deeper that the story could cause his father grief," Swidey wrote.
And the story changed.
Is it really possible that he drove his dog though a car wash? An animal that he claims was "a good friend of the family?"
Just when you thought Mitt Romney could not appear less compassionate.
I would not let this guy water my houseplants, much less run my country.
Labels:
2012,
animal cruelty,
inhumane,
Mitt Romney,
PETA,
politics
Saturday, January 07, 2012
Mitt Romney on Peta, "Not happy with me because my dog likes fresh air." Did he really say that?
Like I mentioned before this might just turn out to be the story that actually causes Mitt Romeny the most difficulty moving forward.
Politicians are expected to change their positions based on whose vote they are trying to win. But EVERYBODY, both conservatives and liberals, love animals.
So strapping your beloved family pet to the top of a car, driving him 12 hours down a freeway while he craps in fear all over your car, and then claiming that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals dislikes you because your dog likes fresh air, comes off as being just this side of inhuman.
And for a man who is comes off as wooden and lacking in compassion even on a good day, THIS paints a rather unfortunate portrait of who you are as a human being.
Not to mention what kind of President you would make if you were to win this election.
I shudder at the very thought.
Politicians are expected to change their positions based on whose vote they are trying to win. But EVERYBODY, both conservatives and liberals, love animals.
So strapping your beloved family pet to the top of a car, driving him 12 hours down a freeway while he craps in fear all over your car, and then claiming that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals dislikes you because your dog likes fresh air, comes off as being just this side of inhuman.
And for a man who is comes off as wooden and lacking in compassion even on a good day, THIS paints a rather unfortunate portrait of who you are as a human being.
Not to mention what kind of President you would make if you were to win this election.
I shudder at the very thought.
Labels:
2012,
dogs,
inhumane,
Mitt Romney,
PETA,
pets,
politics,
Presidency,
Republicans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)