Slut shaming Donald Trump once negotiated a contract for his wife to appear in Playboy magazine.

@LPDonovan Nifty find. Trump pressuring his future wife to pose for Playboy. Personally negotiated the fee. pic.twitter.com/P4AMmx10ls

— Jeff Nichols (@backwards_river) October 1, 2016

Courtesy of Raw Story:

The article, tweeted by historian and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Illinois Jeff Nichols, ABD, outlines how Trump insisted that Maples do the centerfold and negotiated a million dollar check to compensate her for so doing.

“‘Donald doesn’t want Marla to look like she’s against Ivana,’ Says Trump’s PR guru, Chuck Jones. ‘Donald wants picture approval. Donald says to emphasize her early years,'” the article reads. 

It continues talking about how much Maples didn’t want to do the nude layout, fearing people would only see her as a pretty face, not a serious woman. 

“‘Trump himself was on the phone negotiating the fee,’ remembers a top Playboy editor. ‘He wanted her to do the nude layout. She didn’t.’ (‘I’m thankful for my body, but I didn’t want to exploit it,’ Marla offers. ‘How would I ever be taken seriously?’)” The story continues.

So essentially Trump tired to pimp his wife out so that millions of men could masturbate to pictures of her nude body.  And yet now he erroneously claims that a former Miss USA who dared to speak out against him starred in a pornographic film.

The word for today boys and girls is "projection."

And speaking of projection Trump also accused his opponent Hillary Clinton of cheating on Bill: 

Trump did not stop there. He said he did not believe Clinton would be loyal to her supporters and chuckled, “I don’t even think she’s loyal to Bill, to tell you the truth. And why should she be, right? Why should she be?”

So attacking her for being the victim of infidelity is no longer enough, now he wants to accuse her of betraying her vows as well. And this from a guy who cheated on his wife, and then bragged about it to Howard Stern.

Trump also attacked Hillary's "stamina" in his speech yesterday: Yeah well she certainly had enough stamina to kick his ass during that debate, didn't she?

By the way here is a reminder that THIS is the guy attacking women over their weight and lack of stamina.

Remember that word kids, "projection."

Donald Trump directs Twitter rampage at former Miss USA contestant who he fat shamed. Update!

Wow, did you see how badly @CNN (Clinton News Network) is doing in the ratings. With people like @donlemon, who could expect any more?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

Started by going after CNN.

Anytime you see a story about me or my campaign saying "sources said," DO NOT believe it. There are no sources, they are just made up lies!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

And then branched off to go after the media in general.

Wow, Crooked Hillary was duped and used by my worst Miss U. Hillary floated her as an "angel" without checking her past, which is terrible!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

But then he revealed his true target.

Using Alicia M in the debate as a paragon of virtue just shows that Crooked Hillary suffers from BAD JUDGEMENT! Hillary was set up by a con.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

Did Crooked Hillary help disgusting (check out sex tape and past) Alicia M become a U.S. citizen so she could use her in the debate?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

Note the times on these. He literally woke up in the middle of the night and decided that these were tweets that needed to be seen by his followers and the American people.

By the way the allegations that Machado made a sex tape appear to be false.

However even if she had made one, who cares?

After all SHE'S not running to be President of the United States.

And besides Donald Trump claims to love Paris Hilton like a daughter (And lust after like one too.) and she made perhaps the most famous sex tape in sex tape history.

I swear this guy gets more disgusting every single day.

Update: Check out this latest tweet.

Remember, don't believe "sources said" by the VERY dishonest media. If they don't name the sources, the sources don't exist.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2016

This from the guy who made the President produce his birth certificate because of anonymous sources.

Christian sex education course tells high school girls that too much sex will break their "chemical bond."

Courtesy of The Age:  

Year 7 girls have been warned not to have multiple sex partners or risk becoming like overused sticky tape, in a Christian sex education program at a public Victorian high school. 

The students at Fairhills High School, in Knoxfield in Melbourne's outer east, were also told that a chemical released in females' brains made them more needy than boys. 

A booklet titled 'Science & Facts', that was given to the students, said that "girls are needier than guys in a relationship and always want to be close".  (Wait, the booklet is called "Science & Facts?"  Is that like calling Fox News "Fair & Balanced?")


It said that a chemical called oxytocin, is released when "two people touch", and was produced by women more than men, making them needier. (By  the way Oxytocin is a hormone released by the pituitary gland to help regulate breastfeeding and childbirth. It is not released when girls simply touch a boy.)

"If a woman becomes physically close and hugs a guy for 20 seconds it will trigger the bonding process, creating a greater desire to be near him. Then if the guy wants to take the relationship further it will become harder for her to say no," the booklet said. (Why is it always the female's job to say no?)

It warned that having too many relationships could break "this special chemical bond" and harm a woman's capacity to form future relationships. 

"Having multiple sex partners is almost like tape that loses its stickiness after being applied and removed multiple times. So the more you have the harder it is to bond to the next," it said.

Yes too much sex will make it much harder to use women to hold things together. Makes perfect sense.

This particular school is in Knoxfield, Victoria, a suburb of Melbourne, Australia, but you know this same type of garbage is being introduced in public schools here in America as well. And in many private schools it is undoubtedly the ONLY curriculum available.

Since this article was first published the church was forced to apologize, but I think we all know they  will continue distributing this false information until all of the schools car them from their campuses.

Once again this kind of misinformation and shaming of girls is just another type of child abuse, and simply should not be tolerated in ANY educational setting.

In 1995 book Jeb Bush suggested that public shaming and ridicule were good ways to keep women from having babies out of wedlock.

Courtesy of HuffPo: 

Public shaming would be an effective way to regulate the “irresponsible behavior” of unwed mothers, misbehaving teenagers and welfare recipients, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) argued in his 1995 book Profiles in Character. 

In a chapter called "The Restoration of Shame,” the likely 2016 presidential candidate made the case that restoring the art of public humiliation could help prevent pregnancies “out of wedlock.” 

"One of the reasons more young women are giving birth out of wedlock and more young men are walking away from their paternal obligations is that there is no longer a stigma attached to this behavior, no reason to feel shame. Many of these young women and young men look around and see their friends engaged in the same irresponsible conduct. Their parents and neighbors have become ineffective at attaching some sense of ridicule to this behavior. There was a time when neighbors and communities would frown on out of wedlock births and when public condemnation was enough of a stimulus for one to be careful." 

Bush points to Nathaniel Hawthorne's 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter, in which the main character is forced to wear a large red "A" for "adulterer" on her clothes to punish her for having an extramarital affair that produced a child, as an early model for his worldview. "Infamous shotgun weddings and Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter are reminders that public condemnation of irresponsible sexual behavior has strong historical roots,” Bush wrote.

Well good to know that if we elect Jeb Bush to the White House that he will try to bring back the public shaming of women.

And seriously how does a guy like this have the nerve to write a book with the title "Profiles in Character?"

Seriously fuck this guy and everything he stands for!

Family Research Council senior fellow on allowing single people to have sex: “Functioning societies don’t do that, they stop it, they punish it, they corral people, they shame people, they do whatever."

Courtesy of Mediaite:  

While guesting on Washington Watch Monday afternoon, FRC senior fellow Pat Fagan argued that the 1972 Supreme Court court case Eisenstadt v. Baird, which overturned a Massachusetts law banning the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried people, is quite possibly “the single most destructive decision in the history of the Court.” 

Fagan was accompanied by ever-so-thoughtful evangelist and FRC head Tony Perkins. 

In Fagan’s mind, that Court decision effectively told all single people that they have “the right to engage in sexual intercourse.” Never mind the fact that, well, they kind of do have the right — you know, consenting adults and whatnot — because Fagan remembers when society used to have laws forbidding such sin. 

“Society never gave young people that right,” he continued. “Functioning societies don’t do that, they stop it, they punish it, they corral people, they shame people, they do whatever. The institution for the expression of sexuality is marriage and all societies always shepherded young people there, what the Supreme Court said was forget that shepherding, you can’t block that, that’s not to be done.” 

By giving an implicit seal of approval on premarital sex, Fagan said, the Court was “brushing aside millennia, thousands and thousands of years of wisdom, tradition, culture and setting in motion what we have.”

“Functioning societies don’t do that, they stop it, they punish it, they corral people, they shame people, they do whatever." That may be perhaps the most honest description for the function of religion that I have ever read.

By the way, the "thousands and thousands of years" he is referring to, is thousands and thousands of years of the Christian oppression of human sexuality. Not "wisdom." The entire religion is essentially set up to police the sexual conduct of human beings.

Just ask the Hawaiian people, or native Americans. They were people whose sexuality was as open and natural to them as eating or breathing. That is until they were introduced to the idea of shame, and were told that every terrible thing that befell them in life was the direct result of their "sins against God." And those sins were more often than not of a sexual nature.

The idea that the most basic function of humankind, our sexuality, is something that these people feel they have the right to control, is to me repugnant and, dare I say it,  evil.

The thing that Christianity fears the most is sex. Especially the sexuality of females.

Do you think they persecuted women as witches because they thought they were agents of Satan?

Fuck no, they persecuted them because their feared the power of the feminine, and they wanted to crush ANY sexuality not given the stamp of approval by the church. That goes for unmarried sex, gay sex, and, for quite a long time, sex between the races or between Christians and other religious faiths. Regardless of whether they were legally married or not.

Our most primitive religions were based either predominantly on the female deity, or the worship was spread evenly between male and female gods. Simply put, Christianity could not abide that.

Just imagine how different, how much more free, our country could have been without these puritanical sexual standards having been used to oppress us for lo these many years.