Showing posts with label Chuck Hagel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chuck Hagel. Show all posts

Monday, November 24, 2014

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is resigning today. Sources say that he is being forced out. Update!

Courtesy of Business Insider: 

A senior administration official subsequently confirmed to Business Insider that Hagel would resign. They said Hagel would announce his decision alongside the president at 11:00 a.m. 

 "A successor will be named in short order, but Secretary Hagel will remain as Defense Secretary until his replacement is confirmed by the United States Senate," the official said. 

The official characterized Hagel's decision to step down as normal administration turnover in the wake of the midterm elections earlier this month. 

That is the official response to why Hagel is leaving, however the unofficial response is much different:   

Senior defense officials confirmed to NBC News Monday that Hagel was forced to resign. 

The officials say the White House has lost confidence in Hagel to carry out his role at the Pentagon. According to one senior official, “He wasn’t up to the job.” 

Another senior administration official said that Hagel has been discussing a departure from the White House "for several weeks."

As we know President Obama is incredibly loyal to his people, so for Hagel to be "forced out" is a real recognition of his lack of confidence in the Defense Secretary's abilities.

Apparently there will be a press conference in about an hour so there will be more to add to this post then.

So I guess Monday's starting off with a bang.

Update: I just watched the Hagel press conference, and my take away is that he might have been forced from his job for incompetence, but his friendship with the President and Vice President Joe Biden seems quite genuine and deeply affectionate. 

At times it almost looked like the President and Chuck Hagel were both there against their will, and Joe Biden simply looked pissed off.

I think in the weeks ahead we will learn more about what instigated this resignation, but I am pretty confident that it was not due to any friction between Hagel and the President.

Wednesday, May 01, 2013

Sarah Palin fires off a tweet to take a stand against the separation of church and state. No, really!

Here is an update courtesy of Palin's Facebook page:

President Barack Obama had better clear this up today, right now. Surely he is just allowing his handlers to throw up this kind of ridiculous, amoral, un-American trial balloon. I call on Obama to address this immediately with the American public, clear it up, and renounce these reports as the nonsense they surely in God's name must be. 

- Sarah Palin 

It looks like Palin is embracing her new career as a non-broadcast televangelist by jumping on this newest Evangelical band wagon to nowhere.

I have been looking and cannot yet find the actual Pentagon statement that has these paint chip eaters so worked up. (All of the Right Wing and Evangelical websites seem to be getting their panties in a twist over the same Breitbart article that Palin is referring to.), but what the article claims is that soldiers in the military could be prosecuted for proselytizing.

Taking evangelism out of the military?

Keeping church and state separate?

Following the Constitution?

Why how could patriotic Americans stand for it?

Like I said I have not seen the actual report, however I will say that I do know quite a lot about the attempts of Mikey Weinstein to rid the military of the incredibly aggressive Evangelism which now permeates it, and which often results in bullying behaviors and a feeling of isolation for those not interested in participating in religious activities.

This is what the Washington Post reported about a meeting between Chuck Hagel and a group of sergeants and petty officers: 

“The armed forces are on the verge of falling apart,” Larry Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell, told me in an interview. Aside from proselytizing, he said, other problems include “sexual assault, suicides, lowering entrance standards and war weariness. They are in trouble, and the leadership is oblivious.” Sexual assault and proselytizing, according to Wilkerson, “are absolutely destructive of the bonds that keep soldiers together.” 

Wilkerson was speaking to me in an interview with former ambassador Joe Wilson and the head of the private Military Religious Freedom Foundation, Mikey Weinstein. They were on their way to a meeting at the Pentagon on April 23 where they would discuss religious issues in a group that included several generals and a military chaplain. 

The chaplain’s role, according to Wilson, “is to minister to spiritual needs. You don’t proselytize. It’s a workplace violation.” 

Weinstein told me after the Pentagon meeting that military leaders need to understand that “there is systematic misogyny, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in the military.” He said it is all part of the same culture. 

“This is a national security threat. What is happening [aside from sexual assault] is spiritual rape. And what the Pentagon needs to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished.” 

“The chain of command is compliant,” said Wilkerson. “Abuse of power is inimical to all military. Condoning of sexual assault or proselytizing is an abuse of command.” The idea of “zero tolerance,” he said, is “the most mocked phrase in the military. It camouflages a lot.”

"Spiritual rape?" Oh you know THAT is not going to go over very well!

But if the Pentagon DID respond to the concerns of these soldiers and ARE going after commanders and soldiers attempting to bully their fellow military members into joining their faith, they would be well within their rights to do so according to “Air Force Culture, Air Force Standards,” published on Aug. 7, 2012: 

Section 2.11 requires “government neutrality regarding religion.” 

“Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for an individual’s free exercise of religion or other personal beliefs and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion,” the regulation states.

So if the Pentagon decides to enforce this regulation, that might piss off the religious nuts who treat the military as a recruitment center for Jesus, but they have every right to do exactly that. 

However I can see why the Fundamentalists, and their attack dog Sarah Palin, are all in a panic. After all if you miss the chance to indoctrinate someone as a totally trusting child, the next best time to get them is as a soldier trained to respond to every directive given by a superior without question.

Can I get an OO-RAH?

Friday, February 15, 2013

Republicans demonstrate their dedication to obstructionism by blocking confirmation of President Obama's choice for Secretary of Defense. Only two Republicans refuse to go along.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

You know I RARELY get the opportunity to say anything nice about Republicans these days. And it seems I NEVER get to say that nice thing about an Alaskan Republican.

But I have to say that I am damn proud of Senator Lisa Murkowski for refusing to bow under to pressure from her GOP colleagues and join them in this embarrassing partisan display of obstructionism.

I have said for awhile now that Murkowski is virtually bullet proof here in Alaska after soundly defeating the vaguely bearded one in 2010, and I am very pleased to see her using that knowledge to demonstrate her independence from an increasingly ridiculous political party.

Good on ya, Lisa.

Friday, February 01, 2013

John McCain's vicious interrogation of his old friend Chuck Hagel yesterday, had NOTHING to do with Chuck Hagel, and EVERYTHING to do with the man who nominated him for Secretary of Defense.

Courtesy of The American Prospect:

At any rate, what happened yesterday wasn’t about Hagel at all. It wasn’t even about the Iraq War’s 2007 “surge,” which McCain is desperate to justify because he can never justify the war itself that finds Hagel moved to the right side of history while McCain remains stubbornly on the wrong. It’s about that junior senator from Illinois who crossed McCain early in some obscure backroom Senate deal no one can remember anymore, then denied McCain the presidency in no small part because Obama understood the folly of Iraq better than McCain can allow himself to. McCain’s personal honor in Hanoi was too hard won to be stained now by almost anything he does, including how he’s allowed temperament, pique and ego to steamroll the judgment and perspective that we hope all of our elected officers have, let alone presidents. But his political honor, not to mention whatever might once have recommended him to the presidency, has fallen victim to the way that Obama has gotten fatally under his skin. Even if this once-noble statesman should succeed in denying Hagel’s nomination as he denied Susan Rice’s prospects for Secretary of State (and even the most devout Hagel supporter would have to acknowledge that the Defense nominee’s performance before the Committee was often a shambles), McCain’s unrelenting obsession with the grievance that Obama has come to represent to him is the saddest legacy in memory. The very fact of Obama and all things Obamic has turned McCain into something toxic, maybe even to himself. 

You know we often condemn Sarah Palin for her constant, and never ending, attacks on the President, but truth be known John McCain is equally aggressive in going after Obama at every opportunity. And in fact has been a key figure in helping to block many of Obama's policies and appointments.

Even after four years these two petty little bitches, simply CANNOT let anything go.

However it is one thing for Palin to throw her sad little fits on Fox News (A venue that is now closed to her) and Facebook, while it is quite another for a sitting Senator to use his office to exact revenge on a political foe.

Besides in my opinion, Chuck Hagel got the best of McCain yesterday. While the Arizona Senator was trying to shame Hagel for not supporting the surge in Iraq, Hagel turned that around and used the opportunity to condemn the whole Iraq war, which of course in the minds of most Americans should never have been fought in the first place:

MCCAIN: Are you going to answer the question? Were you right or wrong? That’s a straightforward question. Answer whether you are right or wrong and then you are free to elaborate. 

HAGEL: I’m not going to give you a yes or no answer. 

MCCAIN: Let the record show he refuses to answer the question. Please go ahead. 

[...] 

HAGEL: I’m not going to give you a yes or no. It’s far more complicated than that. I will defer that judgment to history. As to the comment I made about the most dangerous foreign policy decision since Vietnam, that was about not just the surge, but the overall war of choice going into Iraq. That particular decision made on the surge, but more to the point, our war in Iraq, I think was the most fundamentally bad, dangerous decision since Vietnam.

You know what? That is EXACTLY the mindset that I want the Secretary of the Defense to go into his job with.

Thank you Senator McCain for giving this man the opportunity to express such an important, and welcome point of view.

Now you should probably hurry off, I understand there are some kids playing on your lawn.