British government begs Prince Harry not to invite Barack Obama to his wedding for fer of angering the orange tyrant in the White House.

Courtesy of The Sun: 

Harry and fiancée Meghan Markle have told aides they want the former US president and wife Michelle at their big day on May 19.

The 33-year-old prince has become good friends with the Obamas since bonding with them during the Invictus Games. 

But Britain’s relations with Trump’s White House have sunk to their lowest ebb since his election last year.

There are deep fears among senior Foreign Office and No10 officials that another perceived national snub will make it impossible for Theresa May to meaningfully engage with Trump. 

A senior government source said: “Harry has made it clear he wants the Obamas at the wedding, so it’s causing a lot of nervousness. 

“Trump could react very badly if the Obamas get to a Royal wedding before he has had a chance to meet the Queen.

“Conversations are ongoing about and ministers will eventually have to decide. If the PM lays down the law, Harry will just have to suck it up.” 

As the wedding is not a state occasion, the Government only have a consultative role in its organization and heads of state will not be invited.

First off can you believe you just read that?

Quite literally the British government is trying to dissuade a prince from inviting a personal friend to his own wedding, because it might anger the sitting president of the United States and may negatively impact foreign relations with our country.

That is literally insane.

Of course the thing is that Prince Harry is well known for breaking the rules, so I imagine that Brits will have a hard time convincing him to make a decision like this.

And he absolutely SHOULD NOT!

This is HIS goddamn wedding, Obama is HIS goddamn friend, and this should be NOBODY'S goddamn business.

I still think that Harry and Meghan should make Obama part of their wedding party, and send a huge "fuck you" to Tangerine Hitler.

Donald Trump suggests that an American basketball player should have remained in a Chinese jail because his father did not adequately kiss his ass.

So as you all probably heard these three UCLA basketball players got busted in China for shoplifting and spent some time in jail over there.

Eventually they were released and Donald Trump wanted to make sure that everybody knew that he was the one that made that happen.

Do you think the three UCLA Basketball Players will say thank you President Trump? They were headed for 10 years in jail!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2017

To the three UCLA basketball players I say: You're welcome, go out and give a big Thank You to President Xi Jinping of China who made.....

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2017

....your release possible and, HAVE A GREAT LIFE! Be careful, there are many pitfalls on the long and winding road of life!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2017

So gracious, don't you think?

Anyhow one of the player's dads was interviewed about the incident yesterday, and he clearly is not a Trump fan.

Courtesy of ESPN: 

LaVar Ball downplayed his son's shoplifting incident in China, as well as President Donald Trump's involvement in getting LiAngelo Ball and two other UCLA basketball players back to the United States earlier this week. 

"Who?" LaVar Ball told ESPN on Friday, when asked about Trump's involvement in the matter. "What was he over there for? Don't tell me nothing. Everybody wants to make it seem like he helped me out."

Now that may seem a little ungrateful since Trump DID intervene on the player's behalf with Chinese president Xi Jinping, though the Chinese themselves suggested that the players were going to be released anyhow.

Courtesy of WaPo:

For their part, the Chinese government wasn’t eager to say that Xi had followed through on Trump’s request to intervene. 

“I am not aware of the details, but I believe the Chinese police would have handled the case in strict accordance with the law,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a news conference Wednesday, when asked if Xi had intervened.

Whoever is actually responsible for getting the players released is almost beside the point, because the real news is how Trump responded to not being given the credit.

Now that the three basketball players are out of China and saved from years in jail, LaVar Ball, the father of LiAngelo, is unaccepting of what I did for his son and that shoplifting is no big deal. I should have left them in jail!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 19, 2017

Seriously?

Now keep in mind that the young man, LiAngelo Ball, already personally thanked Trump during a press conference for helping get him out, but now that his father refuses to do the same, Trump is actually suggesting that should have left the players to rot in a Chinese prison.

Damn! That is the very definition of thin skinned.

Trump does not seem to have any understanding of what is means to be a public servant and to do selfless things for his constituents.

Instead he demands that everybody applaud every simple fucking thing that he does, as if he is a one year old who successfully made his first boom boom in the big toilet. 

Donald Trump doubles down on attack of "wacky" Congresswoman who called him out over insensitive call to Gold Star family even though his Chief of Staff confirmed she was telling the truth.

The Fake News is going crazy with wacky Congresswoman Wilson(D), who was SECRETLY on a very personal call, and gave a total lie on content!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 20, 2017

Courtesy of Raw Story: 

Both the family and Wilson released statements that refute Trump’s take on the call. Wilson is a close friend of the Johnson family and had the late Sgt. La David Johnson in a leadership class as a child. She’s known him for more than 15 years. The Master Sergeant with the family riding to the airport to retrieve the body was the one who received the call. He put it on speakerphone so that the all in the car could hear the call. 

The soldier’s mother confirmed the Congresswoman’s account of the situation. Rather than attack the family of a fallen soldier, however, Trump has chosen to attack a Democratic Congresswoman, calling her “wacky” in his Thursday tweet.

What's even stranger about this is that yesterday Trump's Chief of Staff, John Kelly, admitted that HE was the one who suggested the phrase "He knew what he signed up for" which essentially confirmed that Trump had said it.

And of course the family also backed up Wilson's version of events.

So WHO is the liar here?

In order to avoid protesters Donald Trump is visiting Poland, who promised to bus in "cheering crowds."

Courtesy of the AP: 

President Donald Trump is headed back to Europe hoping to receive a friendly welcome in Poland despite lingering skepticism across the continent over his commitment to NATO, his past praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his decision to pull the U.S. out of a major climate agreement. 

Trump arrives in Warsaw, Poland, later Wednesday for a brief visit that will include a speech in Krasinski Square, near the site of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising against the Nazis. He’ll also meet with the leaders of Poland and Croatia and hold a joint press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda.

You may be wondering why Trump chose Poland of all places to visit first.

Here's a hint:   

According to Polish media reports, Poland’s government promised the White House a reception of cheering crowds as part of its invitation. To make good on that pledge, ruling party lawmakers and pro-government activists plan to bus in groups from the provinces to hear Trump’s speech. 

The White House didn’t respond to a request for comment on those reports.

Busing in crowds that will cheer and not boo Trump, nor erupt in protest.

Now why does that sound familiar?

Demanding that crowds only contain supporters, vilifying the media, and exhibiting spontaneous outbursts of frustration and anger.

The similarities are almost unavoidable at this point.

So it appears that Donald Trump's visit to the UK is cancelled after all.

Now look I will only come if you promise there will be no booing.

You may remember that two Sundays ago we reported that Trump was refusing to travel to the United Kingdom until people started being nicer to him there.

In response both the UK and US responded that the trip was still a go.

Well as it turns out, not so much.

Courtesy of The Telegraph: 

Donald Trump's state visit to the UK appears to have been shelved for at least two years after it was not included in the Queen's speech. 

The Queen's address usually mentions planned state visits, but Wednesday's speech only contained a reference to welcoming King Felipe and Queen Letizia of Spain in July. 

It follows reports that the American President told the Prime Minister he will not come to the UK on a state visit if there are large-scale protests against him. 

Apparently the invitation from Prime Minister May still stands, but there is no information when the thin skinned one might deign to take her up on it.

Let's face it Trump is a giant orange panty waist who is too afraid to face crowds of people who will not kiss his ass.

That's why he likes those campaign rallies where he can have security escort out any hecklers or protesters.

However he is at some point expected to travel to places in the world where hecklers and protesters will make up the majority of the attendees.

Hell the way things are going with his poll numbers pretty soon the only place he will be able to attract a crowd of people to applaud his speech will be inside the Oval Office.

And that is only if he does NOT invite his wife.

Donald Trump may literally have pulled out of the Paris climate change accords in order to get back at the French Prime Minister for mocking him over a handshake.

The Washington Post has up an article that goes into great detail in explaining all of the advice, both pro and con, that Trump received before finally deciding to pull America's support out of the Paris deal.

However buried at the very bottom are these four paragraphs: 

If he needed a nudge, though, one came from France over the weekend. Macron was quoted in a French journal talking about his white-knuckled handshake with Trump at their first meeting in Brussels, where the newly elected French president gripped Trump’s hand tightly and would not let go for six long seconds in a show of alpha-male fortitude. 

“My handshake was not innocent,” Macron said. He likened Trump to a pair of authoritarian strongmen — Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan — and said that he was purposefully forceful because he believed his encounter with Trump was “a moment of truth.” 

Hearing smack-talk from the Frenchman 31 years his junior irritated and bewildered Trump, aides said. 

A few days later, Trump got his revenge. He proclaimed from the Rose Garden, “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.”

Could it really be that Trump is such a thin skinned little snowflake that he would sacrifice our children's future in exchange for the opportunity to get back at a man who he felt had humiliated him in some way?

Well consider his long time feud with Graydon Carter, the man who first labeled him a "short fingered vulgarian":

Just to drive him a little bit crazy, I took to referring to him as a “short-fingered vulgarian” in the pages of Spy magazine. That was more than a quarter of a century ago. To this day, I receive the occasional envelope from Trump. There is always a photo of him — generally a tear sheet from a magazine. On all of them he has circled his hand in gold Sharpie in a valiant effort to highlight the length of his fingers. I almost feel sorry for the poor fellow because, to me, the fingers still look abnormally stubby.

So to the question of whether or not Trump is such a thin skinned little snowflake that he would sacrifice our children's future in exchange for the opportunity to get back at a man who he felt had humiliated him in some way?

The answer can only be, "Yes, of course he is."

Former FBI Director James Comey may have sealed his fate with just one phrase.

Courtesy of Politico: 

Telling Congress that he was “mildly nauseous” at the thought of having influenced the presidential election may have won former FBI Director James Comey plaudits among Democrats and within the bureau. But his choice of words may have doomed him with President Donald Trump. 

He found the testimony last week infuriating and griped about it extensively for at least two days, several associates and advisers said. “He was basically defending Hillary Clinton,” said one adviser, explaining Trump’s interpretation of Comey’s testimony. Another person said: “He couldn’t figure out why Comey would go out and say that.”

I guess Trump does not appreciate thinking that somebody was made nauseous by his victory.

Well boy do I have bad news for him on that front.

That may have been the trigger, but Trump's pump was already primed. (I just made that saying up right here on the spot.)

Trump did not appreciate that Comey declared his campaign to be under investigation on live TV, said two people who know the president well. He didn’t like that Comey contradicted his unsubstantiated accusation that President Barack Obama tapped his phone line at Trump Tower. And Trump was displeased that the FBI seemed uninterested in pursuing investigations into the leaks he believes are weakening his administration.

“He got tired of him,” one White House official said. “I think that’s how you would explain it. He got really tired of him.”

So yes, it WAS all about the Russia investigation.

Just like everybody with half a brain figured out from the very beginning. 

Which makes what Trump did not only comparable to Richard Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre, but perhaps even worse.

By the way Comey turned down that invitation to testify in a closed door session before the Senate Intelligence Committee, but an associate of his is saying it is not because he doesn't want to testify, but that if he does testify he wants to do so publicly in front of the American people.

That in my opinion is very smart.

The Tweeter-in-Chief strikes again.

Watched protests yesterday but was under the impression that we just had an election! Why didn't these people vote? Celebs hurt cause badly.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2017

Actually Pussy-grabber I would actually imagine that the vast majority of the participants in the protest DID vote.

However without a doubt there are a lot of people in the country who did not recognize the importance of this election, who are now kicking themselves.

Perhaps some of them showed up as well.

Wow, television ratings just out: 31 million people watched the Inauguration, 11 million more than the very good ratings from 4 years ago!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2017

Of course Trump would be quick to brag about this. However he clearly does not understand how inaugural TV ratings work.

Here let The Hollywood Reporter explain this to you Donnie:

Wall-to-wall coverage of the extensive festivities reached an average 30.6 million total viewers across the 12 broadcast and cable networks that went live for much of the day. That's 18 percent down from the nearly 38 million viewers who watched President Barack Obama being sworn in as No. 44 in 2009.

Topping 2009 was a lofty goal, but beating the most recent inauguration was easy. Second-term festivities, quite predictably, never have as much appeal as the first go around. And 2013 saw Obama average 20.6 million viewers. (That was the most for a second swearing-in since Bill Clinton's in 1997.) First-term comparisons are considerably more competitive. The 2009 inauguration saw an average 37.8 million viewers watch between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, with an estimated 25.5 percent of U.S. households watching. Ronald Reagan, the last entertainer turned politician to take the highest office, did so with 41.8 million viewers tuned in — and a whopping 37.4 percent of households.

In other words if Trump wants to do an apples to apples comparison he needs to wait until his second inauguration.  (Assuming of course that he is not impeached during his first term.)

Just to drive the point home Nielsen shows that his TV numbers were the second worst in first term inaugural history. Just ahead of George H. W. Bush.

Not a lot of bragging rights there Donnie.

At this point it appears that somebody a little less thin skinned seems to have grabbed control of Trump's Twitter account.

Peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy. Even if I don't always agree, I recognize the rights of people to express their views.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2017

Sure he does.

Of course this makes little difference since we all know that just as soon as Trump finds his phone he will tweet something completely un-presidential to remind the country how unfit he is for the job.

Petty Putin puppet throws author off golf course for writing that he raped his wife.

Courtesy of Politico:  

A Koch associate told POLITICO that when Hurt returned from his exchange with Trump, he offered to take an Uber home and allow the rest of the foursome to continue playing without him. 

“And David said, ‘No, we came as a foursome and we'll leave as a foursome,’” said the Koch associate, who was briefed on the incident.

What happened after that exchange is slightly different depending on who is telling the story.

According to a member of Trump's transition team security tapped Hurt on the shoulder and asked him to leave after he returned to his foursome.

However a member of that foursome said that there was no interaction with security at all.

Either way it just makes Trump look petty. 

Awfully thin skinned for a rapist, don't you think?

So it appears that this popular vote loss is really getting under Donald Trump's orange tinged skin.

Campaigning to win the Electoral College is much more difficult & sophisticated than the popular vote. Hillary focused on the wrong states!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 21, 2016

I would have done even better in the election, if that is possible, if the winner was based on popular vote - but would campaign differently

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 21, 2016

I have not heard any of the pundits or commentators discussing the fact that I spent FAR LESS MONEY on the win than Hillary on the loss!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 21, 2016

(By the way as I reported before, Hillary won the popular vote by an amazing 2,864,974.)

Yeah it must be a bummer when even the Russian government, Wikileaks, and the FBI working together cannot steal the popular vote for you.

By the way for the few holdouts who are still clinging to the false belief that Wikileaks was not working with the Russians to help steal this election, remember that they released those Podesta e-mails less than an hour after Trump's "pussy grabbing" tape was released.

I actually do believe in something called a "coincidence" but this one strains incredulity.

Just a video of Donald Trump humiliating and manhandling a former Miss Universe in front of an audience in Sydney, Australia.

Courtesy of HuffPo: 

Revenge has been a fixture of Donald Trump’s corporate speeches for years. It almost always comes up as he offers advice to his audience on how to succeed in business, and usually includes a Rosie O’Donnell anecdote. 

But at one speech in Sydney in October 2011, he decided to give the audience a live example of what revenge looks like by calling a woman he felt had slighted him onstage and sexually humiliating her in front of thousands of onlookers.

“Get even with people. If they screw you, screw them back 10 times as hard. I really believe that,” he begins, receiving a round of applause and cheers. 

“I’ll give you an example: Jennifer Hawkins. Where’s Jennifer? Where’s she sitting? Get over here, Jennifer,” Trump says, referring to the 2004 Miss Universe winner, who is Australian. “First of all, how beautiful is Jennifer? This is about getting even.” 

Trump then explains why he needs to “get even” with Hawkins, whom he accuses of declining to introduce him at the event. “I was so angry at her yesterday. Seriously, as I said, I thought that she dissed me. I thought that my Jennifer ― I’m going around saying she’s my favorite Miss Universe, but I think I like the new one better, Jennifer. So I go around saying she’s the greatest ... then when I came here, there was no Jennifer Hawkins to introduce me.” 

As you can see in the video Hawkins tries to explain herself but Trump dismisses her and at one point physically pushes her away from the microphone while he continues to  insult and demean her.

And when all is said and done what does he try to do?

He grabs her, gropes her, and tries to kiss her.

Just the fact that this POS brags that he has to "get even" with people, and "screw them back 10 times as hard," should be more than enough to disqualify him from running for the job of Commander-in-Chief.

But then to watch him mistreat a woman like this in front of a bunch of strangers just proves that he has no respect for over half of the human beings living in the country that he wants to lead.

New Frontline investigation confirms that it is quite likely that Donald Trump's campaign was inspired by President Obama mocking him at the 2011 White House Correspondent's Dinner.

Courtesy of Yahoo:

It was a painful moment for Donald Trump. As he sat in his tuxedo at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner, President Obama mercilessly mocked him as a loony conspiracy theorist. The real estate mogul, grim-faced, watched helplessly, unable to respond, while hundreds of journalists and their celebrity guests convulsed in laughter. 

But it may also have been a transformative moment, according to a new “Frontline” documentary on the presidential race, called “The Choice 2016,” which airs next Tuesday night on PBS. “I think that is the night that he resolves to run for president,” Roger Stone, a longtime Trump adviser and confidant, says in the film. “I think that he is kind of motivated by it. ‘Maybe I’ll just run. Maybe I’ll show them all.’”

Donald Trump himself has dismissed this idea as silly, but it WOULD seem to match what we know about Trump and his thin skin,

Here is what his friend Omarosa had to say about that night: 

Omarosa Manigault, the former “Apprentice” star who now serves as director of African-American outreach for the Trump campaign, notes that when she talked to Trump at the start of the evening — he was a guest of the Washington Post, no less — “he was in just such a great mood. And he was very jovial.”

But as the president “kept going and going and he just kept hammering him,” Trump’s mood changed, she says. His face became “incredibly serious. He just put on a poker face.” And by the time the skewering was over, she suggests, Trump wanted payback. 

“Every critic, every detractor will have to bow down to President Trump,” Manigault says. “It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Donald, whoever disagreed, whoever challenged him. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful man in the universe.”

Well if that does not chill your blood I don't know what would.

I have already gone on record as suggesting that this was likely the moment that Trump decided to teach President Obama and the smug journalists in the room laughing at him a lesson.

I just think it's obvious.

After all Donald Trump had made a living out of manipulating the dumbest human beings on the planet by convincing them that he was some kind of super capitalist, now all he had to do was reach out to their friends and neighbors, who were just as stupid, and convince them that he would be a super President.

After all how could he fail, he is white.

I still don't think he really wants it. 

But he wants to know that if he wanted it he could have it, and he wants his enemies to know it as well.

Donald Trump assures America that as President he will be just as big of an asshole as he has been during the campaign.

Courtesy of the New York Times: 

In a heated, 40-minute appearance in the lobby of Trump Tower in Manhattan, Mr. Trump dismissed a CNN reporter as “a real beauty” and an ABC reporter as “a sleaze,” and said that if he was elected president, the American public could expect a similar dynamic in the White House briefing room. 

“Yes, it is,” he said. “It is going to be like this.”

I have to say that I never doubted this for one minute.

Donald Trump will always be Donald Trump no matter what job Donald Trump may have in the future.

He is an obnoxious, arrogant, thin skinned, stubby fingered vulgarian, who would do vast amounts of damage to this country if he were ever given the power to do so.

And here he is essentially admitting just that.

So for all of you diehard Bernie-bots claiming that you will NEVER vote for Hillary Clinton in the general election no matter what,  like it or not, understand it or not, accept it or not, THIS is who you are supporting in this next election.

Fox News accuses Donald Trump of having a "sick obsession" with Megyn Kelly.

Everybody should boycott the @megynkelly show. Never worth watching. Always a hit on Trump! She is sick, & the most overrated person on tv.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 18, 2016

Trump tweeted the above after Kelly did a segment about him on her show, which by the way virtually EVERY cable news network does several times a day it seems.

Fox News responded by issuing this statement:   

Donald Trump's vitriolic attacks against Megyn Kelly and his extreme, sick obsession with her is beneath the dignity of a presidential candidate who wants to occupy the highest office in the land. Megyn is an exemplary journalist and one of the leading anchors in America. We're extremely proud of her phenomenal work and continue to fully support her throughout every day of Trump's endless barrage of crude and sexist verbal assaults. As the mother of three young children, with a successful law career and the second highest rated show in cable news, it's especially deplorable for her to be repeatedly abused just for doing her job.

Now Trump goes after just about everybody who dares to criticize him, so is it fair to accuse him of having a "sick obsession" with Megyn Kelly?

Let's check his tweets for more evidence.

"@gregens21: @BertShad @FoxNews @megynkelly She's choking on the results! Call her justifiable Kelly. Justifying everything she says."

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 15, 2016

"@jsconlon11: @BertShad @Foxnews @megynkelly I tried to give them a shot tonight, but they have the whole anti Trump cheerleading team."

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 15, 2016

"@SCNAK45: @megynkelly is trying so hard to bash @realDonaldTrump it's ridiculous" Don't worry, everyone is wise to Crazy Megyn!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 15, 2016

Can't watch Crazy Megyn anymore. Talks about me at 43% but never mentions that there are four people in race. With two people, big & over!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 16, 2016

Watching other networks and local news. Really good night! Crazy @megynkelly is unwatchable.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 16, 2016

Yeah okay, I definitely see their point.

This is really the thing about Donald Trump.

Not only is he so thin skinned that he must respond to virtually every criticism, but when that criticism comes from a woman it seems to piss him off like a thousand percent more.

In this case he is literally attacking a star of the Republican party's go to propaganda outlet, and turning the entire cable news station against him, simply because he cannot stand for a woman to stand up to him.

Man, I can hardly wait to watch him self destruct while facing off against Hillary Clinton.

Fox News host is suing Hasbro for making a toy hamster that shares her name. In other news the animal fox is suing Fox News for poisoning its brand.

Courtesy of ABC News:  

An anchor for Fox News is suing Hasbro for more than $5 million over a toy hamster that shares her name — and possibly even her resemblance. 

Harris Faulkner sued Hasbro this week over its plastic Harris Faulkner hamster, sold as part of the Pawtucket, Rhode Island-based company's popular Littlest Pet Shop line. She says the toy wrongfully appropriates her name and persona, harms her professional credibility as a journalist and is an insult. 

"Hasbro's portrayal of Faulkner as a rodent is demeaning and insulting," says the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in U.S. District Court in New Jersey. 

Faulkner has been at Fox News for a decade. She hosts the daytime show "Outnumbered" and anchors a Sunday evening newscast.

Here's my favorite line from the article, "harms her professional credibility as a journalist."

I hate to break it to you lady but that happened the day you signed on to work for Fox News.

Faulkner should be so lucky that when people think of her they think of this:

Instead of this:

One version is rodent like creature that associates with lowly life forms. The other is a cute plastic hamster.

It's almost a week later, and everybody else has moved on, however Bristol Palin's ghostwriter feels the need to defend Sarah wearing her daughter's dress to the SNL anniversay show.

Yesterday Brancy linked to an article concerning Palin's SNL appearance.

This portion in particular seems to have bothered her: 

The outfit Sarah Palin wore to the SNL 40th Anniversary Celebration raised some eyebrows — and some questions about whether she raided her daughter's closet. The former Alaska governor made quite a splash on the red carpet at the star-studded affair, showing a lot of skin in a short, white dress that appeared to be the same one her daughter, Bristol, wore to the 2011 White House Correspondents Association dinner.

Brancy responded rather defensively:  

Well, here’s the truth about that. They’re right about having already seen it. Mom borrowed my dress. Who cares?! 

I think it is funny how much people dig into the dumbest stuff. My mom hates shopping, so why not use a dress we already had? Most Americans wear their clothes more than once, and Mom is the most down to earth woman around. 

That is a GOOD thing! Plus, she looked great.

Well that last part is debatable.

However what Bristol/Nancy/Sarah seems to misunderstand is that any criticism aimed in Palin's direction over her attire, and this article really does not contain any of that, is not due to the fact that she wore an outfit more than once, but more to the fact that she wore such a skanky dress in the first place.

I mean to be sure there were equally revealing dresses worn by some of the other attendees (Though not by fifty year old attendees it seems.) however none of those people were one time vice presidential candidates.

After all it is one thing to be a young ingenue attempting to get attention from potential directors or producers who might take notice and put you in their next movie. And quite another thing to be an ex-politician who talks about small town morality and Christian values, while appearing in a dress better suited to the AVN awards.

I personally could care less what Palin wears.

However if you are attempting to fight off the stereotype of being an inbred hillbilly from a small town awash in methamphetamines, you might think about resisting the urge to dress as if you are an inbred hillbilly from a small town awash in methamphetamines.

I'm just saying.

Sarah Palin pimps Bristol's blog, complains that event organizers keep uninviting her, and claims to have gay friends. Update!

Courtesy of ole Whiny Britches Facebook page:

Check out this post at Bristol’s blog and offer your thoughts. (I so appreciate her sincere and respectful “what do you think?” approach to these topics.) I am a huge admirer of Coach Dungy's, and I totally get where he's coming from. (By the way Brancy's blog borrows a Right Wing bloggers headline, "If you want to prove that you don't hate gays, all you have to do is worship at their feet." so you know that this defense of Coach Dungy's remarks that he would not have drafted openly gay player Michael Sam is gong to be a trip to homophobic crazy town.) Looking at this personally, my family and I have been told certain event organizers would like us to participate in something but just can't because of the distractions I'd invite. (Oh yeah I bet there are tons of these.) I totally get it and I don't want to burden them with anything that takes focus off their mission. I don't whine that those people "uninviting" us are sexist or anti-conservative or anti-Christian. (What are you doing now? And how does not inviting Sarah Palin to an event make these organizers sexist, anti-conservative, or anti-Christian?) It is what it is, and in sports a coach needs to FOCUS on the goal, not unnecessary distractions! The key to victory on the field is keeping the main thing, the main thing. 

(And, by the way, I think I know my gay friends well enough to know that not one of them would take offense with Coach Dungy's commonsense comments. In fact, from what they've told me, they're as sick and tired of the intolerant, politically correct thought police as I am. The small minority of uber-sensitive intolerant gays who make a big darn deal out of anything that can be spun up as “offensive” are really giving fellow members of their community a bad rap.)

- Sarah Palin

Okay seriously how many of you think that Palin has more than one or two gay friends? And how does she even know, since almost any gay person in her vicinity would be hiding deeply in the closet for fear she might find out?

Look I agree that there are some within ANY any group that get upset about every single perceived slight. You know like all of those times Palin claimed that there was a "War on Christmas," or claimed that Joe McGinniss had moved next door to peer in Piper's window, or states that every policy coming from this President is an attack on the Founding Fathers and an attempt to fundamentally change HER country.

Oh and as for the gay people themselves, well I happen to have a very close relationship with a very outspoken member of that group. And she loves it that the LGBT community is standing up for itself  and refusing to accept the constant stream of name calling, open hostility, and attempts to convince them to change their sexuality in order to make the heterosexuals comfortable.

Oh and she hates Sarah Palin too.

Just like the majority of gay people.

Update: You know it occurs to me to wonder how history might have been changed if Branch Rickey the general manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers would have had the same attitude about controversy while thinking about signing Jackie Robinson, as Tony Dungy expressed about the signing of Michael Sams? Sometimes it takes men of strength and moral fiber to withstand the barrage of negative attention they invite when they choose to take a stand for progress, instead of going along like a dead salmon in a stream.

Now where did I hear that last part from I wonder?

Donald Trump continues to show that he is an irrelevant joke by going after David Letterman for pointing out the obvious, that he is a racist.

Courtesy of the New York Post:

In a letter he sent to the gap-toothed comic on Friday, Trump canceled an appearance on "Late Show With David Letterman" and lambasted Dave for saying Trump's prolonged attacks on President Obama had begun to "smack of racism."

"I was disappointed to hear the statements you made about me last night on your show that I was a 'racist,' " Trump wrote to Letterman. "In actuality, nothing could be further from the truth and there is nobody who is less of a racist than Donald Trump."

He continued: "Based upon your statements, and despite the fact that we have always done so well together, especially in your ratings, I am canceling my May 18th appearance on your show.

"Additionally," Trump wrote, "please inform your staff that I will likewise not do the 'top ten' list that they had been trying to set up."

Jesus is this guy beginning to channel Sarah Palin more every day or what?

I mean he has already said hateful things about our President, starred in a crappy reality show, and demonstrated that he knows nothing about politics.

So what is he going to do next?

Fake a pregnancy?

Send his wife running off to a male prostitute?

Threaten to sue a blogger? (Uh oh!)

I find it funny that since Trump just got his ass handed to him by the President of the United States that he has now shifted his sites to a target which he mistakenly believes he might stand a better chance against.

However I have to say that a battle of wits between Donald Trump and David Letterman is comparable to a fight between somebody shooting spitballs through a straw at man with his finger hovering over the nuclear button.

Perhaps he should shift his sites even lower and pick a fight with Lindsay Lohan.  Though to be honest I imagine she could probably kick his pudgy white ass too.

Here is the exchange between Letterman and his guest Dr. Phil that made The Donald so pissy.



(The reference to Trump begins at the 1:06 mark.)

All of Barbara Walters 10 most fascinating people were happy with their portrayal on her show save one. Do I really even have to give you a hint?

I hope next year Walters leaves the ungrateful, thin skinned bitch off her list.

We all now that what Palin hates more than anything is to be ignored.  Hopefully someday soon she will have the opportunity to spend ALL day hating the fact that she is being ignored. Then she might know what it feels like to be one of her children.