Monday, January 31, 2011

Alaska WTF returns!


Since I know how much all of you missed the irreverent "say anything" blog I thought I would alert you to the fact that Dirk Diggler has returned to the web.

Just click here and let him explain what happened.

Right now it is just an HTML page so if you want to leave him a message you can leave it here and he said he will check back occasionally to see your comments.

Arizona lawmaker introduces bill in the hopes it will keep President Obama from being reelected.

From Mother Jones:

Last week, Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges, a Republican, introduced a bill that would bar presidential candidates who do not prove they were born in the United States from appearing on the ballot in the Grand Canyon state. And state Rep. Chad Campbell, the top Democrat in the GOP-controlled Arizona House of Representatives, tells Mother Jones that the bill is likely to pass. It was introduced with 25 co-sponsors in the House and 16 co-sponsors in the state Senate; the measure needs 31 votes in the House and 16 in the Senate for approval. "Will it matter?" asks Campbell. "We've started a tradition here of passing legislation that is political grandstanding or that sets up litigation."

But the birthers—those ardent Obama foes who believe the president was not born in Hawaii and, thus, is not constitutionally qualified serve as president—see this measure as more than symbolic. For them, it's part of a well-orchestrated campaign to deny Obama reelection.

It's not that Obama necessarily requires Arizona's 10 electoral votes to win reelection in 2012. In 2008, he lost there to John McCain, Arizona's senior senator (though in 2012, Obama could make a play for the state). More important, Burges' bill—which would establish a strict standard for proving natural-born citizenship (which the birthers presume Obama could not meet)—is a model for other states, and similar efforts are under way in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Montana, Georgia, and Texas. (Obama won Pennsylvania in 2008 and lost Missouri by less than 4,000 votes.) Arizona may be where this birther ball gets rolling.

Jesus no wonder Sarah Palin is shuffling her kids off to Arizona and helping to set up a ground base there.

(Picture removed at request of source.)
.

So first Thomas Van Flein hightails it to Arizona to work for a teabagging Congressman as his "political advisor. "

Then Bristol defies her custody agreement, kidnaps her son and runs off to practice abstinence with her pipeline working boy-toy in the same state.

Later we come to find out that Sarah is also renting a humongous McMansion there as well.

And just now we learn that another teabagging Arizona Representative is trying to pass a  law to make it impossible for Barack Obama to get on the ballot, because they realize that the only possible way they have of beating Obama is by somehow managing to stack the deck against him.

You know, much like Sarah Palin I also do not believe in coincidences.

At least not in this case.

Just for fun. Sarah Palin and the moose.



You know, I do not believe I have EVER heard Ms. Palin sound more articulate.

P.S. To all of you worried that I will follow Dana Milbank's lead and take a month off from talking about Sarah Palin, don't you worry. I NEVER do what the Grizzled Mam wants me to do, don'tcha know?

Sarah Palin's biggest fan denies that the Grizzled Mama modified her signature phrase.

From Politico:

Her speech last night to the Safari Club in Reno was closed press, but the Reno Gazette-Journal's David Jacobs put his ear to a closed door.

He reported Palin dropped the "reload" phrase from her routine, telling the audience of hunters "don't retreat, stand tall" — a shift from her now infamous and well-known "don't retreat, reload" line that played on a loop on cable in the after the Tucson shooting.

But Palin aide Rebecca Mansour denied that the former governor dropped the line, suggested to her by her father.

"The governor actually did use the phrase 'Don't retreat, reload,'" Mansour told POLITICO in an email. "She also said, 'Don't retreat, stand tall.'"

"Her father, Chuck Heath, was present at the speech yesterday, and the crowd cheered when she pointed to her Dad and repeated this favorite saying of his," the aide added.

You know the ironic part of this disagreement is that if Sarah Palin were not so completely hyper paranoid of having reporters allowed inside to hear her speech, there would be no question as to exactly what she said.  But then again, could THAT be why she refuses to allow them access?

So who are we to believe?

A journalist from the Reno Gazette-Journal, whose paper I imagine insists that it's reporters strive for accuracy?  Or a woman on Snowdrift Snooki's payroll who once clumsily tried to convince people that the crosshairs on Sarah Palin's Facebook map were really surveyor's symbols, despite the fact that her Queen had stated otherwise?

Wow!  That is a conundrum!

30 years of Right Wing Violence in Pictures. Update!

For all of those who still argue that BOTH sides engage in violence against the other, take a look at this Daily Kos post:

As not wanting to be accused of exploiting the tragedy in Arizona I decided to wait a little while before I published this diary. Many people have been justifiably outraged at the traditional media's insistence that "both sides" use violent rhetoric. But since 1980 the numbers of deaths by right-wing terrorist numbers over 200, versus 7 by the left.

This is a fairly comprehensive list and I urge you to take a look.  Afterwards do not be alarmed if you get a sick feeling in your stomach and suddenly see Sarah Palin's violent rhetoric in a whole new light.

Update: And the Right Wing violence against those they disagree with continues still. 

From TPM:

Roger Stockham, a 63-year-old Army veteran from California who was reportedly angry at the U.S. government, was arrested by police in Michigan and charged with allegedly threatening to blow up a Mosque in Dearborn.

It will be interesting to learn whether or not Fox News is willing to label this a domestic act of terrorism. 

Because you know that if the shoe were on the other foot, and this was a Muslim threatening to blow up a church they would not hesitate.

Fox News can't find Egypt on the map.

From Vancity Buzz


Can you believe that millions of Americans still consider Fox News a reliable source of information?

Or that they still believe that Sarah Palin is a viable Presidential candidate?

For those who still don't see the problem:


:

Sunday, January 30, 2011

The Alaska Ear hesitantly addresses the Todd Palin/Shailey Tripp prostitution story. However there are others NOT so hesitant!

From The Ear:

Q AND A . . . The question is: Why isn't The Omniscient Orifice waxing smarmy over the National Enquirer stories claiming Todd had an affair with a prostitute?

The answer is, "Yuck." Did you see the "story"? Basically, an Anchorage woman got arrested for running a place of prostitution. Someone in her building allegedly told someone they saw Todd. That's it, darlings.

In the latest "news," the Enquirer shouts that Anchorage police had issued a statement. Well, they did. They said everything in the story was a lie, except there was a woman arrested. No Rolodex, no anonymous tipster, no call to APD from the Enquirer to check facts, no connection to "Wasilla resident Todd Palin."

Of course, Ear may revisit the matter if the "facts" change.

So as you can see Sheila Toomey felt she had to address the story because there was so much interest, but treated it like it was radioactive acting as if the story is too "yucky" for her to waste her valuable time on, and essentially dismissing it out of hand.

That did not sit well with our friend Frozen Vogler who responded thusly:

I'm pretty sure that the "facts" have changed, or were never properly reported in the first place.

According to page 3 of the document, "Agreement by Defendant" in the court file of the alleged Madam, it says that, "APD got complaint of possible prostitution ring at an office".

That document directly contradicts the "press release" which Lt. Parker gave to the National Enquirer, which isn't listed on the official APD website.

http://www.muni.org/department...

Take a tripp to the courthouse and look at the files of the Madam and her employee, you'd learn also that the boyfriend of the alleged Madam works for the Public Defender agency, "GLG", Gorton Logue and Graper.

According to the court documents, APD seized evidence from an employee who was working on the premises at the time, and was arrested along with the alleged Madam.

What did they seize from her ?

Who complained ?

In the plea agreement with the court, the alleged Madam is directed to stay away from three people; the employee, Ms. Thomas, and two other people. What are their first names and why is she to stay away from them ?

Why did the alleged Madam change her plea recently from nolo contendere to not guilty ?

(Frozen Vogler's Flickr page for Shailey Tripp.)
Let me just say, nicely done Frozen!  Now THAT is how to embarrass both the Alaska media, and the APD, with just one simple comment. And by the way let me also thank you for going down to the courthouse and looking up the records to set the record straight.

Since I have been getting my information elsewhere I had not thought to go down the courthouse on my own, and Frozen Vogler's decision to take the initiative turned out to be quite valuable, and definitely reinforces the Enquirer's version of events.

While we are on the subject of the National Enquirer I figure the latest copy has been out long enough so that anybody who is going to buy it for this story already has already made that purchase, so I thought it would be fine to share it with you here. (Just click the JPEG's to enlarge them.)




Speaking of getting my information elsewhere, I am still in contact with my sources, and continue to learn more about this story every day.

I have picked through some of the information I have received, and chosen a few tidbits to share with you that are very interesting but do not reveal anything that might put my source in jeopardy.  Believe me, there is MUCH more.

Fact is Sarah has known about this story since the week before Christmas. She had more than 2 weeks to prepare. She may not have known names but she knows them now. If the Enquirer or any other news source will publish what they have, they need another internet person to start basically making some connections and out right make the accusations and then no holds bar, they and others can print. The question is will they?

Another hole in the Enquirer is the location of the arrest. The arrest took place at the Decor Lighting Building, at Cybertron- Shailey Tripp's business. Her massage lic. had expired Dec. 2009 and she didn't renew it. Up until that point she had stayed on top of renewing her lic. perhaps some changes were taking place in her life.

Also Shailey Tripp had tried to break her ties with Todd Palin and within 2 weeks of that she got arrested. There may have been a real prostitution thing going on and maybe other women worked for her or with her. But she was not in any big giant prostitution ring. She did not hardly have any money to her name. She could barely even pay her bills. She literally was scraping by.

To answer the first questions I am sure you must have:

Yes I have verified who this person is.

Yes they are in a position to know this and much more.

No there is no real way of knowing that they are telling me the absolute truth about everything, however the parts I have been able to cross check so far have turned out to be accurate.

Like I have said the National Enquirer is taking the lead at this time but there is quite a lot of information that they may not be interested in dealing with, so the really damaging portions may require a different media outlet altogether.

There might be hope for the future of our children's education.

From The Hill:

The Hill: ‘No Child Left Behind’ is up due for reauthorization this year. What exactly do you want to see fixed in the law?

Secretary (of Education Arne) Duncan: There are a number of things that I think are broken with the current law that working in a bipartisan way we can have common sense fixes. I think the law is too punitive, too prescriptive, it’s led to a dumbing down of standards, and it’s led to a narrowing of curriculum. We need to fix all of those things. We have to reward success, reward excellence, look at growth and gain, not just absolute test scores. We have to be much more flexible. When I ran the Chicago public schools, I almost had to sue this department for the right to tutor my children after school. It made no sense why I had to fight this department to help kids who wanted to learn after school, so we have to really get out of the way there. We have to continue to raise standards. We’ve seen 40 states provide leadership, and do that, and we need to provide a well-rounded curriculum, so reading and math are important, but science, social studies, dance, drama, art, music, foreign languages, physical education, all those things. We want the new law to be fair, to be focused to be flexible. And we think we can do these things working together this year.

I have to say that this gives me some hope that FINALLY the Obama administration will do something about this devastatingly bad NCLB policy.  I have been railing against that law for the last seven years and I really hope that we will finally witness REAL education reform that actually improves education before the next presidential election.

I worked at a local elementary school for a number of years, and we were NOT allowed to say anything negative about NCLB on school property, not even in our e-mails, but away from the classroom the universally accepted opinion was that it was the worst thing to happen to education in our lifetimes.

It is still my considered opinion that the GOP purposefully attempted to destroy the public education system in this country in order to push people toward Christian based home school and private school options.  The Republicans have LONG railed against the teachers union and the state of American education. But I have never believed that they wanted to improve it, but rather to do away with it.

I have also never really understood how George Bush was able to convince the late Senator Kennedy to support such a deeply flawed policy decision.

Rep. Jack Kingston denying the existence of evolution on Real Time with Bill Maher.



What an idiot!

I am absolutely dumbfounded that he actually used the "Where is the missing link? argument. Clearly this moron has not paid any attention to the incredible research and progress being made in evolutionary biology.

Thankfully my daughter no longer lives in Georgia.

Sarah Palin finally admits that she was wrong. Well sort of anyway.


While speaking in front of the Safari Club last night Palin did a little editing to her most famous slogan.

“Don’t retreat, stand tall,” Palin told the crowd as she emphasized the importance of “responsible conservation.”

“Don’t retreat, stand tall?”  What does that even mean?

You would assume that Palin's patented "don't retreat, reload" would have been a phrase more accepted by a bunch of gun toting wealthy hunting enthusiasts than in just about any other place in America, and yet the Grizzled Mama chose to censor herself. Why?

Could it be that she has finally seen how irresponsible and potentially dangerous her ridiculous rhetoric might be to innocent Americans?  Highly doubtful.

Could she have chosen to modify her patented phrase as a show of respect for the still recovering Gabby Giffords?  Nope, not buying it.

Or could it be that her handlers have finally managed to get a message through that cotton candy brain of hers that if she does not stop acting like a hate spewing, inhuman lunatic that her reputation will remain so badly damaged that, instead of actually having the opportunity to run for President, she may soon have to flee the country in disgrace?  Ding, ding, ding. Folks I think we have a winner!

Let's face it, Sarah Palin NEVER admits to a mistake. And changing perhaps her most famous rallying cry, is essentially doing exactly that.  The only reason that she would ever do such  thing is that somebody explained in very simple, easy to understand words, that she simply had no choice.

At least that is my opinion.  What do you think?

BTW I wonder how Burton Cummings feels about this change in Palin's slogan?

Sarah Palin receives ringing endorsement from Jimmy "Rent is Too Damn High" McMillan. Yeah, THAT should help her credibility.

From AOL News:

What do you think of Sarah Palin? Would you consider her for VP?

Love her. Constitution. American citizen. Exercising the right to privacy. Free speech. Haters -- those who don't like Sarah Palin. That's what they are. Sarah Palin: I love you because America gives you the constitutional right to do whatever you want to do as a woman. And people don't think you can do because you're a woman. They try to make a mockery out of you. But you stand up for your rights and stand strong for your rights. And don't let anyone try to cut you down. Not only are they talking about Sarah Palin. They're talking about me.

I think they make a promising political team, "Vote the Jimmy McMillan/Sarah Palin ticket. We've tried intelligence and competence, isn't it time for crazy to have a shot?"

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Without Federal dollars Sarah Palin's Spudnut example of free market excellence would not even exist.

As I am sure almost all of you are aware Palin tripped herself up during her interview with Greta Van Susteren in an attempt to rebut President Obama's wonderful SOTU speech.

Then in an attempt to dig herself out of the hole that she found herself in Palin fired up the RAM and made her pound out a Facebook rebuttal to explain her rebuttal. (One has to wonder if the rebuttal of the criticism of the Facebook rebuttal will take the form of a Twitter rebuttal.  Then after that she will have to turn to jungle drums and smoke signals to get her rebuttals out.) It is long and stupid, but here is the part that was supposed to explain that her "mistake" was no such thing:

Now, in a recent interview I mentioned analogies that could relate to solutions to our economic challenges, including the difference between a communist government’s “Sputnik” and the private sector’s “Spudnut.” The analogies I mentioned obviously aren’t comparable in size, but highlight a clear difference in economic focus: big government command and control economies vs. America’s small businesses.

So there you go.  The issue has been rebutted for the final time and Palin  emerges victorious, right?

What, are you new here ?

From one of Digby's commenters:

Palin's quirky invocation of the "Spudnut Shop" here in Richland Washington as an example of American "can-doism" is far more ironic than you and most of your readers likely realize.

The fact is, the town of Richland was literally built by the federal government as a part of the Manhattan Project. All of the houses that surround the Spudnut shop were built by the Army. To this day, the only employer in Richland of any consequence is the Department of Energy and the contractors that work on DoE contracts at the Hanford site, just north of Richland. As a result, virtually all of the Spudnut shop's customers are paid by tax dollars. Those that aren't are retirees, drawing government pensions and social security.

Were it not for government spending, the Spudnut shop would be bankrupt in a week.

One of Andrew Sullivan's readers also has his two cents to add:

The Spudnut shop Palin speaks of is half a mile from my house in Richland, WA and it's really good (the secret is potato flour in the batter). She may not realize that the federal government buys most of those doughnuts: the annual budget for cleanup of the nearby Hanford Nuclear Reservation is more than $2 billion, employing about 11,000 workers, and spudnuts are the pastry of choice at meetings there.

Hang on I will get my daughter to type this last part.

Epic Fail. WTF?

Doesn't she have a way with words?

"Daddy? Will you read me a story?"

It is my opinion that there is no experience as completely life altering as the day that you hold your child, newly emerged into this world, and feel that sudden electric connection as your eyes meet  for the very first time.

In those few seconds you are suddenly connected to the world around you in a way that you have never felt before. Every dream, every fear, and every idea you ever had about yourself is suddenly brought into sharp focus and you find yourself wanting to be a better human being in order to earn the right to hold and to be loved by the beautiful child staring up into your face.

And so it was with me.

I was not just going to be daddy.  I was going to be "Super Daddy."

But alas "Super Daddy" was not also "Super Husband" and my marriage fell apart. Which meant that I broke the very first promise  I ever made to my daughter, that she would NOT have to grow up the child of divorce as had been the fate of both her mother and I.

But even a "Super Daddy" cannot make love out of nothing.

I did vow however to NEVER break a promise made to her again. Ever.

The divorce was brutal. My wife wanted to have full legal AND physical custody. She had money, I did not.

I spent every cent I had, borrowed heavily from family members for the first time in my life, and took side jobs that put money in my pocket but made me feel badly for lowering myself to accept work that I felt beneath me.

Eventually the judge demanded that we work out a 50/50 custody deal. And so we did, with my ex-wife crying through the entire negotiation.

I remarried when my daughter was still a toddler, which then provided her with TWO families.  Not perfect, but still she was surrounded by love, and seemed happy and well adjusted in both houses. Of course my ex-wife also remarried.

For a while my daughter's mother was fine with living in Alaska. but after a few years she wanted to pack up and move out of state to Georgia. Why Georgia?  I still have no good idea.

My first reaction was predictable. "You can go wherever the hell you want, but if you think you are taking my little girl away from me you are sadly mistaken!"

Back to court we went.

Another furious battle ensued, but I was encouraged to skip the legal fight and instead work it out in mediation. What was there to work out I thought?  My little girl was not going anywhere.

However mediation is a process in which sometimes the unacceptable becomes acceptable.

My ex was determined to go to Georgia.  "How could a loving father deny his child the opportunity to live with her mother?" I was asked.  There was no way to win a battle in which my little girl's heart was so nakedly exposed and vulnerable.

So I agreed to a painful compromise.

My ex-wife could move down to Georgia and my daughter would live with me for the first three years and visit with her twice a year, and then we would reverse it for the next three years, and after that she would be old enough to choose her primary residence. At that time I was confident she would choose to live with me. Clairvoyance is NOT one of my gifts.

I kept telling myself I had done the right thing.  That I was being an adult.  That someday my daughter would thank me for not being selfish and denying her access to her mother. Those thoughts did nothing to ease my pain or my fears.

The first time I put my little girl on a plane headed to Georgia by herself was a day defined by hazy memory and sharply felt emotions. I vividly remember watching her walk hand in hand with the kindly stewardess toward the jet bridge, barely visible behind the large pink backpack full of her favorite books and with Sherman, her cabbage patch doll, dangling from one impossibly tiny hand. She was just seven years old.

She looked back to smile and called out "I love you Daddy." one last time before disappearing around the corner to board the plane. I fervently hoped that she had been too far away to see the tears streaming down my cheeks.

I remember standing at the window for the longest time to watch the plane taxi down the runway, then willing it to take off safely, before watching it fade into the tiniest of dots on the horizon. I was overwhelmed with the irrational belief that if I blinked, or lost concentration, for even a second that something horrible, and unthinkable would happen to that plane.

After the jet was impossible to detect against the blue of the sky I became suddenly aware that the world had somehow shifted out of focus.  Everything that had become sharp and beautiful to my eyes on the day she was born was suddenly dull and barely perceptible.

I wish I could describe what I did next, but I truly do not remember.  I do know it took me two hours to finally make my way home to my wife, who was pretty worried by that time, but realized from the look on my face that it was better that she simply hug me rather than to complain about my absence.

It took me a day or two to bounce back to my usual good humor, but always my mind was distracted by worry.  And that worry lasted until months later when my daughter arrived safely back in Anchorage and came running back into my arms again.

I can report that things became easier after that first time.  Not "easy" mind you, just "easier."

After awhile I was able to make it all of the way out of the airport terminal before becoming overwhelmed with emotion and unable to drive, stopping by the side of the road to gather myself before continuing the ride home.

Because I knew my time was short, and that in three short years my daughter would be living most of the year with her mother, I wanted to expose her to all of the things that I loved. To share experiences and hopefully create lasting memories.

I loved the outdoors so we went on long hikes, splashed through creeks, and rolled down hills together. 

I loved movies so we sat huddled in the darkness each weekend watching the newest release. Comedies, action, animated, horror, we watched and loved them all.

I also loved music so we sang til our throats were dry and danced til out feet were numb.

And I loved books.  Oh, how I loved books.

The most magical, most important, most sacred time for us was the hour before bedtime when I would sit by her bed and read to her, as her eyes grew heavy and her breathing became deep,  right up until she could no longer support the weight of her eyelids and slowly drifted off to sleep.. Then I would reach over to turn off the light by her bed, kiss her on her forehead, and promise to continue our adventure the following night.

A promise, like all of my promises, that I never failed to keep.

And let me just tell you dear reader that these were not just ordinary books.  Oh no, not for MY little girl.  These were the classics.

We had started when she was quite small, age four I believe, with The World of Pooh.  No colorfully illustrated Disney sanitized version was this, but rather the original, just as A. A. Milne had written it, which began as follows:

"Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head. behind Christopher Robin."

And what followed was the magical journey through the "hundred acre wood." complete with a different voice, compliments of Daddy, assigned to each and every character.  My daughter's squeals of enjoyment and wide smiling eyes still the greatest payment I have ever received.

In our many evenings together we prowled the jungles beside Mowgli, with Rudyard Kipling as our guide. Danced through the clouds with Peter Pan as he flew back to Neverland with Wendy and her brothers in tow. Fought back our tears as young Travis released Old Yeller from the pain of a rabies bite. And walked beside Tom Sawyer as he explored his world with his pal Huck Finn, and learned about love as he clumsily wooed Becky Thatcher.

There were many others as well but it was this last book. Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, that I was reading during the last few weeks before my daughter made the transition, agreed to in our mediated custody arrangement, and went to live in Georgia with her mother. As always on the night before she left, I closed the book and promised to read more just as soon she was back with me and lying in her bed.

I will not bore you with the details of how everything I expected to occur after my daughter's three years with my ex-wife failed to materialize.  But I will say that she greatly enjoyed being a big sister and that, as much as she loved me, she felt that her mother depended on her to help care for the new babies in their life.  I certainly could not selfishly ask my daughter to abandon her sisters in order to return to Alaska and live with me.

I still saw her every summer, and alternated between Christmas and Spring breaks, but we never returned to the world of Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, and our priorities shifted to other things.

Going to the movies together became our primary father/daughter activity and soon her reading shifted to lighting techniques for movies, the wonders of stage design, and sound engineering, as she prepared for the life she would soon have behind the cameras working on television shows and movie sets.  And really I could not be more proud of the woman she has become and passion she shows in pursuing her dreams.

As many of you already know after all of these many years she is now living here with me. In fact right now, as I write this, she is only about ten feet away sleeping once again under her father's roof, and surrounded by the Alaska that we both love so much.

Just last night we were regaling her friends with stories about her life growing up here and all of the adventures that she and I had shared.  It was during that conversation that I looked over at my angel and saw her looking back with an odd expression on her face, as if she had suddenly remembered a long forgotten secret.

This morning, as I stumbled into my home office, clutching my cup of coffee and wiping the sleep dust from my eyes I found something unexpected waiting for me on my desk.


So I guess I know what I am doing tonight.

Let's see, where were we?

Chapter 15.  Tom's Stealthy Visit Home

"A few minutes later Tom was in the shoal water of the bar, wading toward the Illinois shore."

Gee I wonder what the boys have been up to all of these years?  Well I imagine we will have to find that out together. Because after  all, I DID promise.

You may THINK you have been raped, but you have not REALLY been raped, unless the Republicans tell YOU that you have been raped!

From Mother Jones:

Rape is only really rape if it involves force. So says the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law.

For years, federal laws restricting the use of government funds to pay for abortions have included exemptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. (Another exemption covers pregnancies that could endanger the life of the woman.) But the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," a bill with 173 mostly Republican co-sponsors that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has dubbed a top priority in the new Congress, contains a provision that would rewrite the rules to limit drastically the definition of rape and incest in these cases.

With this legislation, which was introduced last week by Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape, many of which are non-forcible. For example: If a 13-year-old girl is impregnated by a 24-year-old adult, she would no longer qualify to have Medicaid pay for an abortion. (Smith's spokesman did not respond to a call and an email requesting comment.)

I have a question. 

Perhaps one of you can help me to answer it.

How in the hell do women continue to vote Republican?

This party routinely steps on the rights of women, minorities, and homosexuals, and yet there are still those from each of those demographics that STILL routinely votes for them, as if they have not heard a single thing this all male, whites only, bunch rich assholes have been saying since the very inception of their party. 

How can women especially support a political party that refuses to protect the most vulnerable among us, rape and incest victims, for purely political reasons?

I am sorry but refusing to acknowledge that a young woman has really been raped simply because the man who violated her did not also beat her into submission, is NOT an indication of a differing point of view, it is an indication of the lack of humanity.

I have known far more than my fair share of women who spent their childhoods dreading the nights when daddy made a special visit to their rooms, or who were violated by a "friend" after they became too intoxicated to realize what was happening until they woke up the next morning lying naked on the floor with their shredded underwear wadded up next to them, to not understand that these constitute a VERY real violation which requires that they receive the same compassion and access to medical treatment that a women who has been both raped and beaten deserve.

But hey that is just me. You know the guy with the young daughter, and whose underage mother was impregnated by a man who was legally an adult.  What do I know?   

Friday, January 28, 2011

Bristol is the best pupil a Mama Grizzly could ever hope to have.

Apparently having Washington University dump her as a speaker on a subject that she knows absolutely nothing about has pissed Bristol the Pistol off and she is, dare I say it, GOING ROGUE!

From Radar Online:

Now Bristol’s lawyer has release this statement to RadarOnline.com, slamming the university and even suggesting the Palin name is the real reason she was dumped.

"Bristol was invited to speak with college students as part of a panel. Evidently she has now been disinvited because of apparent concerns by some vocal members of the undergraduate community,” the statement reads.

“Bristol is deeply disappointed that an institution that publicly claims to "listen to diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives, to contribute rigorous academic standards and unbiased scholarship to discussions, and to encourage a civil discourse in which a pluralistic society can respectfully address complex and difficult issues" would withdraw an invitation to a speaker because of "uproar" over their assumed content of her message or even worse, because of her last name."

Further down the page on the Radar Online post they go into more detail about how Bristol came to be considered for the position and why they ultimately decided to let her go.  Here is a hint: It did NOT have anything to do with her name, and everything to do with how much money she was being paid and why.

Which by the way closely echoes the reasons provided to me in an e-mail that I received earlier today from one of the professors at that very same University.

I enjoy your blog very much and am an avid follower. I don't know if you have been following this story, but Bristol Palin was first invited to speak on abstinence at Washington University's "Sex Week" by student representatives. The ensuing uproar by the student body resulted in a cancellation of this appearance. Wash. U. is a fairly liberal institution. But the students were not so much opposed to her viewpoint, but rather to her lack of expertise and the high cost she is charging.

So you see Bristol dumping your ass had NOTHING to do with hatred for your mother, and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you are too unqualified to know what in the hell you are talking about.  But of course since you ARE your mother's daughter you simply cannot resist playing the victim card, can you?

Welcome to the world of academia little cub, where the standards are just a wee bit higher than they are in Wasilla, Alaska.

Sarah Palin's e-mail "hacker" too well off for halfway house but not too well off for prison. WTF?

From the New York Times:

A top federal official is explaining why prison instead of a halfway house was a better place for a former Tennessee student convicted of hacking Sarah Palin's private e-mail account.

A judge had recommended that David Kernell serve his one-year sentence at a Knoxville halfway house. But the U.S. Bureau of Prisons instead sent Kernell to a minimum-security prison in Kentucky.

The Knoxville News Sentinel reports that Bureau of Prisons chief Jose Santana wrote to U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Phillips to explain the decision.

Santana said the halfway house space is needed for inmates who have limited skills, resources and community support. He said that Kernell has three years of college and the support of his family.

Kernell's lawyer says the explanation is lacking.

It is important to remember that the reason this kid is serving time at all is because Sarah Palin is a vindictive woman who wanted him punished.  All the dumb kid did was guess her stupid, ridiculously easy to figure out, password and this is his punishment.

In the meantime Sarah Palin encourages insurrection against our government, inspires people to threaten our Representatives, and broke very ethical guideline imaginable while Governor of Alaska, and she is still free as a bird.

I am no longer satisfied to see Sarah Palin failing as apolitical figure, or seeing her humiliated by scandals concerning Todd and his prostitutes, I want her to serve time.

Yeah I think THAT is the only way to feel that justice has been done when it comes to this hateful creature.

Oh and because Bristol lied about fearing for her safety while cohabiting with her hockey playing boyfriend Levi, and surrounded by Secret Service agents, I would not mind seeing her do a couple of months in the state pen as well.  That seems only fair to me.

Concerning Palingates.

I have had a little while to mull things over and have engaged in conversations with many bloggers, ex-bloggers,  and friends who have been impacted in some way by the changes now taking place over at Palingates, or by events that have happened in the past.

Because of those conversations, and the concerns of many that re-opening old wounds will be detrimental to them personally, or the blogging community in general, I have decided to leave the "can of worms" unopened.

Much of my decision has to do with Regina's request specifically that I allow things from the past to remain in the past.  Since she is in a position to be negatively impacted by the blowback that would be generated from my post I will respect her request and let those sleeping dogs lie.

However there are a few left over "worms" that I feel obligated to expose to the light of day.

First off I had NOTHING to do with Regina's decision to remove P and K. At least as far as I know. 

I sent no e-mails, nor encouraged others to send e-mails, nor threatened to write anything damaging.  When the decision was made I was as shocked as anybody else.

Actually when it happened I was very caught up my own drama, which resulted from the post that also inspired Regina's decision.

As many of you know it was the Shailey Tripp piece (since removed) that proved to be the straw that snapped the camel's back over at Palingates. But what you may not know is how that piece caused me to lose credibility, and possibly put the Enquirer story at risk.

You see the gentleman friend of Ms. Tripp, who I will only identify by his initials R.N., was hoping to tell his side of the story concerning the private side of Shailey Tripp, in order to let people know that she was not just a prostitute but a real person who happened to make a very poor decision which has virtually destroyed her life.

However RN is a VERY private person and he was determined to remain so.  He thought he might be willing to tell his story but ONLY if his anonymity was protected.  I was working to make that happen.

Somehow P got a hold of this gentleman's contact information and told him, and I quote "I am working with Gryphen.  Talking to me is the same as talking to Gryphen." Because of this assurance RN trusted P enough to reveal a few preliminary bits of information for which he was rewarded by having his entire life plastered all over Palingates.  Not only was his life put on display, but so were the names of many of Ms. Tripp's friends and acquaintances, some of who had no idea what she had done, and now found their names linked to her on a blog.

Obviously I started to get calls immediately.  Angry calls wanting to know why I betrayed RN and allowed my "collaborator" to do what they did. When the first call came in I literally had no idea what they were talking about.

It took me most of the day to explain that I had nothing to do with it, and to attempt to rebuild the trust that was now in shattered pieces. As of this writing that trust is still badly damaged and may be irreparable.  Which of course could also impact my ability to gain the trust of others in the the near future.

As a blogger, without the deep pockets of a tabloid like the National Enquirer, all I have to use as currency to "buy" information is trust.  Once I don't have that, I don't have anything.

So yes I was very angry.  Especially since this was not the first time this very same situation had played out.

However my anger was NEVER at Regina who I have always considered a true friend.  And now that she is back in charge of running the show, and the offending post has been removed, I am happy to welcome Palingates back onto my blogroll.  I wish I had never felt it necessary to have removed it in the first place.

I am going to be very careful in how I moderate comments coming in for this post.  I am afraid that I will NOT be allowing any mention by name of RN, P, or K, nor any attacks directed at Regina.  If you want to be mad at me that is okay up to a point, but let's not go crazy alright?

I know that some of you are going to feel confused, and betrayed, and even possibly believe that I must be making the whole thing up, but I assure you I am not.

As for P and K, I wish them much success in whatever they decide to do next.  They are a truly gifted research team.

I really hope that the people who were fans of Palingates will stick by Regina.  She is a very good person as well as a skilled writer and researcher.

Good luck Regina!

Update: For those who still feel I am being petty or perhaps even manufacturing a problem concerning P and K, perhaps you should head on over and read Regina's latest post.

And let me address this jealousy issue that keeps coming up.

I have NEVER felt in competition with any other blog for the entire six years this blog has been in existence.

In fact  I have gone out of my way to include new blogs in my blogroll when I have enjoyed their content or hoped that they would be helpful in discovering new information about Palin or other interesting topics.  In the past I have added such "just starting out" blogs as Mudflats, Palin's Deceptions, Bree Palin, Oz Mudflats, Hypocrites and Heffalump Traps, God's Own Party, Alaska WTF, Mercede Johnston, Malia Litman, and yes even Palingates, just to name a few.

I have also been credited with inspiring at least twenty individuals to start blogs of their own.  So no, I have never worried about competition or felt jealous of the other bloggers who are my, very near or sometimes very distant, neighbors on the internet.

Nor by the way have I EVER demanded from anybody that they give me credit if their post, or article, was clearly derivative of mine, or even stolen outright.  I always felt that if more people saw the information all the better.

And by the way ALL of my interactions with my fellow bloggers have been positive and rewarding.  With one notable exception.

More bad news for those saddled with the Palin name.

From ABC News:

Washington University in St. Louis says Bristol Palin won't be speaking there next month after all.

The decision comes after some students expressed outrage over Palin being paid with student-generated funds.

The daughter of former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin had been invited by the university's Student Health Advisory Committee to be part of a panel discussion on abstinence on Feb. 7. Bristol Palin became pregnant at 17 and is a single mom to a 2-year-old son.

It's not clear exactly how much she was to receive, but student leaders had approved spending $20,000 for the panel.

Well it is about time that people started to realize that a young woman who became a teen mother, and still appears to be in a constant process of  incubation, is NOT the best person to have stand on a podium and tell people to abstain from sex.

This reminds me that on Bristol's last appearance on the Bob and Mark show one of the knuckle dragging Neanderthals stated what a good time it was to have the last name of "Palin."

Wanna bet?

Jon Stewart takes Bill O'Reilly to school. Wherein O'Reilly learns about the internet, commenters, and Nazis.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Bill O'Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogThe Daily Show on Facebook

Comedian Tracy Morgan succintly sums up Sarah Palin's appeal.



It is not her intelligence.

It is not her ability to deliver a speech. 

And it is not her ability to lead this nation.

In the end, whether you like it or not, it is EXACTLY what Tracy Morgan says it is.

Which is why the Sarah Palin phenomena is one of the WORST things to happen to the Women's Movement in the last fifty years.  She has taken the opportunity provided to her by the thousands of women who suffered and sacrificed to earn the right to have a capable woman get a shot at the Presidency, and squandered it.

After all of those more heroic women blazed the trail to make it easier for those that followed, who saunters up to the front of the line?  The addled brained, sexy librarian stereotype that is Sarah Palin.

No wonder so many women despise her.

Update: The power of Palin has caused TNT to quickly apologize for Morgan's remarks.

Still does not make him wrong though.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Sarah Palin's e-mails are coming out May 31. No, THIS time they mean it!


Courtesy of MSNBC:

The state of Alaska has until May 31 to release about 25,000 pages of e-mails from former Gov. Sarah Palin and senior members of her administration, the state attorney general declared Wednesday.

Officials in the governor's office asked the attorney general to approve a 15th delay in the process, until May 31. That request was approved Wednesday by the new attorney general, John J. Burns.
But Burns said this deadline is firm:

"I am granting the requested extension with the unequivocal expectation that all requested records that are not privileged will be provided no later than May 31, 2011," Burns wrote in a letter to the administrative director of the governor's office. He sent a copy of the letter to the news organizations and citizens who have requested records, including msnbc.com.

The other requestors are the Associated Press, Mother Jones magazine, Republican activist Andreé McLeod and author Geoffrey Dunn. Journalists and citizens requested records on Palin's administration in the summer of 2008, when she vaulted onto the national stage after Sen. John McCain chose her as his running mate in his quest for the White House.

I am going to reserve judgement on just how revealing this e-mails may turn out to be until I get a chance to see them.  They may be the break everybody has been waiting for, but I have also heard that they have been heavily redacted and that many with the potential to cause the most damage to Palin's reputation, or even put her behind bars, are in the "privileged" category.

Which means that NOBODY will ever see those.  At least not by going through the usual channels.

Sarah Palin defends Todd against the charges that he is involved wiith prostitutes on the Bob and Mark radio show.



(Forward to 11:36) With no prodding whatsoever Palin denies the Todd prostitution story.

"What hurts are the lies that come from Alaskans, look at this recent BS about Todd supposedly being all caught up in a a prostitution ring in Anchorage. And then APD had to come out and say 'Bull, theres' no evidence'..or heck all they needed to do is ask me...or ask Tawd himself. 'Hey Todd you been hanging out with hookers in Anchorage?' And he'd tell the truth, and obviously it was a big lie but things like that, you guys, that come from Alaskans and then they go viral. They are picked up by national, and international press, we've been dilling with THAT issue the last two weeks. It's a waste of time..things like THAT are hurtful because when we trace back the lies and know that they come FROM our home state of ALASKA that's what hurts...is hurtful but..besides that..um..ya know..I know that other people take a heck of a lot more meaningful, hurtful shots than we do when it comes to things that REALLY matter in this world people who are..losing their jobs, or maybe have a sick child, or their health is in jeopardy, and those things that really, truly matter in life. Todd and I an our kids know that we are so extremely blessed and we'll take those political shots that come our way, but I shore wish that people would just believe in truth and tell the truth and then and we could all be a bit more productive and not waste time in this world."

So, she finally came out and denied the story.

Good that is what everybody has been waiting for.

Hey Sarah, I am totally with you. I ALSO wish that people would believe in the truth and tell the truth." And I am planning on helping people do that very thing.

BTW this story is now going mainstream thanks to Palin finally addressing, it as you can see here.  Thanks Sarah, as usual we could not do it without you.

Is the Internet broken? Nah!

Okay there are a lot of you asking me what is happening with both Alaska WTF and Palingates.

Somebody MIGHT have tried to hack Alaska WTF or it might simply be a misunderstanding with Google, Dirk is still trying to figure that out.  I will know more later.

However what is going on over at Palingates is a MUCH longer and convoluted story, which I will have to address in a much longer post later, hopefully with some help from others who have a part in the story as well.

For those who are wondering I personally had nothing to do with the rift. Though to be honest I was thinking of opening a can of worms that would have resulted in some problems over there.

I will open that can later.

For now PLEASE give Regina your support. She is absolutely a wonderful woman who is only trying to do the right thing.  She is NOT the villain in this drama by any means.

And no the Immoral Minority is not going anywhere so don't worry yourselves about that.

Now we know why Bristol can do whatever she wants with Tripp and Levi can't do anything to stop her.


Levi with Tank Jones.
 From Radar Online:

In an exclusive interview with RadarOnline.com Levi’s manager, Tank Johnson (I have no idea who this "Tank Johnson" guy is.  I used to regularly talk to  Tank Jones" so I assume it is the same guy and that it is THIS kind of great writing and command of the facts that keeps "Team Levi" coming back to Radar Online over and over again as their media outlet of choice.) says that his 20-year-old client is refusing to dignify Bristol’s recent comments about him being an absentee father, and is choosing to take the moral high road.

Bristol recently told a radio station that "since Dancing With the Stars [Levi’s] seen [his son] at most three times.”

Tank denied her allegations and said Levi spends as much time with his two-year-old as he can, and went on to dish out some advice to both Bristol and her family.

("Levi spends as much time with his two year old as he can?" Bullshit!  The custody agreement states that he gets Tripp twice a week, not three times in three months. The only reason that he is NOT seeing his little boy more often is because he is not using the courts to enforce his rights.)

"The Palins need to take the high road. There's a child involved in this and Levi is not going to stoop to this level,” he said. "The Palins like to fight. They can say whatever they want to say.

(Yes they like to fight.  Because they are bullies. The ONLY way that bullies stop beating you up and taking advantage of you is when you FIGHT BACK!)

"But Levi is not going to dignify their comments with a response.”

(Why the hell not?)

And as for Bristol wanting to change Tripp's last name from Johnston to Palin, Tank said that wasn't going to happen.

"Levi has his son and that isn't changing. It is what it is."

(Well as it turns out the only reason that Tripp Johnston may not wake up one day and find that his name is Tripp "Palin" is because it is too much hard work to change it, and the Palins don't like hard work.)

However, a source close to Palin confirms that there won’t be a legal name change: “That will not be happening, legally that would actually take a lot of work and despite all the rumors Bristol and Levi are actually getting along pretty well just now.”

Yeah well how could they not be "getting along pretty well" since Levi is allowing Bristol to treat him like her bitch at every turn?  The Palins LOVE people who bend to their will and let them treat them like dirt. Isn't that right RAM?

Personally I am beyond disgusted with Levi's legal team.  Tank Jones is a six foot, two inch, three hundred pound behemoth, who obviously has balls the size of dried raisins. He talks tough but every time he is supposed to have Levi's back he is nowhere to be seen, or working on getting a little media attention of his own.

And as for Rex Butler, I know at least two female attorneys in Alaska who would have had Thomas Van Flein huddled in a corner sucking his thumb and promising to let Levi have Tripp every day if somebody would just "make the mean lady stop!" Yet Rex has NEVER presented much of a challenge to the Palin legal team even when the deck is stacked in his favor.

Bristol took Levi's son away from him and all he has to do is complain to the court to force her to bring the child back so that he can see him, and work out a better arrangement.  But if his "team" is too cowardly to stand up to the Palins than he is screwed.

Once again Levi, sac up and call me and we will get your little boy back. I promise.

I can barely make out Joel Osteen telling Piers Morgan that homosexuals are going to burn in hell over the loud pinging of my gay-dar.



I'm sorry, and I hate to be crude, but just how long do you think that Osteen spent tweezing his eyebrows and grooming his luxurious chestnut colored  mane before sitting next to his beard wife and condemning the Village People to eternal damnation?

Methinks that Ted Haggard might be in a position to provide a little counseling to a fellow closet case in the very near future, don't you?

By the way Christians, Jesus was totally gay.  I mean come on, he hung out with twelve dudes and only let the one hot easy chick in the group rub his feet.  What does THAT say to you?

But do you know what?  His father loved him just the way he was. 

I mean sure he did let the Romans tie him to a tree, stick him with a spear in the ribs, and leave him to rot in a cave, but once he knew Jesus would never stop digging the dudes he still let him come live with him in heaven.

And isn't it really ALL about the happy ending?

"What am I thinking now?" By Sarah Palin's face.


"Why is Greta asking me questions in slow motion? Doesn't she know I have to keep talking or the combination of Red Bull and Methamphetamine will cause so much pressure to build up behind my eyes that they will start bleed? Bitch!"


"Let me see.  Are my chances of being elected President better if I kill Todd and dump him in Lake Lucille, or worse? "


"No I definitely need to keep pretending I have a happy marriage or else that asshole Gryphen will never stop bragging about how he was right all along.  I hate that guy!"

"Oh my God!  Was that gift certificate for a massage that Todd gave me for my birthday just a way to get me to allow his girlfriend to touch my naked body?  That does it, into the lake the goes!"

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Almost time to tweet the twit's tragic tirade against the SOTU speech. Updated with video of interview.


Yes I will be firing up the Twitter in anticipation of a potential meltdown or at the very least another shovel full of dirt thrown on the end of Palin's political career.

You can follow me here, if you are so inclined or leave your own comments to share your take on Palin's performance.

WHAT..IN...THE..HELL..WAS...THAT!

I know that most of you are thinking "Gryphen is a genius for knowing she was going to go on a tirade."

First, thank you for recognizing my intellect.  But no, I had no idea that she was going to be so....manic.

I literally almost threw a knuckle out of joint trying to keep up on Twitter. That was an amazing performance of crazy. 

Which of course means that Bachmann is out, and Sarah has retaken the crown of the "Crazy Teabagger Queen!" Sorry Michelle you are just not batshit crazy enough to compete.

I will post my tweets momentarily.  I need a drink first. Maybe two.

So Palin us going to appear on Greta tonight and do her own rebuttal to the SOTU speech. I wonder if SHE can find the right camera?

Sarah Palin talks jobs. What will she say? Zzzzz

On the attack right away. (She came on the air working her mouth in between questions and talking so fast that only hummingbirds could make out what she was saying.)

WTF? Is right she is raging! (I swear at one point I saw foam around the mouth!)

Talk faster lady! It definitely makes you sound smarter. (Not really.)

"fluffery?" (Describing the substance of Obama's speech. Not the porn kind of "fluffery.")

Cut social security? Uh oh.

Greta lobs softball. Sarah whiffs it. (Greta tried to help, but Palin was too wired to fully process a simple question.)

Lip service. Funny you should mention that. Shailey says hi. (Totally kidding.  Shailey says "hi" to Todd, wherever he is.)

Big government is the problem? Well duh. (Sarcasm.  Did I scare you?)

Good God how much Red Bull did she drink?

Is she saying that Republicans are not usually in lockstep? Really? (The only ones usually in lockstep more than the Republicans are those guys that the Teabaggers believe Obama used to be in charge of.)

"make manifest" that is evangelical code language.

Sarah is giving a history lesson. Gather round kids. (This is where she explained that the space race destroyed the Soviet Union.  What?  You never read that in school?)

"spud-nut" moments? (How come everything Palin says sounds dirty?  Is that on purpose?)

Bristol has a job. As Palins assistant? Or a radio gig? (According to Sarah Bristol was there hiding just off camera. I can't add anything more, because everything I am thinking is mean.)

Talk faster Greta. Palin needs to respond before she explodes. (Totally NOT joking about that.)

Civil means " civility." somebody write that down! (The "stupid" hurts my brain bad!)

Attacking the media now. (Sarah viciously spit out calmly explained that the reason their is so much uncivil discourse is because of her hate speech and crosshair map the media.)

Is she done? WTF? Indeed!

Okay when this interview makes it to the web i am going to post it, because, believe me, my tweets are not even remotely descriptive enough to explain the trainwreck I just witnessed!

Update: Here is the video. I dare you to try and make sense out of what she says.



She kept saying WTF. Does SHE even know what that means? Or perhaps she is simply saying that she is a fan of this website.

Part two.

More bad news for Palin. But hey, good news for us!

The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin [Hardcover]
Joe McGinniss (Author)
Like (2)
|
List Price: $25.00
Price: $16.50 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $8.50 (34%)
Pre-order Price Guarantee. Learn more.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
This title will be released on September 13, 2011.
Pre-order now!

I understand that the image of the book cover should be up soon.

Well just to start things off I just pre-ordered my copy. And while I was at it I pre-ordered Geoffey Dunn's book as well.

2011 is going to rock!

"You know who" will be on Greta tonight trying to one up Michele Bachmann's rebuttal of the President's SOTU speech. Oh THIS ought to be good!



I am curious to see if she will address the Todd sex scandal or not.

Remember if she refuses to deny it then it MUST be true!

By the way I have received a PDF of the National Enquirer's new story and they are still being VERY cautious.

However Shailey Tripp IS quoted in this one and she confirms that she and Todd did indeed have sex numerous times and that she even once gave a massage to the Grizzled Mama herself. (No happy ending provided of course.)

And by the way there seems to be some confusion as to where the arrest took place. It was in Anchorage at Blue Hands Massage, not Wasilla.

APD Spokesperson Dave Parker confirms that the report about Todd Palin not being connected to prostitution arrest of Shailey Tripp IS from them.


We called the APD and according to Dave Parker, APD spokesperson, the statement put out to the  National Enquirer and TMZ was indeed written by them. (For some reason THIS statement is not available on the APD website as is the custom, and you can ONLY get confirmation by calling Parker directly. Things that make you go Hmmm.)

Now the only question remaining is WHY they would make a public statement about a story in the tabloids and on the internet which is usually NOT the policy of law enforcement in Alaska? (You know, when it doesn't involve the Palin of course.)

However it does appear that Officer Parker is not exactly neutral in his opinion  of Sarah Palin, for whatever THAT is worth.  Check out this statement he made for the New York Daily News:

In explaining the bombshell allegations, Parker said some in Anchorage were just "rabidly anti-Palin," adding "they will do anything to destroy the platform Sarah Palin is standing on."

If it sounds like a Palin-bot, and acts like a Palin-bot.....

In one last FU to the Alaska voters Joe Miller costs the state an estimated $100,000 in legal fees before fading into the fog of anonymity.

From Alaska Dispatch:

Assistant attorney general Sarah Felix, one of a number of state attorneys involved in the Joe Miller case, told the committee that the legal wrangling, mainly in the state Superior Court, cost the state $85,000 to $100,000. The state is currently seeking to recover 20 percent of the cost -- about $17,000 -- from Miller, the maximum amount allowed under the law.

"A team of five attorneys working around the clock" made up the bulk of the cost of the lawsuit, Felix said. In addition to the money spent in Superior Court, where most of the legal arguments and briefings took place, the state also spent money to argue in the Alaska Supreme Court and in federal court as well.

(Sen. Bill)Wielechowski, in an interview after the hearing, pointed out that the cost could have climbed into the hundreds of thousands of dollars if it had been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

I guess keeping costs down, and the Federal government out of state business, only counts when it does NOT benefit Joe Miller.

I am certainly no fan of Lisa Murkowski, but I just have to say how happy I am to have her as my Senator and not this hypocritical teabagging son-of-a-bitch.

In case you missed it, here is the President's SOTU speech in full.



Wow! That was amazing. (And once again for those who cannot watch the video, you can find the transcript here.)

Just in case your television's parental controls do not allow you to receive the batshit crazy channel, here is Michelle "I sound a LITTLE saner than Sarah Palin" Bachmann's rebuttal.



I especially enjoyed the huge lipstick stains she left on the Tea Party's ass before whipping out her Ross Perot charts of made up statistics to prove how scholarly she is.

Update: You ahve GOT to read the Guardian's take on Bachmann's speech.  Too funny!

Here is a taste:

Bachmann's comments, spoken to camera and broadcast only by CNN, appeared to be off the mark, literally. She spoke directly into a camera operated by a dedicated broadcaster, Tea Party HD, thinking it was on air when the live camera was to one side.

So when she came to praise American voters — "thanks to you, there's reason for all of us to have hope" — she appeared to be thanking an off-screen CNN cameraman.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Anchorage Police Department denies Todd Palin involved in prostitution arrest. Really? Update!


So the Palins remain mum on the topic of Shailey Tripp and her connection to Todd, but for some reason the Anchorage Police decide to come out to provide cover instead,  Isn't THAT interesting?

Well let's see what we have here.

Police statement courtesy of NE:

The Anchorage Police Department have issued the following press release:


Shailey Tripp Investigation APD #10-1823


The Anchorage Police Department investigation and arrest of Shailey Tripp has recently been mischaracterized in internet blogs and in a National Enquirer article. Several errors regarding the investigation and arrest were reported in the Enquirer article (printed and internet versions):

None of the physical evidence examined by police showed any connection to Wasilla resident Todd Palin and his name did not appear in any of the records seized by APD.

(Well unless the APD did not bother to open Shailey Tripp's computer files or check the other items they took from her business I have a hard time believing this. But fear not, the National Enquirer has what they need to tie all of this together.)

The investigation of the prostitution operation was initiated by Anchorage Police Department’s Vice Unit responding to internet advertisements, not through information developed from any tips or other persons.

(Yeah well that does not match up with anything that I have heard.)

No rolodex was seized and taken into evidence.

(No "rolodex seized" does not mean that the kind of information that might be found in one was not seized. Words are tricky.)

The National Enquirer has not contacted Anchorage Police Department Public Affairs Unit to fact check its story so their reported “call to Anchorage Police Department” could not have been returned.

(I am in the dark about the accuracy of this one, so I can offer no further enlightenment.)

“Bloggers” have had no access to the evidence seized so their linking of evidence in police custody to any other person is incorrect.

(True, none of the bloggers I know have had access to the evidence seized by the police.  But THAT certainly does not mean that we do not have access to very incriminating evidence.  Here is a hint: SOME of us do.)

And speaking of bloggers I suggest that everybody be very careful as to exactly who they are trusting to provide them with information.  It has come to my attention that there are some wild geese being chased all through the internet concerning this story. 

It is understandable that people are anxious for information, but making things up to fill the void does nobody any good in the long run and  besides when the real story comes out it will make them look a little silly.  Not to mention that there are real people whose live have already been negatively impacted by the Palins that do not deserve to be violated again by others desperately digging for something to put on their blog.

BTW the fact that the National Enquirer has not taken down their initial post on this subject should give everybody a pretty good indication that they are standing by their story.  The Palins are going to do everything in their power to kill this story behind the scenes without giving themselves away, which should give all of us a pretty good idea of exactly how much power they still wield in Alaska.

And exactly WHEN was the last time a law enforcement agency in Alaska broke protocol and talked about a rumor circulating around the blogs and tabloids?  Wasn't that about two years ago concerning a possible Federal investigation?

Hmm isn't that a coinky-dink?

More popcorn anybody?

Update: Thomas Van Flein's favorite gossip site also has the story.  Hmm I guess somebody is STILL on the payroll.

Update 2: It looks like the Enquirer has definitely NOT been scared off of the story.


It should hit the stands tomorrow. If you guys don't mind I would really like some PDF's of this since I won't get it up here until NEXT week.

I think I already know what most of it says but I would still like to read it for myself.  Thanks ahead of time.

For the impatient ones among us the State of the Union speech has been leaked.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 25, 2011

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery
State of the Union Address
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Washington, DC

As Prepared for Delivery—

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:


Tonight I want to begin by congratulating the men and women of the 112th Congress, as well as your new Speaker, John Boehner. And as we mark this occasion, we are also mindful of the empty chair in this Chamber, and pray for the health of our colleague – and our friend – Gabby Giffords.

It’s no secret that those of us here tonight have had our differences over the last two years. The debates have been contentious; we have fought fiercely for our beliefs. And that’s a good thing. That’s what a robust democracy demands. That’s what helps set us apart as a nation.

But there’s a reason the tragedy in Tucson gave us pause. Amid all the noise and passions and rancor of our public debate, Tucson reminded us that no matter who we are or where we come from, each of us is a part of something greater – something more consequential than party or political preference.

We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people; that we share common hopes and a common creed; that the dreams of a little girl in Tucson are not so different than those of our own children, and that they all deserve the chance to be fulfilled.

That, too, is what sets us apart as a nation.

Now, by itself, this simple recognition won’t usher in a new era of cooperation. What comes of this moment is up to us. What comes of this moment will be determined not by whether we can sit together tonight, but whether we can work together tomorrow.

I believe we can. I believe we must. That’s what the people who sent us here expect of us. With their votes, they’ve determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties. New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. We will move forward together, or not at all – for the challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics.

At stake right now is not who wins the next election – after all, we just had an election. At stake is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. It’s whether the hard work and industry of our people is rewarded. It’s whether we sustain the leadership that has made America not just a place on a map, but a light to the world.

We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.

But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone. We measure progress by the success of our people. By the jobs they can find and the quality of life those jobs offer. By the prospects of a small business owner who dreams of turning a good idea into a thriving enterprise. By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.

That’s the project the American people want us to work on. Together.

We did that in December. Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans’ paychecks are a little bigger today. Every business can write off the full cost of the new investments they make this year. These steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.

But we have more work to do. The steps we’ve taken over the last two years may have broken the back of this recession – but to win the future, we’ll need to take on challenges that have been decades in the making.

Many people watching tonight can probably remember a time when finding a good job meant showing up at a nearby factory or a business downtown. You didn’t always need a degree, and your competition was pretty much limited to your neighbors. If you worked hard, chances are you’d have a job for life, with a decent paycheck, good benefits, and the occasional promotion. Maybe you’d even have the pride of seeing your kids work at the same company.

That world has changed. And for many, the change has been painful. I’ve seen it in the shuttered windows of once booming factories, and the vacant storefronts of once busy Main Streets. I’ve heard it in the frustrations of Americans who’ve seen their paychecks dwindle or their jobs disappear – proud men and women who feel like the rules have been changed in the middle of the game.

They’re right. The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business. Steel mills that once needed 1,000 workers can now do the same work with 100. Today, just about any company can set up shop, hire workers, and sell their products wherever there’s an internet connection.

Meanwhile, nations like China and India realized that with some changes of their own, they could compete in this new world. And so they started educating their children earlier and longer, with greater emphasis on math and science. They’re investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became home to the world’s largest private solar research facility, and the world’s fastest computer.

So yes, the world has changed. The competition for jobs is real. But this shouldn’t discourage us. It should challenge us. Remember – for all the hits we’ve taken these last few years, for all the naysayers predicting our decline, America still has the largest, most prosperous economy in the world. No workers are more productive than ours. No country has more successful companies, or grants more patents to inventors and entrepreneurs. We are home to the world’s best colleges and universities, where more students come to study than any other place on Earth.

What’s more, we are the first nation to be founded for the sake of an idea – the idea that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny. That is why centuries of pioneers and immigrants have risked everything to come here. It’s why our students don’t just memorize equations, but answer questions like “What do you think of that idea? What would you change about the world? What do you want to be when you grow up?”

The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can’t just stand still. As Robert Kennedy told us, “The future is not a gift. It is an achievement.” Sustaining the American Dream has never been about standing pat. It has required each generation to sacrifice, and struggle, and meet the demands of a new age.

Now it’s our turn. We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business. We need to take responsibility for our deficit, and reform our government. That’s how our people will prosper. That’s how we’ll win the future. And tonight, I’d like to talk about how we get there.

The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation.

None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from. Thirty years ago, we couldn’t know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution. What we can do – what America does better than anyone – is spark the creativity and imagination of our people. We are the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook. In America, innovation doesn’t just change our lives. It’s how we make a living.

Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation. But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout history our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they need. That’s what planted the seeds for the Internet. That’s what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS.

Just think of all the good jobs – from manufacturing to retail – that have come from those breakthroughs.

Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik¸ we had no idea how we’d beat them to the moon. The science wasn’t there yet. NASA didn’t even exist. But after investing in better research and education, we didn’t just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.

This is our generation’s Sputnik moment. Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development we haven’t seen since the height of the Space Race. In a few weeks, I will be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We’ll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology – an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people.

Already, we are seeing the promise of renewable energy. Robert and Gary Allen are brothers who run a small Michigan roofing company. After September 11th, they volunteered their best roofers to help repair the Pentagon. But half of their factory went unused, and the recession hit them hard.

Today, with the help of a government loan, that empty space is being used to manufacture solar shingles that are being sold all across the country. In Robert’s words, “We reinvented ourselves.”

That’s what Americans have done for over two hundred years: reinvented ourselves. And to spur on more success stories like the Allen Brothers, we’ve begun to reinvent our energy policy. We’re not just handing out money. We’re issuing a challenge. We’re telling America’s scientists and engineers that if they assemble teams of the best minds in their fields, and focus on the hardest problems in clean energy, we’ll fund the Apollo Projects of our time.

At the California Institute of Technology, they’re developing a way to turn sunlight and water into fuel for our cars. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, they’re using supercomputers to get a lot more power out of our nuclear facilities. With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.

We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I’m asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but they’re doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy, let’s invest in tomorrow’s.

Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling. So tonight, I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal: by 2035, 80% of America’s electricity will come from clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas. To meet this goal, we will need them all – and I urge Democrats and Republicans to work together to make it happen.

Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America’s success. But if we want to win the future – if we want innovation to produce jobs in America and not overseas – then we also have to win the race to educate our kids.

Think about it. Over the next ten years, nearly half of all new jobs will require education that goes beyond a high school degree. And yet, as many as a quarter of our students aren’t even finishing high school. The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations. America has fallen to 9th in the proportion of young people with a college degree. And so the question is whether all of us – as citizens, and as parents – are willing to do what’s necessary to give every child a chance to succeed.

That responsibility begins not in our classrooms, but in our homes and communities. It’s family that first instills the love of learning in a child. Only parents can make sure the TV is turned off and homework gets done. We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline.

Our schools share this responsibility. When a child walks into a classroom, it should be a place of high expectations and high performance. But too many schools don’t meet this test. That’s why instead of just pouring money into a system that’s not working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top. To all fifty states, we said, “If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we’ll show you the money.”

Race to the Top is the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a generation. For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, it has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning. These standards were developed, not by Washington, but by Republican and Democratic governors throughout the country. And Race to the Top should be the approach we follow this year as we replace No Child Left Behind with a law that is more flexible and focused on what’s best for our kids.

You see, we know what’s possible for our children when reform isn’t just a top-down mandate, but the work of local teachers and principals; school boards and communities.

Take a school like Bruce Randolph in Denver. Three years ago, it was rated one of the worst schools in Colorado; located on turf between two rival gangs. But last May, 97% of the seniors received their diploma. Most will be the first in their family to go to college. And after the first year of the school’s transformation, the principal who made it possible wiped away tears when a student said “Thank you, Mrs. Waters, for showing… that we are smart and we can make it.”

Let’s also remember that after parents, the biggest impact on a child’s success comes from the man or woman at the front of the classroom. In South Korea, teachers are known as “nation builders.” Here in America, it’s time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect. We want to reward good teachers and stop making excuses for bad ones. And over the next ten years, with so many Baby Boomers retiring from our classrooms, we want to prepare 100,000 new teachers in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.

In fact, to every young person listening tonight who’s contemplating their career choice: If you want to make a difference in the life of our nation; if you want to make a difference in the life of a child – become a teacher. Your country needs you.

Of course, the education race doesn’t end with a high school diploma. To compete, higher education must be within reach of every American. That’s why we’ve ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks, and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students. And this year, I ask Congress to go further, and make permanent our tuition tax credit – worth $10,000 for four years of college.

Because people need to be able to train for new jobs and careers in today’s fast-changing economy, we are also revitalizing America’s community colleges. Last month, I saw the promise of these schools at Forsyth Tech in North Carolina. Many of the students there used to work in the surrounding factories that have since left town. One mother of two, a woman named Kathy Proctor, had worked in the furniture industry since she was 18 years old. And she told me she’s earning her degree in biotechnology now, at 55 years old, not just because the furniture jobs are gone, but because she wants to inspire her children to pursue their dreams too. As Kathy said, “I hope it tells them to never give up.”

If we take these steps – if we raise expectations for every child, and give them the best possible chance at an education, from the day they’re born until the last job they take – we will reach the goal I set two years ago: by the end of the decade, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

One last point about education. Today, there are hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens. Some are the children of undocumented workers, who had nothing to do with the actions of their parents. They grew up as Americans and pledge allegiance to our flag, and yet live every day with the threat of deportation. Others come here from abroad to study in our colleges and universities. But as soon as they obtain advanced degrees, we send them back home to compete against us. It makes no sense.

Now, I strongly believe that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration. I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our laws and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows. I know that debate will be difficult and take time. But tonight, let’s agree to make that effort. And let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who can staff our research labs, start new businesses, and further enrich this nation.

The third step in winning the future is rebuilding America. To attract new businesses to our shores, we need the fastest, most reliable ways to move people, goods, and information – from high-speed rail to high-speed internet.

Our infrastructure used to be the best – but our lead has slipped. South Korean homes now have greater internet access than we do. Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railways than we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our own engineers graded our nation’s infrastructure, they gave us a “D.”

We have to do better. America is the nation that built the transcontinental railroad, brought electricity to rural communities, and constructed the interstate highway system. The jobs created by these projects didn’t just come from laying down tracks or pavement. They came from businesses that opened near a town’s new train station or the new off-ramp.

Over the last two years, we have begun rebuilding for the 21st century, a project that has meant thousands of good jobs for the hard-hit construction industry. Tonight, I’m proposing that we redouble these efforts.

We will put more Americans to work repairing crumbling roads and bridges. We will make sure this is fully paid for, attract private investment, and pick projects based on what’s best for the economy, not politicians.

Within 25 years, our goal is to give 80% of Americans access to high-speed rail, which could allow you go places in half the time it takes to travel by car. For some trips, it will be faster than flying – without the pat-down. As we speak, routes in California and the Midwest are already underway.

Within the next five years, we will make it possible for business to deploy the next generation of high-speed wireless coverage to 98% of all Americans. This isn’t just about a faster internet and fewer dropped calls. It’s about connecting every part of America to the digital age. It’s about a rural community in Iowa or Alabama where farmers and small business owners will be able to sell their products all over the world. It’s about a firefighter who can download the design of a burning building onto a handheld device; a student who can take classes with a digital textbook; or a patient who can have face-to-face video chats with her doctor.

All these investments – in innovation, education, and infrastructure – will make America a better place to do business and create jobs. But to help our companies compete, we also have to knock down barriers that stand in the way of their success.

Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries. Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change.

So tonight, I’m asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system. Get rid of the loopholes. Level the playing field. And use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years – without adding to our deficit.

To help businesses sell more products abroad, we set a goal of doubling our exports by 2014 – because the more we export, the more jobs we create at home. Already, our exports are up. Recently, we signed agreements with India and China that will support more than 250,000 jobs in the United States. And last month, we finalized a trade agreement with South Korea that will support at least 70,000 American jobs. This agreement has unprecedented support from business and labor; Democrats and Republicans, and I ask this Congress to pass it as soon as possible.

Before I took office, I made it clear that we would enforce our trade agreements, and that I would only sign deals that keep faith with American workers, and promote American jobs. That’s what we did with Korea, and that’s what I intend to do as we pursue agreements with Panama and Colombia, and continue our Asia Pacific and global trade talks.

To reduce barriers to growth and investment, I’ve ordered a review of government regulations. When we find rules that put an unnecessary burden on businesses, we will fix them. But I will not hesitate to create or enforce commonsense safeguards to protect the American people. That’s what we’ve done in this country for more than a century. It’s why our food is safe to eat, our water is safe to drink, and our air is safe to breathe. It’s why we have speed limits and child labor laws. It’s why last year, we put in place consumer protections against hidden fees and penalties by credit card companies, and new rules to prevent another financial crisis. And it’s why we passed reform that finally prevents the health insurance industry from exploiting patients.

Now, I’ve heard rumors that a few of you have some concerns about the new health care law. So let me be the first to say that anything can be improved. If you have ideas about how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you. We can start right now by correcting a flaw in the legislation that has placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses.

What I’m not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing condition. I’m not willing to tell James Howard, a brain cancer patient from Texas, that his treatment might not be covered. I’m not willing to tell Jim Houser, a small business owner from Oregon, that he has to go back to paying $5,000 more to cover his employees. As we speak, this law is making prescription drugs cheaper for seniors and giving uninsured students a chance to stay on their parents’ coverage. So instead of re-fighting the battles of the last two years, let’s fix what needs fixing and move forward.

Now, the final step – a critical step – in winning the future is to make sure we aren’t buried under a mountain of debt.

We are living with a legacy of deficit-spending that began almost a decade ago. And in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people’s pockets.

But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same.

So tonight, I am proposing that starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. This would reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.

This freeze will require painful cuts. Already, we have frozen the salaries of hardworking federal employees for the next two years. I’ve proposed cuts to things I care deeply about, like community action programs. The Secretary of Defense has also agreed to cut tens of billions of dollars in spending that he and his generals believe our military can do without.

I recognize that some in this Chamber have already proposed deeper cuts, and I’m willing to eliminate whatever we can honestly afford to do without. But let’s make sure that we’re not doing it on the backs of our most vulnerable citizens. And let’s make sure what we’re cutting is really excess weight. Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may feel like you’re flying high at first, but it won’t take long before you’ll feel the impact.

Now, most of the cuts and savings I’ve proposed only address annual domestic spending, which represents a little more than 12% of our budget. To make further progress, we have to stop pretending that cutting this kind of spending alone will be enough. It won’t.

The bipartisan Fiscal Commission I created last year made this crystal clear. I don’t agree with all their proposals, but they made important progress. And their conclusion is that the only way to tackle our deficit is to cut excessive spending wherever we find it – in domestic spending, defense spending, health care spending, and spending through tax breaks and loopholes.

This means further reducing health care costs, including programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which are the single biggest contributor to our long-term deficit. Health insurance reform will slow these rising costs, which is part of why nonpartisan economists have said that repealing the health care law would add a quarter of a trillion dollars to our deficit. Still, I’m willing to look at other ideas to bring down costs, including one that Republicans suggested last year: medical malpractice reform to rein in frivolous lawsuits.

To put us on solid ground, we should also find a bipartisan solution to strengthen Social Security for future generations. And we must do it without putting at risk current retirees, the most vulnerable, or people with disabilities; without slashing benefits for future generations; and without subjecting Americans’ guaranteed retirement income to the whims of the stock market.

And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break.

It’s not a matter of punishing their success. It’s about promoting America’s success.

In fact, the best thing we could do on taxes for all Americans is to simplify the individual tax code. This will be a tough job, but members of both parties have expressed interest in doing this, and I am prepared to join them.

So now is the time to act. Now is the time for both sides and both houses of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – to forge a principled compromise that gets the job done. If we make the hard choices now to rein in our deficits, we can make the investments we need to win the future.

Let me take this one step further. We shouldn’t just give our people a government that’s more affordable. We should give them a government that’s more competent and efficient. We cannot win the future with a government of the past.

We live and do business in the information age, but the last major reorganization of the government happened in the age of black and white TV. There are twelve different agencies that deal with exports. There are at least five different entities that deal with housing policy. Then there’s my favorite example: the Interior Department is in charge of salmon while they’re in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in when they’re in saltwater. And I hear it gets even more complicated once they’re smoked.

Now, we have made great strides over the last two years in using technology and getting rid of waste. Veterans can now download their electronic medical records with a click of the mouse. We’re selling acres of federal office space that hasn’t been used in years, and we will cut through red tape to get rid of more. But we need to think bigger. In the coming months, my administration will develop a proposal to merge, consolidate, and reorganize the federal government in a way that best serves the goal of a more competitive America. I will submit that proposal to Congress for a vote – and we will push to get it passed.

In the coming year, we will also work to rebuild people’s faith in the institution of government. Because you deserve to know exactly how and where your tax dollars are being spent, you will be able to go to a website and get that information for the very first time in history. Because you deserve to know when your elected officials are meeting with lobbyists, I ask Congress to do what the White House has already done: put that information online. And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: if a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.

A 21st century government that’s open and competent. A government that lives within its means. An economy that’s driven by new skills and ideas. Our success in this new and changing world will require reform, responsibility, and innovation. It will also require us to approach that world with a new level of engagement in our foreign affairs.

Just as jobs and businesses can now race across borders, so can new threats and new challenges. No single wall separates East and West; no one rival superpower is aligned against us.

And so we must defeat determined enemies wherever they are, and build coalitions that cut across lines of region and race and religion. America’s moral example must always shine for all who yearn for freedom, justice, and dignity. And because we have begun this work, tonight we can say that American leadership has been renewed and America’s standing has been restored.

Look to Iraq, where nearly 100,000 of our brave men and women have left with their heads held high; where American combat patrols have ended; violence has come down; and a new government has been formed. This year, our civilians will forge a lasting partnership with the Iraqi people, while we finish the job of bringing our troops out of Iraq. America’s commitment has been kept; the Iraq War is coming to an end.

Of course, as we speak, al Qaeda and their affiliates continue to plan attacks against us. Thanks to our intelligence and law enforcement professionals, we are disrupting plots and securing our cities and skies. And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are a part of our American family.

We have also taken the fight to al Qaeda and their allies abroad. In Afghanistan, our troops have taken Taliban strongholds and trained Afghan Security Forces. Our purpose is clear – by preventing the Taliban from reestablishing a stranglehold over the Afghan people, we will deny al Qaeda the safe-haven that served as a launching pad for 9/11.

Thanks to our heroic troops and civilians, fewer Afghans are under the control of the insurgency. There will be tough fighting ahead, and the Afghan government will need to deliver better governance. But we are strengthening the capacity of the Afghan people and building an enduring partnership with them. This year, we will work with nearly 50 countries to begin a transition to an Afghan lead. And this July, we will begin to bring our troops home.

In Pakistan, al Qaeda’s leadership is under more pressure than at any point since 2001. Their leaders and operatives are being removed from the battlefield. Their safe-havens are shrinking. And we have sent a message from the Afghan border to the Arabian Peninsula to all parts of the globe: we will not relent, we will not waver, and we will defeat you.

American leadership can also be seen in the effort to secure the worst weapons of war. Because Republicans and Democrats approved the New START Treaty, far fewer nuclear weapons and launchers will be deployed. Because we rallied the world, nuclear materials are being locked down on every continent so they never fall into the hands of terrorists.

Because of a diplomatic effort to insist that Iran meet its obligations, the Iranian government now faces tougher and tighter sanctions than ever before. And on the Korean peninsula, we stand with our ally South Korea, and insist that North Korea keeps its commitment to abandon nuclear weapons.

This is just a part of how we are shaping a world that favors peace and prosperity. With our European allies, we revitalized NATO, and increased our cooperation on everything from counter-terrorism to missile defense. We have reset our relationship with Russia, strengthened Asian alliances, and built new partnerships with nations like India. This March, I will travel to Brazil, Chile, and El Salvador to forge new alliances for progress in the Americas. Around the globe, we are standing with those who take responsibility – helping farmers grow more food; supporting doctors who care for the sick; and combating the corruption that can rot a society and rob people of opportunity.

Recent events have shown us that what sets us apart must not just be our power – it must be the purpose behind it. In South Sudan – with our assistance – the people were finally able to vote for independence after years of war. Thousands lined up before dawn. People danced in the streets. One man who lost four of his brothers at war summed up the scene around him: “This was a battlefield for most of my life. Now we want to be free.”

We saw that same desire to be free in Tunisia, where the will of the people proved more powerful than the writ of a dictator. And tonight, let us be clear: the United States of America stands with the people of Tunisia, and supports the democratic aspirations of all people.

We must never forget that the things we’ve struggled for, and fought for, live in the hearts of people everywhere. And we must always remember that the Americans who have borne the greatest burden in this struggle are the men and women who serve our country.

Tonight, let us speak with one voice in reaffirming that our nation is united in support of our troops and their families. Let us serve them as well as they have served us – by giving them the equipment they need; by providing them with the care and benefits they have earned; and by enlisting our veterans in the great task of building our own nation.

Our troops come from every corner of this country – they are black, white, Latino, Asian and Native American. They are Christian and Hindu, Jewish and Muslim. And, yes, we know that some of them are gay. Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love. And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation.

We should have no illusions about the work ahead of us. Reforming our schools; changing the way we use energy; reducing our deficit – none of this is easy. All of it will take time. And it will be harder because we will argue about everything. The cost. The details. The letter of every law.

Of course, some countries don’t have this problem. If the central government wants a railroad, they get a railroad – no matter how many homes are bulldozed. If they don’t want a bad story in the newspaper, it doesn’t get written.

And yet, as contentious and frustrating and messy as our democracy can sometimes be, I know there isn’t a person here who would trade places with any other nation on Earth.

We may have differences in policy, but we all believe in the rights enshrined in our Constitution. We may have different opinions, but we believe in the same promise that says this is a place where you can make it if you try. We may have different backgrounds, but we believe in the same dream that says this is a country where anything’s possible. No matter who you are. No matter where you come from.

That dream is why I can stand here before you tonight. That dream is why a working class kid from Scranton can stand behind me. That dream is why someone who began by sweeping the floors of his father’s Cincinnati bar can preside as Speaker of the House in the greatest nation on Earth.

That dream – that American Dream – is what drove the Allen Brothers to reinvent their roofing company for a new era. It’s what drove those students at Forsyth Tech to learn a new skill and work towards the future. And that dream is the story of a small business owner named Brandon Fisher.

Brandon started a company in Berlin, Pennsylvania that specializes in a new kind of drilling technology. One day last summer, he saw the news that halfway across the world, 33 men were trapped in a Chilean mine, and no one knew how to save them.

But Brandon thought his company could help. And so he designed a rescue that would come to be known as Plan B. His employees worked around the clock to manufacture the necessary drilling equipment. And Brandon left for Chile.

Along with others, he began drilling a 2,000 foot hole into the ground, working three or four days at a time with no sleep. Thirty-seven days later, Plan B succeeded, and the miners were rescued. But because he didn’t want all of the attention, Brandon wasn’t there when the miners emerged. He had already gone home, back to work on his next project.

Later, one of his employees said of the rescue, “We proved that Center Rock is a little company, but we do big things.”

We do big things.

From the earliest days of our founding, America has been the story of ordinary people who dare to dream. That’s how we win the future.

We are a nation that says, “I might not have a lot of money, but I have this great idea for a new company. I might not come from a family of college graduates, but I will be the first to get my degree. I might not know those people in trouble, but I think I can help them, and I need to try. I’m not sure how we’ll reach that better place beyond the horizon, but I know we’ll get there. I know we will.”

We do big things.

The idea of America endures. Our destiny remains our choice. And tonight, more than two centuries later, it is because of our people that our future is hopeful, our journey goes forward, and the state of our union is strong.

Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.