Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Monday, January 31, 2011
Alaska WTF returns!
Since I know how much all of you missed the irreverent "say anything" blog I thought I would alert you to the fact that Dirk Diggler has returned to the web.
Just click here and let him explain what happened.
Right now it is just an HTML page so if you want to leave him a message you can leave it here and he said he will check back occasionally to see your comments.
Arizona lawmaker introduces bill in the hopes it will keep President Obama from being reelected.
From Mother Jones:
Last week, Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges, a Republican, introduced a bill that would bar presidential candidates who do not prove they were born in the United States from appearing on the ballot in the Grand Canyon state. And state Rep. Chad Campbell, the top Democrat in the GOP-controlled Arizona House of Representatives, tells Mother Jones that the bill is likely to pass. It was introduced with 25 co-sponsors in the House and 16 co-sponsors in the state Senate; the measure needs 31 votes in the House and 16 in the Senate for approval. "Will it matter?" asks Campbell. "We've started a tradition here of passing legislation that is political grandstanding or that sets up litigation."
But the birthers—those ardent Obama foes who believe the president was not born in Hawaii and, thus, is not constitutionally qualified serve as president—see this measure as more than symbolic. For them, it's part of a well-orchestrated campaign to deny Obama reelection.
It's not that Obama necessarily requires Arizona's 10 electoral votes to win reelection in 2012. In 2008, he lost there to John McCain, Arizona's senior senator (though in 2012, Obama could make a play for the state). More important, Burges' bill—which would establish a strict standard for proving natural-born citizenship (which the birthers presume Obama could not meet)—is a model for other states, and similar efforts are under way in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Montana, Georgia, and Texas. (Obama won Pennsylvania in 2008 and lost Missouri by less than 4,000 votes.) Arizona may be where this birther ball gets rolling.
Jesus no wonder Sarah Palin is shuffling her kids off to Arizona and helping to set up a ground base there.
(Picture removed at request of source.)
.
So first Thomas Van Flein hightails it to Arizona to work for a teabagging Congressman as his "political advisor. "
Then Bristol defies her custody agreement, kidnaps her son and runs off to practice abstinence with her pipeline working boy-toy in the same state.
Later we come to find out that Sarah is also renting a humongous McMansion there as well.
And just now we learn that another teabagging Arizona Representative is trying to pass a law to make it impossible for Barack Obama to get on the ballot, because they realize that the only possible way they have of beating Obama is by somehow managing to stack the deck against him.
You know, much like Sarah Palin I also do not believe in coincidences.
At least not in this case.
Last week, Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges, a Republican, introduced a bill that would bar presidential candidates who do not prove they were born in the United States from appearing on the ballot in the Grand Canyon state. And state Rep. Chad Campbell, the top Democrat in the GOP-controlled Arizona House of Representatives, tells Mother Jones that the bill is likely to pass. It was introduced with 25 co-sponsors in the House and 16 co-sponsors in the state Senate; the measure needs 31 votes in the House and 16 in the Senate for approval. "Will it matter?" asks Campbell. "We've started a tradition here of passing legislation that is political grandstanding or that sets up litigation."
But the birthers—those ardent Obama foes who believe the president was not born in Hawaii and, thus, is not constitutionally qualified serve as president—see this measure as more than symbolic. For them, it's part of a well-orchestrated campaign to deny Obama reelection.
It's not that Obama necessarily requires Arizona's 10 electoral votes to win reelection in 2012. In 2008, he lost there to John McCain, Arizona's senior senator (though in 2012, Obama could make a play for the state). More important, Burges' bill—which would establish a strict standard for proving natural-born citizenship (which the birthers presume Obama could not meet)—is a model for other states, and similar efforts are under way in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Montana, Georgia, and Texas. (Obama won Pennsylvania in 2008 and lost Missouri by less than 4,000 votes.) Arizona may be where this birther ball gets rolling.
Jesus no wonder Sarah Palin is shuffling her kids off to Arizona and helping to set up a ground base there.
(Picture removed at request of source.)
.
So first Thomas Van Flein hightails it to Arizona to work for a teabagging Congressman as his "political advisor. "
Then Bristol defies her custody agreement, kidnaps her son and runs off to practice abstinence with her pipeline working boy-toy in the same state.
Later we come to find out that Sarah is also renting a humongous McMansion there as well.
And just now we learn that another teabagging Arizona Representative is trying to pass a law to make it impossible for Barack Obama to get on the ballot, because they realize that the only possible way they have of beating Obama is by somehow managing to stack the deck against him.
You know, much like Sarah Palin I also do not believe in coincidences.
At least not in this case.
Labels:
Arizona,
Bristol Palin,
politics,
President Obama,
Sarah Palin,
teabaggers,
Thomas Van Flein
Just for fun. Sarah Palin and the moose.
You know, I do not believe I have EVER heard Ms. Palin sound more articulate.
P.S. To all of you worried that I will follow Dana Milbank's lead and take a month off from talking about Sarah Palin, don't you worry. I NEVER do what the Grizzled Mam wants me to do, don'tcha know?
Labels:
humor,
Sarah Palin,
YouTube
Sarah Palin's biggest fan denies that the Grizzled Mama modified her signature phrase.
From Politico:
Her speech last night to the Safari Club in Reno was closed press, but the Reno Gazette-Journal's David Jacobs put his ear to a closed door.
He reported Palin dropped the "reload" phrase from her routine, telling the audience of hunters "don't retreat, stand tall" — a shift from her now infamous and well-known "don't retreat, reload" line that played on a loop on cable in the after the Tucson shooting.
But Palin aide Rebecca Mansour denied that the former governor dropped the line, suggested to her by her father.
"The governor actually did use the phrase 'Don't retreat, reload,'" Mansour told POLITICO in an email. "She also said, 'Don't retreat, stand tall.'"
"Her father, Chuck Heath, was present at the speech yesterday, and the crowd cheered when she pointed to her Dad and repeated this favorite saying of his," the aide added.
You know the ironic part of this disagreement is that if Sarah Palin were not so completely hyper paranoid of having reporters allowed inside to hear her speech, there would be no question as to exactly what she said. But then again, could THAT be why she refuses to allow them access?
So who are we to believe?
A journalist from the Reno Gazette-Journal, whose paper I imagine insists that it's reporters strive for accuracy? Or a woman on Snowdrift Snooki's payroll who once clumsily tried to convince people that the crosshairs on Sarah Palin's Facebook map were really surveyor's symbols, despite the fact that her Queen had stated otherwise?
Wow! That is a conundrum!
Her speech last night to the Safari Club in Reno was closed press, but the Reno Gazette-Journal's David Jacobs put his ear to a closed door.
He reported Palin dropped the "reload" phrase from her routine, telling the audience of hunters "don't retreat, stand tall" — a shift from her now infamous and well-known "don't retreat, reload" line that played on a loop on cable in the after the Tucson shooting.
But Palin aide Rebecca Mansour denied that the former governor dropped the line, suggested to her by her father.
"The governor actually did use the phrase 'Don't retreat, reload,'" Mansour told POLITICO in an email. "She also said, 'Don't retreat, stand tall.'"
"Her father, Chuck Heath, was present at the speech yesterday, and the crowd cheered when she pointed to her Dad and repeated this favorite saying of his," the aide added.
You know the ironic part of this disagreement is that if Sarah Palin were not so completely hyper paranoid of having reporters allowed inside to hear her speech, there would be no question as to exactly what she said. But then again, could THAT be why she refuses to allow them access?
So who are we to believe?
A journalist from the Reno Gazette-Journal, whose paper I imagine insists that it's reporters strive for accuracy? Or a woman on Snowdrift Snooki's payroll who once clumsily tried to convince people that the crosshairs on Sarah Palin's Facebook map were really surveyor's symbols, despite the fact that her Queen had stated otherwise?
Wow! That is a conundrum!
Labels:
hunters,
journalism,
RAM,
Sarah Palin,
speech,
violent rhetoric
30 years of Right Wing Violence in Pictures. Update!
For all of those who still argue that BOTH sides engage in violence against the other, take a look at this Daily Kos post:
As not wanting to be accused of exploiting the tragedy in Arizona I decided to wait a little while before I published this diary. Many people have been justifiably outraged at the traditional media's insistence that "both sides" use violent rhetoric. But since 1980 the numbers of deaths by right-wing terrorist numbers over 200, versus 7 by the left.
This is a fairly comprehensive list and I urge you to take a look. Afterwards do not be alarmed if you get a sick feeling in your stomach and suddenly see Sarah Palin's violent rhetoric in a whole new light.
Update: And the Right Wing violence against those they disagree with continues still.
From TPM:
Roger Stockham, a 63-year-old Army veteran from California who was reportedly angry at the U.S. government, was arrested by police in Michigan and charged with allegedly threatening to blow up a Mosque in Dearborn.
It will be interesting to learn whether or not Fox News is willing to label this a domestic act of terrorism.
Because you know that if the shoe were on the other foot, and this was a Muslim threatening to blow up a church they would not hesitate.
As not wanting to be accused of exploiting the tragedy in Arizona I decided to wait a little while before I published this diary. Many people have been justifiably outraged at the traditional media's insistence that "both sides" use violent rhetoric. But since 1980 the numbers of deaths by right-wing terrorist numbers over 200, versus 7 by the left.
This is a fairly comprehensive list and I urge you to take a look. Afterwards do not be alarmed if you get a sick feeling in your stomach and suddenly see Sarah Palin's violent rhetoric in a whole new light.
Update: And the Right Wing violence against those they disagree with continues still.
From TPM:
Roger Stockham, a 63-year-old Army veteran from California who was reportedly angry at the U.S. government, was arrested by police in Michigan and charged with allegedly threatening to blow up a Mosque in Dearborn.
It will be interesting to learn whether or not Fox News is willing to label this a domestic act of terrorism.
Because you know that if the shoe were on the other foot, and this was a Muslim threatening to blow up a church they would not hesitate.
Labels:
Daily Kos,
murder,
Right Wing,
violence
Fox News can't find Egypt on the map.
From Vancity Buzz
:
Can you believe that millions of Americans still consider Fox News a reliable source of information?
Or that they still believe that Sarah Palin is a viable Presidential candidate?
For those who still don't see the problem:
Sunday, January 30, 2011
The Alaska Ear hesitantly addresses the Todd Palin/Shailey Tripp prostitution story. However there are others NOT so hesitant!
From The Ear:
Q AND A . . . The question is: Why isn't The Omniscient Orifice waxing smarmy over the National Enquirer stories claiming Todd had an affair with a prostitute?
The answer is, "Yuck." Did you see the "story"? Basically, an Anchorage woman got arrested for running a place of prostitution. Someone in her building allegedly told someone they saw Todd. That's it, darlings.
In the latest "news," the Enquirer shouts that Anchorage police had issued a statement. Well, they did. They said everything in the story was a lie, except there was a woman arrested. No Rolodex, no anonymous tipster, no call to APD from the Enquirer to check facts, no connection to "Wasilla resident Todd Palin."
Of course, Ear may revisit the matter if the "facts" change.
So as you can see Sheila Toomey felt she had to address the story because there was so much interest, but treated it like it was radioactive acting as if the story is too "yucky" for her to waste her valuable time on, and essentially dismissing it out of hand.
That did not sit well with our friend Frozen Vogler who responded thusly:
I'm pretty sure that the "facts" have changed, or were never properly reported in the first place.
According to page 3 of the document, "Agreement by Defendant" in the court file of the alleged Madam, it says that, "APD got complaint of possible prostitution ring at an office".
That document directly contradicts the "press release" which Lt. Parker gave to the National Enquirer, which isn't listed on the official APD website.
http://www.muni.org/department...
Take a tripp to the courthouse and look at the files of the Madam and her employee, you'd learn also that the boyfriend of the alleged Madam works for the Public Defender agency, "GLG", Gorton Logue and Graper.
According to the court documents, APD seized evidence from an employee who was working on the premises at the time, and was arrested along with the alleged Madam.
What did they seize from her ?
Who complained ?
In the plea agreement with the court, the alleged Madam is directed to stay away from three people; the employee, Ms. Thomas, and two other people. What are their first names and why is she to stay away from them ?
Why did the alleged Madam change her plea recently from nolo contendere to not guilty ?
(Frozen Vogler's Flickr page for Shailey Tripp.)
Let me just say, nicely done Frozen! Now THAT is how to embarrass both the Alaska media, and the APD, with just one simple comment. And by the way let me also thank you for going down to the courthouse and looking up the records to set the record straight.
Since I have been getting my information elsewhere I had not thought to go down the courthouse on my own, and Frozen Vogler's decision to take the initiative turned out to be quite valuable, and definitely reinforces the Enquirer's version of events.
While we are on the subject of the National Enquirer I figure the latest copy has been out long enough so that anybody who is going to buy it for this story already has already made that purchase, so I thought it would be fine to share it with you here. (Just click the JPEG's to enlarge them.)
Speaking of getting my information elsewhere, I am still in contact with my sources, and continue to learn more about this story every day.
I have picked through some of the information I have received, and chosen a few tidbits to share with you that are very interesting but do not reveal anything that might put my source in jeopardy. Believe me, there is MUCH more.
Fact is Sarah has known about this story since the week before Christmas. She had more than 2 weeks to prepare. She may not have known names but she knows them now. If the Enquirer or any other news source will publish what they have, they need another internet person to start basically making some connections and out right make the accusations and then no holds bar, they and others can print. The question is will they?
Another hole in the Enquirer is the location of the arrest. The arrest took place at the Decor Lighting Building, at Cybertron- Shailey Tripp's business. Her massage lic. had expired Dec. 2009 and she didn't renew it. Up until that point she had stayed on top of renewing her lic. perhaps some changes were taking place in her life.
Also Shailey Tripp had tried to break her ties with Todd Palin and within 2 weeks of that she got arrested. There may have been a real prostitution thing going on and maybe other women worked for her or with her. But she was not in any big giant prostitution ring. She did not hardly have any money to her name. She could barely even pay her bills. She literally was scraping by.
To answer the first questions I am sure you must have:
Yes I have verified who this person is.
Yes they are in a position to know this and much more.
No there is no real way of knowing that they are telling me the absolute truth about everything, however the parts I have been able to cross check so far have turned out to be accurate.
Like I have said the National Enquirer is taking the lead at this time but there is quite a lot of information that they may not be interested in dealing with, so the really damaging portions may require a different media outlet altogether.
Q AND A . . . The question is: Why isn't The Omniscient Orifice waxing smarmy over the National Enquirer stories claiming Todd had an affair with a prostitute?
The answer is, "Yuck." Did you see the "story"? Basically, an Anchorage woman got arrested for running a place of prostitution. Someone in her building allegedly told someone they saw Todd. That's it, darlings.
In the latest "news," the Enquirer shouts that Anchorage police had issued a statement. Well, they did. They said everything in the story was a lie, except there was a woman arrested. No Rolodex, no anonymous tipster, no call to APD from the Enquirer to check facts, no connection to "Wasilla resident Todd Palin."
Of course, Ear may revisit the matter if the "facts" change.
So as you can see Sheila Toomey felt she had to address the story because there was so much interest, but treated it like it was radioactive acting as if the story is too "yucky" for her to waste her valuable time on, and essentially dismissing it out of hand.
That did not sit well with our friend Frozen Vogler who responded thusly:
I'm pretty sure that the "facts" have changed, or were never properly reported in the first place.
According to page 3 of the document, "Agreement by Defendant" in the court file of the alleged Madam, it says that, "APD got complaint of possible prostitution ring at an office".
That document directly contradicts the "press release" which Lt. Parker gave to the National Enquirer, which isn't listed on the official APD website.
http://www.muni.org/department...
Take a tripp to the courthouse and look at the files of the Madam and her employee, you'd learn also that the boyfriend of the alleged Madam works for the Public Defender agency, "GLG", Gorton Logue and Graper.
According to the court documents, APD seized evidence from an employee who was working on the premises at the time, and was arrested along with the alleged Madam.
What did they seize from her ?
Who complained ?
In the plea agreement with the court, the alleged Madam is directed to stay away from three people; the employee, Ms. Thomas, and two other people. What are their first names and why is she to stay away from them ?
Why did the alleged Madam change her plea recently from nolo contendere to not guilty ?
(Frozen Vogler's Flickr page for Shailey Tripp.)
Let me just say, nicely done Frozen! Now THAT is how to embarrass both the Alaska media, and the APD, with just one simple comment. And by the way let me also thank you for going down to the courthouse and looking up the records to set the record straight.
Since I have been getting my information elsewhere I had not thought to go down the courthouse on my own, and Frozen Vogler's decision to take the initiative turned out to be quite valuable, and definitely reinforces the Enquirer's version of events.
While we are on the subject of the National Enquirer I figure the latest copy has been out long enough so that anybody who is going to buy it for this story already has already made that purchase, so I thought it would be fine to share it with you here. (Just click the JPEG's to enlarge them.)
Speaking of getting my information elsewhere, I am still in contact with my sources, and continue to learn more about this story every day.
I have picked through some of the information I have received, and chosen a few tidbits to share with you that are very interesting but do not reveal anything that might put my source in jeopardy. Believe me, there is MUCH more.
Fact is Sarah has known about this story since the week before Christmas. She had more than 2 weeks to prepare. She may not have known names but she knows them now. If the Enquirer or any other news source will publish what they have, they need another internet person to start basically making some connections and out right make the accusations and then no holds bar, they and others can print. The question is will they?
Another hole in the Enquirer is the location of the arrest. The arrest took place at the Decor Lighting Building, at Cybertron- Shailey Tripp's business. Her massage lic. had expired Dec. 2009 and she didn't renew it. Up until that point she had stayed on top of renewing her lic. perhaps some changes were taking place in her life.
Also Shailey Tripp had tried to break her ties with Todd Palin and within 2 weeks of that she got arrested. There may have been a real prostitution thing going on and maybe other women worked for her or with her. But she was not in any big giant prostitution ring. She did not hardly have any money to her name. She could barely even pay her bills. She literally was scraping by.
To answer the first questions I am sure you must have:
Yes I have verified who this person is.
Yes they are in a position to know this and much more.
No there is no real way of knowing that they are telling me the absolute truth about everything, however the parts I have been able to cross check so far have turned out to be accurate.
Like I have said the National Enquirer is taking the lead at this time but there is quite a lot of information that they may not be interested in dealing with, so the really damaging portions may require a different media outlet altogether.
Labels:
Alaska,
National Enquirer,
Prostitution,
Sarah Palin,
Shailey Tripp,
Todd Palin
There might be hope for the future of our children's education.
From The Hill:
The Hill: ‘No Child Left Behind’ is up due for reauthorization this year. What exactly do you want to see fixed in the law?
Secretary (of Education Arne) Duncan: There are a number of things that I think are broken with the current law that working in a bipartisan way we can have common sense fixes. I think the law is too punitive, too prescriptive, it’s led to a dumbing down of standards, and it’s led to a narrowing of curriculum. We need to fix all of those things. We have to reward success, reward excellence, look at growth and gain, not just absolute test scores. We have to be much more flexible. When I ran the Chicago public schools, I almost had to sue this department for the right to tutor my children after school. It made no sense why I had to fight this department to help kids who wanted to learn after school, so we have to really get out of the way there. We have to continue to raise standards. We’ve seen 40 states provide leadership, and do that, and we need to provide a well-rounded curriculum, so reading and math are important, but science, social studies, dance, drama, art, music, foreign languages, physical education, all those things. We want the new law to be fair, to be focused to be flexible. And we think we can do these things working together this year.
I have to say that this gives me some hope that FINALLY the Obama administration will do something about this devastatingly bad NCLB policy. I have been railing against that law for the last seven years and I really hope that we will finally witness REAL education reform that actually improves education before the next presidential election.
I worked at a local elementary school for a number of years, and we were NOT allowed to say anything negative about NCLB on school property, not even in our e-mails, but away from the classroom the universally accepted opinion was that it was the worst thing to happen to education in our lifetimes.
It is still my considered opinion that the GOP purposefully attempted to destroy the public education system in this country in order to push people toward Christian based home school and private school options. The Republicans have LONG railed against the teachers union and the state of American education. But I have never believed that they wanted to improve it, but rather to do away with it.
I have also never really understood how George Bush was able to convince the late Senator Kennedy to support such a deeply flawed policy decision.
The Hill: ‘No Child Left Behind’ is up due for reauthorization this year. What exactly do you want to see fixed in the law?
Secretary (of Education Arne) Duncan: There are a number of things that I think are broken with the current law that working in a bipartisan way we can have common sense fixes. I think the law is too punitive, too prescriptive, it’s led to a dumbing down of standards, and it’s led to a narrowing of curriculum. We need to fix all of those things. We have to reward success, reward excellence, look at growth and gain, not just absolute test scores. We have to be much more flexible. When I ran the Chicago public schools, I almost had to sue this department for the right to tutor my children after school. It made no sense why I had to fight this department to help kids who wanted to learn after school, so we have to really get out of the way there. We have to continue to raise standards. We’ve seen 40 states provide leadership, and do that, and we need to provide a well-rounded curriculum, so reading and math are important, but science, social studies, dance, drama, art, music, foreign languages, physical education, all those things. We want the new law to be fair, to be focused to be flexible. And we think we can do these things working together this year.
I have to say that this gives me some hope that FINALLY the Obama administration will do something about this devastatingly bad NCLB policy. I have been railing against that law for the last seven years and I really hope that we will finally witness REAL education reform that actually improves education before the next presidential election.
I worked at a local elementary school for a number of years, and we were NOT allowed to say anything negative about NCLB on school property, not even in our e-mails, but away from the classroom the universally accepted opinion was that it was the worst thing to happen to education in our lifetimes.
It is still my considered opinion that the GOP purposefully attempted to destroy the public education system in this country in order to push people toward Christian based home school and private school options. The Republicans have LONG railed against the teachers union and the state of American education. But I have never believed that they wanted to improve it, but rather to do away with it.
I have also never really understood how George Bush was able to convince the late Senator Kennedy to support such a deeply flawed policy decision.
Labels:
America,
education,
George W. Bush,
No Child Left Behind,
Ted Kennedy
Rep. Jack Kingston denying the existence of evolution on Real Time with Bill Maher.
What an idiot!
I am absolutely dumbfounded that he actually used the "Where is the missing link? argument. Clearly this moron has not paid any attention to the incredible research and progress being made in evolutionary biology.
Thankfully my daughter no longer lives in Georgia.
Sarah Palin finally admits that she was wrong. Well sort of anyway.
While speaking in front of the Safari Club last night Palin did a little editing to her most famous slogan.
“Don’t retreat, stand tall,” Palin told the crowd as she emphasized the importance of “responsible conservation.”
“Don’t retreat, stand tall?” What does that even mean?
You would assume that Palin's patented "don't retreat, reload" would have been a phrase more accepted by a bunch of gun toting wealthy hunting enthusiasts than in just about any other place in America, and yet the Grizzled Mama chose to censor herself. Why?
Could it be that she has finally seen how irresponsible and potentially dangerous her ridiculous rhetoric might be to innocent Americans? Highly doubtful.
Could she have chosen to modify her patented phrase as a show of respect for the still recovering Gabby Giffords? Nope, not buying it.
Or could it be that her handlers have finally managed to get a message through that cotton candy brain of hers that if she does not stop acting like a hate spewing, inhuman lunatic that her reputation will remain so badly damaged that, instead of actually having the opportunity to run for President, she may soon have to flee the country in disgrace? Ding, ding, ding. Folks I think we have a winner!
Let's face it, Sarah Palin NEVER admits to a mistake. And changing perhaps her most famous rallying cry, is essentially doing exactly that. The only reason that she would ever do such thing is that somebody explained in very simple, easy to understand words, that she simply had no choice.
At least that is my opinion. What do you think?
BTW I wonder how Burton Cummings feels about this change in Palin's slogan?
Labels:
America,
guns,
hate speech,
Hunting,
politics,
Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin receives ringing endorsement from Jimmy "Rent is Too Damn High" McMillan. Yeah, THAT should help her credibility.
From AOL News:
What do you think of Sarah Palin? Would you consider her for VP?
Love her. Constitution. American citizen. Exercising the right to privacy. Free speech. Haters -- those who don't like Sarah Palin. That's what they are. Sarah Palin: I love you because America gives you the constitutional right to do whatever you want to do as a woman. And people don't think you can do because you're a woman. They try to make a mockery out of you. But you stand up for your rights and stand strong for your rights. And don't let anyone try to cut you down. Not only are they talking about Sarah Palin. They're talking about me.
I think they make a promising political team, "Vote the Jimmy McMillan/Sarah Palin ticket. We've tried intelligence and competence, isn't it time for crazy to have a shot?"
What do you think of Sarah Palin? Would you consider her for VP?
Love her. Constitution. American citizen. Exercising the right to privacy. Free speech. Haters -- those who don't like Sarah Palin. That's what they are. Sarah Palin: I love you because America gives you the constitutional right to do whatever you want to do as a woman. And people don't think you can do because you're a woman. They try to make a mockery out of you. But you stand up for your rights and stand strong for your rights. And don't let anyone try to cut you down. Not only are they talking about Sarah Palin. They're talking about me.
I think they make a promising political team, "Vote the Jimmy McMillan/Sarah Palin ticket. We've tried intelligence and competence, isn't it time for crazy to have a shot?"
Labels:
crazy,
Jimmy McMillan,
politics,
Sarah Palin
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Without Federal dollars Sarah Palin's Spudnut example of free market excellence would not even exist.
As I am sure almost all of you are aware Palin tripped herself up during her interview with Greta Van Susteren in an attempt to rebut President Obama's wonderful SOTU speech.
Then in an attempt to dig herself out of the hole that she found herself in Palin fired up the RAM and made her pound out a Facebook rebuttal to explain her rebuttal. (One has to wonder if the rebuttal of the criticism of the Facebook rebuttal will take the form of a Twitter rebuttal. Then after that she will have to turn to jungle drums and smoke signals to get her rebuttals out.) It is long and stupid, but here is the part that was supposed to explain that her "mistake" was no such thing:
Now, in a recent interview I mentioned analogies that could relate to solutions to our economic challenges, including the difference between a communist government’s “Sputnik” and the private sector’s “Spudnut.” The analogies I mentioned obviously aren’t comparable in size, but highlight a clear difference in economic focus: big government command and control economies vs. America’s small businesses.
So there you go. The issue has been rebutted for the final time and Palin emerges victorious, right?
What, are you new here ?
From one of Digby's commenters:
Palin's quirky invocation of the "Spudnut Shop" here in Richland Washington as an example of American "can-doism" is far more ironic than you and most of your readers likely realize.
The fact is, the town of Richland was literally built by the federal government as a part of the Manhattan Project. All of the houses that surround the Spudnut shop were built by the Army. To this day, the only employer in Richland of any consequence is the Department of Energy and the contractors that work on DoE contracts at the Hanford site, just north of Richland. As a result, virtually all of the Spudnut shop's customers are paid by tax dollars. Those that aren't are retirees, drawing government pensions and social security.
Were it not for government spending, the Spudnut shop would be bankrupt in a week.
One of Andrew Sullivan's readers also has his two cents to add:
The Spudnut shop Palin speaks of is half a mile from my house in Richland, WA and it's really good (the secret is potato flour in the batter). She may not realize that the federal government buys most of those doughnuts: the annual budget for cleanup of the nearby Hanford Nuclear Reservation is more than $2 billion, employing about 11,000 workers, and spudnuts are the pastry of choice at meetings there.
Hang on I will get my daughter to type this last part.
Epic Fail. WTF?
Doesn't she have a way with words?
Then in an attempt to dig herself out of the hole that she found herself in Palin fired up the RAM and made her pound out a Facebook rebuttal to explain her rebuttal. (One has to wonder if the rebuttal of the criticism of the Facebook rebuttal will take the form of a Twitter rebuttal. Then after that she will have to turn to jungle drums and smoke signals to get her rebuttals out.) It is long and stupid, but here is the part that was supposed to explain that her "mistake" was no such thing:
Now, in a recent interview I mentioned analogies that could relate to solutions to our economic challenges, including the difference between a communist government’s “Sputnik” and the private sector’s “Spudnut.” The analogies I mentioned obviously aren’t comparable in size, but highlight a clear difference in economic focus: big government command and control economies vs. America’s small businesses.
So there you go. The issue has been rebutted for the final time and Palin emerges victorious, right?
What, are you new here ?
From one of Digby's commenters:
Palin's quirky invocation of the "Spudnut Shop" here in Richland Washington as an example of American "can-doism" is far more ironic than you and most of your readers likely realize.
The fact is, the town of Richland was literally built by the federal government as a part of the Manhattan Project. All of the houses that surround the Spudnut shop were built by the Army. To this day, the only employer in Richland of any consequence is the Department of Energy and the contractors that work on DoE contracts at the Hanford site, just north of Richland. As a result, virtually all of the Spudnut shop's customers are paid by tax dollars. Those that aren't are retirees, drawing government pensions and social security.
Were it not for government spending, the Spudnut shop would be bankrupt in a week.
One of Andrew Sullivan's readers also has his two cents to add:
The Spudnut shop Palin speaks of is half a mile from my house in Richland, WA and it's really good (the secret is potato flour in the batter). She may not realize that the federal government buys most of those doughnuts: the annual budget for cleanup of the nearby Hanford Nuclear Reservation is more than $2 billion, employing about 11,000 workers, and spudnuts are the pastry of choice at meetings there.
Hang on I will get my daughter to type this last part.
Epic Fail. WTF?
Doesn't she have a way with words?
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
bloggers,
daughter,
Digby,
Facebook,
Federal Government,
Sarah Palin
"Daddy? Will you read me a story?"
It is my opinion that there is no experience as completely life altering as the day that you hold your child, newly emerged into this world, and feel that sudden electric connection as your eyes meet for the very first time.
In those few seconds you are suddenly connected to the world around you in a way that you have never felt before. Every dream, every fear, and every idea you ever had about yourself is suddenly brought into sharp focus and you find yourself wanting to be a better human being in order to earn the right to hold and to be loved by the beautiful child staring up into your face.
And so it was with me.
I was not just going to be daddy. I was going to be "Super Daddy."
But alas "Super Daddy" was not also "Super Husband" and my marriage fell apart. Which meant that I broke the very first promise I ever made to my daughter, that she would NOT have to grow up the child of divorce as had been the fate of both her mother and I.
But even a "Super Daddy" cannot make love out of nothing.
I did vow however to NEVER break a promise made to her again. Ever.
The divorce was brutal. My wife wanted to have full legal AND physical custody. She had money, I did not.
I spent every cent I had, borrowed heavily from family members for the first time in my life, and took side jobs that put money in my pocket but made me feel badly for lowering myself to accept work that I felt beneath me.
Eventually the judge demanded that we work out a 50/50 custody deal. And so we did, with my ex-wife crying through the entire negotiation.
I remarried when my daughter was still a toddler, which then provided her with TWO families. Not perfect, but still she was surrounded by love, and seemed happy and well adjusted in both houses. Of course my ex-wife also remarried.
For a while my daughter's mother was fine with living in Alaska. but after a few years she wanted to pack up and move out of state to Georgia. Why Georgia? I still have no good idea.
My first reaction was predictable. "You can go wherever the hell you want, but if you think you are taking my little girl away from me you are sadly mistaken!"
Back to court we went.
Another furious battle ensued, but I was encouraged to skip the legal fight and instead work it out in mediation. What was there to work out I thought? My little girl was not going anywhere.
However mediation is a process in which sometimes the unacceptable becomes acceptable.
My ex was determined to go to Georgia. "How could a loving father deny his child the opportunity to live with her mother?" I was asked. There was no way to win a battle in which my little girl's heart was so nakedly exposed and vulnerable.
So I agreed to a painful compromise.
My ex-wife could move down to Georgia and my daughter would live with me for the first three years and visit with her twice a year, and then we would reverse it for the next three years, and after that she would be old enough to choose her primary residence. At that time I was confident she would choose to live with me. Clairvoyance is NOT one of my gifts.
I kept telling myself I had done the right thing. That I was being an adult. That someday my daughter would thank me for not being selfish and denying her access to her mother. Those thoughts did nothing to ease my pain or my fears.
The first time I put my little girl on a plane headed to Georgia by herself was a day defined by hazy memory and sharply felt emotions. I vividly remember watching her walk hand in hand with the kindly stewardess toward the jet bridge, barely visible behind the large pink backpack full of her favorite books and with Sherman, her cabbage patch doll, dangling from one impossibly tiny hand. She was just seven years old.
She looked back to smile and called out "I love you Daddy." one last time before disappearing around the corner to board the plane. I fervently hoped that she had been too far away to see the tears streaming down my cheeks.
I remember standing at the window for the longest time to watch the plane taxi down the runway, then willing it to take off safely, before watching it fade into the tiniest of dots on the horizon. I was overwhelmed with the irrational belief that if I blinked, or lost concentration, for even a second that something horrible, and unthinkable would happen to that plane.
After the jet was impossible to detect against the blue of the sky I became suddenly aware that the world had somehow shifted out of focus. Everything that had become sharp and beautiful to my eyes on the day she was born was suddenly dull and barely perceptible.
I wish I could describe what I did next, but I truly do not remember. I do know it took me two hours to finally make my way home to my wife, who was pretty worried by that time, but realized from the look on my face that it was better that she simply hug me rather than to complain about my absence.
It took me a day or two to bounce back to my usual good humor, but always my mind was distracted by worry. And that worry lasted until months later when my daughter arrived safely back in Anchorage and came running back into my arms again.
I can report that things became easier after that first time. Not "easy" mind you, just "easier."
After awhile I was able to make it all of the way out of the airport terminal before becoming overwhelmed with emotion and unable to drive, stopping by the side of the road to gather myself before continuing the ride home.
Because I knew my time was short, and that in three short years my daughter would be living most of the year with her mother, I wanted to expose her to all of the things that I loved. To share experiences and hopefully create lasting memories.
I loved the outdoors so we went on long hikes, splashed through creeks, and rolled down hills together.
I loved movies so we sat huddled in the darkness each weekend watching the newest release. Comedies, action, animated, horror, we watched and loved them all.
I also loved music so we sang til our throats were dry and danced til out feet were numb.
And I loved books. Oh, how I loved books.
The most magical, most important, most sacred time for us was the hour before bedtime when I would sit by her bed and read to her, as her eyes grew heavy and her breathing became deep, right up until she could no longer support the weight of her eyelids and slowly drifted off to sleep.. Then I would reach over to turn off the light by her bed, kiss her on her forehead, and promise to continue our adventure the following night.
A promise, like all of my promises, that I never failed to keep.
And let me just tell you dear reader that these were not just ordinary books. Oh no, not for MY little girl. These were the classics.
We had started when she was quite small, age four I believe, with The World of Pooh. No colorfully illustrated Disney sanitized version was this, but rather the original, just as A. A. Milne had written it, which began as follows:
"Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head. behind Christopher Robin."
And what followed was the magical journey through the "hundred acre wood." complete with a different voice, compliments of Daddy, assigned to each and every character. My daughter's squeals of enjoyment and wide smiling eyes still the greatest payment I have ever received.
In our many evenings together we prowled the jungles beside Mowgli, with Rudyard Kipling as our guide. Danced through the clouds with Peter Pan as he flew back to Neverland with Wendy and her brothers in tow. Fought back our tears as young Travis released Old Yeller from the pain of a rabies bite. And walked beside Tom Sawyer as he explored his world with his pal Huck Finn, and learned about love as he clumsily wooed Becky Thatcher.
There were many others as well but it was this last book. Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, that I was reading during the last few weeks before my daughter made the transition, agreed to in our mediated custody arrangement, and went to live in Georgia with her mother. As always on the night before she left, I closed the book and promised to read more just as soon she was back with me and lying in her bed.
I will not bore you with the details of how everything I expected to occur after my daughter's three years with my ex-wife failed to materialize. But I will say that she greatly enjoyed being a big sister and that, as much as she loved me, she felt that her mother depended on her to help care for the new babies in their life. I certainly could not selfishly ask my daughter to abandon her sisters in order to return to Alaska and live with me.
I still saw her every summer, and alternated between Christmas and Spring breaks, but we never returned to the world of Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, and our priorities shifted to other things.
Going to the movies together became our primary father/daughter activity and soon her reading shifted to lighting techniques for movies, the wonders of stage design, and sound engineering, as she prepared for the life she would soon have behind the cameras working on television shows and movie sets. And really I could not be more proud of the woman she has become and passion she shows in pursuing her dreams.
As many of you already know after all of these many years she is now living here with me. In fact right now, as I write this, she is only about ten feet away sleeping once again under her father's roof, and surrounded by the Alaska that we both love so much.
Just last night we were regaling her friends with stories about her life growing up here and all of the adventures that she and I had shared. It was during that conversation that I looked over at my angel and saw her looking back with an odd expression on her face, as if she had suddenly remembered a long forgotten secret.
This morning, as I stumbled into my home office, clutching my cup of coffee and wiping the sleep dust from my eyes I found something unexpected waiting for me on my desk.
So I guess I know what I am doing tonight.
Let's see, where were we?
Chapter 15. Tom's Stealthy Visit Home
"A few minutes later Tom was in the shoal water of the bar, wading toward the Illinois shore."
Gee I wonder what the boys have been up to all of these years? Well I imagine we will have to find that out together. Because after all, I DID promise.
In those few seconds you are suddenly connected to the world around you in a way that you have never felt before. Every dream, every fear, and every idea you ever had about yourself is suddenly brought into sharp focus and you find yourself wanting to be a better human being in order to earn the right to hold and to be loved by the beautiful child staring up into your face.
And so it was with me.
I was not just going to be daddy. I was going to be "Super Daddy."
But alas "Super Daddy" was not also "Super Husband" and my marriage fell apart. Which meant that I broke the very first promise I ever made to my daughter, that she would NOT have to grow up the child of divorce as had been the fate of both her mother and I.
But even a "Super Daddy" cannot make love out of nothing.
I did vow however to NEVER break a promise made to her again. Ever.
The divorce was brutal. My wife wanted to have full legal AND physical custody. She had money, I did not.
I spent every cent I had, borrowed heavily from family members for the first time in my life, and took side jobs that put money in my pocket but made me feel badly for lowering myself to accept work that I felt beneath me.
Eventually the judge demanded that we work out a 50/50 custody deal. And so we did, with my ex-wife crying through the entire negotiation.
I remarried when my daughter was still a toddler, which then provided her with TWO families. Not perfect, but still she was surrounded by love, and seemed happy and well adjusted in both houses. Of course my ex-wife also remarried.
For a while my daughter's mother was fine with living in Alaska. but after a few years she wanted to pack up and move out of state to Georgia. Why Georgia? I still have no good idea.
My first reaction was predictable. "You can go wherever the hell you want, but if you think you are taking my little girl away from me you are sadly mistaken!"
Back to court we went.
Another furious battle ensued, but I was encouraged to skip the legal fight and instead work it out in mediation. What was there to work out I thought? My little girl was not going anywhere.
However mediation is a process in which sometimes the unacceptable becomes acceptable.
My ex was determined to go to Georgia. "How could a loving father deny his child the opportunity to live with her mother?" I was asked. There was no way to win a battle in which my little girl's heart was so nakedly exposed and vulnerable.
So I agreed to a painful compromise.
My ex-wife could move down to Georgia and my daughter would live with me for the first three years and visit with her twice a year, and then we would reverse it for the next three years, and after that she would be old enough to choose her primary residence. At that time I was confident she would choose to live with me. Clairvoyance is NOT one of my gifts.
I kept telling myself I had done the right thing. That I was being an adult. That someday my daughter would thank me for not being selfish and denying her access to her mother. Those thoughts did nothing to ease my pain or my fears.
The first time I put my little girl on a plane headed to Georgia by herself was a day defined by hazy memory and sharply felt emotions. I vividly remember watching her walk hand in hand with the kindly stewardess toward the jet bridge, barely visible behind the large pink backpack full of her favorite books and with Sherman, her cabbage patch doll, dangling from one impossibly tiny hand. She was just seven years old.
She looked back to smile and called out "I love you Daddy." one last time before disappearing around the corner to board the plane. I fervently hoped that she had been too far away to see the tears streaming down my cheeks.
I remember standing at the window for the longest time to watch the plane taxi down the runway, then willing it to take off safely, before watching it fade into the tiniest of dots on the horizon. I was overwhelmed with the irrational belief that if I blinked, or lost concentration, for even a second that something horrible, and unthinkable would happen to that plane.
After the jet was impossible to detect against the blue of the sky I became suddenly aware that the world had somehow shifted out of focus. Everything that had become sharp and beautiful to my eyes on the day she was born was suddenly dull and barely perceptible.
I wish I could describe what I did next, but I truly do not remember. I do know it took me two hours to finally make my way home to my wife, who was pretty worried by that time, but realized from the look on my face that it was better that she simply hug me rather than to complain about my absence.
It took me a day or two to bounce back to my usual good humor, but always my mind was distracted by worry. And that worry lasted until months later when my daughter arrived safely back in Anchorage and came running back into my arms again.
I can report that things became easier after that first time. Not "easy" mind you, just "easier."
After awhile I was able to make it all of the way out of the airport terminal before becoming overwhelmed with emotion and unable to drive, stopping by the side of the road to gather myself before continuing the ride home.
Because I knew my time was short, and that in three short years my daughter would be living most of the year with her mother, I wanted to expose her to all of the things that I loved. To share experiences and hopefully create lasting memories.
I loved the outdoors so we went on long hikes, splashed through creeks, and rolled down hills together.
I loved movies so we sat huddled in the darkness each weekend watching the newest release. Comedies, action, animated, horror, we watched and loved them all.
I also loved music so we sang til our throats were dry and danced til out feet were numb.
And I loved books. Oh, how I loved books.
The most magical, most important, most sacred time for us was the hour before bedtime when I would sit by her bed and read to her, as her eyes grew heavy and her breathing became deep, right up until she could no longer support the weight of her eyelids and slowly drifted off to sleep.. Then I would reach over to turn off the light by her bed, kiss her on her forehead, and promise to continue our adventure the following night.
A promise, like all of my promises, that I never failed to keep.
And let me just tell you dear reader that these were not just ordinary books. Oh no, not for MY little girl. These were the classics.
We had started when she was quite small, age four I believe, with The World of Pooh. No colorfully illustrated Disney sanitized version was this, but rather the original, just as A. A. Milne had written it, which began as follows:
"Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head. behind Christopher Robin."
And what followed was the magical journey through the "hundred acre wood." complete with a different voice, compliments of Daddy, assigned to each and every character. My daughter's squeals of enjoyment and wide smiling eyes still the greatest payment I have ever received.
In our many evenings together we prowled the jungles beside Mowgli, with Rudyard Kipling as our guide. Danced through the clouds with Peter Pan as he flew back to Neverland with Wendy and her brothers in tow. Fought back our tears as young Travis released Old Yeller from the pain of a rabies bite. And walked beside Tom Sawyer as he explored his world with his pal Huck Finn, and learned about love as he clumsily wooed Becky Thatcher.
There were many others as well but it was this last book. Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, that I was reading during the last few weeks before my daughter made the transition, agreed to in our mediated custody arrangement, and went to live in Georgia with her mother. As always on the night before she left, I closed the book and promised to read more just as soon she was back with me and lying in her bed.
I will not bore you with the details of how everything I expected to occur after my daughter's three years with my ex-wife failed to materialize. But I will say that she greatly enjoyed being a big sister and that, as much as she loved me, she felt that her mother depended on her to help care for the new babies in their life. I certainly could not selfishly ask my daughter to abandon her sisters in order to return to Alaska and live with me.
I still saw her every summer, and alternated between Christmas and Spring breaks, but we never returned to the world of Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, and our priorities shifted to other things.
Going to the movies together became our primary father/daughter activity and soon her reading shifted to lighting techniques for movies, the wonders of stage design, and sound engineering, as she prepared for the life she would soon have behind the cameras working on television shows and movie sets. And really I could not be more proud of the woman she has become and passion she shows in pursuing her dreams.
As many of you already know after all of these many years she is now living here with me. In fact right now, as I write this, she is only about ten feet away sleeping once again under her father's roof, and surrounded by the Alaska that we both love so much.
Just last night we were regaling her friends with stories about her life growing up here and all of the adventures that she and I had shared. It was during that conversation that I looked over at my angel and saw her looking back with an odd expression on her face, as if she had suddenly remembered a long forgotten secret.
This morning, as I stumbled into my home office, clutching my cup of coffee and wiping the sleep dust from my eyes I found something unexpected waiting for me on my desk.
So I guess I know what I am doing tonight.
Let's see, where were we?
Chapter 15. Tom's Stealthy Visit Home
"A few minutes later Tom was in the shoal water of the bar, wading toward the Illinois shore."
Gee I wonder what the boys have been up to all of these years? Well I imagine we will have to find that out together. Because after all, I DID promise.
You may THINK you have been raped, but you have not REALLY been raped, unless the Republicans tell YOU that you have been raped!
From Mother Jones:
Rape is only really rape if it involves force. So says the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law.
For years, federal laws restricting the use of government funds to pay for abortions have included exemptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. (Another exemption covers pregnancies that could endanger the life of the woman.) But the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," a bill with 173 mostly Republican co-sponsors that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has dubbed a top priority in the new Congress, contains a provision that would rewrite the rules to limit drastically the definition of rape and incest in these cases.
With this legislation, which was introduced last week by Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape, many of which are non-forcible. For example: If a 13-year-old girl is impregnated by a 24-year-old adult, she would no longer qualify to have Medicaid pay for an abortion. (Smith's spokesman did not respond to a call and an email requesting comment.)
I have a question.
Perhaps one of you can help me to answer it.
How in the hell do women continue to vote Republican?
This party routinely steps on the rights of women, minorities, and homosexuals, and yet there are still those from each of those demographics that STILL routinely votes for them, as if they have not heard a single thing this all male, whites only, bunch rich assholes have been saying since the very inception of their party.
How can women especially support a political party that refuses to protect the most vulnerable among us, rape and incest victims, for purely political reasons?
I am sorry but refusing to acknowledge that a young woman has really been raped simply because the man who violated her did not also beat her into submission, is NOT an indication of a differing point of view, it is an indication of the lack of humanity.
I have known far more than my fair share of women who spent their childhoods dreading the nights when daddy made a special visit to their rooms, or who were violated by a "friend" after they became too intoxicated to realize what was happening until they woke up the next morning lying naked on the floor with their shredded underwear wadded up next to them, to not understand that these constitute a VERY real violation which requires that they receive the same compassion and access to medical treatment that a women who has been both raped and beaten deserve.
But hey that is just me. You know the guy with the young daughter, and whose underage mother was impregnated by a man who was legally an adult. What do I know?
Rape is only really rape if it involves force. So says the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law.
For years, federal laws restricting the use of government funds to pay for abortions have included exemptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. (Another exemption covers pregnancies that could endanger the life of the woman.) But the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," a bill with 173 mostly Republican co-sponsors that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has dubbed a top priority in the new Congress, contains a provision that would rewrite the rules to limit drastically the definition of rape and incest in these cases.
With this legislation, which was introduced last week by Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape, many of which are non-forcible. For example: If a 13-year-old girl is impregnated by a 24-year-old adult, she would no longer qualify to have Medicaid pay for an abortion. (Smith's spokesman did not respond to a call and an email requesting comment.)
I have a question.
Perhaps one of you can help me to answer it.
How in the hell do women continue to vote Republican?
This party routinely steps on the rights of women, minorities, and homosexuals, and yet there are still those from each of those demographics that STILL routinely votes for them, as if they have not heard a single thing this all male, whites only, bunch rich assholes have been saying since the very inception of their party.
How can women especially support a political party that refuses to protect the most vulnerable among us, rape and incest victims, for purely political reasons?
I am sorry but refusing to acknowledge that a young woman has really been raped simply because the man who violated her did not also beat her into submission, is NOT an indication of a differing point of view, it is an indication of the lack of humanity.
I have known far more than my fair share of women who spent their childhoods dreading the nights when daddy made a special visit to their rooms, or who were violated by a "friend" after they became too intoxicated to realize what was happening until they woke up the next morning lying naked on the floor with their shredded underwear wadded up next to them, to not understand that these constitute a VERY real violation which requires that they receive the same compassion and access to medical treatment that a women who has been both raped and beaten deserve.
But hey that is just me. You know the guy with the young daughter, and whose underage mother was impregnated by a man who was legally an adult. What do I know?
Labels:
abortion,
rape,
Republicans,
women
Friday, January 28, 2011
Bristol is the best pupil a Mama Grizzly could ever hope to have.
Apparently having Washington University dump her as a speaker on a subject that she knows absolutely nothing about has pissed Bristol the Pistol off and she is, dare I say it, GOING ROGUE!
From Radar Online:
Now Bristol’s lawyer has release this statement to RadarOnline.com, slamming the university and even suggesting the Palin name is the real reason she was dumped.
"Bristol was invited to speak with college students as part of a panel. Evidently she has now been disinvited because of apparent concerns by some vocal members of the undergraduate community,” the statement reads.
“Bristol is deeply disappointed that an institution that publicly claims to "listen to diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives, to contribute rigorous academic standards and unbiased scholarship to discussions, and to encourage a civil discourse in which a pluralistic society can respectfully address complex and difficult issues" would withdraw an invitation to a speaker because of "uproar" over their assumed content of her message or even worse, because of her last name."
Further down the page on the Radar Online post they go into more detail about how Bristol came to be considered for the position and why they ultimately decided to let her go. Here is a hint: It did NOT have anything to do with her name, and everything to do with how much money she was being paid and why.
Which by the way closely echoes the reasons provided to me in an e-mail that I received earlier today from one of the professors at that very same University.
I enjoy your blog very much and am an avid follower. I don't know if you have been following this story, but Bristol Palin was first invited to speak on abstinence at Washington University's "Sex Week" by student representatives. The ensuing uproar by the student body resulted in a cancellation of this appearance. Wash. U. is a fairly liberal institution. But the students were not so much opposed to her viewpoint, but rather to her lack of expertise and the high cost she is charging.
So you see Bristol dumping your ass had NOTHING to do with hatred for your mother, and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you are too unqualified to know what in the hell you are talking about. But of course since you ARE your mother's daughter you simply cannot resist playing the victim card, can you?
Welcome to the world of academia little cub, where the standards are just a wee bit higher than they are in Wasilla, Alaska.
From Radar Online:
Now Bristol’s lawyer has release this statement to RadarOnline.com, slamming the university and even suggesting the Palin name is the real reason she was dumped.
"Bristol was invited to speak with college students as part of a panel. Evidently she has now been disinvited because of apparent concerns by some vocal members of the undergraduate community,” the statement reads.
“Bristol is deeply disappointed that an institution that publicly claims to "listen to diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives, to contribute rigorous academic standards and unbiased scholarship to discussions, and to encourage a civil discourse in which a pluralistic society can respectfully address complex and difficult issues" would withdraw an invitation to a speaker because of "uproar" over their assumed content of her message or even worse, because of her last name."
Further down the page on the Radar Online post they go into more detail about how Bristol came to be considered for the position and why they ultimately decided to let her go. Here is a hint: It did NOT have anything to do with her name, and everything to do with how much money she was being paid and why.
Which by the way closely echoes the reasons provided to me in an e-mail that I received earlier today from one of the professors at that very same University.
I enjoy your blog very much and am an avid follower. I don't know if you have been following this story, but Bristol Palin was first invited to speak on abstinence at Washington University's "Sex Week" by student representatives. The ensuing uproar by the student body resulted in a cancellation of this appearance. Wash. U. is a fairly liberal institution. But the students were not so much opposed to her viewpoint, but rather to her lack of expertise and the high cost she is charging.
So you see Bristol dumping your ass had NOTHING to do with hatred for your mother, and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you are too unqualified to know what in the hell you are talking about. But of course since you ARE your mother's daughter you simply cannot resist playing the victim card, can you?
Welcome to the world of academia little cub, where the standards are just a wee bit higher than they are in Wasilla, Alaska.
Labels:
abstinence,
Bristol Palin,
dumped,
speech,
University
Sarah Palin's e-mail "hacker" too well off for halfway house but not too well off for prison. WTF?
From the New York Times:
A top federal official is explaining why prison instead of a halfway house was a better place for a former Tennessee student convicted of hacking Sarah Palin's private e-mail account.
A judge had recommended that David Kernell serve his one-year sentence at a Knoxville halfway house. But the U.S. Bureau of Prisons instead sent Kernell to a minimum-security prison in Kentucky.
The Knoxville News Sentinel reports that Bureau of Prisons chief Jose Santana wrote to U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Phillips to explain the decision.
Santana said the halfway house space is needed for inmates who have limited skills, resources and community support. He said that Kernell has three years of college and the support of his family.
Kernell's lawyer says the explanation is lacking.
It is important to remember that the reason this kid is serving time at all is because Sarah Palin is a vindictive woman who wanted him punished. All the dumb kid did was guess her stupid, ridiculously easy to figure out, password and this is his punishment.
In the meantime Sarah Palin encourages insurrection against our government, inspires people to threaten our Representatives, and broke very ethical guideline imaginable while Governor of Alaska, and she is still free as a bird.
I am no longer satisfied to see Sarah Palin failing as apolitical figure, or seeing her humiliated by scandals concerning Todd and his prostitutes, I want her to serve time.
Yeah I think THAT is the only way to feel that justice has been done when it comes to this hateful creature.
Oh and because Bristol lied about fearing for her safety while cohabiting with her hockey playing boyfriend Levi, and surrounded by Secret Service agents, I would not mind seeing her do a couple of months in the state pen as well. That seems only fair to me.
A top federal official is explaining why prison instead of a halfway house was a better place for a former Tennessee student convicted of hacking Sarah Palin's private e-mail account.
A judge had recommended that David Kernell serve his one-year sentence at a Knoxville halfway house. But the U.S. Bureau of Prisons instead sent Kernell to a minimum-security prison in Kentucky.
The Knoxville News Sentinel reports that Bureau of Prisons chief Jose Santana wrote to U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Phillips to explain the decision.
Santana said the halfway house space is needed for inmates who have limited skills, resources and community support. He said that Kernell has three years of college and the support of his family.
Kernell's lawyer says the explanation is lacking.
It is important to remember that the reason this kid is serving time at all is because Sarah Palin is a vindictive woman who wanted him punished. All the dumb kid did was guess her stupid, ridiculously easy to figure out, password and this is his punishment.
In the meantime Sarah Palin encourages insurrection against our government, inspires people to threaten our Representatives, and broke very ethical guideline imaginable while Governor of Alaska, and she is still free as a bird.
I am no longer satisfied to see Sarah Palin failing as apolitical figure, or seeing her humiliated by scandals concerning Todd and his prostitutes, I want her to serve time.
Yeah I think THAT is the only way to feel that justice has been done when it comes to this hateful creature.
Oh and because Bristol lied about fearing for her safety while cohabiting with her hockey playing boyfriend Levi, and surrounded by Secret Service agents, I would not mind seeing her do a couple of months in the state pen as well. That seems only fair to me.
Labels:
Alaska,
e-mails,
justice,
Sarah Palin
Concerning Palingates.
I have had a little while to mull things over and have engaged in conversations with many bloggers, ex-bloggers, and friends who have been impacted in some way by the changes now taking place over at Palingates, or by events that have happened in the past.
Because of those conversations, and the concerns of many that re-opening old wounds will be detrimental to them personally, or the blogging community in general, I have decided to leave the "can of worms" unopened.
Much of my decision has to do with Regina's request specifically that I allow things from the past to remain in the past. Since she is in a position to be negatively impacted by the blowback that would be generated from my post I will respect her request and let those sleeping dogs lie.
However there are a few left over "worms" that I feel obligated to expose to the light of day.
First off I had NOTHING to do with Regina's decision to remove P and K. At least as far as I know.
I sent no e-mails, nor encouraged others to send e-mails, nor threatened to write anything damaging. When the decision was made I was as shocked as anybody else.
Actually when it happened I was very caught up my own drama, which resulted from the post that also inspired Regina's decision.
As many of you know it was the Shailey Tripp piece (since removed) that proved to be the straw that snapped the camel's back over at Palingates. But what you may not know is how that piece caused me to lose credibility, and possibly put the Enquirer story at risk.
You see the gentleman friend of Ms. Tripp, who I will only identify by his initials R.N., was hoping to tell his side of the story concerning the private side of Shailey Tripp, in order to let people know that she was not just a prostitute but a real person who happened to make a very poor decision which has virtually destroyed her life.
However RN is a VERY private person and he was determined to remain so. He thought he might be willing to tell his story but ONLY if his anonymity was protected. I was working to make that happen.
Somehow P got a hold of this gentleman's contact information and told him, and I quote "I am working with Gryphen. Talking to me is the same as talking to Gryphen." Because of this assurance RN trusted P enough to reveal a few preliminary bits of information for which he was rewarded by having his entire life plastered all over Palingates. Not only was his life put on display, but so were the names of many of Ms. Tripp's friends and acquaintances, some of who had no idea what she had done, and now found their names linked to her on a blog.
Obviously I started to get calls immediately. Angry calls wanting to know why I betrayed RN and allowed my "collaborator" to do what they did. When the first call came in I literally had no idea what they were talking about.
It took me most of the day to explain that I had nothing to do with it, and to attempt to rebuild the trust that was now in shattered pieces. As of this writing that trust is still badly damaged and may be irreparable. Which of course could also impact my ability to gain the trust of others in the the near future.
As a blogger, without the deep pockets of a tabloid like the National Enquirer, all I have to use as currency to "buy" information is trust. Once I don't have that, I don't have anything.
So yes I was very angry. Especially since this was not the first time this very same situation had played out.
However my anger was NEVER at Regina who I have always considered a true friend. And now that she is back in charge of running the show, and the offending post has been removed, I am happy to welcome Palingates back onto my blogroll. I wish I had never felt it necessary to have removed it in the first place.
I am going to be very careful in how I moderate comments coming in for this post. I am afraid that I will NOT be allowing any mention by name of RN, P, or K, nor any attacks directed at Regina. If you want to be mad at me that is okay up to a point, but let's not go crazy alright?
I know that some of you are going to feel confused, and betrayed, and even possibly believe that I must be making the whole thing up, but I assure you I am not.
As for P and K, I wish them much success in whatever they decide to do next. They are a truly gifted research team.
I really hope that the people who were fans of Palingates will stick by Regina. She is a very good person as well as a skilled writer and researcher.
Good luck Regina!
Update: For those who still feel I am being petty or perhaps even manufacturing a problem concerning P and K, perhaps you should head on over and read Regina's latest post.
And let me address this jealousy issue that keeps coming up.
I have NEVER felt in competition with any other blog for the entire six years this blog has been in existence.
In fact I have gone out of my way to include new blogs in my blogroll when I have enjoyed their content or hoped that they would be helpful in discovering new information about Palin or other interesting topics. In the past I have added such "just starting out" blogs as Mudflats, Palin's Deceptions, Bree Palin, Oz Mudflats, Hypocrites and Heffalump Traps, God's Own Party, Alaska WTF, Mercede Johnston, Malia Litman, and yes even Palingates, just to name a few.
I have also been credited with inspiring at least twenty individuals to start blogs of their own. So no, I have never worried about competition or felt jealous of the other bloggers who are my, very near or sometimes very distant, neighbors on the internet.
Nor by the way have I EVER demanded from anybody that they give me credit if their post, or article, was clearly derivative of mine, or even stolen outright. I always felt that if more people saw the information all the better.
And by the way ALL of my interactions with my fellow bloggers have been positive and rewarding. With one notable exception.
Because of those conversations, and the concerns of many that re-opening old wounds will be detrimental to them personally, or the blogging community in general, I have decided to leave the "can of worms" unopened.
Much of my decision has to do with Regina's request specifically that I allow things from the past to remain in the past. Since she is in a position to be negatively impacted by the blowback that would be generated from my post I will respect her request and let those sleeping dogs lie.
However there are a few left over "worms" that I feel obligated to expose to the light of day.
First off I had NOTHING to do with Regina's decision to remove P and K. At least as far as I know.
I sent no e-mails, nor encouraged others to send e-mails, nor threatened to write anything damaging. When the decision was made I was as shocked as anybody else.
Actually when it happened I was very caught up my own drama, which resulted from the post that also inspired Regina's decision.
As many of you know it was the Shailey Tripp piece (since removed) that proved to be the straw that snapped the camel's back over at Palingates. But what you may not know is how that piece caused me to lose credibility, and possibly put the Enquirer story at risk.
You see the gentleman friend of Ms. Tripp, who I will only identify by his initials R.N., was hoping to tell his side of the story concerning the private side of Shailey Tripp, in order to let people know that she was not just a prostitute but a real person who happened to make a very poor decision which has virtually destroyed her life.
However RN is a VERY private person and he was determined to remain so. He thought he might be willing to tell his story but ONLY if his anonymity was protected. I was working to make that happen.
Somehow P got a hold of this gentleman's contact information and told him, and I quote "I am working with Gryphen. Talking to me is the same as talking to Gryphen." Because of this assurance RN trusted P enough to reveal a few preliminary bits of information for which he was rewarded by having his entire life plastered all over Palingates. Not only was his life put on display, but so were the names of many of Ms. Tripp's friends and acquaintances, some of who had no idea what she had done, and now found their names linked to her on a blog.
Obviously I started to get calls immediately. Angry calls wanting to know why I betrayed RN and allowed my "collaborator" to do what they did. When the first call came in I literally had no idea what they were talking about.
It took me most of the day to explain that I had nothing to do with it, and to attempt to rebuild the trust that was now in shattered pieces. As of this writing that trust is still badly damaged and may be irreparable. Which of course could also impact my ability to gain the trust of others in the the near future.
As a blogger, without the deep pockets of a tabloid like the National Enquirer, all I have to use as currency to "buy" information is trust. Once I don't have that, I don't have anything.
So yes I was very angry. Especially since this was not the first time this very same situation had played out.
However my anger was NEVER at Regina who I have always considered a true friend. And now that she is back in charge of running the show, and the offending post has been removed, I am happy to welcome Palingates back onto my blogroll. I wish I had never felt it necessary to have removed it in the first place.
I am going to be very careful in how I moderate comments coming in for this post. I am afraid that I will NOT be allowing any mention by name of RN, P, or K, nor any attacks directed at Regina. If you want to be mad at me that is okay up to a point, but let's not go crazy alright?
I know that some of you are going to feel confused, and betrayed, and even possibly believe that I must be making the whole thing up, but I assure you I am not.
As for P and K, I wish them much success in whatever they decide to do next. They are a truly gifted research team.
I really hope that the people who were fans of Palingates will stick by Regina. She is a very good person as well as a skilled writer and researcher.
Good luck Regina!
Update: For those who still feel I am being petty or perhaps even manufacturing a problem concerning P and K, perhaps you should head on over and read Regina's latest post.
And let me address this jealousy issue that keeps coming up.
I have NEVER felt in competition with any other blog for the entire six years this blog has been in existence.
In fact I have gone out of my way to include new blogs in my blogroll when I have enjoyed their content or hoped that they would be helpful in discovering new information about Palin or other interesting topics. In the past I have added such "just starting out" blogs as Mudflats, Palin's Deceptions, Bree Palin, Oz Mudflats, Hypocrites and Heffalump Traps, God's Own Party, Alaska WTF, Mercede Johnston, Malia Litman, and yes even Palingates, just to name a few.
I have also been credited with inspiring at least twenty individuals to start blogs of their own. So no, I have never worried about competition or felt jealous of the other bloggers who are my, very near or sometimes very distant, neighbors on the internet.
Nor by the way have I EVER demanded from anybody that they give me credit if their post, or article, was clearly derivative of mine, or even stolen outright. I always felt that if more people saw the information all the better.
And by the way ALL of my interactions with my fellow bloggers have been positive and rewarding. With one notable exception.
Labels:
bloggers,
Palingates
More bad news for those saddled with the Palin name.
From ABC News:
Washington University in St. Louis says Bristol Palin won't be speaking there next month after all.
The decision comes after some students expressed outrage over Palin being paid with student-generated funds.
The daughter of former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin had been invited by the university's Student Health Advisory Committee to be part of a panel discussion on abstinence on Feb. 7. Bristol Palin became pregnant at 17 and is a single mom to a 2-year-old son.
It's not clear exactly how much she was to receive, but student leaders had approved spending $20,000 for the panel.
Well it is about time that people started to realize that a young woman who became a teen mother, and still appears to be in a constant process of incubation, is NOT the best person to have stand on a podium and tell people to abstain from sex.
This reminds me that on Bristol's last appearance on the Bob and Mark show one of the knuckle dragging Neanderthals stated what a good time it was to have the last name of "Palin."
Wanna bet?
Washington University in St. Louis says Bristol Palin won't be speaking there next month after all.
The decision comes after some students expressed outrage over Palin being paid with student-generated funds.
The daughter of former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin had been invited by the university's Student Health Advisory Committee to be part of a panel discussion on abstinence on Feb. 7. Bristol Palin became pregnant at 17 and is a single mom to a 2-year-old son.
It's not clear exactly how much she was to receive, but student leaders had approved spending $20,000 for the panel.
Well it is about time that people started to realize that a young woman who became a teen mother, and still appears to be in a constant process of incubation, is NOT the best person to have stand on a podium and tell people to abstain from sex.
This reminds me that on Bristol's last appearance on the Bob and Mark show one of the knuckle dragging Neanderthals stated what a good time it was to have the last name of "Palin."
Wanna bet?
Labels:
abstinence,
Bristol Palin,
education,
speech,
University,
Washington
Jon Stewart takes Bill O'Reilly to school. Wherein O'Reilly learns about the internet, commenters, and Nazis.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Bill O'Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies | ||||
| www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
| ||||
Labels:
Bill O'Reilly,
comedy,
FOX News,
Jon Stewart,
Megyn Kelly
Comedian Tracy Morgan succintly sums up Sarah Palin's appeal.
It is not her intelligence.
It is not her ability to deliver a speech.
And it is not her ability to lead this nation.
In the end, whether you like it or not, it is EXACTLY what Tracy Morgan says it is.
Which is why the Sarah Palin phenomena is one of the WORST things to happen to the Women's Movement in the last fifty years. She has taken the opportunity provided to her by the thousands of women who suffered and sacrificed to earn the right to have a capable woman get a shot at the Presidency, and squandered it.
After all of those more heroic women blazed the trail to make it easier for those that followed, who saunters up to the front of the line? The addled brained, sexy librarian stereotype that is Sarah Palin.
No wonder so many women despise her.
Update: The power of Palin has caused TNT to quickly apologize for Morgan's remarks.
Still does not make him wrong though.
Labels:
comedy,
Sarah Palin,
sex,
YouTube
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Sarah Palin's e-mails are coming out May 31. No, THIS time they mean it!
Courtesy of MSNBC:
The state of Alaska has until May 31 to release about 25,000 pages of e-mails from former Gov. Sarah Palin and senior members of her administration, the state attorney general declared Wednesday.
Officials in the governor's office asked the attorney general to approve a 15th delay in the process, until May 31. That request was approved Wednesday by the new attorney general, John J. Burns.
But Burns said this deadline is firm:
"I am granting the requested extension with the unequivocal expectation that all requested records that are not privileged will be provided no later than May 31, 2011," Burns wrote in a letter to the administrative director of the governor's office. He sent a copy of the letter to the news organizations and citizens who have requested records, including msnbc.com.
The other requestors are the Associated Press, Mother Jones magazine, Republican activist Andreé McLeod and author Geoffrey Dunn. Journalists and citizens requested records on Palin's administration in the summer of 2008, when she vaulted onto the national stage after Sen. John McCain chose her as his running mate in his quest for the White House.
I am going to reserve judgement on just how revealing this e-mails may turn out to be until I get a chance to see them. They may be the break everybody has been waiting for, but I have also heard that they have been heavily redacted and that many with the potential to cause the most damage to Palin's reputation, or even put her behind bars, are in the "privileged" category.
Which means that NOBODY will ever see those. At least not by going through the usual channels.
Labels:
Alaska,
Attorney General,
e-mails,
justice,
Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin defends Todd against the charges that he is involved wiith prostitutes on the Bob and Mark radio show.
(Forward to 11:36) With no prodding whatsoever Palin denies the Todd prostitution story.
"What hurts are the lies that come from Alaskans, look at this recent BS about Todd supposedly being all caught up in a a prostitution ring in Anchorage. And then APD had to come out and say 'Bull, theres' no evidence'..or heck all they needed to do is ask me...or ask Tawd himself. 'Hey Todd you been hanging out with hookers in Anchorage?' And he'd tell the truth, and obviously it was a big lie but things like that, you guys, that come from Alaskans and then they go viral. They are picked up by national, and international press, we've been dilling with THAT issue the last two weeks. It's a waste of time..things like THAT are hurtful because when we trace back the lies and know that they come FROM our home state of ALASKA that's what hurts...is hurtful but..besides that..um..ya know..I know that other people take a heck of a lot more meaningful, hurtful shots than we do when it comes to things that REALLY matter in this world people who are..losing their jobs, or maybe have a sick child, or their health is in jeopardy, and those things that really, truly matter in life. Todd and I an our kids know that we are so extremely blessed and we'll take those political shots that come our way, but I shore wish that people would just believe in truth and tell the truth and then and we could all be a bit more productive and not waste time in this world."
So, she finally came out and denied the story.
Good that is what everybody has been waiting for.
Hey Sarah, I am totally with you. I ALSO wish that people would believe in the truth and tell the truth." And I am planning on helping people do that very thing.
BTW this story is now going mainstream thanks to Palin finally addressing, it as you can see here. Thanks Sarah, as usual we could not do it without you.
Labels:
Alaska,
Anchorage,
lies,
Prostitution,
Sarah Palin,
scandal,
Shailey Tripp,
Todd Palin,
truth
Is the Internet broken? Nah!
Okay there are a lot of you asking me what is happening with both Alaska WTF and Palingates.
Somebody MIGHT have tried to hack Alaska WTF or it might simply be a misunderstanding with Google, Dirk is still trying to figure that out. I will know more later.
However what is going on over at Palingates is a MUCH longer and convoluted story, which I will have to address in a much longer post later, hopefully with some help from others who have a part in the story as well.
For those who are wondering I personally had nothing to do with the rift. Though to be honest I was thinking of opening a can of worms that would have resulted in some problems over there.
I will open that can later.
For now PLEASE give Regina your support. She is absolutely a wonderful woman who is only trying to do the right thing. She is NOT the villain in this drama by any means.
And no the Immoral Minority is not going anywhere so don't worry yourselves about that.
Somebody MIGHT have tried to hack Alaska WTF or it might simply be a misunderstanding with Google, Dirk is still trying to figure that out. I will know more later.
However what is going on over at Palingates is a MUCH longer and convoluted story, which I will have to address in a much longer post later, hopefully with some help from others who have a part in the story as well.
For those who are wondering I personally had nothing to do with the rift. Though to be honest I was thinking of opening a can of worms that would have resulted in some problems over there.
I will open that can later.
For now PLEASE give Regina your support. She is absolutely a wonderful woman who is only trying to do the right thing. She is NOT the villain in this drama by any means.
And no the Immoral Minority is not going anywhere so don't worry yourselves about that.
Labels:
AlaskaWTF,
bloggers,
internet,
Sarah Palin
Now we know why Bristol can do whatever she wants with Tripp and Levi can't do anything to stop her.
From Radar Online:
In an exclusive interview with RadarOnline.com Levi’s manager, Tank Johnson (I have no idea who this "Tank Johnson" guy is. I used to regularly talk to Tank Jones" so I assume it is the same guy and that it is THIS kind of great writing and command of the facts that keeps "Team Levi" coming back to Radar Online over and over again as their media outlet of choice.) says that his 20-year-old client is refusing to dignify Bristol’s recent comments about him being an absentee father, and is choosing to take the moral high road.
Bristol recently told a radio station that "since Dancing With the Stars [Levi’s] seen [his son] at most three times.”
Tank denied her allegations and said Levi spends as much time with his two-year-old as he can, and went on to dish out some advice to both Bristol and her family.
("Levi spends as much time with his two year old as he can?" Bullshit! The custody agreement states that he gets Tripp twice a week, not three times in three months. The only reason that he is NOT seeing his little boy more often is because he is not using the courts to enforce his rights.)
"The Palins need to take the high road. There's a child involved in this and Levi is not going to stoop to this level,” he said. "The Palins like to fight. They can say whatever they want to say.
(Yes they like to fight. Because they are bullies. The ONLY way that bullies stop beating you up and taking advantage of you is when you FIGHT BACK!)
"But Levi is not going to dignify their comments with a response.”
(Why the hell not?)
And as for Bristol wanting to change Tripp's last name from Johnston to Palin, Tank said that wasn't going to happen.
"Levi has his son and that isn't changing. It is what it is."
(Well as it turns out the only reason that Tripp Johnston may not wake up one day and find that his name is Tripp "Palin" is because it is too much hard work to change it, and the Palins don't like hard work.)
However, a source close to Palin confirms that there won’t be a legal name change: “That will not be happening, legally that would actually take a lot of work and despite all the rumors Bristol and Levi are actually getting along pretty well just now.”
Yeah well how could they not be "getting along pretty well" since Levi is allowing Bristol to treat him like her bitch at every turn? The Palins LOVE people who bend to their will and let them treat them like dirt. Isn't that right RAM?
Personally I am beyond disgusted with Levi's legal team. Tank Jones is a six foot, two inch, three hundred pound behemoth, who obviously has balls the size of dried raisins. He talks tough but every time he is supposed to have Levi's back he is nowhere to be seen, or working on getting a little media attention of his own.
And as for Rex Butler, I know at least two female attorneys in Alaska who would have had Thomas Van Flein huddled in a corner sucking his thumb and promising to let Levi have Tripp every day if somebody would just "make the mean lady stop!" Yet Rex has NEVER presented much of a challenge to the Palin legal team even when the deck is stacked in his favor.
Bristol took Levi's son away from him and all he has to do is complain to the court to force her to bring the child back so that he can see him, and work out a better arrangement. But if his "team" is too cowardly to stand up to the Palins than he is screwed.
Once again Levi, sac up and call me and we will get your little boy back. I promise.
![]() |
| Levi with Tank Jones. |
In an exclusive interview with RadarOnline.com Levi’s manager, Tank Johnson (I have no idea who this "Tank Johnson" guy is. I used to regularly talk to Tank Jones" so I assume it is the same guy and that it is THIS kind of great writing and command of the facts that keeps "Team Levi" coming back to Radar Online over and over again as their media outlet of choice.) says that his 20-year-old client is refusing to dignify Bristol’s recent comments about him being an absentee father, and is choosing to take the moral high road.
Bristol recently told a radio station that "since Dancing With the Stars [Levi’s] seen [his son] at most three times.”
Tank denied her allegations and said Levi spends as much time with his two-year-old as he can, and went on to dish out some advice to both Bristol and her family.
("Levi spends as much time with his two year old as he can?" Bullshit! The custody agreement states that he gets Tripp twice a week, not three times in three months. The only reason that he is NOT seeing his little boy more often is because he is not using the courts to enforce his rights.)
"The Palins need to take the high road. There's a child involved in this and Levi is not going to stoop to this level,” he said. "The Palins like to fight. They can say whatever they want to say.
(Yes they like to fight. Because they are bullies. The ONLY way that bullies stop beating you up and taking advantage of you is when you FIGHT BACK!)
"But Levi is not going to dignify their comments with a response.”
(Why the hell not?)
And as for Bristol wanting to change Tripp's last name from Johnston to Palin, Tank said that wasn't going to happen.
"Levi has his son and that isn't changing. It is what it is."
(Well as it turns out the only reason that Tripp Johnston may not wake up one day and find that his name is Tripp "Palin" is because it is too much hard work to change it, and the Palins don't like hard work.)
However, a source close to Palin confirms that there won’t be a legal name change: “That will not be happening, legally that would actually take a lot of work and despite all the rumors Bristol and Levi are actually getting along pretty well just now.”
Yeah well how could they not be "getting along pretty well" since Levi is allowing Bristol to treat him like her bitch at every turn? The Palins LOVE people who bend to their will and let them treat them like dirt. Isn't that right RAM?
Personally I am beyond disgusted with Levi's legal team. Tank Jones is a six foot, two inch, three hundred pound behemoth, who obviously has balls the size of dried raisins. He talks tough but every time he is supposed to have Levi's back he is nowhere to be seen, or working on getting a little media attention of his own.
And as for Rex Butler, I know at least two female attorneys in Alaska who would have had Thomas Van Flein huddled in a corner sucking his thumb and promising to let Levi have Tripp every day if somebody would just "make the mean lady stop!" Yet Rex has NEVER presented much of a challenge to the Palin legal team even when the deck is stacked in his favor.
Bristol took Levi's son away from him and all he has to do is complain to the court to force her to bring the child back so that he can see him, and work out a better arrangement. But if his "team" is too cowardly to stand up to the Palins than he is screwed.
Once again Levi, sac up and call me and we will get your little boy back. I promise.
Labels:
Bristol Palin,
Levi Johnston,
Rex Butler,
Tank Jones,
Tripp Johnston
I can barely make out Joel Osteen telling Piers Morgan that homosexuals are going to burn in hell over the loud pinging of my gay-dar.
I'm sorry, and I hate to be crude, but just how long do you think that Osteen spent tweezing his eyebrows and grooming his luxurious chestnut colored mane before sitting next to his
Methinks that Ted Haggard might be in a position to provide a little counseling to a fellow closet case in the very near future, don't you?
By the way Christians, Jesus was totally gay. I mean come on, he hung out with twelve dudes and only let the one hot easy chick in the group rub his feet. What does THAT say to you?
But do you know what? His father loved him just the way he was.
I mean sure he did let the Romans tie him to a tree, stick him with a spear in the ribs, and leave him to rot in a cave, but once he knew Jesus would never stop digging the dudes he still let him come live with him in heaven.
And isn't it really ALL about the happy ending?
"What am I thinking now?" By Sarah Palin's face.
"Why is Greta asking me questions in slow motion? Doesn't she know I have to keep talking or the combination of Red Bull and Methamphetamine will cause so much pressure to build up behind my eyes that they will start bleed? Bitch!"
"Let me see. Are my chances of being elected President better if I kill Todd and dump him in Lake Lucille, or worse? "
"No I definitely need to keep pretending I have a happy marriage or else that asshole Gryphen will never stop bragging about how he was right all along. I hate that guy!"
"Oh my God! Was that gift certificate for a massage that Todd gave me for my birthday just a way to get me to allow his girlfriend to touch my naked body? That does it, into the lake the goes!"
Labels:
Greta Van Susteren,
Sarah Palin,
Todd Palin
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Almost time to tweet the twit's tragic tirade against the SOTU speech. Updated with video of interview.
Yes I will be firing up the Twitter in anticipation of a potential meltdown or at the very least another shovel full of dirt thrown on the end of Palin's political career.
You can follow me here, if you are so inclined or leave your own comments to share your take on Palin's performance.
WHAT..IN...THE..HELL..WAS...THAT!
I know that most of you are thinking "Gryphen is a genius for knowing she was going to go on a tirade."
First, thank you for recognizing my intellect. But no, I had no idea that she was going to be so....manic.
I literally almost threw a knuckle out of joint trying to keep up on Twitter. That was an amazing performance of crazy.
Which of course means that Bachmann is out, and Sarah has retaken the crown of the "Crazy Teabagger Queen!" Sorry Michelle you are just not batshit crazy enough to compete.
I will post my tweets momentarily. I need a drink first. Maybe two.
So Palin us going to appear on Greta tonight and do her own rebuttal to the SOTU speech. I wonder if SHE can find the right camera?
Sarah Palin talks jobs. What will she say? Zzzzz
On the attack right away. (She came on the air working her mouth in between questions and talking so fast that only hummingbirds could make out what she was saying.)
WTF? Is right she is raging! (I swear at one point I saw foam around the mouth!)
Talk faster lady! It definitely makes you sound smarter. (Not really.)
"fluffery?" (Describing the substance of Obama's speech. Not the porn kind of "fluffery.")
Cut social security? Uh oh.
Greta lobs softball. Sarah whiffs it. (Greta tried to help, but Palin was too wired to fully process a simple question.)
Lip service. Funny you should mention that. Shailey says hi. (Totally kidding. Shailey says "hi" to Todd, wherever he is.)
Big government is the problem? Well duh. (Sarcasm. Did I scare you?)
Good God how much Red Bull did she drink?
Is she saying that Republicans are not usually in lockstep? Really? (The only ones usually in lockstep more than the Republicans are those guys that the Teabaggers believe Obama used to be in charge of.)
"make manifest" that is evangelical code language.
Sarah is giving a history lesson. Gather round kids. (This is where she explained that the space race destroyed the Soviet Union. What? You never read that in school?)
"spud-nut" moments? (How come everything Palin says sounds dirty? Is that on purpose?)
Bristol has a job. As Palins assistant? Or a radio gig? (According to Sarah Bristol was there hiding just off camera. I can't add anything more, because everything I am thinking is mean.)
Talk faster Greta. Palin needs to respond before she explodes. (Totally NOT joking about that.)
Civil means " civility." somebody write that down! (The "stupid" hurts my brain bad!)
Attacking the media now. (Sarah
Is she done? WTF? Indeed!
Okay when this interview makes it to the web i am going to post it, because, believe me, my tweets are not even remotely descriptive enough to explain the trainwreck I just witnessed!
Update: Here is the video. I dare you to try and make sense out of what she says.
She kept saying WTF. Does SHE even know what that means? Or perhaps she is simply saying that she is a fan of this website.
Part two.
Labels:
FOX News,
Greta Van Susteren,
holy shit,
interview,
Sarah Palin,
WTF
More bad news for Palin. But hey, good news for us!
The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin [Hardcover]
Joe McGinniss (Author)
Like (2)
|
List Price: $25.00
Price: $16.50 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $8.50 (34%)
Pre-order Price Guarantee. Learn more.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
This title will be released on September 13, 2011.
Pre-order now!
I understand that the image of the book cover should be up soon.
Well just to start things off I just pre-ordered my copy. And while I was at it I pre-ordered Geoffey Dunn's book as well.
2011 is going to rock!
Joe McGinniss (Author)
Like (2)
|
List Price: $25.00
Price: $16.50 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $8.50 (34%)
Pre-order Price Guarantee. Learn more.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
This title will be released on September 13, 2011.
Pre-order now!
I understand that the image of the book cover should be up soon.
Well just to start things off I just pre-ordered my copy. And while I was at it I pre-ordered Geoffey Dunn's book as well.
2011 is going to rock!
Labels:
books,
Geoffrey Dunn,
Joe McGinnis,
Sarah Palin
"You know who" will be on Greta tonight trying to one up Michele Bachmann's rebuttal of the President's SOTU speech. Oh THIS ought to be good!
I am curious to see if she will address the Todd sex scandal or not.
Remember if she refuses to deny it then it MUST be true!
By the way I have received a PDF of the National Enquirer's new story and they are still being VERY cautious.
However Shailey Tripp IS quoted in this one and she confirms that she and Todd did indeed have sex numerous times and that she even once gave a massage to the Grizzled Mama herself. (No happy ending provided of course.)
And by the way there seems to be some confusion as to where the arrest took place. It was in Anchorage at Blue Hands Massage, not Wasilla.
APD Spokesperson Dave Parker confirms that the report about Todd Palin not being connected to prostitution arrest of Shailey Tripp IS from them.
Now the only question remaining is WHY they would make a public statement about a story in the tabloids and on the internet which is usually NOT the policy of law enforcement in Alaska? (You know, when it doesn't involve the Palin of course.)
However it does appear that Officer Parker is not exactly neutral in his opinion of Sarah Palin, for whatever THAT is worth. Check out this statement he made for the New York Daily News:
In explaining the bombshell allegations, Parker said some in Anchorage were just "rabidly anti-Palin," adding "they will do anything to destroy the platform Sarah Palin is standing on."
If it sounds like a Palin-bot, and acts like a Palin-bot.....
Labels:
Anchorage,
APD,
Sarah Palin,
Todd Palin
In one last FU to the Alaska voters Joe Miller costs the state an estimated $100,000 in legal fees before fading into the fog of anonymity.
From Alaska Dispatch:
Assistant attorney general Sarah Felix, one of a number of state attorneys involved in the Joe Miller case, told the committee that the legal wrangling, mainly in the state Superior Court, cost the state $85,000 to $100,000. The state is currently seeking to recover 20 percent of the cost -- about $17,000 -- from Miller, the maximum amount allowed under the law.
"A team of five attorneys working around the clock" made up the bulk of the cost of the lawsuit, Felix said. In addition to the money spent in Superior Court, where most of the legal arguments and briefings took place, the state also spent money to argue in the Alaska Supreme Court and in federal court as well.
(Sen. Bill)Wielechowski, in an interview after the hearing, pointed out that the cost could have climbed into the hundreds of thousands of dollars if it had been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
I guess keeping costs down, and the Federal government out of state business, only counts when it does NOT benefit Joe Miller.
I am certainly no fan of Lisa Murkowski, but I just have to say how happy I am to have her as my Senator and not this hypocritical teabagging son-of-a-bitch.
Assistant attorney general Sarah Felix, one of a number of state attorneys involved in the Joe Miller case, told the committee that the legal wrangling, mainly in the state Superior Court, cost the state $85,000 to $100,000. The state is currently seeking to recover 20 percent of the cost -- about $17,000 -- from Miller, the maximum amount allowed under the law.
"A team of five attorneys working around the clock" made up the bulk of the cost of the lawsuit, Felix said. In addition to the money spent in Superior Court, where most of the legal arguments and briefings took place, the state also spent money to argue in the Alaska Supreme Court and in federal court as well.
(Sen. Bill)Wielechowski, in an interview after the hearing, pointed out that the cost could have climbed into the hundreds of thousands of dollars if it had been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
I guess keeping costs down, and the Federal government out of state business, only counts when it does NOT benefit Joe Miller.
I am certainly no fan of Lisa Murkowski, but I just have to say how happy I am to have her as my Senator and not this hypocritical teabagging son-of-a-bitch.
Labels:
Alaska,
Joe Miller,
Lisa Murkowski,
politics,
Senate
In case you missed it, here is the President's SOTU speech in full.
Wow! That was amazing. (And once again for those who cannot watch the video, you can find the transcript here.)
Just in case your television's parental controls do not allow you to receive the batshit crazy channel, here is Michelle "I sound a LITTLE saner than Sarah Palin" Bachmann's rebuttal.
I especially enjoyed the huge lipstick stains she left on the Tea Party's ass before whipping out her Ross Perot charts of made up statistics to prove how scholarly she is.
Update: You ahve GOT to read the Guardian's take on Bachmann's speech. Too funny!
Here is a taste:
Bachmann's comments, spoken to camera and broadcast only by CNN, appeared to be off the mark, literally. She spoke directly into a camera operated by a dedicated broadcaster, Tea Party HD, thinking it was on air when the live camera was to one side.
So when she came to praise American voters — "thanks to you, there's reason for all of us to have hope" — she appeared to be thanking an off-screen CNN cameraman.
Labels:
Michelle Bachman,
President Obama,
speech,
YouTube
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Anchorage Police Department denies Todd Palin involved in prostitution arrest. Really? Update!
Well let's see what we have here.
Police statement courtesy of NE:
The Anchorage Police Department have issued the following press release:
Shailey Tripp Investigation APD #10-1823
The Anchorage Police Department investigation and arrest of Shailey Tripp has recently been mischaracterized in internet blogs and in a National Enquirer article. Several errors regarding the investigation and arrest were reported in the Enquirer article (printed and internet versions):
None of the physical evidence examined by police showed any connection to Wasilla resident Todd Palin and his name did not appear in any of the records seized by APD.
(Well unless the APD did not bother to open Shailey Tripp's computer files or check the other items they took from her business I have a hard time believing this. But fear not, the National Enquirer has what they need to tie all of this together.)
The investigation of the prostitution operation was initiated by Anchorage Police Department’s Vice Unit responding to internet advertisements, not through information developed from any tips or other persons.
(Yeah well that does not match up with anything that I have heard.)
No rolodex was seized and taken into evidence.
(No "rolodex seized" does not mean that the kind of information that might be found in one was not seized. Words are tricky.)
The National Enquirer has not contacted Anchorage Police Department Public Affairs Unit to fact check its story so their reported “call to Anchorage Police Department” could not have been returned.
(I am in the dark about the accuracy of this one, so I can offer no further enlightenment.)
“Bloggers” have had no access to the evidence seized so their linking of evidence in police custody to any other person is incorrect.
(True, none of the bloggers I know have had access to the evidence seized by the police. But THAT certainly does not mean that we do not have access to very incriminating evidence. Here is a hint: SOME of us do.)
And speaking of bloggers I suggest that everybody be very careful as to exactly who they are trusting to provide them with information. It has come to my attention that there are some wild geese being chased all through the internet concerning this story.
It is understandable that people are anxious for information, but making things up to fill the void does nobody any good in the long run and besides when the real story comes out it will make them look a little silly. Not to mention that there are real people whose live have already been negatively impacted by the Palins that do not deserve to be violated again by others desperately digging for something to put on their blog.
BTW the fact that the National Enquirer has not taken down their initial post on this subject should give everybody a pretty good indication that they are standing by their story. The Palins are going to do everything in their power to kill this story behind the scenes without giving themselves away, which should give all of us a pretty good idea of exactly how much power they still wield in Alaska.
And exactly WHEN was the last time a law enforcement agency in Alaska broke protocol and talked about a rumor circulating around the blogs and tabloids? Wasn't that about two years ago concerning a possible Federal investigation?
Hmm isn't that a coinky-dink?
More popcorn anybody?
Update: Thomas Van Flein's favorite gossip site also has the story. Hmm I guess somebody is STILL on the payroll.
Update 2: It looks like the Enquirer has definitely NOT been scared off of the story.
It should hit the stands tomorrow. If you guys don't mind I would really like some PDF's of this since I won't get it up here until NEXT week.
I think I already know what most of it says but I would still like to read it for myself. Thanks ahead of time.
Labels:
National Enquirer,
Sarah Palin,
Shailey Tripp,
Todd Palin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















